- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
KULWANT SINGH S/O LA... v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF...
Structured Summary of the Provided Legal Opinion
Factual and Procedural Background
The applicant filed an application complaining that bakeries, welding shops and slaughter houses were operating as illegal, polluting activities in non-conforming/residential localities (specifically New Lahore Shastri Nagar), in breach of Rule 3 of the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 and provisions of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974. The applicant relied on prior judicial authority (M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (2004) 6 SCC 588) and alleged that that judgment was being violated.
The Commissioner, MCD (East) filed a statement indicating that prosecutions and inspections had been initiated against certain unlicensed trades (welding shops and bakeries) and that some inspections by veterinary and health inspectors did not find animal slaughtering at the relevant inspection dates. The Commissioner stated that prosecutions/chit challans had been instituted under the DMC Act and would be presented before the Metropolitan Magistrate.
The Tribunal issued directions (including by order dated 02.08.2018) directing the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) and other authorities to examine and take remedial action, to ascertain whether the activities required consent to operate and whether they were permissible in residential/municipal areas in accordance with DPCC categorisation and CPCB guidelines, and to inform the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) about actions taken.
Following these directions, the CPCB and various authorities (DPCC, EDMC, SDMC, North DMC, Haryana State PCB, etc.) filed reports and action taken statements. The Tribunal repeatedly reviewed the matter over several years, consolidated various original applications and connected matters (including OA No. 56(THC)/2013 and others), constituted an Oversight Committee (OC), and monitored enforcement steps: surveys, sealing of units, imposition of Environmental Damage Compensation (EDC), recovery certificates, and follow-up inspections. The Tribunal recorded instances of continuing non-compliance (including alleged shifting of polluting activity to adjoining areas in Haryana) and expressed concern at inadequate enforcement in some respects.
After extended monitoring, reports and orders (including the Tribunal's order dated 20.03.2020 disposing of the OC final report), the Tribunal concluded the present proceedings by disposing of the application while noting that statutory authorities must continue enforcement and that aggrieved parties retain liberty to approach the Tribunal again.
Legal Issues Presented
- Whether the conduct of bakeries, welding shops and slaughter houses in non-conforming/residential areas amounts to violation of Rule 3 of the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 and relevant provisions of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Air Act, 1981 and the Water Act, 1974, requiring preventive and remedial measures.
- Whether the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) and municipal authorities have complied with their statutory duties (including assessing requirement of consent to operate, categorising activities under DPCC/CPCB guidelines and taking action where activities are illegal or non-compliant).
- Whether enforcement measures (sealing of units, disconnection of utilities, imposition and recovery of Environmental Damage Compensation, and restoration actions) have been adequately implemented and supervised, including inter-state aspects where activities may have shifted to adjoining Haryana.
- Whether the orders and directions issued pursuant to the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgment in M.C. Mehta (2004) and by the Tribunal have been followed in practice, and what remedial oversight and consequences are appropriate where compliance is deficient.
Arguments of the Parties
Applicant's Arguments
- Illegal and polluting activities (bakeries, welding shops, slaughter houses) are being carried out in non-conforming/residential areas (New Lahore Shastri Nagar), violating environmental statutes and Rule 3 of the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986.
- The judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (2004) 6 SCC 588 was being violated and enforcement measures mandated thereunder were not being adhered to.
- Action taken by the authorities has been inadequate; burning of plastic and other polluting activities continue, and some industries are using scrap and plastic as fuel. There are allegations that polluting activities have shifted to adjoining Haryana areas.
Respondents / Government Authorities' Position
- The Commissioner, MCD (East) and municipal/health authorities stated that prosecutions and enforcement actions had been initiated: inspections were conducted, welding shops and bakeries were found operating without municipal trade/health licenses, and prosecution chits/challans were filed to be produced before the Metropolitan Magistrate.
- DPCC, CPCB and municipal corporations filed action taken reports stating that surveys, sealing of units in multiple “steps,” imposition of Environmental Damage Compensation (EDC) on identified units, and recovery measures were undertaken. Specific numbers of units sealed and categories of units were provided in reports.
- The Chief Secretary, Delhi informed the Tribunal about an action plan, monitoring and steps taken (including sealing drives, publicity for licensing under household policy, and camps to facilitate licensing). The Chief Secretary also informed that around 200 officers had been removed under Rule 56(j) as compulsory retirement for administrative reasons.
- DPCC stated that compensation recovered had been partly utilized and that directions were issued to ensure illegal units are not allowed to operate in non-conforming areas. DPCC also reported employing persons using EDC funds (which the Tribunal criticized as improper use).
- Haryana State authorities reported steps taken under Section 144 Cr.P.C., formation of district committees, inspections, initiation of cases to vacate agricultural land used for plastic segregation, closure of units using illegal fuel and imposition of compensation in accordance with the polluter-pays principle.
Table of Precedents Cited
| Precedent | Rule or Principle Cited For | Application by the Court |
|---|---|---|
| M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, (2004) 6 SCC 588 | Supreme Court judgment addressing non-conforming industrial users in residential areas and providing directions for closure/shift and prevention of environmental harm. | The Tribunal repeatedly referred to M.C. Mehta as the governing authority for directing closure/shift of illegal polluting activities, for requiring coordinated action by the Chief Secretary and agencies, and for informing CPCB about remedial measures. The Tribunal also relied on the judgment in structuring oversight and monitoring obligations. |
| Satish Kumar v. Union of India & Ors. (OA No. 56(THC)/2013) | Case (original application) addressing burning of plastic by illegal industrial units and seeking scientific management of plastic waste. | Used as one of the lead matters consolidated for common directions on scientific management of plastic waste, and for directing closure/shift of illegal industrial activities in non-conforming areas after reference to M.C. Mehta. |
| Mahavir Singh v. Union of India (OA No. 57(THC)/2013) | Connected original application related to illegal polluting activities (consolidated with OA No. 56(THC)/2013). | Tagged and consolidated with OA Nos. 56/57 for common adjudication and direction on remedial measures for plastic waste and illegal activities in non-conforming areas. |
| Chattar Singh Rachhoya v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation (OA No. 726/2017) | Original application against hazardous activities by industrial units in non-conforming areas. | Tagged to the lead matters; the Tribunal issued directions for remedial action and considered reports and inspections in the consolidated monitoring exercise. |
| N.S. Yadav v. Commissioner, North MCD (OA No. 435/2016) | Grievance against illegal denting, painting and other activities in non-conforming areas. | Directed for remedial action and tagged to OA No. 56(THC)/2013 for consolidated monitoring and enforcement steps. |
| Chanakya Place Residents Welfare Association v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (OA No. 13/2017) | Grievance against operation of polluting factories in non-conforming/residential areas. | Tagged and treated with the other OAs for consolidated action; joint inspections and closures were referenced in the Tribunal's review of enforcement. |
| Rajeev Kumar v. Central Pollution Control Board (Execution Application No. 47/2018) | Execution application for enforcement of earlier Tribunal order disposing of OA No. 56(THC)/2013. | The execution application was part of the consolidated matters and enforcement reporting, reflecting ongoing implementation of Tribunal orders. |
| Mayank Manohar & Paras Singh, Reporter Times of India v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (OA No. 601/2018) | Original application based on a news item alleging large numbers of factories operating illegally in non-conforming areas. | The Tribunal constituted an Oversight Committee in OA 601/2018, whose reports were considered in the consolidated monitoring and enforcement exercise across the related matters. |
| Lokadhikar Sangathan v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (O.A No. 159/2013) | Referenced as providing directions regarding the Oversight Committee and enforcement timelines in related proceedings. | The Tribunal referred to earlier orders in Lokadhikar Sangathan for oversight mechanisms and the OC headed by Justice Pratibha Rani furnished its final report as required by the Tribunal's directions. |
Court's Reasoning and Analysis
The Tribunal's analysis proceeded on the following lines, each step grounded in factual material and prior judicial directions reflected in the record:
- Prima facie finding of violations: The Tribunal observed that materials on record prima facie indicated violations of environmental law by illegal industrial/other activities in non-conforming/residential areas (e.g., bakery, welding shops and alleged slaughter activities), warranting further directed enforcement.
