Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ
 

Idbi Bank Limited v. Jaypee Infratech Lmited

National Company Law Tribunal
Aug 9, 2017
Smart Summary (Beta)

Factual and Procedural Background

The applicant, IDBI Limited (Financial Creditor), filed a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (the Code) read with Rule 4 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016, to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the respondent corporate debtor company, M/s Jaypce Infratech Ltd.

IDBI Limited is a banking company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 and the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The Corporate Debtor, M/s Jaypce Infratech Ltd., incorporated on April 5, 2007, has an authorised share capital of Rs. 3000 crore and a paid-up share capital of approximately Rs. 1388.93 crore.

The Financial Creditor sanctioned four loans aggregating Rs. 4650 crore, of which Rs. 900 crore was sold to India Infrastructure Finance Company Limited by a Novation Deed. The total debt granted to the Corporate Debtor was Rs. 3750 crore. The Financial Creditor alleged default in repayment of principal and interest aggregating Rs. 526.11 crore as on June 15, 2017.

The Financial Creditor submitted detailed particulars of financial debt, security documents including deeds of hypothecation, personal guarantee by the Chairman Cum Managing Director, indentures of mortgage, and pledge of shares by a shareholder. The estimated market value of the assets securing the debt was Rs. 17,116 crore, with a distress value of Rs. 14,548 crore.

Supporting documents such as audited balance sheets, balance confirmations, RBI directives, CRILC and CIBIL reports, and entries in the banker's book were annexed to evidence the default.

The Corporate Debtor initially filed an objection opposing admission of the petition but subsequently withdrew the objection through a formal memo expressing no objection to the initiation of the insolvency process, citing the interest of stakeholders and ongoing resolution plans under consideration by lenders.

The Adjudicating Authority admitted the petition under Section 7 of the Code and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), imposing a moratorium and issuing consequential directions as per the Code.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether the Financial Creditor has established the occurrence of default by the Corporate Debtor sufficient to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 7 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016?
  2. Whether the application filed by the Financial Creditor is complete and in conformity with the requirements of the Code and Rules?
  3. Whether there is any disciplinary proceeding pending against the proposed Interim Resolution Professional?
  4. Whether the Adjudicating Authority should admit the petition for initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process based on the evidence and submissions?

Arguments of the Parties

Financial Creditor's Arguments

  • The Financial Creditor submitted evidence of sanctioned loans, disbursement, default in repayment of principal and interest, and detailed financial documents evidencing default.
  • Provided security documents including hypothecation, personal guarantee, mortgage, and pledge to secure the debt.
  • Submitted audited balance sheets, balance confirmations, RBI directives, and credit reports to demonstrate default and compliance with procedural requirements.
  • Proposed an Interim Resolution Professional with no disciplinary proceedings pending against him, supported by written communication.

Corporate Debtor's Arguments

  • Initially opposed the admission of the petition.
  • Subsequently withdrew the objection through a formal memo, expressing no objection to the insolvency process initiation, citing the interest of stakeholders and ongoing lender resolution plans.

Table of Precedents Cited

Precedent Rule or Principle Cited For Application by the Court
Innoventive Industries Ltd. v. ICICI Bank, Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1 & 2 of 2017 Interpretation of Section 7 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 regarding the adjudicating authority's duty to ascertain default, completeness of application, and disciplinary proceedings against the proposed IRP. The court relied on this precedent to clarify that the Adjudicating Authority must admit the application if satisfied on these three criteria and is not required to examine other factors.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The court examined the application filed by the Financial Creditor under Section 7 of the Code and found it complete and in conformity with the statutory provisions and Rules. It noted the occurrence of default as defined under Sections 3(11) and 3(12) of the Code, supported by documentary evidence including audited financial statements, balance confirmations, RBI directives, and credit reports.

The court observed that the proposed Interim Resolution Professional had no disciplinary proceedings pending, as evidenced by the written communication filed.

