- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
Navi Mumbai Sports Assn., In Re
Structured Summary of the Advance Ruling
Factual and Procedural Background
This is an application under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 filed by M/s Navi Mumbai Sports Association seeking an advance ruling on two sets of questions:
- whether entrance/admission fees (forming part of corpus fund), annual subscription fees and annual maintenance fees collected from members are liable to GST; and
- whether fees collected towards training/coaching in recreational and sports activities (specific activities listed by the applicant) are exempt under Entry No. 80 of Notification No. 12/2017-CTR dated 28 June 2017.
Key factual assertions by the applicant (as stated in the opinion): the applicant is a non-government sports organization and public charitable trust registered under the Societies Registration Act and the Bombay Public Trust Act and holds registration under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. It operates an international sports complex with multiple facilities, maintains various categories of membership, collects one-time admission/entrance fees (forming part of the corpus) and recurring fees including annual subscription and maintenance fees, sports activity fees, training/coaching fees and hire charges. The applicant stated that these receipts are pooled to defray administrative and operational expenses and that it charges GST on all receipts except training/coaching fees (which it treats as exempt under Entry 80).
Procedural history as recorded: the application was admitted after a preliminary hearing on 29.06.2021. A final hearing took place on 14.12.2021. The jurisdictional officer did not make written submissions despite directions and was absent at hearings. The authority considered documents on record and oral submissions by the applicant's authorised representatives before passing the order.
Legal Issues Presented
- Whether the following amounts collected by the applicant from its members are liable to GST:
- Entrance/Admission fees which form part of corpus fund;
- Annual subscription fees;
- Annual maintenance fees.
- Whether fees collected towards rendering training/coaching in recreational & sports activities are exempt from GST under Entry No. 80 of Notification No. 12/2017-CTR dated 28 June 2017, in respect of:
- Football/Basketball/Athletic/Cricket/Swimming coaching fees;
- Summer coaching fees;
- Dance coaching;
- Karate/Physical fitness.
Arguments of the Parties
Applicant's Arguments
- The receipts from members (entrance/admission, annual subscription and maintenance charges) fall outside the scope of GST by application of the principle of mutuality — the club and its members should be treated as one and the same person for GST purposes and therefore there is no "supply" between two distinct persons.
- Interpretation of relevant provisions: applicant relied on a harmonious reading of Sections 2(17), 2(31), 2(105), 2(93) and Section 7 of the CGST Act to support the mutuality argument and contended that Section 25 does not treat association and members as distinct persons under GST.
- Even if Schedule I were considered, the applicant argued entry 2 (supply between related/distinct persons) would not cover club-member transactions because, on mutuality, they are not distinct persons under section 25.
- The applicant relied on multiple judicial decisions (Ranchi Club Ltd v. Chief Commissioner — Jharkhand High Court; Cricket Club of India Ltd v. Commissioner — Mumbai CESTAT; Sports Club of Gujarat Ltd v. UOI — Gujarat High Court; and the larger bench of the Supreme Court in State of West Bengal v. Calcutta Club Ltd/Ranchi Club Ltd) to support that services by a members' club to its members are services to self and not taxable.
- The applicant asserted collection of annual subscription/maintenance is only to defray administrative and operational expenses and cited Advance Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling decisions (Rotary Club of Mumbai Queens Necklace; Lions Club of Poona Kothrud) as supporting non-leviability of such receipts.
- Regarding training/coaching fees, the applicant submitted it is a charitable entity registered under section 12AA and that training/coaching in listed sports / arts qualifies for exemption under Entry No. 80 of Notification No. 12/2017-CTR dated 28.06.2017.
Jurisdictional Officer / Concerned Officer
The jurisdictional officer did not make any submissions in the matter.
