- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
National Institute Of Bank Management, In Re
Comprehensive Summary of the Advance Ruling Application by National Institute of Bank Management (NIBM)
Factual and Procedural Background
This opinion records an application filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 seeking an Advance Ruling. The applicant is National Institute of Bank Management (NIBM), a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and established in 1969 by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) as an academic and training institute (a.k.a. an autonomous apex institute).
The specific question posed was whether consideration paid as subscription, contribution (towards recurring or capital expenses), reimbursement or by whatever name called to NIBM by its members (being RBI, State Bank of India and other Public Sector Banks) for its recurring and non-recurring expenses is leviable to GST.
Relevant facts set out by the applicant include: RBI, SBI and other Public Sector Banks (as promoters/members) contribute annually Rs. 100 lakh as subscriptions for recurring expenses; capital expenditure (CAPEX) is contributed at actuals in a stated ratio (RBI 40%, SBI 20%, other PSBs 40%); NIBM also earns revenue by charging fees for short-term training, consultancy and research activities (on which GST is already charged where not exempt).
Procedural history: The application was admitted after a preliminary hearing (16.04.2019). Final hearing took place on 06.06.2019. Representatives of NIBM and the jurisdictional officer (Dy. Commissioner) appeared and made submissions. The Authority considered written records and oral submissions and delivered the ruling answering the question in the affirmative.
Legal Issues Presented
- Whether consideration paid as subscription or contribution towards recurring or capital expenses or reimbursement or by whatever name called to National Institute of Bank Management (NIBM) by its members (being RBI, SBI and other Public Sector Banks) for its recurring and non-recurring expenses is leviable to GST?
Arguments of the Parties
Applicant's (NIBM) Arguments
- NIBM contended that contributions/subscriptions from member banks are not "consideration" under section 2(31) because members do not receive services in exchange and contributions are mandated by the Governing Board (not voluntary donations tied to a supply).
- There is no nexus/link between contribution amount and a taxable activity rendered to the contributing banks; contributions are said to support the charitable/educational objectives of the society.
- Contributions are more in the nature of aid/grant/subsidy to support functioning; unspent contributions are carried forward and adjusted, indicating the absence of profit motive.
- NIBM relied on the “principle of mutuality” — that transactions among members and the society are not taxable because the entity cannot make a taxable profit by dealing with itself — and cited multiple authorities where mutuality/non-taxability was recognized.
- NIBM cited precedent and administrative guidance (e.g., Cultural Society of Angamally v. CCE, Public Health Foundation of India decision, MF(DR) circular No.127/9/2010-ST) to support the proposition that donations/grants for charitable/training activities are not consideration for taxable services.
- NIBM accepted that it charges fees (with GST wherever not exempt) for certain training/consultancy/research and that PGDM (AICTE-recognized) is GST-exempt, but maintained that member contributions are distinct and non-taxable.
Concerned Officer's (Jurisdictional Officer) Arguments
- The jurisdictional officer submitted that NIBM carries out activities that fall within the GST definition of "supply" and that the subscriptions and reimbursements received are used for carrying out those activities.
- The officer relied on statutory definitions: "person" (section 2(84)), "business" (section 2(17)) and "supply" (section 7), arguing that a society providing facilities or benefits to members for a subscription is engaged in "business" and that contributions can constitute "consideration".
- The officer drew a parallel with an Advance Ruling in the case of Banking Codes & Standards Board of India (BCSBI), concluding that the BCSBI ruling supports considering contributions as consideration for supply; the officer argued the BCSBI ratio applies to NIBM.
- According to the officer, the Cultural Society of Angamally precedent was distinguishable because that case involved donations from various persons with no nexus to services provided.
- Overall, the officer concluded there is a direct relation between the activities performed by NIBM and the funds received and therefore the receipts are leviable to GST.
Table of Precedents Cited
| Precedent | Rule or Principle Cited For | Application by the Court (as reflected in the opinion) |
|---|---|---|
| Cultural Society of Angamally v. CCE (2008) (CESTAT) | Held/clarified that amounts received as charitable donations out of free will and public/Government grants for activities of a society are not related to services provided by the society and are excludible from taxable value for charging service tax. | The applicant relied on this decision to support non-taxability of contributions. The concerned officer and the Authority found this ratio distinguishable (the officer noted donations there were from various persons with no nexus). The Authority did not accept the applicant's reliance as determinative, concluding that in NIBM's case contributions were tied to performance of activities in the MOA and thus constituted consideration. |
| Public Health Foundation of India v. Commissioner of Service-tax, Delhi (no year cited) | Held that in absence of nexus between grants/donations and beneficiaries of training, donations cannot be included in gross taxable value for service tax. | Applicant cited this to argue lack of nexus. The Authority examined nexus and concluded that in NIBM's facts the contributions carried a caveat to perform activities, so the absence-of-nexus rationale did not apply. |
| MF(DR) circular No.127/9/2010-ST dated 16.8.2010 | Administrative clarification that donations and grants-in-aid received by charitable institutions for conducting training courses are not consideration for coaching services (service-tax context). | Applicant relied on this circular. The Authority considered the submissions but determined that the statutory definition of consideration and facts of the NIBM contributions (tied to activities) meant the circular did not preclude treating the contributions as consideration for GST purposes. |
| Bankipur Club (CIT. v. Bankipur Club) [1997] 92 Taxman 278 (SC) | Principle of mutuality — an association not making a taxable profit by dealing with itself; mutuality can exclude certain receipts from tax. | Applicant cited the mutuality principle from this and other club decisions. The Authority acknowledged the doctrine but concluded it did not apply because NIBM and the member banks are distinct persons and the contributions are tied to supply of services under the MOA; the mutuality argument was therefore rejected for these facts. |