- Immediate enforcement directions: In view of those prima facie materials, the Tribunal directed respondent authorities (notably DPCC and municipal corporations) to perform statutory duties under environmental laws and to take appropriate action within a stipulated time (e.g., one month in an earlier interim order). The DPCC was specifically directed to examine whether the activities required consent to operate, their category under DPCC/CPCB categorisation and siting policy, and whether they were permissible in residential/municipal areas.
- Reliance on Supreme Court precedent: The Tribunal repeatedly invoked M.C. Mehta (supra) as the controlling judicial standard for closing or shifting non-conforming polluting industrial activities, and it mandated communication with the CPCB and inter-agency coordination in light of that precedent.
- Monitoring, oversight and remedial steps: Due to protracted non-compliance, the Tribunal required detailed action plans, created an Oversight Committee (OC) to prepare a time-bound action plan, and called for the Chief Secretary (Delhi) to coordinate and be personally accountable for on-ground implementation. The Tribunal recorded specific remedial measures ordered over time (sealing drives, disconnection of utilities, imposition of EDC, listing and categorisation of units).
- Assessment of reports and adequacy of action: The Tribunal scrutinised reports from CPCB, DPCC, municipal corporations and Haryana authorities, comparing asserted enforcement steps against on-ground realities (e.g., allegations by applicants that burning continues or pollution had shifted to Haryana). Where reports showed partial measures (sealing of units, issuance of show-cause notices, imposition of EDC) the Tribunal pressed for recovery, appropriate use of recovered funds for restoration (with CPCB approval), and full accounting of amounts levied and utilised.
- Administrative and procedural remedies: The Tribunal criticised the DPCC's reported use of EDC funds for employment (observing that EDC is meant for restitution/remediation) and directed DPCC to submit details and an action plan for EDC utilisation. It suggested administrative steps such as review of postings of supervising officers, action against non-performers, consideration of CISF deployment during severe pollution incidents, use of remote sensing applications for fire detection and a dedicated helpline for reporting plastic burning.
- Inter-state coordination where activities shifted: Given allegations that illegal plastic burning shifted to Haryana, the Tribunal directed the Chief Secretary of Haryana to ascertain the factual position and take remedial action and furnish a report.
- Closure of monitoring docket with safeguards: After extended monitoring over seven-plus years and in light of the OC final report (disposed vide order dated 20.03.2020), the Tribunal concluded that further routine monitoring by itself was unnecessary and that enforcement must proceed under the supervisory structure mandated by the Supreme Court in M.C. Mehta, with the Chief Secretary, Delhi continuing responsibility. Consequently, the Tribunal closed the present proceedings while preserving liberty for aggrieved parties to return if necessary.
Holding and Implications
Holding: The Tribunal disposed of the application. The operative disposition is that the application is disposed of with liberty to the aggrieved parties to move the Tribunal again as and when necessary.
Implications and Direct Consequences:
- Statutory authorities (DPCC, municipal corporations, Chief Secretary, etc.) are required to continue enforcement measures against illegal/non-conforming polluting activities (including sealing, disconnection of water/electricity where appropriate, imposition and recovery of Environmental Damage Compensation and follow-up recovery measures) in accordance with law and prior judicial directions.
- The DPCC was directed to determine whether the activities required consent to operate and to categorise activities under the DPCC/CPCB siting and categorisation policy; DPCC must also ensure appropriate action where activities are illegal or non-compliant.
- Recovered Environmental Damage Compensation must be properly accounted for and utilized only for restitution/remediation with the approval of the Central Pollution Control Board; DPCC was ordered to submit details of EDC levied and utilized and an action plan for its use.
- The Tribunal emphasised enhanced monitoring, cross-agency coordination, use of technological tools (remote sensing, helplines) and administrative accountability for supervising officers; the Tribunal also required the Chief Secretary (Haryana) to report on alleged shifting of illegal burning into Haryana.
- Although the matter has been closed for further routine monitoring by the Tribunal, the closure does not foreclose future judicial review: aggrieved parties retain liberty to approach the Tribunal again if violations recur or enforcement remains inadequate.
- No novel legal doctrine or new binding precedent was formulated by the Tribunal in this opinion; the decision operates as a disposition of the application with further supervisory and remedial directions grounded in the existing Supreme Court precedent (M.C. Mehta) and earlier Tribunal orders.
Note: This summary is prepared strictly from the content of the provided opinion. No information has been added beyond what is contained in the opinion text.
1. Grievance in this application is that illegal and polluting activities are being carried out by the bakeries, welding shops and slaughter houses in non-conforming/residential areas such as New Lahore Shastri Nagar, in violation of provisions of the Rule 3 of the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 as well as provisions of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974. The applicant has inter alia stated that in a suit filed by him, the Commissioner, MCD (East) stated as follows:
“It is submitted that action against the unlicensed trade at the site in question already initiated as infect the answering respondent/EDMC are only looking after the health trades/factory/vatenary activates of the area. The answering respondent/EDMC taking the prosecution action against the health trade/factory/vatenary activities found running without Municipal license. It is reported by Additional Deputy factory inspector visited the area and found to welding shop operating without Municipal License. The prosecution action already has been taken against the above to welding shops which is the subject matter of present suit. The sites in question were also inspected by the area vatenary inspector and it has been reported that no animal slaughtering was notice doing the inspection, on 09-02-2016. The sites in questions was also inspected by the public health inspector of the Health Department Shahdara, Zone on 29.7.2015. Doing the inspection it had been noticed that the Bakeri shops were being found running at the ten shops including one Daba. Without obtaining the health trade license. The all trades were prosecuted. The sites were again inspected by the health department on 03/03/2016. It was found that the traders including the defendant No. 6,7,8 and-9, were found running Bakeries without Municipal trade License there were again prosecuted by way of chits challan as per the section 417/397/421 etc. of the DMC Act. The chit Challans would be presented before the Ld. Metropolitan Magistrate as per the procedure on 11-03-2016. The further action would be against the un licenses trade license activating at the site in questions as per the provision of DMC Act in due course of time, hence no order/directions are liable to passed against the answering respondent/EDMC as action against the unlicensed trade already has been instated as stated above.