The withdrawal of the Corporate Debtor's objection through a formal memo was considered, reflecting consensus between the Financial Creditor, other lenders, and the Corporate Debtor for early approval of a resolution plan.

Relying on the precedent set by the Hon'ble NCLAT in Innoventive Industries Ltd., the court emphasized that the Adjudicating Authority's role is limited to ascertaining default, completeness of the application, and disciplinary status of the IRP. Having satisfied these criteria, the court admitted the petition.

Consequential directions were issued including appointment of the IRP, imposition of moratorium under Section 14, prohibition on suits and asset disposal, continuation of essential supplies, and obligations on the Corporate Debtor and its management to cooperate with the IRP.

Holding and Implications

The petition filed by IDBI Limited under Section 7 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is admitted.

The court appointed Mr. Anuj Jain as Interim Resolution Professional and imposed a moratorium on the Corporate Debtor from 09.08.2017 until completion of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process or further orders. The moratorium prohibits institution or continuation of suits, recovery actions, and disposal of assets by the Corporate Debtor. Essential supplies are to continue, and the Corporate Debtor must cooperate with the IRP.

The decision directly affects the parties by commencing the insolvency resolution process and imposing protective measures for the Corporate Debtor's assets and operations. No broader precedent beyond the application of existing statutory provisions and the Innoventive Industries Ltd. ruling was established.

Show all summary ...

H.P. Chaturvedi:— The applicant IDBI Limited (for brevity Financial Creditor) has filed the present petition U/s 7 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read [hereinafter referred to as “the Code”) with Rule 4 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process in respect of the respondent corporate debtor company M/s Jaypce Infratech Ltd. Hie Brief facts of the present case are slated as under:

(i) The applicant IDBI Bank Ltd. is a company within the meaning of the Companies Act. 2013 and a banking company within the meaning of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and having its registered office IDBI Tower, WTC Complex, Cuffe Parade, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 005, in the State of Maharashtra and a branch, inter alia, at IDBI Tower, 4 Floor, Plot No - C-7, G Block, Opp. NSE, Next to SBI, Bandra-Kurla Complex Bandra (East), Mumbai -400051, in the State of Maharashtra.

(ii) It was incorporated on September 27, 2004 as a company within the meaning of the Companies Act, 2013 and further a banking company within the meaning of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

(iii) The ‘Corporate Debtor’ has CIN No. L45203UP2007PLC033119. It was incorporated on April 5 , 2007. Its authorised share capital is Rs.3000,00,00,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand Crore only) and the paid up share capital is Rs. 1388,93,34,970 - (Rupees One Thousand Three Hundred Eighty-Eight Crore Ninety-Three Lakh Thirty-Four Thousand Nine Hundred and Seventy). The aforesaid data concerning the Corporate Debtor is authenticated by master data available on the website of Ministry of Corporate Affairs.

(iv) The “Financial Creditor’ has given all the details of financial debt as per the Code. In part-IV of the application, which is on a proforma prescribed under Rule-4 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 read with Section 7 of the Code, the following details are given about the financial debts:

a. In total the Financial Creditor has sanctioned four (4) loans aggregating to Rs. 4650, (QM)M0 (Rupees tour Thousand Six Hundred and Fifty Gores) and disbursed the entire said amount.

b. An amount of Rs.9Q0,00M,Q00 (Rupees Nine Hundred Crore) was then sold to India Infrastructure Finance Company Limited, as per the Takeout Finance Agreement dated May 22, 2015, and by a Novation Deed to the Common Loan Agreement all rights and obligations in respect of the said amount were novated to India Infrastructure Finance Company Limited. The total debt, therefore granted to the Corporate Debtor was Rs.3750.00M t000 (Rupees Three Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Crore).