Table of Precedents Cited
| Precedent | Rule or Principle Cited For | Application by the Court |
|---|---|---|
| Ranchi Club Ltd. v. Chief Commissioner (Jharkhand High Court) | Cited by applicant in support of the principle of mutuality — that services by a members' club to its members are services to self and not taxable. | The court noted this decision was relied upon by the applicant as part of the mutuality argument. The authority considered such precedents but concluded that a statutory amendment to Section 7 of the CGST Act alters the legal position and renders the mutuality argument inapplicable for the purposes of GST after the amendment. |
| Cricket Club of India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Service Tax (Mumbai CESTAT) | Relied upon to support the mutuality principle and non-leviability of tax on club-member receipts (service tax era authorities relied on by applicant). | The court observed the applicant's reliance on this decision but held that the legislative amendment (insertion of clause (aa) in Section 7(1)) changes the position in the GST regime, making club-member transactions supplies between distinct persons. |
| Sports Club of Gujarat Ltd. v. Union of India (Gujarat High Court) | Relied upon by applicant as authority for the principle of mutuality and non-taxability of club receipts. | The authority acknowledged the precedent but determined that the amended statutory provision (clause (aa) of Section 7(1) of CGST Act) supersedes the mutuality-based position for GST purposes. |
| State of West Bengal v. Calcutta Club Ltd./Ranchi Club Ltd. (Supreme Court, Larger Bench) [(2019) 19 SCC 107] | Held that services by a members' club to its members amount to services to self and would not qualify as a taxable service — authoritative pronouncement on mutuality under the earlier regimes. | The court accepted that this is an authoritative Supreme Court pronouncement relied upon by the applicant. However, the authority concluded that the subsequent amendment to Section 7(1) (clause (aa)) of the CGST Act results in club and members being treated as distinct persons for GST purposes; therefore, the mutuality principle as applied in that decision does not prevail in the post-amendment statutory framework for GST. |
| Rotary Club of Mumbai Queens Necklace; Lions Club of Poona Kothrud (AAR / Advance Appellate Authority orders) | Applied for the proposition that collection of annual subscription and maintenance fees is not leviable to GST as it merely defrays administrative/operational expenses. | The court noted these decisions were cited by the applicant but observed that at least some of these orders (e.g., Lions Club of Pune Kothrud) were rendered prior to the statutory amendment. The authority treated such precedents as not controlling in the post-amendment landscape. |
Court's Reasoning and Analysis
The court proceeded in two parts corresponding to the two questions raised.
Analysis on liability of member fees to GST
- The court first noted that prior to amendment, the applicant's mutuality argument relied on judicial pronouncements treating club-member transactions as not constituting supply because the club and its members were effectively the same "person" for the purposes of taxation.
- The court examined the statutory position under Section 7 of the CGST Act (definition of "supply") and recorded that an amendment (referred to as clause (aa) proposed by clause 99) was enacted to insert an express provision treating activities or transactions by a person (other than an individual) to their members or constituents (or vice versa) for consideration as "supply." The clause was stated in the opinion as being deemed inserted with effect from 1 July 2017 (as per the proposal), and the amendment received the President's assent on 28 March 2021. Notification No. 39/2021 - Central Tax dated 21.12.2021 was cited as appointing 1 January 2022 as a date on which certain provisions come into force; the authority concluded the relevant amendment has been notified by the Central Government.
- The court read clause (aa) of Section 7(1) as clearly specifying that activities or transactions by a person other than an individual to their members will be treated as "supply" — thereby treating the person (the club/association) and its members as distinct persons for GST purposes.
- The court referred to the definition of "person" under section 2(84) (which includes associations of persons) and concluded that, in view of the amended Section 7, the applicant and its members are distinct persons and the fees received from members constitute consideration for supply of goods/services by a separate entity.
- The court therefore held that the principle of mutuality, relied upon by the applicant and supported by earlier case law, is not applicable in light of the legislative amendment to Section 7. It observed that the amendment covers all activities/transactions between such persons with no list, limit or restriction, and that fees collected by the applicant are consideration for supply within the scope of "business" (including clause (e) of the definition of "business" which specifically mentions provision of facilities/benefits to members by clubs/associations).
Analysis on exemption for training/coaching under Entry No. 80
- The court reproduced Entry No. 80 of Notification No. 12/2017-CTR which provides a NIL rate (exemption) for "services by way of training or coaching in recreational activities relating to (a) arts or culture, or (b) sports by charitable entities registered under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act."
- The authority noted the applicant's registration under section 12AA and the list of training/coaching activities offered: Football, Basketball, Athletic, Cricket, Swimming, Karate, Dance, Physical fitness and general "summer coaching."
- The court considered whether each activity fell within the Entry's description. It concluded that Football, Basketball, Athletic, Cricket, Swimming and Karate are sports; Dance would be covered under arts. By contrast, "Physical fitness" training was concluded to be neither sport nor arts/culture; and the generic term "summer coaching" was held to be too general to be said to cover sports, arts or culture per se.
- Consequently, the court found the exemption under Entry No. 80 would apply to training/coaching in the sporting activities and dance listed, but not to physical fitness training or to general/unspecified "summer coaching."