The prosecution action already has been taken against the above to welding shops which is the subject matter of present suit. The sites in question were also inspected by the area Vatenanory inspector and it has been reported that no animal slaughtering was notice doing the inspection, on 09-02-2016. The sites in questions was also inspected by the public health inspector of the Health Department Shahdara, Zone on 29.07.2015. Doing the inspection it had been noticed that the Bakeri shops were being found running at the ten shops including one Daba. Without obtaining the health trade license. The sites were again inspected by the health department on 03/03/2016. It was found that the traders including the defendant No. 6,7,8 and-9, were found running Bakeries without Municipal trade License there were again prosecuted by way of chits challan as per the section 417/397/421 etc. of the DMC Act. The chit Challans would be presented before the Ld. Metropolitan Magistrate as per the procedure on 11-03-2016. The further action would be against the un licenses trade License activating at the site in questions as per the provision of DMC Act in due course of time.”
2. Accordingly, the applicant has sought directions to the authorities for taking preventive and remedial measures. It was inter alia pointed out that the issue had been dealt with by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (2004) 6 SCC 588 but the said judgement was being violated.
3. Vide order dated 02.08.2018, the Tribunal directed the DPCC to look into the matter and take remedial action. Operative part of the order is reproduced below:—
“1 to 3…xxx…………………………….xxx……………………………xx
4. Since there are materials on record prima-facie indicating violations of law which need to be looked into by the respondent nos. 2 and 3, we consider it appropriate to direct the said respondents to perform their legal duty in accordance with law and take appropriate action within one month from today.
5. The Delhi Pollution Control Committee may look into the questions whether the illegal activities pointed out by the applicant require any consent to operate and whether such consent has been obtained. It may also be examined that as to which category the activities fall as per the categorisation and siting policy published by the DPCC in terms of the latest guidelines on the subject issued by the Central Pollution Control Board and whether such activities are permissible in residential or municipal areas. In the event, the activities are found to be illegal or non-compliant of the pollution norms, the Delhi Pollution Control Committee is at liberty to take appropriate action as per law by following the due process.
6. In view of the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (2004) 6 SCC 588, the action taken by the respondent nos. 2 and 3 may be intimated to the Central Pollution Control Board by e-mail within one month from today.
7. The Central Pollution Control Board may thereafter look into the matter and send its observation to respondent nos. 2 and 3 for further action which may be complied by the respondent nos. 2 and 3. A further report may thereafter be sent to Central Pollution Control Board.
8. Central Pollution Control Board may send compliance report to this Tribunal after three months by e-mail at filing.ngt@gmail.com.”
4. In pursuance of above, the CPCB filed its report dated 3.12.2018 annexing action taken reports filed by the DPCC and EDMC about the steps taken in the matter.
5. The matter was then taken up on 04.12.2018 and to await further orders of Hon'ble Supreme Court on the subject, the matter was deferred. Reference was made to order dated 26.11.2018 in W.P. (C) No. 4677/1985, M.C. Mehta v. UOI of the Hon'ble Supreme Court dealing with 49 Report of the Monitoring Committee submitted by Commissioner, SDMC on the issue of non-conforming industrial user in residential area. Relevant extracts from the said order are as follows:—
“An affidavit has been filed by Mr. Puneet Kumar Goel, Commissioner of SDMC who is also a member of the Monitoring Committee constituted by this Court on 07.05.2004 (subsequently modified).
It is stated in the affidavit that the Monitoring Committee held meetings on 25.10.2018, 12.11.2018 and 20.11.2018.
Annexed to the affidavit is the 49th Progress Report of the Monitoring Committee. This is signed by all the five members of the Monitoring Committee.
It is stated that in compliance with the orders of this Court passed on 31.10.2018, directions have been issued to close 21960 non permissible industries operating in residential and non conforming areas and water and electricity supply to be disconnected within three days. The affidavit of Mr. Puneet Kumar Goel states in para 5 and 6 that all these 21960 industrial units have actually been closed down. We take it that water and electricity supply are also disconnected but we would like a clear affidavit in this regard.
We direct that none of these 21960 industrial units should be allowed to reopen without the permission of this Court.
It is stated that there are about 30,000 similar units which are operating illegally in residential and non conforming areas. They are also required to be closed down and their water and electricity supply is also required to be disconnected.
It is stated by learned counsel on behalf of the Monitoring Committee that these 30,000 non conforming units will also be closed down within 8 weeks from today.
We take the statement of learned counsel on record and make it clear that the Monitoring Committee will be bound by the statement made.
Eight weeks' time is granted for taking necessary steps as postulated and as stated on behalf of learned counsel for the Monitoring Committee.
List the matter on 04.02.2019.
The affidavit of the Chief Secretary, Delhi should be filed not only with regard to 21960 industries but also of subsequent action taken by the Monitoring Committee.
49th Progress Report stands disposed of.”
6. However, thereafter, the same issue came up before the Tribunal and was dealt with inter alia vide order dated 10.12.2020 in O.A. No. 56(THC)/2013, Satish Kumar v. UOI and connected matters as follows:—
“1….xxx………………………….xxxx…………………………………xxx
2. We may briefly mention the subject matter of eight matters which will stand covered by this common order.
First two matters being OA No. 56(THC)/2013, Satish Kumar v. Union Of India & Ors. and OA No. 57(THC)/2013, Mahavir Singh v. Union of India, arise out of two writ petitions filed before the Delhi High Court against burning of plastic etc. by industrial units working illegally in non-conforming areas at Mundka, Nangloi and other adjoining areas in outer Delhi. After transfer of the writ petitions to this Tribunal, the Tribunal issued directions for scientific management of plastic waste. The Tribunal directed the Chief Secretary, Delhi to coordinate with the concerned authorities by holding a joint meeting. After referring to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in M.C. Mehta (supra), direction was also issued to shift/close illegal industrial activities operating in non-confirming areas. OA No. 1027/2018 was separately registered after OA Nos. 56(THC) and 57(THC) of 2013 were technically disposed of but kept pending for considering the report.
OA No. 726/2017, Chattar Singh Rachhoya v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation was filed against hazardous activities by industrial units in non-conforming area. The said matter was directed to be tagged to OA Nos. 56(THC) and 57(THC) of 2013, after issuing directions, vide order dated 28.09.2018, for remedial action against the illegally polluting activities.
OA No. 435/2016, N.S. Yadav v. Commissioner, North MCD is in respect of grievance against illegal denting, and painting and other activities in non-conforming areas. On 04.10.2018, after issuing directions for remedial action, the said matter was also directed to be tagged to OA No. 56(THC) of 2013.
In OA No. 13/2017, Chanakya Place Residents Welfare Association v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi, the grievance was against operation of polluting factories in non-conforming/residential areas. Vide order dated 11.10.2018, the matter was tagged to OA No. 726/2017 and OA No. 435/2016.
