Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

1. Department of Power, Government of Mizoram, Aiz...

Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
Oct 19, 2011

Pan

DATE O

In the m

D

energy Govern

And In the m

1

2

Parties p

It Despatc surchar of Mizo Commi and Se

t/Oct/Ord

CE

F HEARING

atter of

efault in p drawn in ment of M

atter of

. Departm

. Secretary

resent:

None

was noti h Centre ge was ou ram on a ssion in it cretary, D

er in Petitio

NTRAL ELE

Petiti

: 18.10.20

ayment access o izoram, Ai ent of Pow , Departm ced from

(NERLDC

tstanding ccount

s order da epartmen

n No. 158/2

CTRICITY R

NEW

on No. 158 Coram

1. Dr

2. Sh

3. Sh

4. Sh

11

of Unsche f the dra zwal

er, Gover ent of Po

O

the rep ) that a against of arre ted 12.7 t of Pow

011 (Suo m

EGULATOR

DELHI

/2011 (Su

. Pramod ri S.Jayara ri V.S.Verm ri M.Deena

duled inte wn sched nment of wer, Gove

RDER

ort of No n amou

the Depa ars of UI .2011 had er, Gove

otu)

Y COMM

o-motu) Deo, Chai man, Me a, Memb Dayalan

DATE O

rchanges ule by De Mizoram, A rnment o rthern-Eas nt of ` 1 rtment of drawl as directed rnment o

ISSION

rperson mber

er

, Member

F ORDER: 1

(UI) char partment izwal

f Mizoram,

…Re

tern Reg

0.47 crore Power, G on 31.5. the first f Mizoram

Page

9.10.2011

ges for th of Powe Aizwal

spondents

ional Loa includin overnmen 2011. Th responden (secon

1

e r, d

g

t

e

t

d

1

respond Electric initiated Electric related In respo notice n

2. Th behalf directed current to perso reasons directio

3. D

behalf o Mizoram was c

4. W

underst utility dr

t/Oct/Ord

ent) to s ity Act, 2 against ity Regula matters) R nse, the or had en e matter of the resp the firs UI charg nally app for non- ns contain uring the f the resp , who wa onspicuou e note w ood the

awing po

er in Petitio

how caus 003 (here them f

tory Com egulation responde tered app was listed ondents. t respond es by 10 ear befo complian ed in

hearing o ondents. s directed s by his ab ith conce UI mech

wer from t

n No. 158/2

e as to inafter re or non-co mission (U s, 2009 (h nts had n earance for hear The Com ent to liqu

.10.2011.

re the C ce with our orde f the ma Secreta to pe

sence.

rn that so anism in it he grid ov

011 (Suo m

why actio ferred to mpliance nschedul ereinafter either fil n person o ing on 2 mission in idate the Second

ommission the provi r dated 12 tter on 1 ry, Depart rsonally a me of th s correct er and ab

otu)

n under as 'the A of the pro ed Interc referred t ed any rep r through

6.7.2011.

its order d outstand responde on 18.10 sions of

.7.2011.

8.10.2011,

ment of Po ppear be e constitu prospect ove its sc Section ct') shal visions of hange ch o as 'UI re ly to the s advocate None app ated 27. ing UI inc nt was als .2011 to e UI regula none ap

wer, Gov fore the C ent State ive. Any hedule is

Page

142 of th l be no the Centra arges an gulations' how caus

.

eared o 9.2011 ha luding th o directe xplain th tions an peared o ernment o ommissio s have no constituen getting th

2

e t l d

).

e

n

d

e

d

e

d

n

f

n

t

t

2

power a to mak belongs drawn constitu operati therefo Accord under S the dat

5. Th

18.10.20

non-ap the Ac non-co a pena persona

(M.DEEN

MEMBE

t/Oct/Ord

t the cos e promp to othe under UI ents of th on of

re, clearly ingly, we ection 142 e of issue o e second

11 as dire pearance

t has be

mpliance

lty of `

lly liable Sd/-

A DAYALA

R

er in Petitio

t of other t paymen r constitue , the first eir legitim the com

violated th impose

of the

f this orde respond

cted nor

. Therefore en mad

with the one lakh to pay fo

N) (V

M

n No. 158/2

constituen t for con nts. By no respond ate UI due mercial e provisio a penalty Act which r.

ent did n had he file , a clea e out

order of th on the s r non-com sd/-

.S.VERMA)

EMBER

011 (Suo m

ts. Conse suming t t making p ent has s, but ha mechanis ns of Regu of ` one shall be ot appea d any af r cut case against e Commis econd re pliance o s

(S.JAYA

MEM

otu)

quently, he powe rompt pa not only s created m. The

lation 10 lakh on deposite r before fidavit listin of violati the seco

sion. Acc

spondent

f the orde d/-

RAMAN)

BER

it is unde r which l yment for deprived impedime responden of the UI the first d within 15 the Com

g the rea on of Sect nd respo ordingly, which h

r of the Co sd/-

(Dr. PRAM

CHAIRPE

Page

r obligatio egitimate the powe the othe nts in th ts hav

regulation responden days from mission o sons for h ion 142 o ndent fo we impos e will b mmission.

OD DEO)

RSON

3

n ly r

r

e

e

s. t

n

is f

r

e

3