Holding and Implications
Holding:
- Question 1 (leviability of Entrance/Admission fees part of corpus, Annual Subscription fees, Annual Maintenance fees): Answered in the affirmative. The authority held these amounts are liable to GST because, after the amendment to Section 7(1) (clause (aa)), activities/transactions by a person (other than an individual) to its members are treated as supplies between distinct persons.
- Question 2 (exemption under Entry No. 80 for training/coaching): The benefit of exemption under Entry No. 80 of Notification No. 12/2017-CTR dated 28.06.2017, as amended, is available to the applicant only in respect of training and coaching in the following activities: Football, Basketball, Athletic, Cricket, Swimming, Karate and Dance. Physical fitness training and the generic term "summer coaching" were held not to fall under Entry No. 80 and thus are not exempt under that provision.
Implications:
- Direct effect on the parties: the applicant (M/s Navi Mumbai Sports Association) must treat entrance/admission fees (even if forming part of corpus), annual subscription and annual maintenance fees collected from members as consideration for supply and accordingly liable to GST. The applicant may claim the NIL rate under Entry No. 80 only for fees charged for training/coaching in the specific sports and dance activities identified; fees for physical fitness training and unspecified "summer coaching" are not covered by that exemption.
- The authority's order is a statutory advance ruling on the questions presented; the opinion notes prior case law relied upon by the applicant but treats the legislative amendment to Section 7(1) as dispositive in the GST context. The opinion does not purport to lay down a novel judicial precedent beyond applying the statute and the notification as recorded.
This summary is limited to and strictly based on the information contained in the provided opinion. No additional facts, interpretations or inferences have been added beyond what is present in the opinion.
1. The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s Navi Mumbai Sports Association, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions.
1. Whether the following amount collected by the applicant from its members is liable to GST?
a. Entrance/Admission fees which forms part of corpus fund
b. Annual Subscription fees
c. Annual Maintenance fees
2. Whether the amount/fees collected towards rendering training/coaching in recreational & sports activities are exempt from payment of GST under entry no. 80 of notification 12/2017 CTR dated 28th June, 2017?
a. Football/Basketball/Athletic/Cricket/Swimming coaching fees
b. Summer coaching fees c Dance coaching
d. Karate/Physical fitness
2. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to any dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provision under the MGST Act. Further to the earlier, henceforth for the purposes of this Advance Ruling, the expression ‘GST Act’ would mean CGST Act and MGST Act.
FACTS AND CONTENTION - AS PER THE APPLICANT FACTS:
2.1 M/s Navi Mumbai Sports Association (“the Applicants/Association”) is a Non-Government Sports Organization & Public Charitable Trust registered under The Societies Registration Act, 1860 VIDE Registration 03.02.1981 & The Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 vide registration dated 07.04.1981. The Association holds a valid registration under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2.2 The association has constructed international sports complex on land allotted by M/s CIDCO to it. The main aim & object of the Association is to encourage & foster sports, cultural & social activities. It also provides health and sports education, and inter alia includes the following:
a Praviding facilities for indoor and outdoor games, swimming pool, recreation activities.
b. Provide facilities for physical activities.
c. Organize cultural programmes.
d. Organize training camps for youngsters with a view to serve the national interest and also provide necessary facilities for the same.
e. Utilize the funds to the maximum for developing the sports and other similar activities on no loss no Profit basis.
f. Promote all other activities as are necessary from time to time to further the aim and objects of the association.
g. Utilize the income and properties of the Association, whatsoever derived from solely towards the object and business of the Association and no portion thereof shall be paid, transferred or distributed directly or indirectly by way of dividend, bonus or interest or otherwise whatsoever, by way of profit to the members of the Association.
2.3 The applicant association is regulated and managed by an elected body i.e. Managing committee, which looks into the affairs of the association & makes policy decisions which aims at promotion of sports, fellowship and fitness for individual, families, schools, institutions and corporate bodies. For promotion of sports, Annual Camps are held to select talents and rigorous work out are given to make them champions. Schools and colleges are provided the association's infrastructure for sports and competitions. For fellowship, it has affiliations with prestigious clubs across India and abroad for the benefit of its members.
2.4 The sports complex is equipped with various facilities for achieving its objectives, which includes indoor badminton, squash, table tennis courts, gym and health club, retiring rooms, football and cricket ground, swimming pools, restaurants, conference halls etc.