Execution Application No. 47/2018, Rajeev Kumar v. Central Pollution Control Board was filed for enforcement of earlier order of this Tribunal dated 20.07.2018, disposing of the application in terms of orders passed in OA No. 56(THC) of 2013.
OA No. 601/2018, Mayank Manohar & Paras Singh, Reporter Times of India v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi was on the basis of a news item dated 20.08.2018 that there are 51,837 factories operating illegally, in non-conforming areas.
2. In all the matters, the Tribunal directed the Chief Secretary, Delhi, who was to head the Committee for enforcement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgment, to take realistic action and to appear in person. The Chief Secretary appeared in person on 05.08.2019 and filed an action plan giving the schedule of the planned action. Thereafter, on 19.11.2019, again the Chief Secretary was present in person and after interaction with the Chief Secretary, further orders were passed. We may also note that in view of inadequacy of the compliance for a long time, the Tribunal also constituted an Oversight Committee (OC), vide order dated 24.01.2019 in OA 601/2018, to prepare a time bound action plan to deal with the problem. The OC gave its report which was considered vide order dated 19.11.2019 and final report of the OC was further considered on 20.03.2020.
3&4…xxx……………………………………xxx……………………………xxx
5. Order of this Tribunal dated 19.11.2019 sums up earlier proceedings as follows : -
“2. The Tribunal dealt the matter by way of final order dated 12.12.2013 noting that environmental degradation and havoc was being caused by unscientific handling of plastic on the environment. Plastic clogs the natural cycles - both physico - chemical as well as biological. Recklessly littered plastic was injurious even to the animals which devour it. There is temptation to dispose the plastic by burning which generates fumes containing toxic volatile emissions. Plastic combustion also generates airborne particulate emissions (soot) and solid residue ash (black carbonaceous material). It was observed that several studies have demonstrated that soot and solid residue ash poses high potential of significant health and environmental concerns. Soot so generated contains Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), semi-VOCs, smoke (particulate matter), particulate bound heavy metals including Lead, Cadmium, Chromium and Copper, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and Dioxins, which have the ability to travel long distances, depending on prevailing atmospheric conditions before it drops back to earth and thus, enters into the food chain. Composition of byproducts of plastic combustion with respect to its type and concentration depends on the combustion temperature and the flame residence time. A study of the combustion of Polyethylene (both Low and High Density Polyethylene) at different operating conditions detected more than 230 VOCs and semi-VOCs, especially Olefins, Paraffin, Aldehydes and light hydrocarbons including benzo(a)Pyrene and 1, 3, 5 Trimethyl benzene. Significant amount of pollutants of environmental and health concern including carcinogens such as PAHs, nitro-PAHs and Dioxins have been identified in the airborne particulate emissions. Further, these particulates have been found to be highly mutagenic. PAHs in the range of 8-340 ppm have been observed in the soot which is significant enough to cause cancer. Di-(2-ethylehexyl) phthalate (DEHP), one of the compounds among the plasticizers used in plastic manufacturing, has been described by US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) as a probable human carcinogen, a potential endocrine disruptor and is believed to be harmful by inhalation, generating possible health risks and irreversible effects. The Tribunal directed the authorities to perform their statutory duty and deal with the matter.
3. In spite of lapse of more than fourteen years after the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and more than four and a half year after the order of this Tribunal, when the matter was reviewed on 20.07.2018, the Tribunal found that unregulated handling of plastic continued unabated. Orders of this Tribunal dated 12.12.2013, 24.12.2014, 24.02.2015, 06.12.2016, 10.01.2017 and 10.10.2017 remained on paper in absence of sincerity of the authorities who were expected to take steps in the matter. Illegal burning of plastic continued, shown by photographs produced before this Tribunal.
4. This Tribunal directed the Chief Secretary, Delhi to co-ordinate with the concerned authorities and ensure compliance of directions of this Tribunal at the ground level forthwith. Four months' time was given for doing so. The Chief Secretary, Delhi was also directed to indicate the persons accountable for their failure against whom appropriate penal action could be taken.
5. The matter was thereafter reviewed on 03.12.2018 in the light of the above background. It was again noted that in violation of order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed more than 14 years ago, unregulated handling of plastic including burning thereof was continuing to imperil the health of the citizens and the environment. The report from authorities placed on record itself showed carrying on of illegal activities and creation of unhygienic/unhealthy conditions. It was noted that large scale degradation of environment was taking place. The Tribunal directed the Government of Delhi to deposit a sum of Rs. 25 Crores towards cost of damage to the environment and furnish performance guarantee in the like amount with the CPCB. It was further directed that if the failure continues, the Delhi Government will be liable to pay a further amount of Rs. 10 Crore per month as a coercive measure for compliance of the order of this Tribunal. The amount is to be spent on restoration of the environment.
6. Again, vide order dated 18.07.2019, the Tribunal found that action taken against identified polluters was inadequate and gave last opportunity to Delhi Government to take necessary steps in the matter and file further compliance report giving details of action taken month-wise. The Chief Secretary was required to remain present in person.
7. The matter was thereafter further considered on 05.08.2019 in the presence of the Chief Secretary and in the light of compliance affidavit filed on 02.08.2019 by the Delhi Government as follows : -
“7. Accordingly, the Chief Secretary is present in person and compliance affidavit has been filed on 02.08.2019 by the Special Secretary (Environment) and Member Secretary, DPCC stating that an action plan has been prepared and has been executed. Regular monitoring was being done at the level of Chief Secretary. Month-wise action taken is mentioned as follows : -
“(i) November and December, 2018 - Joint Inspection teams consisting officers from West Zone, South DMC, DPCC and Delhi Police carried out door to door survey in the areas of Chanakya Place and Sitapuri. A total of 624 industrial units were found operating.
(ii) May, 2019 - Out of the 624 industrial units, 03 units have been identified being polluting in nature (Orange category). DPCC has got sealed/closed down all these polluting units. Simultaneously Environmental Compensation has been imposed on these 03 units.
(iii) June, 2019 - the 03 polluting units (micro units were sealed, their electricity connections were disconnected for ensuring effective closure. Three units have deposited the Environmental Compensation imposed upon them.
(iv) July, 2019-West Zone, South DMC has carried out publicity in the area that those who are eligible under the household category are required to obtain the license under the policy and those who are not eligible for license under the household category and also those units who do not apply for license will be closed w.e.f. 01.08.2019. Camps were also organized for facilitating applying for license and disseminating information on the policy.
(v) August, 2019-2098 small industrial units have applied for license under the household policy of South MCD, which are being processed. The sealing drive has been initiated against 522 units who are not eligible. On the first day of the drive i.e. on 01.08.2019, 12 units were sealed and 06 units have vacated on their own. MCD officials shall complete the process at the earliest and this drive shall continue with full vigour.
(vi) It has been decided to impose Environmental Compensation on the polluting units operating in the area illegally.”