The tabulation of the four loans is as follows:

Particulars (Facility-wise) Sanction Amount (In INR) Rupee Term Loan Tranche-II 200,00,00,000/- Rupee Term Loan Tranche-11 4000,00,00,000/- (900,00,00,000 Down sold to India Infrastructure Finance Company Limited Company Limited) Rupee Term Loan - B 350,00,00,000/- Rupee Term Loan -B 100,00,00,000/-

The date of disbursement of loan under the Loan Agreement has been annexed the application as Exhibit-6.

(v) The defaulted amount within the meaning of Section 3(12), i.e. the computation relating to the defaulted amount and days of default has been annexed by the Financial Creditor at Exhibit - 7. The total amount clue as on June 15, 2017 is Rs.526,11,40,827/- (Rupees Five Hundred Twenty-Six Crore, Eleven Lakh, Forty Thousand, Fight Hundred Twenty-Seven), this includes the principal amount in default under the Rupee Term Loan - Tranche - II of the Common Loan Agreement which is Rs.49,99,99,998 (Rupees Forty-Nine Crore Ninety-Nine Lacs Ninety-Nine Thousand, Nine Hundred and Ninety-Fight). In addition to this, the default amount towards the overdue interest (including liquidated damages as default interest) amounts to Rs. 476,11,40,829 (Rupees Four Hundred and Seventy-Six Crore Eleven Lacs Forty Thousand, Eight Hundred and Twenty-Nine).

IDBI EXPOSURE AS ON JUNE 01, 2017 (Amount in Rs.) Particulars (Facility wise) Sanction amount Outstanding Overdues Overdue Since Principal Interest Total RTL Tranche-I 200,00,00,000 218,63,02,119 Nil 18,63,02,119 18,63,02,119 31.10.2016 RTL Tranche-II 4000,00,00,000 3513,24,20,268 Nil 413,24,20,268 413,24,20,268 31.07.2016 RTL-A 350,00,00,000 384,52,59,120 Nil 34,52,59,120 34,52,59,120 31.10.2016 RTL-8 100,00,00,000 109,71,59,322 49,99,99,998 9,71,59,322 59,71,59,320 31.10.2016 Total 4650,00,000 4226,11,40,829 49,99,99,998 476,11,40,829 526,11,40,827

(vi) The Financial Creditor has provided particulars of financial debt documents, records and evidence of default. The Financial Creditor has provided details of the Security documents from Exhibit 8 to Exhibit 13 in Volume II - IV of the Application. The Security comprises the following:

I. Deed of Hypothecation: The Unattested Deed of Hypothecation dated May 25, 2015 (the “Unattested Deed of Hypothecation”) and the Amended and Restated Deed of Hypothecation dated February 6, 2016 (the “Amended and Restated Deed of Hypothecation”) have been attested by the Corporate Debtor in favour of the Security Trustee. Following security has been created;

a. A First charge on all the movables of the company, present and future; excluding movables which are forming part of the common infrastructural facilities of real estate development;

b. A First charge on the corporate debtor company's book debts, receivables, on all bank account including but not limited to the Debt Service Reserve Account (DSRA), the Trust & Retention Account (TRA) where all the cash inflows from toll collection and sale proceeds of the real- estate shall be utilized in a manner & priority to be decided by the lender's agent/RTF lenders, commissions, revenues of whatsoever nature & wherever arising, intangibles including but not limited to goodwill, rights, undertaking and uncalled capital, both present and future;

c. A First charge on or assignment of all rights, title, interest, benefits, claim and demands whatsoever of the Corporate Debtor in the concession agreement save and except in relation to portion of land which is developed undeveloped and alienated by Corporate Debtor from time to time pursuant to sale agreement and project documents duly acknowledged and consented to be the relevant counter parties to such project documents, all as amended, varied or supplemented from time to time, statutory/non-statutory clearances & approvals obtained/ to be obtained for the project; letter of credit, guarantee, performance bond, etc. provided by any party for the project; insurance contracts/insurance Proceeds pertaining to the project (other than those in respect of discharge of third party liability) and all benefits incidental to project activities.

d. A first charge on the Debt Service Reserve Account (DSR A) for an amount equal to 1.5 times the principal and interest payment due for the ensuing quarter to the rupee term lenderv

e. In support of the above the applicant bank has annexed copies of its Unattested Deed of Hypothecation, Amended and Re-Attested Deed of Hypothecation dated February 6, 2016 executed by the Corporate Debtor in favour of the Security Trustee as Exhibit-10 (Colly) of the present petition.