2.5 Any person desirous of joining the association can do so by becoming member & shall subscribe to the objects of the Association, shall adhere to the rules & regulations & bye laws of the Association. There are various categories of Membership such as Founder member, Life member, Patron member, Organization member, General member, Student member, Associate member etc. The members on joining are required to pay one time admission/entrance fees based on the type of membership & the same shall form part of corpus of the applicant trust/association.
2.6 Apart from entrance/admission fees, the association also collects various fees such as : Annual subscription & Annual maintenance fees; Sports Activity Fees; Training/coaching fees; Hire charges for Banquet Hall/Open ground/Conference Room & Royalty from caterers/decorators.
2.7 The amounts collected by way of various fees stated here in above are pooled together for Convenience and it is not expected to generate any surplus from it. Association, being a charitable entity, aims only at furtherance of its object. It also receives donation from patrons for its charitable activities and to foster its objects.
2.8 The applicant is currently charging and collecting GST on the all receipts/fees except on fees received for training and coaching services provided in various sports in view of exemption under entry 80 of notification 12/2017-CTR dated 28th June, 2017.
3. Based on various court pronouncements & rulings, few members are of the view that GST is not leviable on the annual subscription & maintenance fees collected from members and therefore the subject application has been filed.
B. STATEMENT CONTAINING APPLICANT'S INTERPRETATION OF LAW
2.10 COLLECTION OF FEES FROM MEMBERS IS OUTSIDE PURVIEW OF GST ON THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUALITY.
2.10.1 Harmonious reading of Sections 2(17), 2 (31), 2(105), 2(93) and Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017 determines that where a consideration is involved in a transaction, the recipient is the “person” who pays the consideration to the supplier. Hence, 2 different persons have been envisaged in the law to tax a transaction of supply of goods or services or both in course of business or furtherance of business made for a consideration.
2.10.2 The term “person” is defined u/s 2(84) of the Act and Section 25 of the Act provides that establishments of a person in different states/union territories required to obtain registrations, shall be treated as distinct person. However, the said section 25 does not provide that association and it's members are to be treated as distinct persons for the purpose of GST. Therefore, the association and it's members, on the principle of mutuality they are one and same person.
2.10.3 Further, clause (e) in the definition of term “business” of provision by a club, association, society, or any such body (for a subscription or any other consideration of the facilities or benefits to its members; has to be interpreted & made applicable in case of proprietary clubs, wherein proprietor owns the property and funds and conducts the activities of club to attempt to make a profit. A member's club functions on mutuality, which is not the case in case of “proprietary/owner's club.
2.10.4 Hence from above provisions of the Act, the impugned transaction between the association and its member do not get cover under section 7(1)(a) of the Act, as there are no two distinct person's involved.
Analysis for clause 7(1)(c) of the Act
2.10.5 Schedule I enlists for deeming provision of the activities without consideration therein to be treated as “supply”. Entry 2 of said schedule I provides for Supply of goods or services or both between related persons or between distinct persons as specified in section 25, when made in the course or furtherance of business. Section 25 does not specifically provide that club/association and it's members are to be treated as 2 separate distinct persons. Based on principle of mutuality, an association and its members are the same person and hence the transaction between club/association and it's member does not get cover under entry 2 of schedule I to be treated as “supply”, as well.
2.10.6 The Principle of Mutuality applies to all taxes i.e. Income Tax, VAT/Sales Tax and Service Tax, alike and the courts of law have expounded and illustrated this principle in details, and the case laws are mentioned and relied upon as under:—
Decision of Hon'ble Jharkhand High court in case of Ranchi Club Ltd. v. Chief Commr (2012) 6 TMI 636.
Decision of the Hon'ble Mumbai CESTAT in case of Cricket Club of India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Service Tax (2015) 9 TMI 1389 and
Decision of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Sports Club of Gujarat Ltd v. UOI, (2013) 7 TMI 510.
2.10.7 The larger bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of State of West Bengal v. Calcutta Club Ltd/Ranchi Club Ltd., (2019) TIOL 449 observed at length the applicability of principal of mutuality & held that services by a members' club to its members amounts to services to self and would not qualify as a service that attracts tax. In view of the fact that the concept of mutuality is being upheld by the Larger Bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court during the service tax regime (both pre & post negative regime), the same principle will also be applicable in the GST regime, as there is no change in the legal position.