| Saturday Club Ltd. v. Asstt. CST [2005] (Cal.) and Dalhousie Institute v. Asstt. CST [2005] 1 STT 15 (Cal.) | Case law applying principles of mutuality / non-taxability in club/association contexts. | Applicant cited these decisions to support non-taxability. The Authority reviewed the comparisons but found the factual matrix of NIBM different (not a simple mutual fund-for-members arrangement) and therefore did not accept them as controlling to exempt the contributions from GST. |
| Ranchi Club Ltd. v. Chief Commissioner of C. EX. & S.T., Ranchi Zone [2012] 22 Taxmann.com 217 : 56 STT 64 (Mag.) | Another decision recognizing mutuality principles / non-taxability in appropriate factual settings. | Applicant relied on this and similar club rulings. The Authority treated these as persuasive on mutuality, but concluded factual distinctions (presence of a supply obligation under NIBM's MOA) meant they did not dictate a non-taxable result here. |
| Banking Codes & Standards Board of India (BCSBI) — Advance Ruling (Maharashtra AAR) | An Advance Ruling where the activity of BCSBI was held to fall under the definition of "supply" and member contributions/corpus were considered as consideration; BCSBI's activity was held to be "business" under section 2(17)(e). | The concerned officer relied on the BCSBI AAR, asserting similarity of facts. The Authority found the BCSBI ratio to be relevant and treated the case as similar enough to support the conclusion that NIBM's contributions represent consideration for services and are leviable to GST. |
| MRSSM (case referenced in comparisons) | Referenced for the proposition that education and training by charging fees is covered under "supply" and taxable. | The Authority accepted that where NIBM charges separate fees for training/education, GST is correctly levied; MRSSM was used for comparison to distinguish contributions (treated as non-revenue in some cases) from fees for specific services (taxable). |
Court's Reasoning and Analysis
The Authority began by noting that the CGST Act and MGST Act provisions are substantially the same for the purposes of the Advance Ruling and adopted the shorthand "GST Act" for both.
Step 1 — Identification of statutory ingredients: The Authority reviewed statutory definitions central to the dispute:
- Section 2(31): "consideration" (inclusive definition encompassing payments made in respect of, in response to, or for the inducement of a supply).
- Section 2(17): "business" (inclusive definition that specifically includes provision by a club/association/society of facilities or benefits to members for a subscription or other consideration under clause (e)).
- Section 7: "supply" (includes supply of goods/services made for a consideration by a person in the course or furtherance of business).
Step 2 — Factual matrix and nexus analysis: The Authority examined the objects in NIBM's Memorandum of Association, the nature of contributions (Rs.100 lakh recurring subscription and CAPEX contributions in fixed ratios), and the use of funds to conduct research, training, consultancy and related activities listed in the MOA. The Authority asked whether the contributions are truly unconditional donations or whether they are received to enable the performance of activities described in the MOA.
Step 3 — Application of law to facts:
- The Authority found the contributions were received with an implied/explicit caveat: to perform the activities specified in the MOA (research, training, assistance to banks, studies, etc.). Because the contributions finance those activities, a direct link (nexus) exists between receipts and services rendered.
- Given the inclusive statutory definition of "consideration," receipts that are paid "in respect of" or "in response to" supply of services qualify as consideration. The Authority concluded the member contributions fall within that inclusive definition because they are paid to enable the supply of services in furtherance of NIBM's objects.
- Under section 2(17)(e), a society providing facilities or benefits to members for a subscription or other consideration is covered by the statutory notion of "business." The Authority observed that NIBM provides services to its member banks (and to non-members for fees) that fall within the wide GST conception of services; hence the activities could be regarded as "business."
- The Authority addressed the applicant's mutuality argument: while the principle of mutuality excludes certain receipts where an entity simply deals with itself, the Authority found that NIBM and its member banks are legally distinct "persons" under GST law and that the arrangement involved funding services to be performed in furtherance of NIBM's activities. For these reasons the Authority rejected the application of mutuality in this factual matrix.
- The Authority considered precedents and circulars relied on by the applicant (e.g., Cultural Society of Angamally, PHFI decision, MF(DR) circular) but found the factual distinctions (notably the presence or absence of a nexus and the conditional nature of contributions) to be decisive: those authorities did not control the outcome for NIBM.
- The Authority accepted the concerned officer's reliance on the BCSBI Advance Ruling as a comparable case and regarded the BCSBI ratio as supportive of treating member contributions as consideration where the facts are similar. On that basis the Authority concluded that contributions to NIBM constituted consideration for a supply of services in furtherance of business and therefore were taxable under the GST Act.
Step 4 — Conclusion in reasoning: Bringing the statutory definitions, factual findings and precedential comparisons together, the Authority held that NIBM receives taxable services consideration by way of contributions from its members and that GST is payable on such contributions.
Holding and Implications
Holding: The Authority answered the question in the affirmative: the consideration paid as subscription or contribution towards recurring or capital expenses or reimbursement (by whatever name called) to NIBM by its members for recurring and non-recurring expenses is leviable to GST.
Implications:
- Direct effect on the parties: The Authority's ruling requires that NIBM treat the member contributions described in the application as consideration for taxable services and accordingly be liable to apply GST on those contributions. The opinion explicitly states "GST is payable on such contributions received."
- On the mutuality argument: The Authority rejected the invocation of the principle of mutuality for the facts at hand, because the society and its member banks are distinct persons and the contributions were tied to performance of services under the MOA.
- On precedent and broader law: The Authority applied statutory definitions and distinguished precedents relied on by the applicant where facts showed no nexus between funds and services. It relied in part on the BCSBI Advance Ruling as a comparable authority. The opinion does not purport to announce any novel legal doctrine beyond applying existing statutory definitions and precedent to the facts of NIBM; it resolves how those provisions operate in this specific fact pattern.