II. Personal Guarantee: Shri Manoj Gaur the chairman cum managing director of the Company as being “Personal Guarantor” has further guaranteed the obligations of the Corporate Debtor under the Loan Agreements pursuant to the personal guarantee dated May 25. 2015. (the “Personal Guarantee”) executed by the Personal Guarantor in favour of the Security Trustee. Copy of the Personal Guarantee has been annexed herewith as Exhibit-11.

III. Indentures of Mortgage: Copies of Indentures of Mortgage have been annexed which is marked as forming part of Exhibit -12 of the application.

IV. Pledge: Jaiprakash Associates Limited, a shareholder of the Corporate Debtor by way of a Deed of Pledge dated February 6, 2016 pledged 51% of the Corporate Debtor's total paid up share capital in favor of Security Trustee. A Copy of the Deed of pledge is annexed herewith as Exhibit -13 of present I& B Application.

Estimated Value of the Aforementioned Security: Excluding 51% of the shares of the Corporate Debtor pledged as stated above and movable properties of the Corporate Debtor, the market value of the assets is estimated to be 1NR 17116,00,00,000/- (Rupees Seventeen Thousand One Hundred and Sixteen Crore only). The distress value of the assets is estimated to INR 14548,00,00,000/- (Rupees Fourteen Thousand Five Hundred and Forty-Fight Crore only).

(vi) In support of the existing financial debts under default the Financial Creditor/Applicant has annexed following documents giving particular of the amount and date of default:

a) Copy of the audited Balance Sheet for the Financial year 2016-2017 of the Corporate Debtor acknowledging the indebtedness of the Corporate Debtor;

b) Balance Confirmation acknowledging the indcbt ness of the Corporate Debtor as on March 31, 2017.

c) RBI directive no. DBR No. BP. IBC 10/21.04.048/2016-2017 dated June 15, 2017 giving directions to the 1DBI Bank Limited to initiate Insolvency Resolution Process under the provisions of the I&B Code, 2016.

d) Report from the Central Repository on Information on Large Credits (“CRILC”) date June 17, 2017.

e) CIBIL Report, showing account of the Corporate Debtor as substandard from April 2016 - March 2017.

f) Entries in Banker's Book in accordance with the Banker Books Evidence Act, 1891 as maintained by the IDBI Bank.

By perusal of the application filed by Financial creditor it appears to be found complete as being in conformity with the provision of Section 7 of the Code and Rules applicable. The provision of Section 7 of the Code reads as under:

7. Initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process by financial creditor.

(I) A financial creditor either by itself or jointly with other financial creditors may file an application for initiating corporate insolvency resolution process against a corporate debtor before the Adjudicating Authority when a default has occurred.

Explanation - For the purposes of this subsection, a default includes a default in respect of a financial debt owed not only to the applicant financial creditor but to any other financial creditor of the corporate debtor.

(2) The financial creditor shall make an application under subsection (I) in such form and manner and accompanied with such fee as may be prescribed.

(3) The financial creditor shall, along with the application furnish—

(a) record of the default recorded with the information utility or such other record or evidence of default as may be specified;

(b) the name of the resolution professional proposed to act as an interim resolution professional; and

(c) any other information as may be specified by the Board.

(4) The Adjudicating Authority shall, within fourteen days of the receipt of the application under sub-section (2). ascertain the existence of a default from the records of an information utility or on the basis of other evidence furnished by the financial creditor under sub-section (3).