2.10.8 There is nothing contrary to the said decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Calcutta Club Ltd and as per Article 141 of the Constitution of India, the law declared by the Supreme Court shall be binding on all Courts within the territory of India and therefore, the authoritative pronouncement should bind all. There are no differences in the relevant definitions in Service Tax era and GST era. In fact, under service tax there was a deeming clause i.e. “An unincorporated association or a body of person, as the case may be, and a member thereof shall be treated as distinct person”. The said clause is absent under GST. The intent in GST was never to treat club and members are separate persons.
2.10.9 Hence, it can be concluded that based on the principle of mutuality the receipts collected from members is outside the purview of GST. Further, if it is felt that, the impugned transaction is leviable to GST, applicant requests to distinguish the applicability of above ratio of Hon'ble Supreme Court relied upon.
2.11 COLLECTION OF ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION & MAINTENANCE CHARGES IS ONL Y TO DEFRA Y THE ADMINISTRATIVE AND OPERATIONAL EXPENSES
2.11.1 The requirement of working capital funds is met by way of collection of annual subscription and maintenance charges from the members. The amount collected by association is for convenience of members therein and pooled together only for paying administrative expenses and communication expenses, there is no element of business in this activity and neither any services are rendered nor are any goods being traded against the amount collected as membership subscription and admission fees from members. The Hon'ble Maharashtra Advance Appellate Authority in following cases has held that collection of annual subscription and annual maintenance charges is not leviable to GST as it is merely for defraying the administrative, operational and management expenses of the club:
•Rotary Club of Mumbai Queens Necklace (2020) 6 TMI 627
•Lions Club of Poona Kothrud (2019) 11 TMI 420
2.12 FEES RECEIVED FOR PROVIDING TRAINING/COACHING IN VARIOUS SPORTS ACTIVITIES IS ELIGIBLE FOR EXEMPTION UNDER ENTRY 80 OF NOTIFICATION 12/2017-CTR
2.12.1 Applicant, with view to promote their objectives provide training/coaching on basic/advance courses to members and non-members for various sports activities such as badminton, table tennis, squash, swimming, cricket, basketball, football, dance, etc and charges fees for the same.
2.12.2 Notification 12/2017-CTR dated 28th June, 2017 vide entry 80 provides for exemption from payment of GST on services rendered by way of training or coaching in recreational activities relating to:
a) Arts pr culture or
b) Sports by charitable entities registered under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act
2.12.3 The applicant, a charitable entity registered u/s 12 AA of IT Act is eligible for exemption provided vide Entry no. 80 of Notification 12/2017-CTR in respect of fees received by it towards rendering of training & coaching in various activities listed above. Hence, fees charged/collected from members/nonmembers for various coaching courses in sports is exempt from payment of GST under notification 12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28th June, 2017.
2.13 Vide Additional Submission dated 08.12.2021, the applicant has merely reiterated the above submissions made by them.
CONTENTION - AS PER THE CONCERNED OFFICER:
4. The jurisdictional officer has not made any submissions in the matter.
HEARING
5. Preliminary hearing in the matter was held on 29.06.2021. Authorized Representatives of the applicant, Shri. Rajiv Lutia, CA, Smt. Jinal Maru, CA were present. Jurisdictional officer was absent. The Authorized Representatives made oral submission with respect to admission of their application.
6. The application was admitted and called for final hearing on 14.12.2021. The Authorized representative of the applicant, Shri. Rajiv Luthia, CA, Shri. Samir Gavli, CA and Smt. Jinal Maru, CA were present. The Jurisdictional officer was absent. The matter was heard. Jurisdictional officer was also directed to make written submissions in a weeks' time.
DISCUSSIONS AND FINDINGS:
7. We have gone through the facts of the matter, documents on record and submissions made by the applicant. Inspite of directions, the jurisdictional officer has not made any submissions as on the date of passing this order.
8. The first question raised by the applicant is whether Entrance/Admission fees, Annual Subscription fees and Annual Maintenance fees collected from its members are liable to GST.
9. The applicant has submitted that, the amounts collected by way of various fees, stated here in above are pooled together for Convenience and it is not expected to generate any surplus from it. The applicant is of the opinion that the said fees collected from members of club are not liable to tax under CGST/SGST Act. The primary reason given by the applicant in support of their contention is that, the principle of mutuality is applicable in their case because the club and its members have the same identity. Applicant has made exhaustive submissions in the said context and in support, has cited the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of West Bengal v. Calcutta Club, [(2019) 19 SCC 107].
