- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
Rod Retail Private Limited, In Re
Factual and Procedural Background
The applicant is engaged in the retail sale of sunglasses and was previously registered under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The applicant has since migrated to the GST regime and holds a provisional GST number. The applicant operates several retail outlets in Delhi, including one located in the Security Hold Area of Terminal 3 (International Departure), Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi. This outlet functions beyond the Customs Area under an arrangement with Delhi International Airport Private Limited.
The applicant procures sunglasses from M/s Luxottica India Private Limited, Gurgaon, paying Integrated Tax at 28%, and supplies these goods exclusively to international passengers holding valid international boarding passes. The applicant currently charges SGST and CGST on these supplies but contends that such sales constitute zero-rated export transactions under the IGST Act.
The legal question arises as to whether the retail outlet’s location within the Security Hold Area, beyond the Customs Frontier but geographically within India, qualifies as outside India for the purposes of export under GST law.
Legal Issues Presented
- Whether the location of the applicant’s retail outlet in the Security Hold Area of the International Departure Terminal is considered outside India for the purpose of GST law, despite being geographically within Indian territory.
- Whether the supply of sunglasses to outbound international passengers holding valid international boarding passes from this outlet is liable to SGST and CGST or qualifies as a zero-rated "export" supply under Section 2(23) read with Section 2(5) of the IGST Act, 2017.
Arguments of the Parties
Applicant's Arguments
- The applicant asserts that the retail outlet’s location beyond the Customs Frontier of India places it effectively outside Indian territory for GST purposes, akin to the high seas.
- They rely on the definition of "export of goods" under Section 2(5) of the IGST Act, which means taking goods out of India to a place outside India, arguing that crossing the Customs Frontier satisfies the first limb and supplying to international passengers with boarding passes satisfies the second limb.
- The applicant cites the Supreme Court decision in Hotel Ashoka (Indian Tourism Development Corporation Limited) v. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, which held that sales from Duty Free Shops beyond the Customs Frontier are exempt from State tax under Article 286 of the Constitution and Section 5(1) of the CST Act.
- They also rely on the Supreme Court ruling in Collector Of Customs, Calcutta v. Sun Industries, interpreting export as completed beyond territorial waters, contending the Security Hold Area is akin to high seas and hence outside India.
- On this basis, the applicant claims their sales to international passengers should be treated as zero-rated exports under Section 16(1) of the IGST Act, exempting them from SGST and CGST liability.
Jurisdictional Officer's Comments
- The jurisdictional officer noted that the applicant had paid significant VAT previously and highlighted potential financial implications if GST exemption is granted.
- They recommended inspection of all retail outlets in the duty free zone at IGI Airport before any exemption order is passed.
Table of Precedents Cited
| Precedent | Rule or Principle Cited For | Application by the Court |
|---|---|---|
| Hotel Ashoka (Indian Tourism Development Corporation Limited) v. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (2012) | Sales from Duty Free Shops beyond Customs Frontier are exempt from State tax under Article 286 of the Constitution and Section 5(1) of the CST Act. | The Court noted this precedent but distinguished it on the basis that it related to sales beyond Customs Frontier, not beyond Indian territorial waters or airspace. |
| Collector Of Customs, Calcutta v. Sun Industries (1988) | Export of goods under Customs Act is completed when goods pass beyond territorial waters of India. | The Court applied this ratio to interpret export under IGST Act, holding export occurs only when goods cross territorial waters or airspace, not merely Customs Frontier. |
Court's Reasoning and Analysis
The Court analyzed the definitions of "export of goods" under Section 2(5) of the IGST Act and "India" under Section 2(56) of the CGST Act and Section 2(27) of the Customs Act, which include territorial waters and airspace. The Court held that crossing the Customs Frontier alone does not constitute taking goods out of India since the Customs Frontier lies within Indian territory.
The Court distinguished the precedent from Hotel Ashoka, noting that it dealt with sales beyond Customs Frontier but did not address the issue of territorial waters or airspace. It referred to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Collector Of Customs, Calcutta v. Sun Industries, which clarified that export is completed only when goods cross the territorial waters of India.
Accordingly, the Court concluded that the applicant’s retail outlet, though beyond the Customs Frontier, remains within Indian territory. Therefore, sales made from this outlet to international passengers do not amount to exports under the IGST Act and cannot be zero-rated supplies.
The Court emphasized that the applicant is not taking goods out of India in the legal sense required for export under the IGST Act and must pay GST at applicable rates.
Holding and Implications
Holding: The supply of goods to international passengers from the applicant’s retail outlet located in the Security Hold Area of Terminal 3, IGI Airport, New Delhi, is not an export outside India and hence does not qualify as a zero-rated supply under the IGST Act, 2017. The applicant is liable to pay GST on such supplies.