8. During the hearing, a brief note has been handed over by the learned Additional Solicitor General stating that action taken after 15.07.2019 till date is as follows : -
“1. From 15.07.2019 to 24.07.2019, 37 plastic and other polluting units have been sealed in the Sub-Division of Punjabi Bagh.
2. Five teams were constituted on 24.07.2019 to identify and seal in the villages qua plastic units.
3. Between 25.07.2019 to 29.07.2019, 92 units have been sealed out of total 263 units surveyed.
4. On 31.07.2019, five more units illegal units operating residential/non-conforming areas have been sealed.
5. 12 teams have been constituted vide order dated 31.07.2019 to carry out illegal units in residential/non-conforming areas in Delhi.
6. During 01.08.2019-03.08.2019, 181 units have been surveyed by 12 teams and 58 units have been sealed.
7. In Jahnagirpuri area, 400 tonnes of plastic waste has been removed during two days i.e. 2-3 August, 2019. The land belongs to defence.
8. The DDA has removed 627 Tonnes of plastic waste from Mangolpuri area.
9. In the coming fortnight, 12 teams will take action on large scale.
10. 1003 bighas of land has been cleared of the entire plastic waste during 12.12.2018-17.01.2019. 10766 tonnes of waste has been cleared during this period.
11. Vesting proceedings have been started against 708 bighas of agriculture land in Tikri Kalan area. 180 bighas of land has already been vested till 16.07.2019 with the Government for misuse of the agriculture land. Further land of 108 bighas has been vested after 16.07.2019.
12. 16.35 bighas of land has been put to agriculture.”
9. In view above, we direct that further action be continued and a report as on 31.10.2019 be filed before the next by e-mail at judicial-ngt@gov.in. As already directed, vide order dated 18.07.2019 in O.A No. 159/2013, Lokadhikar Sangathan v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi, the Oversight Committee headed by Justice Pratibha Rani, former Judge of the Delhi High Court, may furnish its final report before 31.10.2019, setting out its recommendations cumulatively at one place in a tabular form in the present case also.”
9. Accordingly, we have considered the matter further and heard the Chief Secretary who is present in person and also perused action taken report filed on 06.11.2019 by the Delhi Government inter-alia stating as follows:
“That, Environmental Damage Compensation (EDC) of Rs. 40,91,02,500/- was imposed on 115 units. Due to nonpayment of EDC by these units, recovery certificates have been issued to SDM (Punjabi Bagh). List of 115 units effectively closed with amount of EDC imposed is annexed as Annexure-2.
That, further, 82 premises have also been effectively closed by the joint inspecting teams and DPCC has imposed environmental damages compensation of Rs. 38,83,85,000/- against these 82 units. List of 82 units effectively closed with amount of EDC imposed is annexed as Annexure-3. Furthermore, for remaining units, EDC is being calculated and orders are being passed.
That, a public notice was published on 07.11.2019 in vernacular languages in newspapers wherein plastic units operating in villages unauthorized/non-conforming areas were directed to close their processes/remove their units with immediate effect. Copy of the public notice dated 07.11.2019 is enclosed as Annexure-4(colly).
That, as already informed to this Hon'ble Tribunal that study was awarded to Jamia Millia Islamia University for assessment of the environmental degradation in village like Tikri kalan, Nangloi, Mundaka, Kamuruddin Nagar, and Ghewra etc. affected by plastic waste recycling and handling. The team of officials of Jamia Millia have collected soil and water samples on 02.11.2019 and will be submitting report and recommendation shortly.
Chattar Singh Rachhoya v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation:
That, during the field visit carried out by Oversight Committee on 25.09.2019 alongwith officials of DPCC, North DMC, District Magistrate (West), Delhi Police & BSES, it was observed that no plastic processing was operating at CWC Nangloi 2 which were earlier sealed and closed as per orders passed in OA 726/2017.
Chanakya Place Residence Welfare Association v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi.
That, earlier a joint inspection was carried out by officials of South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) and Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) with respect to Original Application Number 13 of 2017. 03 units, out of 623 units which were polluting in nature were effectively closed. EDC was imposed on these 03 units and recovery notices were issued to concerned SDM due to nonpayment of EDC. 620 units are small and tiny tailoring/embroidery and similar units. SDMC has been requested thrice to take action against these 620 units and file Action Taken Report in Hon'ble NGT directly.
N.S. Yadav v. Commissioner North DMC:
That, earlier 50 Number of units were inspected and 18 units were sealed in Naharpur Village area. EDC of Rs. 5,15,62,000/- was imposed on 18 units and EDC of Rs. 49,46,00,000/- was imposed on 32 units that had vacated the premises after issuance of notice by North DMC. Due to non-payment of EDC, recovery certificates have been issued to SDM (Saraswati Vihar) in respect of these 50 units.
Since no cause of action survives in the present bunch of applications, the same may kindly be disposed of.”
9. Report had also been filed by MCD. The said report is only by way of filing certain documents without any narrative. The documents show that 28 vehicles were seized and certain encroachments have been removed. The applicants in person and their counsel, however, point out that the action taken is wholly inadequate and burning of plastic is continuing on the spot. It is also pointed out that certain industries are using scrap and plastic as fuel. It is further alleged that plastic burning activities have been shifted to adjoining area of Haryana near Bahadurgarh border. The Chief Secretary mentioned that about 200 Officers have been removed in Delhi under Rule 56(j) of the Civil Service Rules by way of compulsory retirement, out of about 10,000 employees engaged in the process, to bring efficiency. The prevalent inaction in the context of environmental compliance in NCT of Delhi may call for further administrative action.
10. Officers of the DPCC have stated that from the environmental compensation funds, 700 persons have been employed and 200 person each have been deputed to the Municipal Corporation as marshals. We regret to point out that the Environmental Damage Compensation (EDC) funds are not meant for giving employment. Use of the said funds by DPCC in this manner needs to be immediately stopped. Let DPCC submit the details of EDC levied and utilized till 31.12.2019 along with an action plan for its utilization for restitution/remediation.
11. Since the action taken is not adequate and consequences of continuing air pollution on health of citizens are disastrous, posting of the supervising officers needs to be reviewed and action taken against non-performers and persons with doubtful integrity, apart from appraisal of their assessment being reflected in ACRs after following due procedure. There is also need to consider deployment of CISF when pollution levels reach sever plus and use of ISRO's Bhuvan application for detection of fire incidents in the manner it is being done by the forest department for detection of forest fires. The authorities may also consider using services of National Remote Sensing Center, Hyderabad so that such applications are utilized for further action. A dedicated helpline may be required to enable the aggrieved parties to give information about incidents of plastic burning. It is well known that such plastic burning is one of the sources of air pollution in Delhi. Adequate steps have not been taken to control this resulting in serious damage to public health and converting Delhi into a gas chamber.
12. Having regard to the rampant violations, the number of vehicles seized does not appear to be adequate. The amount of compensation recovered also does not appear to be matching to the cost of restoration which has not been assessed. Let suitable measures be taken accordingly.