(5) Where the Adjudicating Authority is satisfied that—

(a) a default has occurred and the application under sub-section (2) is complete, and there is no disciplinary proceedings pending against the proposed resolution professional, it may by order, admit such application; or

(b) default has not occurred or the application under sub-section (2) is incomplete or any disciplinary proceeding is pending against the proposed resolution professional, it may, by order reject such application:

Provided that the Adjudicating Authority shall, before rejecting the application under clause (b) of sub-section (5). give a notice to the applicant to rectify the defect in his application within seven days of receipt of such notice from the Adjudicating Authority.

(6) The corporate insolvency resolution process shall commence from the date of admission of the application under sub-section (5).

(7) The Adjudicating Authority shall communicate—

(a) the order under clause (a) of sub-section (5) to the financial creditor and the corporate debtor;

(b) the order under clause (b) of sub-section (5) to the financial creditor, within seven days of admission or rejection of such application, as the case may be.

From the perusal of documents annexed with the present petition, it is evident the default has occurred, that meets the requirement of Section 3(11) &(12) of the Code.

Section 3(11)and 3(12) of the Code which reads as under:

3(11) “debt” means a liability or obligation in respect of a claim which is due from any person and includes a financial debt and operational debt;

3(12) “default” means non-payment of debt when whole or any part or instalment of the amount of debt has become due and payable and is not repaid by the debtor or the corporate debtor, as the case may be;

The Financial Creditor has also filed the Written Communication sent by the proposed Interim Insolvency Resolution in Form No. II informing that there is no disciplinary proceeding pending against the proposed IRP.

As, the total amount of default now comes to Rs.526,11,40,827/-(Rupees Five hundred twenty-six crores eleven lakh forty thousand eight hundred twenty-seven) which is in excess of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only). Hence, the present application to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (as per the I & B Code, 2016) in respect of Corporate Debtor Company.

The Corporate Debtor Company in the present matter earlier had filed its objection opposing the Admission but later on 04.08.2017 in presence of its officer through its counsel withdrew the same.

Thus, by considering the subsequent development took place in the present matter, this court being Adjudicating authority advised the Corporate Debtor Company to file a formal memo to such effect. Pursuant thereto Shri Manoj Gaur, being Chairman Cum Managing Director filed a formal memo through his Learned counsel Shri R.P. Agarwal, containing such averment, are slated as “the parties to the petition had a meeting on 03.08.2017. They discussed need to withdraw their objection on the present petition. In such meetings they expressed their desire for early approval of the resolution plan of the Corporate Debtor Company which is already under consideration of its lenders. In view of this the Corporate Debtor has expressed its no-objection”.

The Corporate Debtor Company has further explained about its memo of no-objection given on account of considering the interest of all the stakeholders of the Respondents Company including home buyers and depositors. In view of this the Corporate Debtor Company did not press for its objection to the present petition.

Considering the such statement of the withdrawal of the objection and to concede with the prayer made in for seeking admission of the present Petition. It is felt, not necessary to look into merits of such objection.

We have perused the above stated memo and gone through .me present petition and duly considered the subsequent development that took place in the matter.

It is now undisputed position in the present matter the Financial Creditor along with other lenders and the present Corporate Debtors are having a consensus for early approval of resolution plan of the corporate debtor company.

In addition to above the Hon'ble NCLAT in the matter of Innoventive Industries Ltd. v. ICICI Banks Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) So. I &2 of 2017 has examined the relevant provision of the Section 7 of the Code and ruled that the ‘adjudicating authority’ on receipt of the application under Section 7 subsection (2) is required to ascertain existence of default on the basis of evidence furnished by the Financial Creditor under sub - section (3). The ‘adjudicating authority’ is required to satisfy three things: Occurrence of default; application is complete and no disciplinary proceeding is against the proposed Insolvency Resolution Professional.