Implications: This decision requires the applicant to continue charging and paying GST on sales made from the Security Hold Area retail outlet. The ruling clarifies that being beyond the Customs Frontier does not equate to being outside Indian territory for GST purposes. No new precedent beyond this specific interpretation was established.
The applicant is in the business of retail sale of sunglasses. The applicant was registered under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and now the applicant has migrated to GST regime and its present provisional GST Number is 07AADCR6468R1ZF.
2. The applicant has several retail outlets in Delhi and one such outlet is at Terminal 3 (International Departure), Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi. The present application relates to the question arising from the transaction conducted from the said outlet.
3. As a standard rule, every International Airport has a “Landside” and an “Airside”. The Landside area comprises of Check in counters and Baggage Drops and Airside area has aircrafts for boarding. A passenger crosses over from Landside to Airside by passing through Customs & Immigration area and then through security on to the Boarding Gates for departure. The applicant's concerned retail outlet is in the Security Hold Area on crossing the Customs & Immigrations with the address - Shop No. INS-18, SHA Area, International Departure, Terminal 3, IGI Airport, New Delhi-110037. The said outlet is permitted to function beyond the Customs Area and within the Security Hold Area of the IGI Airport vide an arrangement with the Delhi International Airport Private Limited, dated 06.06.2016. The Concept and Category of the applicant under the said agreement being Retail and Sunglasses and the brand- “Sunglass Hut”, which is a retail brand of the International group Luxottica.
4. For the purposes of sale from the said outlet, the applicant procures supplies from the Sunglass Hut brand owner M/s Luxottica India Private Limited, Gurgaon, after payment of Integrated Tax (Inter-State Supply form Gurgaon to Delhi) @ 28%
5. The sunglasses procured from the supplier are further supplied by the applicant to the International passengers travelling to outside India against a valid international boarding pass.
6. The applicant supplies goods only to such passengers which have a valid international boarding pass. In few instances, where domestic passengers are travelling to a domestic destination on a transit International flight, no supply to such passengers holding a domestic boarding pass is made by the applicant.
7. Presently, the applicant is charging SGST/CGST on the supply invoice issued to the International passengers. However, the applicant is of the view that, its supply of goods to international passengers is a zero rated transaction, being “export sale” within the meaning of the same under Section 2(5) of the IG5 Act.
8. The issue is whether the location of the retail outlet of the applicant in the Security Hold Area of the International departure is outside India though geographically it is within the territory of India. The said area is after crossing the Customs Frontier of India and is claimed to be situated outside the territory of India.
Details of Question on which Advance Ruling is requested:
9. Whether the supply of sunglasses from the retail outlet of the applicant at Terminal 3, IGI Airport (International Departure), New Delhi, to outbound international passengers against the international boarding pass is liable to SGST under the DGST Act, 2017 and CGST under the CGST Act, 2017 or is it a zero rated “export” supply within the meaning of Section 2(23) r/w Section 2(5) of the IGST Act, 2017?
Views of the Applicant:
10. Under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (CST Act), as it existed prior to 1 July, 2017, the export out of India were defined under Section 5(1) of the CST Act and which read as under:
5. When is a sale or purchase of goods said to take place in the course of import or export.—
(1) A sale or purchase of goods shall be deemed to take place in the course of the export of the goods out of the territory of India only if the sale or purchase either occasions such export or is effected by a transfer of documents of title to the goods after the goods have crossed the customs frontiers of India.
(2) A sale or purchase of goods shall be deemed to take place in the course of the import of the goods into the territory of India only if the sale or purchase either occasions such import or is effected by a transfer of documents of title to the goods before the goods have crossed the customs frontiers of India.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), the last sale or purchase of any goods preceding the sale or purchase occasioning the export of those goods out of the territory of India shall also be deemed to be in the course of such export, if such last sale or purchase took place after, and was for the purpose of complying with, the agreement or order for or in relation to such export
(4) The provisions of subsection (3) shall not apply to any sale or purchase of goods unless the dealer selling the goods furnishes to the prescribed authority in the prescribed manner a declaration duly filled and signed by the exporter to whom the goods are sold in a prescribed form obtained from the prescribed authority.
(5)Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), if any designated Indian carrier purchases Aviation Turbine Fuel for the purposess of its international flight, such purchase shall be deemed to take place in the course of the export of goods out of the territory of India. Explanation.—For the purposes of this sub-section, “designated Indian carrier” means any carrier which the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify in this behalf.