Note: This summary is confined strictly to the material and statements contained in the provided opinion. No facts or conclusions beyond those expressly provided in the opinion have been added.
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BANK MANAGEMENT, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question.
1. Whether consideration paid as subscription or contribution towards recurring or capital expenses or reimbursement or by whatever name called to National Institute of Bank Management (NIBM); a society registered under Societies Registration Act, 1860 by its members (being Banks) for its recurring and non-recurring expenses is leviable to GST?
At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to any dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provision under the MGST Act. Further to the earlier, henceforth for the purposes of this Advance Ruling, the expression ‘GST Act’ would mean CGST Act and MGST Act.
2. FACTS AND CONTENTION - AS PER THE APPLICANT
“The National Institute of Bank Management a premier Academic cum Training Institute was established in 1969 by Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in constitution with Government of India as an autonomous Apex Institute, with the mandate of playing a proactive role of “Think Tank” of the banking system.
NIBM is registered as a society under the Indian Society Registration Act (XXI) of 1860, RBI, State Bank of India (SBI) & Other Public Sector Banks were the first members of Governing Board of this society to which, by rules of the society, the management of its affairs was entrusted. Copy of Memorandum is attached for reference.
As per Memorandum of Association, the objects for which the society is established are as under:
1. to plan, promote and provide for education and training in operations and management of banking and financial institutions and to undertake, organize, and facilitate Conferences, Seminars, Study Courses, Lectures and similar other activities for the purpose;
2. to promote and conduct research in matters pertaining to:
(a) the improvement of banking operations,
(b) the education, training and development of personnel of banking and financial Institutions,
(c) the maximum augmentation and effective deployment of banks' resources including analytical and perspective studies of various sectors of the economy with a view to promoting national development;
3. to assist banking and financial institutions in matters such as designing measurement tests for employee selection, appraisal programs, conducting morale and productivity_studies, streamlining organizational structure and to review, from time to time, the impact of educational, training and research activities and offer suggestions for filling the gaps in the banking and financial systems;
4. to promote and undertake faculty development programs to assure an adequate supply of competent trainers to institutions conducting training programs for the personnel of banking and financial institutions;
5. to maintain liaison with banking and financial institutions.
RBI, SBI and other Public sector banks in capacity of promoters of the Institute contribute annually an amount of Rs. 100.00 lakh as subscriptions towards recurring expenses. The entire CAPEX is also contributed at actuals by RBI SBI & Other Public Sector Banks in ratio of RBI 40%, SBI 20% & Other Public Sector Banks 40%. This annual contribution of the promoters is for ensuring that we are not in deficit as regards our operations.
3b. Statement containing the applicant's interpretation of law and/or facts, as the case may be, in respect of the aforesaid question(s) (i.e. applicant's view point and submissions on issues on which the advance ruling is sought)
RBI, SBI and other Public Sector Banks are contributing towards fixed amount of Rs. 100 lakh for recurring expenses and Capex at actuals in the capacity of Promoters without receiving any services in exchange.
NIBM runs different courses and training programs in their campus for which it collects fees AND other charges from the participants. NIBM charges GST on the said fees and charges collected from the participants.
However, NIBM contends that the GST is not applicable on the contributions collected from the Public Sector Banks on following grounds:
i) it is a settled legal position that unless the link or nexus between the amount and the taxable activity can be established, the amount cannot be subjected to the tax;
ii) contribution, donation or grant-in-aid is not specifically meant for a person receiving such training or to the specific activity, but is in general meant for the charitable cause championed by the registered foundation;
iii) the contributions given by the Public Sector Banks are given freely in which the said banks do not receive any exclusive benefit in return;
iv) the contribution, received by NIBM from the Public Sector Banks shall not be treated as “consideration” received for training_or other taxable supplies;
v) the supply is defined u/s. 7(1) of the GST Act as follows:
“For the purposes of this Act, the expression “supply” includes
(a) all forms of supply of goods or services or both such as sale, transfer, barter, exchange, licence, rental, lease or disposal made or agreed to be made for a consideration by a person in the course or furtherance of business;
(b) import of services for a consideration whether or not in the course or furtherance of business;
(c) the activities specified in Schedule I, made or agreed to be made without a consideration Thus, the three factors, namely, Goods or Service, Consideration and Business must exist simultaneously to complete the definition of supply
vi) Since, the contributions received/receivable by NIBM from the Public Sectors banks cannot be held as “consideration”, there is no “supply” and thus, GST should not become applicable on these amounts.
vii) NIBM relies on following decisions/circulars, wherein, it has been held/clarified that:
a. the amounts received as charitable donations out of free will and public/Government grants for activities of society are not related to services provided by Society. These are excludible from taxable value for charging service tax - Cultural Society of Angamally v. CCE, (2008) 13 STY 271 (CESTAT);
b. Donations and grants-in-aid received by charitable institution received from different sources for conducting training courses is not consideration received for coaching service provided - MF(DR) circular No. 127/9/2010-ST dated 16.8.2010.
Additional submissions on 06.06.2019
a. Activities of NIBM
The Memorandum of Association of the NIBM (copy attached herewith) states its main objects as follows:
1) To plan, promote and provide for education and training in operations and management of banking and financial institutions and to undertake, organize and facilitate Conferences, Seminars, Study Courses, Lectures and similar other activities for the purpose;
2) to promote and conduct research in matters pertaining to:
a) the improvement of banking operations,
b) the education, training and development of personnel of banking and financial institutions,
c) the maximum augmentation and effective deployment of banks' resources including analytical and perspective studies of various sectors of the economy with a view to promoting national development;
3) to assist banking and financial institutions in matters such as designing measurement tests for employee selection, appraisal programmes, conducting morale and productivity studies, streamlining organizational structure and to review, from time to time, the impact of educational, training and research activities and offer suggestions for filling the gaps in the banking and financial systems;
4) to promote and undertake faculty development programmes to assure an adequate supply of competent trainers to institutions conducting training programmes for the personnel of banking and financial institutions;
c. Contributions collected from member banks:
RBI, SBI & other Public sector banks in capacity of promoters of the Institute contribute now annually an amount of Rs. 100.00 lakh as subscriptions towards recurring expenses. The planned non-recurring expenses including the capital expenditure is also contributed based on the budget approved by the finance committee in their annual meeting.