For the sake of convenience relevant portion is reproduced as under:

82. As discussed in lite previous paragraphs, for initiation of corporate resolution process by Financial creditor under sub section (4) of Section of the Code, 2016, the adjudicating authority on receipt of application under sub section (2) is required to ascertain existence of default from the records of Information Utility or on the basis of other evidence furnished by the financial creditor under sub-section (3) under section 5 of Section 7, the ‘adjudicating authority’ is required to satisfy-

(a) Whether a default has occurred.

(b) Whether an application is complete: and

(c) Whether any disciplinary proceeding is against the proposed Insolvency Resolution Professional.

83. Once, it is satisfied, it is required to admit the case but in case the application is incomplete application, the financial creditor is to be granted seven days time to complete the application. However, in a case where there is no default or defects cannot be rectified, or the record enclosed is misleading, the application has to be rejected.

84. Beyond the aforesaid practice, the ‘adjudicating authority’ is not required to look into any other factor.

Having heard the submission of Shri Bishwajit Dubey along with Shri Rahul Agarwal, Advocate for Financial Creditor as well as Shri R.P. Agrawal, Advocate for Corporate Debtor, the present petition deserves admission. Hence, it is admitted under the Section 7 of the I & B Code, with consequential directions given as under:

I. That the adjudicating Authority of this bench of the Tribunal hereby appoints Mr. Anuj Jain, Email.Id anujvjain@bsraffiliates.com. Registration No. IBBI/IPA-001/IP-P00142/2017-18/10306, Address: M/S BSRR & Co. Chartered Accountants, 8th Floor, Building NoJO, DLF Cybercity, Gurgaon - 122002 as Interim Resolution Professional to carry the functions as mentioned under the Code.

II. That the order of moratorium u/s 14 shall have effect from 09.08.2017 till the completion of corporate insolvency resolution process or until this Bench approves the resolution plan under subsection (1) of Section 31 or passes an order for liquidation of corporate debtor under section 33 as the case may be.

III. That the Bench hereby prohibits the institution of suits or continuation of pending suit or proceedings against the corporate debtor including execution of any judgement, decree or order in any court of law, tribunal, arbitration panel or other authority; transferring, encumbering, alienating or disposing of by the corporate debtor any of its assets or any legal right or beneficial interest therein; any action to foreclose, recover or enforce any security interest created by the Corporate Debtor in respect of its property including any action under the SARFESI Act, 2002; the recovery of any property by an owner or less or where such property is occupied by or in the possession of the corporate debtor.

IV. That the supply of essential goods or services to corporate debtor, continuing, shall not be terminated or suspended or interrupted during the Moratorium period. The Corporate Debtor to provide effective assistance to the 1RP as and when he takes charge of the Corporate Debtor.

V. During the period of Moratorium, the affairs of Corporate Debtor to be continued and conducted in accordance with the law and as a going concern.

VI. That the provisions of Section 14 sub - section (I) shall not apply to such transactions as may be notified by the Central Government in consultation with any financial sector regulator.

VII. That the public announcement of corporate insolvency resolution process be made immediately as specified under Section 13 of the code and calling for submissions of claim under Section 15 of the Code.

VIII. The Interim Resolution Professional shall perform all his functions strictly which are contemplated, interalia, by Sections 17, 18, 20, 21 of the Code. It is further made clear that all the personnel connected with Corporate Debtor, its promoter or any other person associated with Management of the Corporate Debtor are under legal obligation under Section 19 of the Code extend every assistance and cooperation to the Interim Resolution Professional. Where any personnel of the corporate debtor, its promoter or any other person required to assist or co-operate with IRP. does not assist or co-operate, IRP would be at liberty to make appropriate application to this Tribunal with a prayer for passing an appropriate order.

IX. The IRP shall be under duty to protect and preserve the value of the property of the ‘Corporate Debtor’ and manage the operations of the Corporate Debtor as a going concern as a part of its obligation imposed by Section 20 of the I& B Code, 2016.

X. The Registry is hereby directed to communicate this order to the Financial Creditor and the Corporate Debtor after the completion of necessary formalities.

XI. A Copy of this order be communicated to the [RP as well as to Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India.