- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
Gurdial Chadha v. M/s Sugoi Motors Pvt. Ltd. and Others
Factual and Procedural Background
The complaint concerned a car allegedly purchased by the complainant from the opposite parties on 04.07.2017 for Rs.8,67,749/-, with the complainant alleging that the vehicle was not delivered according to the assured specifications. The complaint was filed on 20.01.2020 and was listed for consideration on admission. [1]
Legal Issues Presented
- Whether the consumer complaint was barred by the two-year limitation period under Section 24-A of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. [1]
Arguments of the Parties
The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.
Table of Precedents Cited
No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.
Court's Reasoning and Analysis
- The Forum identified the payment of Rs.8,67,749/- made on 04.07.2017 as the relevant event giving rise to the cause of action. [1]
- It noted that the dispute related to 2017, whereas the complaint was filed on 20.01.2020. [1]
- Applying the two-year statutory limitation period under Section 24-A of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the Forum concluded that the complaint had been filed after expiry of the prescribed period. [1]
- The complaint was therefore held to be hopelessly barred by limitation. [1]
Holding and Implications
DISMISSED AS TIME-BARRED. The complaint was dismissed without any order as to costs, and the file was directed to be consigned to the record room after due compliance. [1]
The decision directly ended the complaint on limitation grounds. The opinion discusses no broader implications and sets no new precedent.
Gurdial Chadha Vs. M/s Sugoi Motors Ltd. Present: Sh.Utkarsh Thapar, Advocate for the complainant. Today the case was fixed for consideration on admission. A bare perusal of the file shows that the dispute pertains to a car which was purchased by the complainant on 04.07.2017 from the OPs by paying a sum of Rs.8,67,749/- vide cheque bearing No. 202020 dated 04.07.2017, because the car has not been delivered to him as per specifications which was assured by the OPs. From the correspondence between the parties shows that the dispute pertains to the year 2017 and the present complaint has been filed on 20.01.2020. Thus, the cause of action, if any, has arisen in the year 2017, when the said payment was made to the OPs. Therefore, the complaint is barred by limitation in view of the fact that lastly the cause of action had accrued on account of deposition of payment on 04.07.2017 and the present complaint has been filed on 20.01.2020 i.e. after the expiry of statutory period of two years under section 24A of the Consumer Protection Act. Therefore, in our opinion the complaint is hopelessly barred by limitation under section 24 A of the Consumer Protection Act and the cases before the Consumer Forum are governed by Section 24-A of the Consumer Act, 1986. Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is hereby dismissed being time barred with no order as to cost. File be consigned to the record room after due compliance. Member Member President, DCDRF, GGN 05.02.2020
Alert