10. As per the submissions, the main aim & object of the Applicant is to encourage & foster sports, cultural & social activities and there is no profit motive in their case. Further, the amounts collected by the applicant are for convenience of its members and pooled together only for paying administrative expenses and communication expenses, there is no element of business in this activity and neither any services are rendered nor are any goods being traded against the said amount collected as annual subscription & maintenance fees and admission fees, etc from its members. 5.2.3 The term “supply” is defined under Section 7 of the CGST Act and was amended last, in the Budget 2021. Prior to the amendment “supply” was defined as:
7(1) For the purposes of this Act, the expression “supply” includes—
(a) all forms of supply of goods or services or both such as sale, transfer, barter, exchange, licence, rental, lease or disposal made or agreed to be made for a consideration by a person in the course or furtherance of business;
(b) the activities specified in Schedule I, made or agreed to be made without a consideration; and
(c) the activities to be treated as supply of goods or supply of services as referred to in Schedule II.
(3) Subject to the provisions of sub-sections (1) and (2), the Government may, on the recommendations of the Council, specify, by notification, the transactions that are to be treated as—
1. a supply of goods and not as a supply of services; or
2. a supply of services and not as a supply of goods.
11. Vide clause 99, an amendment was proposed in the CGST Act, 2017, whereby, in section 7, in sub-section (1), after clause (a), the following clause was to be inserted and deemed to have been inserted with effect from the 1 day of July, 2017, namely:
“(aaj the activities or transactions, by a person, other than an individual, to their members or constituents or vice versa, for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration. Explanation. —For the purposes of this clause, it is hereby clarified that, notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force or any judgment, decree or order of any Court, tribunal or authority, the person and their members or constituents shall be deemed to be two separate persons and the supply of activities or transactions inter se shall be deemed to take place from one such person to another;”.
12. The amendment mentioned above has received the assent of the President of India on the 28 March, 2021 and in view of the same the issue of principles of mutuality in the case of clubs and associations, like the applicant, has been settled. Further, we also find that, Notification No. 39/2021 - Central Tax dated 21.12.2021 has been issued whereby the Central Government has appointed the 1 day of January, 2022, as the date on which provisions of sections 108, 109, and 113 to 122 of the said Act shall come into force. Hence, we find that the relevant amendment has been notified by the Central Government.
13. As per clause (aa) of Section 7(1) of the CGST Act, the activities or transactions, by a person, other than an individual, to their members or constituents or vice versa, for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration. The said clause (aa) clearly specifies that all or any activities or transactions by a person (in this case, the applicant) to their members will be treated as ‘supply’ and therefore, fees/contributions from the members, recovered for expending the same for the administration of the club, its maintenance and for provision of services, etc. to its members amounts to or results in a supply. 5.2.7 As per section 2(84) the term “person” includes (a) an individual
………………………….
(f) an association of persons or a body of individuals, whether incorporated or not, in India or outside India.
14. Therefore, in view of the amended Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017, we find that the applicant and its members are distinct persons and the fees received by the applicant, from its members are nothing but consideration received for supply of goods/services as a separate entity. The principles of mutuality, which has been cited by the applicant to support its contention that it is not rendering any supply to its members and GST is not leviable on the fees collected from its members, is not applicable in view of the amended Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017 and therefore, the applicant has to pay GST on the said amounts received from its members.
15. The reliance placed by the applicant on the orders of the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling in the case of Lions Club of Pune Kothrud, is not proper as said order was passed prior to the amendment mentioned above. The words ‘the activities or transactions, by a person, other than an individual, to its members or constituents or vice-versa, for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration’ cover all types of activities/transactions of the present applicant. There is no list or limit or any restriction prescribed in this respect in this amendment. The fees, collected by the applicant, is nothing but the “consideration” for “supply of services/goods” and is covered by the scope of the term “business”. The club and the member are two distinct persons. The principle of mutuality has no application after this amendment. All the other case laws relied upon, also do not provide any guidance on the legal situation, particularly after the amendment.