The member banks contribute towards the recurring and non-recurring expenditure in the following proportion:
i) RBI 40% of - Rs. 100 lakh and the budgeted expenditure;
ii) SBI 20% of - Rs. 100 lakh and the budgeted expenditure;
iii) Other Public Sector Banks - 40% of Rs. 100 lakh and the budgeted expenditure in proportion to their deposits with RBI.
d. Source of income for NIBM
(i) Short term Training courses offered by NIBM to banks;
(ii) Consultancy related to specific needs of banks;
(iii) Research activities for banks
(iv) Post Graduate Diploma in Management (Banking and Financial Services) PGDM PGDM course offered by NIBM is recognised under AICTE & hence, exempt under GST. For all the other above revenue generating activities, GST is levied on the fees collected by NIBM.
e. Question Raised
Whether amount paid as subscription or contribution towards recurring or capital expenses or reimbursement or by whatever name called to National Institute of Bank Management (NIBM); a society registered under Societies Registration Act, 1860 by its (numbers (being Banks) for its recurring and non-recurring expenses is leviable to GST?
B) Provisions and Interpretation of Law
1. No “Consideration”
The term Consideration has been defined under Section 2(31) of the GST Act as under:
“consideration” in relation to the supply of goods or services or both includes—
(a) any payment made or to be made, whether in money or otherwise, in respect of, in response to, or for the inducement of, the supply of goods or services or both, whether by the recipient or by any other person but shall not include any subsidy given by the Central Government or a State Government;
(b) the monetary value of any act or forbearance, in respect of, in response to, or for the inducement of, the supply of goods or services or both, whether by the recipient or by any other person but shall not include any subsidy given by the Central Government or a State Government:
Provided that a deposit given in respect of the supply of goods or services or both shall not be considered as payment made for such supply unless the supplier applies such deposit as consideration for the said supply;”
From an analysis of the above definition of scope of the term “Supply”, it is essential that there has to be a supply of goods or services by a person and that too for a consideration. As stated above in ‘facts of the case’, it is important to note that the members are required to contribute or subscribe not as per their will but as per the resolution passed by the Governing Board. The contribution by the members is regardless of any services offered by NIBM. As stated in point number 17 of the Object Clause of MoA, the said contribution is to meet the recurring and non-recurring expenses incurred or as deemed fit by the society. The unspent contribution of one year is treated as ‘income received in advance? and adjusted against the contribution of subsequent year. The contribution, therefore, cannot be said to be in the nature of consideration but it is more in the nature of aid/grant/subsidy received from the members to support functioning of the NIBM.
2. No “Business”
Section 2(17) of the GST Act defines Business as follows:
“business” includes
a) any trade, commerce, manufacture, profession, vocation, adventure, wager or any other similar activity, whether or not it is for a pecuniary benefit;
b) any activity or transaction in connection with or incidental or ancillary to sub clause (a);
c) any activity or transaction in the nature of sub-clause (a), whether or not there is volume, frequency; continuity or regularity of such transaction;
d) supply or acquisition of goods including capital goods and services in connection with commencement or closure of business,
e) provision by a club, association, society, or any such body (for a subscription or any Other consideration) of the facilities or benefits to its members;
f) admission, for a consideration, of persons to any premises;
g) services supplied by a person as the holder of an office which has been accepted by him in the course or furtherance of his trade, profession or vocation;
h) activities of a race club including by way of totalisator or a license to book maker or activities of a licensed book maker in such club, and]
i) any activity or transaction undertaken by the Central Government, a State Government or any local authority in which they are engaged as public authorities,
With reference to the given definition, the applicant, who is registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and can therefore be termed as a carrying on business if it provides facilities or benefits to its members for a subscription/fees then that society is squarely covered under Section 2(17)(e) above.
In case of NIBM, no facilities are provided to the member banks against the subscription amount. The amount is collected for the recurring and non-recurring expenses of NIBM and thus no facilities are provided as such. As no facilities are provided by NIBM, there is no business and thus no furtherance of business, ultimately there is no supply:
3. No “Supply”
Section 7 of the GST Act defines the term “Supply” as under:
For the purposes of this Act, the expression “supply” includes—
a) all forms of supply of goods or services or both such as sale, transfer, barter, exchange, license, rental, lease or disposal made or agreed to be made for a consideration by a person in the course or furtherance of business,
b) import of services for a consideration whether or not in the course or furtherance of business;
c) the activities specified in Schedule I, made or agreed to be made without a consideration, and
d) the activities to be treated as supply of goods or supply of services as referred to in Schedule. II.
Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1),
a) activities or transactions specified in, Schedule III; of
b) such activities or transactions undertaken by the Central Government, a State Government or any local authority in which they are engaged as public authorities, as may be notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council, shall be treated neither as a supply of goods nor a supply of services.
Subject to the provisions of sub-sections (1) and (2), the Government may, on the recommendations of the Council, specify, by notification, the transactions that are to be treated as—
a) a supply of goods and not as a supply of services; or
b) a supply of services and not as a supply of goods.
Perusal of the above would reveal that there has to be a supply of goods or services for a ‘consideration by a person in the course or furtherance of business to meet the definition of “supply”.