11. Under the above provisions of the CST Act, an issue had arisen on the sales made from the Duty Free Shops to the International passengers at the International Airport and the Supreme Court of India in the case of Hotel Ashoka (Indian Tourism Development Corporation Limited) v. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, decided on 03.02.2012 expressed a view that such sales are constitutionally exempt from tax under Article 286 of the Constitution of India (being sales in the course of export out of India within the meaning of Section 5(1) of the CST Act). The apex Court in the said decision took note of the fact that Duty Free Shops are located in a Zone which is entered by crossing the customs frontier of India, i.e. they are not within the customs frontiers of India and any sales from the said area is duly covered under Section 5(1) of the CST Act. The apex Court further opined, that, submissions with regard to sale not taking effect by transfer of documents of title to the goods is one of the methods whereby delivery of the goods is effected. Delivery may be physical also. In the case of the duty free shops which are outside the customs frontiers of India, the goods have been sold to the customers by giving physical delivery. Hence, the territorial extent of India starts after crossing the Customs limits. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that when any transaction takes place outside the Custom Frontiers of India, the transaction would be said to have taken place outside India.
12. It is submitted by the applicant that in the case of Collector Of Customs, Calcutta v. Sun Industries ., the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that taking out to a place outside India would also mean a place in high seas. It is beyond the territorial waters of India. Hence, ratio of supreme court decision is applicable to the present case as the goods have been supplied beyond the customs frontiers of India and the said area is akin to high seas and hence outside India,
13. The definition of “export of goods” under Section 2(5) of the IGST Act is reproduced below:
“export of goods” with its grammatical variations an cognate expressions, means taking goods out of India to a place outside India.
14. The Section 2(23) of the IGST Act, defines “zero rated supply” as under:
“zero-rated-suppiy” shall have the meaning assigned to it in Section 16.
15. The relevant portion of Section 16 of the IGST Act reads as under:
Zero rated supply- (1) “zero rated supply” means any of the following supplies of goods or&fittf&tefckgth, namely:—
(a) Export of goods or services or both; or
(b) Supply of goods or services or both to a Special Economic Zone Developer or a Special Economic Zone Unit.
16. The Section 2(4) of the IGST Act also defines “customs frontiers of India” as under:
“Customs frontiers of India” means the limits of a customs area as defined in Section 2 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962)
17. The above definition of “customs frontiers of India” is on the lines of definition of “crossing of customs frontiers of India” given in Section 2(ab) of the CST Act, 1956 and which was examined by Supreme Court of India in case of Hotel Ashoka (Indian Tourism Development Corporation Limited).
18. The legal interpretation of the applicant of the above provisions of law vis-a-vis the transaction of the applicant at its retail outlet at Terminal 3 (International Departure) is as under:
The definition of “export of goods” under Section 2(5) of the IGST Act, reveals, that, it has two limbs—
i. Taking of goods out of India
ii. To a place outside India
The applicant's interpretation, is that, in the present transaction when the goods (sunglasses) are brought into its retail outlet, they do so by crossing the customs frontiers of India (landside of the airport to the airside by crossing the customs and into Security Hold Area - where the outlet is located) and which satisfies the first limb of the definition of the “export of goods” - taking goods out of India.
When the goods are supplied to the International passengers from the retail outlet against the international boarding pass, the second limb of the definition of “export of goods” is also satisfied as the boarding pass gives the destination of the passengers to a place outside India.
19. The applicant has requested that supply of sunglasses to the international passengers from its retail outlet at Terminal 3 (International Departure), IGI Airport, New Delhi, is an instance of “export of goods” and is a zero rated supply under Section 16 of the IGST Act and which means that the applicant has no tax (SGST/CGST) liability on the said transaction of supply under the DGST Act, 2017 or CGST Act, 2017.
Comments of Jurisdictional Officer (SGST):
20. The applicant has paid Rs. 1,94,71,525 as VAT during the year 2016-17. Previously, the sale of sunglasses from the said business place was not exempted under DVAT Act, and now if the same is exempted from paying GST, then there would be financial implications. Therefore, before passing any such orders, it would be appropriate that we should inspect all the shops/retail outlets/business places located in the duty free zone of the International departure of IGI Airport, New Delhi to check whether all such retail outlets are exempted from paying GST.
Relevant Legal Provisions:
21. The relevant provisions of the Constitution of India are as follows:
(i) Article 269(1) before amendment on 08.09.2016: Taxes an the sale or purchase of goods and taxes on the consignment of goods shall be levied and collected by the Government of India but shall be assigned and shall be deemed to have been assigned to the States on or after the 1st day of April, 1996 in the manner provided in clause (2).