13. On account of illegal plastic burning activing being shifted to State of Haryana, it is imperative that the Chief Secretary, Haryana ascertains factual position and takes remedial action and furnishes a report before the next date by e-mail at judicial-ngt@gov.in.
14. Let there be enhanced monitoring and surveillance and further action taken report filed as on 15.01.2020 by 20.01.2020 by e-mail at judicial-ngt@gov.in.
6. The matter was last considered on 20.03.2020 in the light of action taken report filed by the Chief Secretary, Haryana on 29.01.2020, report of the OC constituted by this Tribunal on 24.01.2019 in OA No. 601/2018, Mayank Manohar & Paras Singh, Reporter Times of India v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi, and other status reports. However, since it was stated on behalf of the applicants that polluting activities were still continuing causing damage to the agricultural lands, the Tribunal directed that gaps in terms of action taken and illegalities on the ground may be bridged and compensation assessed recovered. The operative part of the order is reproduced below:
“3. Accordingly following reports have been filed : -
(i) Report filed on 13.03.2020 by SDM, Punjabi Bagh, Delhi Government.
(ii) Report filed on 29.01.2020 by the Chief Secretary, Haryana.
(iii) Report filed on 16.03.2020 by the Haryana State PCB
(iv) A report has also been filed by the Oversight Committee constituted by this Tribunal on 24.01.2019 in O.A. No. 601/2018. Though the said report has been filed in O.A. No. 601/2018 which is being separately dealt with, the report being composite, and also covering the present matter, a reference may be made thereto in respect of the present matter.
4. According to status report filed by the SDM, various steps have been taken including initiation of proceedings for recovery of compensation. The summary of the status is mentioned as follows : -
S. No. Particulars No. of Recovery Cases Recovery of Amount (in Crores) 1. No. of Recovery Certificates sent by DPCC 144 44.47 Crore 2. Recovery Certificates returned to DPCC 92 26.07 Crore 3. Stay Order/Review Order issued by the Hon'ble Court(s) 08 2.51 Crore 4. Recovery done 01 0.01 Crore 5. No. of pending cases for recovery 43 15.00 Crore
5. It is further stated that : -
“In addition to above, it is submitted that in compliance of DPCC Order No.F.DPCC/CMC-VI/NGT/OANo.56 &57/2019/684-699 dated 26.12.2019, the SDM (Punjabi Bagh) constituted 06 Joint Teams consisting of DPCC, Revenue, MCD, Delhi Police, BSES & DJB officers/personnel vide Office Order dated 27.12.2019 for effective closure & disconnection of power and water supply of such polluting units/polluters in different villages of Sub, Division Punjabi Bagh copy Annexed as ANNEXURE-B. During the said drive, 60 polluted units were sealed and Show Cause Notices were issued to the polluters directly by DPCC on 08.01.2020 with copy to undersigned accordingly.”
6. Report of the Chief Secretary Haryana is as follows : -
“Directions have been issued under Section 144 of Cr. P.C. by the District Administration on 19.11.2019 banning burning of garbage, plastic and industrial waste in Bahadurgarh.
The Committee was constituted at District level for checking the burning of plastic in Bahadurgarh with Sub Divisional Officer (Civil), Bahadurgarh as Chairman and Estate Officer of HSVP, Senior Manager of HS/IOC and Executive Officer of Municipal Council (all having jurisdiction over Bahadurgarh) as Members and Regional Officer of HSPCB, Bahadurgarh, as Member Secretary of the Committee.
The Committee was directed to conduct regular inspections at field level and take action against the violators. The Committee was also directed to submit an Action Plan to prevent the illegal plastic burning in the area.
The Committee has been conducting regular inspections and initiating action against the violators following the due procedure. So far 12 cases have been filed for vacating the agricultural land which is being illegally used for segregation of plastic waste. Further, action has been initiated against 58 violators in Bahadurgarh for various violations identified by the Committee. Besides the above actions, closure of 10 units found to be operating on illegal fuel was also taken up and environmental compensation against such violations is also being imposed following the ‘Polluter Pays’ principle (Annex.-D & E).
An Action Plan has also been prepared by the District Administration for mitigation of pollution in Bahadurgarh and is being implemented throh different stakeholder departments of the State Government.”
7. Report of the Haryana State PCB is identical.
8. Report of Oversight Committee filed in O.A. No. 601/2018 is as follows : -
“The land cleared from plastic waste dealers appeared to be not fit for agricultural purpose as it was found with ‘malba’ of demolished walls and left over plastic lying on the ground. To prevent the misuse of the land other than for agricultural purpose, steps should be taken by the government, if the land is vested in it, or by the owner to make it cultivable and use it only for the permissible purposes. The land now vested in the government can also be under the control of BDO with clear directions to use it for extending the green cover. This is high time that residents are associated to be ‘Eye” and “Ear” of the Revenue authority and Civic Bodies. Each village may have a Committee consisting of respectable persons to keep watch that the village land is not used by owner/occupier for any other purpose except permitted under the law. The villagers can be sensitized by such Committee that any act by them in contravention of law will have the effect of vesting the land in government. A complaint box can be put near the letter box/post office of the village, wherein even an anonymous complaint alongwith photographs of the land being misused, can be put by any one to bring to bring to the notice of the authorities about the violations going on.
The Revenue and Municipal authorities may nominate an official operating in the field, to have the feed back from the residents/villagers on periodical basis and if any illegal activity is noticed/reported immediately bring it to the notice of his superior Officers in writing. For this purpose the authorities may maintain a Register on the pattern of ‘Roznamcha’ maintained in the Police Stations to record any violation brought to the notice by way of written complaint (whether anonymous or otherwise) or by the villager or group of villagers. This should be given due publicity and every year Commendation Certificates can be given to such public persons to acknowledge their contribution in checking the pollution and saving the environment. This may motivate the residents to come forward to report about the polluting activities in the area.
Incidents of fire and the cause of fire can be obtained from the nearby fire station to ascertain whether the incident of plastic burning are happening or have stopped. A meeting between DPCC/CPCB with Fire Department to share the fire incidents related to plastic waste burning which can be put on the website of DPCC/CPCB.”
9. Learned counsel for the applicant and some of the applicants in person state that polluting activities are still continuing and damaging the agricultural lands in the area. Whenever action is taken, the polluting activities are shifted from one place to other. We permit the applicants to furnish particulars of such alleged activities to the Haryana State PCB as well as to DPCC.
10. We also find that while action taken has been indicated, the gap in terms of illegal units still existing in the area has not been given. Further, while compensation assessed has been mentioned, steps for recovery of entire amount have not been mentioned. The amount recovered needs to be utilized for restoration in terms of an action plan with the approval of CPCB. The Haryana State PCB and DPCC may file further action taken report before the next date by e-mail at judicial-ngt@gov.in.”
7. In pursuance of the above, reports have been filed by the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) on 31.10.2020, by the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (North DMC) on 09.12.2020 and Haryana State Pollution Control Board (HSPCB) on 03.11.2020 in OA No. 56(THC)/2013 and other connected mattes. A report has also been filed by the Delhi Government on 20.05.2020 in OA No. 601/2018.