In case of receipt of recurring and non-recurring contributions by NIBM from the member banks, there is no supply of goods or services neither there is any consideration nor business or furtherance of business thus the said receipts fall outside the scope of “supply” and thus, shall not attract GST.
As a matter of fact, there is no direct nexus/linkage between the contribution received from members and services offered to them and thus, there is no supply as defined u/s. 7 of the GST Act.
NIBM offers various services in the nature of training, coaching, research, consultancy to members for which separate fees are charged and the GST is levied on such services wherever specific exemption is not available under the GST law.
NIBM also relies on following decisions/circulars, wherein, it has been held/clarified that:
a) the amounts received as charitable donations out of free will and public/Government grants for activities of society are not related to services provided by Society. These are excludible from taxable value for charging service tax - Cultural Society of Angamally v. CCE, (2008) 13 STT 277 (CESTAT);
b) Prima facie, there was no nexus between grants/donations from donors and medical professionals, who were provided training, thus it was held that in absence of such nexus, donations cannot be included in gross taxable value - Public Health Foundation of India Commissioner of Service-tax, Delhi
c) Donations and grants-in-aid received by charitable institution received from different sources for conducting training courses is not consideration received for coaching service provided - MF(DR) circular No. 127/9/2010ST dated 16-8-2010.
Without prejudice to whatever stated in the foregoing, NIBM further contends that:
Even if assuming without conceding that the members, derive indirect benefit from the contribution paid by them, the contribution received from the member banks and the related activity conducted from the contribution would be covered under the Principle of Mutuality: Often, there comes across certain situations where a group of people forms an association and pool in their surplus income in the association's common fund. The fund so collected is then used for the benefit of the members when needed.
Hence, a question would arise whether the monies/contribution/subscription received from the members should be taxed, the answer would be in negative, as principle of mutuality would be applicable.
This doctrine rests on the principle that a person cannot make a profit from himself. An amount received from oneself is not regarded as income and is therefore not subject to tax. In short since there is no commercial element embedded in such transaction, they are exempted from, being taxed. Even in circumstances where surplus money is raised than what is needed to be pursued for the common purpose it would simply mean an increase of the common fund and hence/would neither be considered as income nor it would be taxable.
Principle of Mutuality is guided by the gospel that “No man can trade with himself; he cannot make, in what is its true sense or meaning, taxable profit by dealing with himself”. Mutuality principle offers a tax shelter, as long as its character of a mutual association is retained, with its income not tainted/derived by commerciality.
The ‘Principle of Mutuality’ has been held as a cogent ground for non-taxability of an activity across various taxes such as VAT, Sales Tax as well as Service Tax in several cases. The ‘Principle of Mutuality’ would, therefore, be applicable even in respect of applicability of Goods & Services Tax.
Principle of Mutuality was considered in CIT. v. Bankipur Club, [1997] 92 Taxman 278 (SC). These principles are applicable and have been applied by the Calcutta High Court in Saturday Club Ltd. v. Asstt, CST, [2005] ISTT 64 (Cal.)) as concurred to in Dalhousie Institute v. Asstt. CST, [2005] 1 STT 15 (Cal.))(EXHIBIT A-1 to A-3). 2012 (26) S.T.R. 401 (Jhar.) In the High Court of Jharkhand At Ranchi, Prakash Tatia. CJ. & Aparesh Kumar Singh. J., Ranchi Club Ltd. v. Chief commr. of C. EX. & S.T., RANCHI ZONE, [2012] 22 taxmann com 217 : 56 STT 64 (Mag.)
In case of NIBM, it is registered as a society under the Indian Society Registration Act (XXI) of 1860 wherein RBI, SBI & Other Public Sector Banks are the members. The contribution by the members is regardless of any services offered by NIBM. As stated in point number 17 of the Object Clause of MoA, the said contribution is to meet the recurring and non-recurring expenses incurred or as deemed fit by the society. The unspent contribution on one year is treated as income received in advance and adjusted against the contribution of subsequent year. Thus, no profit accrues to NIBM in receipt of such contribution received from its members. There is no commercial element in the activities related to such contribution.
The essential conditions of the principle of mutuality are met in case of receipt of contributions by NIBM from the member banks towards recurring and non-recurring expenses as the members bank contributes the amounts under a mandate from the Memorandum of Association of the NIBM, the said contributions are utilized for activities of NIBM as per the terms mentioned in the MOA of NIBM and no profit is earned by the NIBM from such contributions.
Hence, NIBM contends that the activities undertaken from the receipt of the contributions from the member banks is squarely covered under the ‘Principle of Mutuality’ and thus, the receipt of the said contributions are not exigible to GST.