16. Further, the term ‘business’ as defined u/s 2(17) of CGST Act, 2017 includes—
(a) Any trade, commerce, manufacture, profession, vocation or any other similar activity, whether or not it is for a pecuniary benefit;
(b) Any activity or transaction in connection with or incidental or ancillary to (a) above;
(c) Any activity or transaction in the nature of (a) above, whether or not there is volume, frequency, continuity or regularity of such transaction;
(d) …………………………….;
(e) Provision by a club, association, society, or any such body (for a subscription or any other consideration) of the facilities or benefits to its members, as the case may be;
(f) …………………………….;
(g) ………………………………;
(h) …………………………….;
(i) Any activity or transaction undertaken by the Central Government, a State Government or any local authority in which they are engaged as public authorities.
17. Black Law Dictionary defines the term “pecuniary benefit” as:“Monetary benefits. An award or compensation or benefit that is quantifiable in monetary terms.”
Therefore, undertaking of a commercial activity, whether or not the same is for pecuniary benefit (used in clause (a) above), implies that whether or not such activity yields the benefit which can be quantifiable in monetary terms or not. Hence the intent behind the said clause (a) is to even cover the commercial transactions which are in the nature of barter or exchange wherein the benefit is in non-monetary terms.
18. Further, Sub-clause (e) is a specific clause made for associations, clubs and societies and the same does not talk about any profit motive to be attributed to any club for the activities to be considered as ‘business’. The said clause only speaks of Provision by a club, association, society, or any such body of the facilities or benefits to its members for a subscription or any other consideration. Therefore, the question of profit motive does not arise in this case at all.
19. In view of the above we hold that the Entrance/Admission fees, Annual subscription & Maintenance fees etc are liable to tax under the GST Laws.
20. Vide the second question, the applicant is asking whether the amount/fees collected towards rendering training/coaching in recreational & sports activities i.e. Football, Basketball, Athletic, Cricket, swimming, Summer coaching, Dance coaching and Karate/Physical fitness, are exempt from payment of GST under Entry No. 80 of Notification 12/2017 CTR dated 28 June, 2017.
21. Entry No 80 mentioned above is reproduced as under:—
Sr. No. Chapter, Section, Heading, Group or Service Code (Tariff) Description of Services Rate % Condition 80 Heading 9996 Services by way of training or coaching in recreational activities relating to— a) arts or culture, or (b) sports by charitable entities registered under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act. NIL NIL
22. From a reading of the said Entry no. 80, we find that Services by way of training or coaching in recreational activities relating to- (a) arts or culture, or (b) sports by charitable entities registered under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act attract NIL rate of GST.
23. From the submissions made by the applicant, we find that they are registered under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act and are providing training and coaching in Football, Basketball, Athletic, Cricket, swimming, Karate, Dance, Physical fitness and ‘summer coaching’.
24. We also observe that Football, Basketball, Athletic, Cricket, swimming, and Karate are sports and ‘Dance’ would be covered under Arts. However, Physical fitness can neither be considered as sports nor Arts or culture. Further, the term ‘summer coaching’ is a general term which cannot be said to cover sports, Arts or culture.
25. In view of the above we find that training and coaching in Football, Basketball, Athletic, Cricket, swimming, Karate, Dance by the applicant would be covered under Entry No. 80 of Notification No. 12/2017 - CTR dated 28.06.2017 as amended and ‘Physical fitness’ training and ‘summer coaching’ are not covered under the said Entry No. 80 mentioned above. Therefore, the benefit of exemption as per Entry No. 80 of Notification No. 12/2017 - CTR dated 28.06.2017 as amended will be available to the applicant only in respect of training and coaching in respect of Football, Basketball, Athletic, Cricket, swimming, Karate and Dance.
26. In view of the extensive deliberations as held hereinabove, we pass an order as follows:
(Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
For reasons as discussed in the body of the order, the questions are answered thus—
Question 1: - Whether the following amount collected by the applicant from its members is liable to GST?
a. Entrance/Admission fees which forms part of corpus fund
b. Annual Subscription fees
c. Annual Maintenance fees Answer:— Answered in the affirmative.
Question 2: - Whether the amount/fees collected towards rendering training/coaching in recreational & sports activities are exempt from payment of GST under entry no. 80 of notification 12/2017 CTR dated 28 June, 2017:
a. Football/Basketball/Athletic/Cricket/Swimming coaching fees
b. Summer coaching fees c Dance coaching
d. Karate/Physical fitness
Answer:— The benefit of exemption as per Entry No. 80 of Notification No. 12/2017 - CTR dated 28.06.2017 as amended will be available to the applicant only in respect of services by way of training and coaching in respect of sports viz Football, Basketball, Athletic, Cricket, swimming, Karate and Dance.
Alert