8. Report of the DPCC is that investigations were carried out against illegal units in non-conforming areas and compensation was recovered and partly utilized. Directions have been issued to the concerned authorities in the areas to ensure that illegal units are not allowed to operate in non-conforming areas.
9. The report of the North DMC is that the field staff has inspected the areas and they are taking preventive measures to stop illegal burning of plastic. The HSPCB has stated that meetings have been held and illegal PVC market has been demolished.
10. Separate report dated 20.05.2020 has been filed in OA No. 601/2018 on behalf of the Delhi Government, report dated 28.10.2020 by the DPCC, report dated 08.12.2020 by the SDMC and report dated 09.12.2020 by the North DMC. The status report of the DPCC as follows:
“xxx xxx xxx
3. That, in compliance to the order of this Hon'ble Tribunal with regard to imposition of Environmental Damages Compensation, details of the units which were sealed in non-conforming areas in all Phases i.e. Step-1, Step-2 and Step-3 were obtained along with the date of closure and the nature of activity carried out by these units so as to categorise these units into White, Green, Orange and Red category based upon their activity.
The Industry Department/Concerned Municipal Corporation has provided list of 1072 units sealed during Step-I, 711 units sealed during Step-II and 1415 units sealed into during Step-III. Thus, 3198 units were sealed during all three phases by the concerned Municipal Corporation of Delhi. Number of units falling in various categories namely White, Green, Orange and Red are tabulated as given below:
Sr. No Category Number of units 1 Red 53 2 Orange 448 3 Green 799 4 White 1898 Total 3198
4. Taking the pollution potential into consideration, Environmental Damages Compensation (EDC) of Rs. 2 Lakhs, 5 Lakhs, 20 Lakhs and 50 Lakhs have been imposed on White, Green, Orange and Red Categories respectively. Show Cause Notices were issued to all the 3198 units for imposition of EDC. After issuance of Show Cause Notices, directions for imposition of EDC were issued to all the 3198 units in July 2020 to Sept 2020. The Corporation wise and Step wise details of EDC imposed against the 3198 units are as given below : -
Name of Municipal Corporation Step-I Step-II No. of Units No. of Units on which EDC is imposed Total amount of EDC imposed (In Lacs) No. of Units No. of Units OD which EDC is imposed Total amount of EDC imposed (In Lacs) East DMC 274 274 890 127 127 254 North DMC 690 690 4869 360 360 1602 South DMC 108 108 357 210 210 1020 Delhi Cantt Board 0 0 0 12 12 60 New Delhi MC 0 0 0 2 2 4 Grand Total 1072 1072 6116 711 711 2940
Step-III Total of Step-I, Step-II & Step-III No. of Units No. of Units on which EDC is imposed Total amount of EDC imposed (In Lacs) Total No. of Units No. of Units on which EDC is imposed Total amount of EDC impose d (In Lacs) 494 494 3394 895 895 4538 617 617 4840 1667 1667 11311 304 304 2111 622 622 3488 0 0 0 12 12 60 0 0 0 2 2 4 1415 1415 10345 3198 3198 19401
5. Many units had mentioned their inability or delay in depositing the EDC due to Covid-19 Pandemic and low economic activity during last few months since March 2020. They have also mentioned that unprecedented health crisis and emergency coupled with steep downfall in the revenue earning due to lockdown which has brought down the economic activities to the lowest level. Till date, only 13 units had deposited EDC.
6. All three Municipal Corporations (i.e. EDMC, SDMC & NDMC) were requested to provide bank details etc. of all units sealed in Step-I, Step-II & Step-III as these units have to file property tax etc. to the concerned Municipal Corporations so that coercive action of attachment of bank account of the units may be taken in case of their failure to deposit EDC. In this regard, reminder letters to Municipal Corporations were issued on 23.10.2020 (Copies of letters dated 23.10.2020 are enclosed herewith and annexed at Annexure-2 (Cully)).
7. Recovery certificate are being issued to the Concerned Revenue Officials to recover the amount as arrears of land revenue in due course from the units which have not deposited Environmental Damages Compensation (EDC).”
11. The report of the SDMC is on same pattern as follows:
4. That the sealing action taken in respect of illegal units under Step-1 was completed by 26.11.2018 and status report is as under:
Step-I
Total units (To whom plots were allotted) Found vacant/closed during survey Units found running which closed after Show Cause Notice NO. of units sealed 4961 3841 913 207 (160+47 *) *47 sealed later during re-inspection in 2019
5. It is submitted that a number of 91 units, under Step-1, were reported to be working and such a re-survey was conducted in July 2019 and 47 units which were found to be running in violation, were sealed. Again a survey in most of the units was carried out by the Constituted Joint Teams w.e.f. July to October 2020 wherein no illegal activity was found. Inspection report, and photographs obtained during the course of inspections/survey have been prepared by concerned Zonal Inspection Teams of SDMC. Some of the photographs/inspection reports, as an illustration/samples are being filed herewith as Annexure-A2 (Colly) while undertaking to produce the same before the Hon'ble Tribunal, if so directed.
6. That in respect of Step-11, the industrial units which applied for industrial plots but were rejected or surrendered, these units were closed down as submitted earlier by 30.01.2019 and the details are being filed as below:
Step-II
Total units (Applicants and Rejectees in Relocation scheme) Found vacant/closed/Permitted use during survey Sealed (Found no Change in sealed status in resurvey) Re-Development industrial area 7275 6081 258 936
7. However, some units were reported working inspite of being sealed. Accordingly, the re-survey was carried out during the period of June-October 2020 by the Special Constituted Teams. The photographs taken by the Inspecting Teams are filed as illustration at Annexure A-3. However, the units under Step-11 are lying closed/sealed/vacated. The record of such units is being maintained by the Corporation and shall be produced before Hon'ble NGT as and when so directed.
8. It is submitted that aforementioned 936 units fall within the jurisdiction of Re-development Industrial Area and vest with DSIIDC and are governed by Delhi Industrial Development Operation & Maintenance Act, 2010. As per the stand taken by DSIIDC, Delhi Government, the Hon'ble Supreme Court which is seized of the matter related to Re-development Industrial areas, that these units are not required to be sealed. In view of this, no action at present is required to be undertaken in respect of Step-1 & II units by answering Respondent. However, the Answering Respondent will take further action if violation is detected in future.
9. That in respect of Step-Ill, periodical survey and inspections are being carried out by the Zonal Inspection Teams constituted for this purpose, on regular basis and is an ongoing process. However, it is further submitted that survey in respect of left out illegal industrial units in the area of Matiala, Kakrola and Nasirpur was carried out during the period Jan-Feb 2020 and again during October November 2020 by Zonal inspection teams. During this survey, 212 premises were surveyed out of which 27 illegal units were sealed by SDMC. As on date, a number of 6034 units were identified under Step-Ill out of which 3610 were closed after issue of Show Cause Notice and 377 illegal industries were sealed, which failed to close their trade on their own. A number of 1079 have applied for household license being non-polluted industry.