Points of Comparison between BCSBI and NIBM
Sr. No. Point of comparison Banking Codes NIBM 1 Contribution by members. Voluntary membership Compulsion to contribute 2 Contribution amount Membership and subscription fees Contribution towards recurring expense (fix, amount shared in defined ratio) and towards nonrecurring and capital expenditure based on approved budget (after adjusting earlier year's unspent amount) 3 Services received out of contribution collected Developing, publishing and publicizing banking codes No service 4 Benefit to members Increased credibility of the banks, advertising, etc. No benefit 5 Consideration for services offered No separate consideration, annual membership fees are utilised for the same. Separate fees are charged and GST is levied on the same. 6 Furtherance of business advertising and publishing promotional literature in newspapers and are also organizing, teaching and training courses, conferences, seminars and lectures and also publishing journals, pamphlets reports, books and booklets in this regard No facilities are provided to members against the subscription amount, as the said amount is utilised for recurring and non-recurring expense. As there is no business, there is no furtherance of business. 7 Supply - publishing and promotions - increased credibility of member banks increased client base - supply - No facility - No business - No furtherance of business and no supply 8 Necessity of the service provided Yes, in case no service was provided by banking codes, there was requirement of the service as per the mandatory guidelines of RBI No such requirement 9 Promoting national development By using the unique codes developed, credibility of the member banks is increased, hence no national development the services provided are for spreading of education, creating awareness and promoting national development
Additional submissions on 21.06.2019
1. Statement of decided cases of Advance Ruling in comparison to NIBM
a) Banking Codes & Standards Board of India
b) Lions club of Poona Kothrud
c) Association of Inner Wheel Club, West Bengal AAR
d) Maharashatra Rajya Sahakari Sangh Maryadit
Points of Comparison between BCSBI and NIBM
Sr. No. Point of comparison Banking Codes NIBM 1 Contribution by members Voluntary membership Non Voluntary contribution 2 Contribution amount Membership and subscription fees Contribution towards recurring expense (fix amount shared in defined ratio) and towards non-recurring and capital expenditure based on approved budget (after adjusting earlier year's unspent amount) 3 Services received out of contribution collected Developing, publishing and publicizing banking code No service 4 Benefit to members No benclit 5 Consideration for services offered No separate consideration, annual membership fees are utilised for the same. Separate fees are charged i.r.o. other revenue generating activities and GST is levied on the same. 6 Furtherance of business advertising and publishing promotional literature in newspapers and are also organizing, leaching and training courses, conferences, seminars and lectures and also publishing journals, pamphlets, reports, books and booklets in this regard No facilities are provided to members against the subscription amount, as the said amount is utilised for recurring and nonrecurring expense. As there is no business, there is no furtherance of business. 7 Supply - publishing and promotions - increased credibility of member banks - increased client base - supply - No facility - No business - No furtherance of business and no supply 8 Necessity of the service provided Yes, in case no service was provided by banking codes, there was requirement of the service as per the mandatory guidelines of RBI No such requirement 9 Promoting national development By using the unique codes developed, credibility of the member banks is increased, hence no national development the services provided are for spreading of education, creating awareness and promoting national development
Similarities between Poona Club and NIBM
Sr. No. Similarity Poona Club NIBM Ruling 1 Utilization of contribution by members The contribution is received for defraying meeting expenses, administrative expenses and other common expenses The contribution is received towards recurring and non-recurring expenses in favour of assessee 2 Principle of mutuality Exists Exists the club is not formed to provide any supply of goods or services to its members qua the fees received from them. There being no supply qua the fees received, there arises no occasion for us to visit the definition of ‘Supply’ under the GST Act. The applicant club as per the facts put up before us does not render any ‘Supply’ for the purposes of the GST Act. Having observed so, we refrain from any further discussion. 3 Services received out of contribution collected No services received by members out of contribution collected No services received by members out of contribution collected 4 Benefit to members No benefit to members No benefit to members 5 Consideration for services offered No service offered to members Separately received for services offered 6 Furtherance of business No furtherance of business No furtherance of business 7 Supply No supply No supply
Points of Comparison
Sr. No. Point of Comparison Poona Club NIBM 1 Nature of activities Humanitarian and charitable Promoting national development 2 Membership Voluntary Non voluntary
Comparison between AIWC and NIBM
Sr. No. Point of comparison AIWC NIBM 1 Benefits not extended to non-members or restricted to members Only the members are granted various facilities and/or benefits, enabling them to attend conventions/meetings for the furtherance of the objectives of the organisation. Such facilities/benefits are not available to the non- members of the organisation. Services in the nature of education, training, etc. are offered to members as well as non-members for separate consideration in the form of fees. No services are provided to members against the contribution received from them as the contribution is received towards meeting of recurring and non-recurring expenses 2 Utilisation of fund raised/contribution received The Balance sheet has no indication of expenses made by them towards social work except some amount of expense towards ‘Relief Fund for Cyclone’ in the year ending on 30th June, 2018. But from ‘income’ side it appears that much amount was raised by the club for that very purpose. Hence, the club has no regular social activity and also has no segregated fund for that purpose though the Appellant claimed in their grounds of Appeal that the subscription/membership fees collected from the members are utilised entirely for funding charitable work and towards administrative expenses incurred in the furtherance of the objectives of the organisation Contribution is received every year to meet the recurring as well as non-recurring expenses.
Comparison between MRSSM and NIBM
Sr. No. Point of comparison MRSSM NIBM 1 Levy of GST on fees for education and training Activities of MRSSM of conducting education and training programmes by charging fees from the participants are covered under the definition of supply; and hence liable to GST. NIBM conducts similar activities of education and training; GST is charged on the fees received from the participants as such activities are covered by definition of supply. 2 Services provided to members hence the annual fees/contribution received Services are provided only to the members, is in the nature of consideration Services are offered to members as well as non-members. However, the same are charged with GST. Contribution received from members, is and/or non members towards the recurring and non-recurring expenses and thus in our view should be exempted from levy of GST
03. CONTENTION - AS PER THE CONCERNED OFFICER
The submission, as reproduced verbatim, could be seen thus - on 15.04.2019
“Ms. National institute of Bank Management (NIBM) is registered as a society under the Indiana-Society Registration Act,
Activities of National Institute of Bank Management are to plan, promote, and Doc-vide for education and training in operation and management of Banking and financial institutions and/to undertake, organize and facilitate conferences, seminars etc., to promote and conduct research, to assist banking and financial institutions, to promote and undertake faculty development programs.
The question on which advance ruling required is as under:
“Whether considerations paid as subscription or contribution towards recurring or capital expenses or reimbursement or by whatever name called to National Institute of Bank Management by its Members for its recurring and non-recurring expenses is leviable to GST.”
National Institute of Bank Management has informed that the Reserve Bank of India, State Bank of India and other public sector banks in capacity of promoters of the institute contribute annually an amount of Rs. 100 lakh as subscription towards recurring expenses. The entire CAPEX is also contributed at actuals by RBI, SBI, and other public sector banks in ratio of RBI 40%, SBI 20%, and other public sector banks 40%.