Besides the above, 580 units fall under Re-development Industrial area of west Zone and in 388 units of Basai Darapur, wherein, the Hon'ble High Court has granted stay order against coercive action vide order dated 04.03.2020 in WP C No. 2522/2020. Brief of above is provided in the table given below:
10. Apart from this, under House Hold Scheme, 1860 number of applications have been received which includes 1079 units of StepIll also. Out of which 398 number of applications have been approved and 1237 number of applications have been rejected as per the following details. The Closure action on 1237 units is initiated already and shall be completed before 31st December. However, it is pertinent to mention that these Household Units are carrying out non-polluting activities of 121 trades specified in Category A & A-1 of MPD-2021 (Annexure A-4). Most of the Household applications were rejected to the non fulfilling requisite parameters envisaged in the policy and eligibility criteria given in MPD-2021 Chaper-7.
11. That strict vigilance will be maintained by the Answering Respondent, SDMC through the Special joint inspection teams constituted by Dy. Commissioners of Zones, with respect to compliance of the closure of polluting units in residential and nonconforming areas falling under the jurisdiction of SDMC in accordance to the orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and Hon'ble National Green Tribunal.”
12. Report of the North DMC is as follows:
“3. That the inspection and survey of the industrial units is an ongoing process which is being carried out by the Answering Respondents on regular basis. However, the competent authority has constituted Special Zonal Inspection Team (SZIT) comprise of Zonal Licensing Officials, Rent Collector Engineers, BSES officials, DJB officials and Police Officials (For sensitive areas), inspected the industrial units in question falling under Step-I, Step-II & Step-Ill of such units and to take appropriate action in accordance with the law and as per directions of Hon'ble NGT dated 19.11.2019. Copies of the orders passed from time to time are filed as Annexure A-1 (Colly).
4. That the sealing action taken in respect of illegal units under Step-I was completed by 26.11.2018 and position of Step-I units were as under:
S. No Total Step-1 data Units Closed/Found Vacant No. of Units Sealed Action Taken Units 1 12294 11604 690 12294
5. A re-survey of above said units was carried out by the Constituted Special Zonal Inspection Team w.e.f. July 2020 to October 2020 wherein no illegal activity was found as noticed on 26.11.2018. During the inspection/survey photographs of sealed/closed/vacant units were taken and some of the photographs of such units annexed herewith as Annexure-A2 (Colly) while undertaking to produce the same before the Hon'ble Tribunal, if so directed.
6. That in respect of Step-II units i.e. the industrial units applied for industrial plots but were rejected or surrendered, it is intimated that these units were closed down/sealed as submitted earlier by 30.01.2019 as under : -
Step-II
S. No Total No. of No of Units allowed units falling in to shift/vacate jurisdiction industrial activity during the drive of closure (during 26.11.2018 to 04.02.2019) Units operating from industrial clusters notified for redevelopment under chapter 7.6 of MPD-2021 Total No. of Units already closed/not found operating during the drive of closure. Actual units sealed in step-II 1 15974 5256 2349 8009 360
7. A re-survey of above said units was carried out by the Constituted Special Zonal Inspection Team w.e.f. July 2020 to October 2020 wherein no illegal activity was found as noticed on 30.01.2019. It is submitted that aforementioned 2349 units fall within the jurisdiction of Re-development Industrial Area and vests with DSIIDC and are governed by Delhi Industrial Development Operation & Maintenance Act, 2010. As per the stand taken by DSIIDC, Delhi Government, the Hon'ble Supreme Court is ceased of the matter related to Redevelopment Industrial areas and these units are not required to be sealed.
8. It is pertinent to mention here that some units were reported working inspite of being sealed. Hence, the re-survey was carried out during the period of June2020 to October 2020 by the Special Zonal Inspection Team and found that no unit found running after sealed earlier. During the inspection/survey under Step-II, photographs of sealed/closed/vacant units were taken and some of the photographs of such units with date annexed herewith as Annexure-A3 (Colly) while undertaking to produce the same before the Hon'ble Tribunal, if so directed.
9. As per the survey report, the Step-II units are still lying closed/sealed/vacated (Record). The record of such units is being maintained by the Corporation and shall be produced before Hon'ble NGT as and when directed.
10. That in respect of Step-III, periodical survey and inspections have been carried out by the Special Zonal Inspection Team constituted for this purpose, on regular basis from July 2020 to October 2020 and is it is an ongoing process. The details of Step-III survey:
Step-III
Sr. No. Description No of units Remarks 1 Total illegal units found 5757 - 2 Units closed after Notice 4640 - 3 Units applied Under Household License 500 Small Household units (Non Polluting) 4 Illegal units sealed 617 -
During the inspection/survey under Ste-III, photographs of sealed/closed/vacant units were taken and some of the photographs of such units with date annexed herewith as Annexure-A4 (Colly) while undertaking to pr duce the same before the Hon'ble Tribunal, if so directed.
11. Apart from this, under House Hold Scheme, 1148 number of applications have been received under which the above mentioned 500 Household units of Step-III also included. The present status of Household units is as under : -
Total No. of Household applications Total No. of Household applications rejected Total No. of Household applications Approved Total No. of Household applications in process 1148 1043 04 101
12. Out of total 1148 Household applications, 04 numbers of applications have been approved and 1043 number of applications has already been rejected. The Closure action on 1043 units is initiated already and shall be completed before 31st December 2020. However, it is pertinent to mention that these Household Units are carrying out non-polluting activities of 121 trades specified in Category A & A-1 of MPD*2021 (List Annexure A-5). Most of the Household applications were rejected due to non-fulfilling of the requisite parameters envisaged in the policy and eligibility criteria given in MPD-2021 Chapter-7.
13. That strict vigilant watch will be maintained by the Answering Respondent, North DMC through the Special Zonal Inspection Team constituted by Dy. Commissioners of Zones, with respect to compliance of the closure of polluting/illegal units in residential and non-conforming areas falling under the jurisdiction of North DMC in accordance to the orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and Hon'ble National Green Tribunal.”
13. The matter having been monitored before this Tribunal for more than seven years, we do not find it necessary to keep the matter pending for indefinite period. It is for the statutory authorities to continue further steps for enforcement of environmental norms as per law. In view of order dated 20.3.2020, disposing of the final report of the OC headed by Justice Pratibha Rani, former Judge, Delhi High Court, further monitoring will be in terms of order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in M.C. Mehta (supra), by the Chief Secretary, Delhi.
14. Accordingly, we close the proceedings with hope and expectation that the concerned authorities will take necessary steps for maintaining environmental norms. There has to be continuous vigil against causing of pollution, particularly burning of plastic and other waste for protection of environment and public health. The amount of compensation recovered must be properly utilized for legitimate purpose with the approval of the CPCB, as already directed. If there is any violation of environmental norms, the aggrieved party will be free to take remedies as per law, as and when necessary.”
7. In view of above, no further order appears to be necessary. The application is disposed of with liberty to the aggrieved parties to move the Tribunal again as and when necessary.
Alert