On perusal of nature of activities undertaken by NIBM it appears that the annual subscription and reimbursement received from RBI and other public sector Banks are used for carrying out the activities of NIBM. NIBM carries out its activities on commercial basis and the promoter banks have control over its activities being the members of governing board. Hence, there is a direct relation between the activities of NIBM and the funds received. Hence the considerations paid as subscription or contribution towards recurring or capital expenses or reimbursement to NIBM by its members for its recurring and non-recurring expenses is leviable to GST.
The ratio of cultural society of Angamally v. CCE (2008) is not applicable as in that case donations were received from various persons by cultural society of Angamally and there was no nexus between donations received and services availed.
Submission on 06.06.2019 dated 04.06.2019
While going through the submissions made by National Institute of Bank Management it is observed that the NIBM is as academic cum training institute established in 1969 by Reserve Bank of India in consultation with Govt., of India as an autonomous Institute. NIBM is registered as a society under the Indian Society Registration Act (XXI) of 1860.
The objects of NIBM are as follows:
1. To plan, promote and provide for education and training in operation and management of banking and financial institutions, to undertake conferences, seminars.
2. To promote and conduct research in:
(a) Improvement of banking operations
(b) Training and development of banking personnel.
(c) Maximum augmentation and effective deployment of Bank's resources:
3. To assist banking and financial institutions in matters such as designing measurements for employee selection etc.
4. To promote and undertake faculty development programmes.
5. To maintain liaison with banking and financial institutions.
RBI, SBI and other Public Sectors Banks in capacity of promoters of the institute contribute annually an amount of Rs. 100 lakhs as subscriptions towards recurring expenses.
NIBM runs different courses and training programs in their campus for which it collects fees and other charges from the participants.
After going through above details it is evident that NIBM fulfills the ingredients of section 2 as follows:
- Section 2(84) “person” includes
- Society as defined under the societies Registration Act, 1860; trust
- Section 2(17) “business” includes
Any trade, commerce, manufacture, profession, vocation, adventure, wager or any other similar activity whether or not it is for a pecuniary benefit.
- Section 7: scope of supply:
- (1) For the purpose of this Act, the expression “Supply” includes
- All forms of supply of goods or services or both such as sale, transfer, barter, exchange license, rental, lease or disposal
- Made or agreed to be made for a consideration by a person in the course of furtherance of business;
- Section 2(31): “consideration” in relation to the supply of goods or services or both includes Any payment made or to be made, whether in money or otherwise, in respect of, in response to, or for the inducement of,
- The supply of goods or services or both, whether by the recipient or by any other person but shall not include any subsidy given by the central Government or a State Govt. The annual subscription and reimbursement received from RBI and other public Sector Banks are used for carrying out the activities of NIBM.
NIBM carries out its activities on commercial basis and the promoter banks have control over its activities being the members of governing board. Hence, there is direct relation between the activities of NIBM and the funds received.
In view of above facts it is seen that NIBM is a person doing business of supply of services for monitory consideration received in the form of annual subscription.
In a similar case of the Banking codes and standards Boards of India Advance Ruling is decided by Hon'ble Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling.
The BCSBI is registered under the Societies Registration Act-1860 and public trust under Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950. BCSBI undertakes various activities viz. to advertise and publish promotional literature in newspaper about codes and standards, to organize teaching & training courses, seminars, to publish journals, reports ate. BSCBI raise annual invoices upon its member banks and member banks pay annual membership fees in monetary terms.
In this case it is held that the activity of BCSBI is falling under the definition of “supply” as per Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017. the contribution made by members banks to “corpus Fund” can be considered as “consideration as per section 2(31) of the CGST Act, 2017, the activity of BCSBI is to be termed as “Business” as provided under section 2(17)(e) of the CGST Act, 2017. The case of NIBM is very similar to the case of BCSBI and the ratio of Advance Ruling in case of BCSBI squarely applies to NIBM.
Therefore the consideration paid as subscription or contribution towards recurring or capital expenses or reimbursement or by whatever name called to National Institute of Bank Management (NIBM); a society registered under Societies Registration Act, 1860 by its members for its recurring and non-recurring expenses is leviable to GST.
04. HEARING
Preliminary hearing in the matter was held on 16.04.2019. Ms. Anagha Kotwal, Accounts Manager, appeared and requested for admission of their application. Jurisdictional Officer Sh. M.A. Bhagat, Dy. Commr. of S.T. (E-611), LTU-1, Pune appeared and made written submissions.
The application was admitted and called for final hearing on 06.06.2019. Ms. Anagha Kotwal, Accts Mgr & Sh. Abhijit Kulkarni. C.A. appeared, made oral & written submissions. Jurisdictional Officer Sh. M.A. Bhagat, Dy. Commr. of S.T. (E-611), LTU-1, Pune also appeared and made written submissions.
05. OBSERVATIONS
5.1 We have gone through the facts of the case, documents on record and submissions made by both, the applicant, as well as the jurisdictional office.
5.2 The applicant, a registered society under the Indian Society Registration Act (XXI) of 1860 is an Academic cum Training Institute established by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in constitution with Government of India as an autonomous Apex Institute. RBI, State Bank of India (SBI) & Other Public Sector Banks were the members of Governing Board to whom, by rules of the society, the management of its affairs was entrusted. They have submitted that the RBI, SBI & other Public sector banks in their capacity of promoters, contribute an amount of Rs. 100.00 lakh, per annum, as subscriptions towards recurring expenses. Their entire CAPEX is also contributed at actuals by them in a certain ratio. The contribution is to ensure that the applicant is not in deficit as regards their operations.
5.3 They have also submitted that their operations, as per Memorandum of Association, include: (A) promotion and conducting of research in matters pertaining to (a) the improvement of banking operations, (b) the education, training and development of personnel of banking and financial Institutions, (c) the maximum augmentation and effective deployment of banks' resources including analytical and perspective studies of various sectors of the economy with a view to promoting national development: (B) to assist banking and financial institutions in matters such as designing measurement tests for employee selection, appraisal programs, conducting morale, productivity studies, streamlining organizational structure and to review, from time to time, the impact of educational, training and research activities and offer suggestions for filling the gaps in the banking and financial systems and to maintain liaison with banking and financial institutions.
5.4 They have further submitted that GST is not applicable on the contributions collected/received from the Public Sector Banks, as mentioned above, because the such contributions received cannot be held as ‘consideration’ as defined under the GST Act, since there is no supply on their part. Further they have stated that there is no link or nexus between the amount received and the activities conducted by them; contributions received are meant for the charitable cause championed by the registered foundation; the Public Sector Banks do not receive any exclusive benefit in return for the contributions so made.
5.5 The applicant has stated that the sources of income is from (i) Short term Training courses offered to banks; (ii) Consultancy related to specific needs of banks; (iii) Research activities for banks and (iv) Post Graduate Diploma in Management (Banking and Financial Services) PGDM. PGDM course offered by NIBM is recognized under AICTE and hence, exempt under GST and for all the other above revenue generating activities, GST is levied on the fees collected by NIBM.
5.6 We find that in the subject case, the applicant receives certain amount of contribution from public sector banks and RBI to cover certain recurring and non-recurring expenses incurred by them. The question that comes to our mind is as to what these recurring and non-recurring expenses are. From the submissions made by the applicant, we find that as per Memorandum of Association, the expenses are incurred for promotion and conducting of research in matters pertaining to the improvement of banking operations, pertaining to the maximum augmentation and effective deployment of banks' resources including analytical and perspective studies of various sectors of the economy with a view to promoting national development, to assist banking and financial institutions in matters such as designing measurement tests for employee selection, appraisal programs, conducting morale, productivity studies, streamlining organizational structure and to review, from time to time, the impact of educational, training and research activities and offer suggestions for filling the gaps in the banking and financial systems and to maintain liaison with banking and financial institutions.
5.7. Hence it is very clear that to receive the contributions as mentioned above, they must carry out the activities entrusted to them and these activities are nothing but supply of services by them, rendered in lieu of the receipt of contributions. Thus their argument that, the contributions are not ‘consideration’ received for taxable supply is not acceptable. They have submitted that the contributions received cannot be said to be in the nature of consideration but it is more in the nature of aid/grant/subsidy received from the members to support functioning of the NIBM. We find that the contribution has been received with a caveat i.e. to perform the activities mentioned in the MOA mentioned above.
5.8 In view of the above, we find that there is a supply of taxable services by the applicant which are performed for consideration (in this case contributions received for performing activities mentioned in the MOA) received in furtherance of their business. As per Section 2(17)(e) ‘business’ includes provision by a club, association, society, or any such body (for a subscription or any other consideration) of the facilities or benefits to its members. Here, the applicant is a society formed by the RBI and various Public Sector Bank/s and are providing services mentioned in para 5.6 above to their member banks. Therefore it can safely be said that they are receiving consideration (contribution) for supply of taxable services rendered in furtherance of their business.
5.9 We now direct our attention to their next line of submissions which states that “Even if assuming without conceding that the members, derive indirect benefit from the contribution paid by them, the contribution received from the member banks and the related activity conducted from the contribution would be covered under the Principle of Mutuality”.
5.10 We do not agree with the applicant's contention that their activity would be covered under the ‘Principal of Mutuality’ i.e. No man can trade with himself; he cannot make, in what is its true sense or meaning, taxable profit by dealing with himself. This assumption is made by the applicant considering that they and the various Public Sector banks and RBI are one and the same. We find that:
a. in the subject case, as per the definition of “person” under the GST Act, 2017, there are two persons namely, the applicant and the other person being the members of the applicant i.e. the Public Sector Banks. Hence the club and member are distinct entities.
b. The GST law has given very wide connotation for services, which will cover any activity other than which involves goods, money and securities. Therefore the activities of the applicant mentioned above can clearly be considered as service being provided by the respondents to its members.
c. From the inclusive definition of the term ‘consideration’ it can decisively be construed that the contributions received by the applicant from the RBI and other Public Sector Banks is meant for both recurring as well as non-recurring expenses which includes activities which are being carried out by the applicant as mentioned in para 5.6 above. Thus, any contributions collected/received by the applicant will definitely be understood as ‘consideration’ as the same has been paid for supply of services.
d. The applicant has fulfilled both the conditions prescribed by Section 7 of the CGST Act; firstly that such supply is made by them in lieu of consideration i.e. contribution and secondly, such supply has been made in the course or furtherance of business since the term business includes provision by club, association, society, or any such body (for a subscription or any other consideration) of the facilities or benefits to its members.
5.11 In view of the discussions made above we are firmly of the opinion that the contributions received by the applicant from the RBI and other Public Sector Banks is nothing but consideration for the entire gamut of services supplied by them as mentioned in para 5.6 supra and GST is payable on such contributions received.
06. In view of the extensive deliberations as held hereinabove, we pass an order as follows:
For reasons as discussed in the body of the order, the questions are answered thus—
Question 1:—Whether consideration paid as subscription or contribution towards recurring or capital expenses or reimbursement or by whatever name called to National Institute of Bank Management (NIBM); a society registered under Societies Registration Act, 1860 by its members (being Banks) for its recurring and nonrecurring expenses is leviable to GST?
Answer:— Answered in the affirmative, in view of discussions made above.
Alert