Explanation.—For the purposes of this clause,—
(a) the expression “taxes on the sale or purchase of goods” shall mean taxes on sale or purchase of goods other than newspapers, where such sale or purchase takes place in the course of inter-State trade or commerce;
(b) the expression “taxes on the consignment of goods” shall mean taxes on the consignment of goods (whether the consignment is to the person making it or to any other person), where such consignment takes place in the course of inter-State trade or commerce
(ii) Article 286(1) before amendment on 08.09.2016:
Restrictions as to imposition of tax on the sale or purchase of goods
(1) No law of a State shall impose, or authorise the imposition of, a tax on the sale or purchase of goods where such sale or purchase takes place—
(a) outside the State; or
(b) in the course of the import of the goods into, or export of the goods out of, the territory of India.
22. Section 5 of the Central State Tax Act, 1956
“When is a sale or purchase of goods said to take place in the course of import or export.—
(1) A sale or purchase of goods shall be deemed to take place in the course of the export of the goods out of the territory of India only if the sale or purchase either occasions such export or is effected by a transfer of documents of title to the goods after the goods have crossed the customs frontiers of India.
(2) A sale or purchase of goods shall be deemed to take place in the course of the import of the goods into the territory of India only if the sale or purchase either occasions such import or is effected by a transfer of documents of title to the goods before the goods have crossed the customs frontiers of India.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), the last sale or purchase of any goods preceding the sale or purchase occasioning the export of those goods out of the territory of India shall also be deemed to be in the course of such export, if such last sale or purchase took place after, and was for the purpose of complying with, the agreement or order for or in relation to such export.
(4) The provisions of sub-section (3) shall not apply to any sale or purchase of goods unless the dealer selling the goods furnishes to the prescribed authority in the prescribed manner a declaration duly filled and signed by the exporter to whom the goods are sold in a prescribed form obtained from the prescribed authority.
(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), if any designated Indian carrier purchases Aviation Turbine Fuel for the purposess of its international flight (such purchase shall be deemed to take place in the course of the export of goods out of the territory of India. Explanation.—For the purposes of this sub-section, “designated Indian carrier” means any carrier which the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify in this behalf
23. Section 2(ab) fo the Central State Tax Act, 1956
“crossing the customs frontiers of India” means crossing in the limits of the area of a customs station in which imported goods or export goods are ordinarily kept before clearance by customs authorities. Explanation.—For the purposes of this clause, “customs station” and “customs authorities” shall have the same meanings as in the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962.
24. The relevant provisions of Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 are as follows:
(i) Section 2(4): “Customs frontiers of India” means the limits of a customs area as defined in section 2 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962);
(ii) Section 2(5): “Export of goods” with its grammatical variations and cognate expressions, means taking goods out of India ta a place outside India;
(iii) Section 2(23): “zero-rated supply” shall have the meaning assigned to it in section 16;
(iv) Section 16(1): “zero rated supply” means any of the following supplies of goods or services or both, namely:—
(a) Export of goods or services or both; or
(b) Supply of goods or services or both to a Special Economic Zone developer or a Special Economic Zone Unit
25. The relevant provision of the CGST Act, 2017:
(i) Section 2(56): “India” means the territory of India as referred to in article 1 of the Constitution, its territorial waters, seabed and sub-soil underlying such waters, continental shelf, exclusive economic zone or any other maritime zone as referred to in the Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf Exclusive Economic Zone and other Maritime Zones Act, 1976, and the air space above its territory and territorial waters;
26. The relevant provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 are as follows:
(i) Section 2(11): “customs area” means the area of a customs station or a warehouse and includes any area in which imported goods or export goods are ordinarily kept before clearance by Customs Authorities;
(ii) Section 2(18): “export”, with its grammatical variations and cognate expressions, means taking out of India to a place outside India;
(iii) Section 2(27): “India” includes the territorial waters of India;
27. The Section 3 of the Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone and other Maritime Zones Act, 1976 read as under:
(1) The sovereignty of India extends and has always extended to the territorial waters of India (hereinafter referred to as the territorial waters) and to the seabed and subsoil underlying, and the air space over, such waters.
(2) The limit of the territorial waters is the line every point of which is at a distance of twelve nautical miles from the nearest point of the appropriate baseline.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-Section (2), the Central Government may, whenever ftjxwsiders necessary so to do having regard to International Law and State practice, alter, by notification in the Official Gazette, the limit of the territorial waters.
DISCUSSIONS:
28. The issue for decision is whether the supply of goods made to international outbound passengers holding international boarding pass from the retail outlet of the applicant which is located in the Security Hold Area of the IGI International Airport, Terminal-3, and which is claimed to be beyond Customs Frontiers of India, should be considered as zero rated supply, being export of goods, or the same should be subjected to GST @ 28%, being presently paid by the applicant.
29. Before the implementation of GST i.e. prior to 01.07.2017, according to the Article 269(1) of the Constitution of India, the tax on sale or purchase of goods in the course of inter-state trade or commerce was levied by Central Government and not by the State Government. Further, under Article 286(1) of the Constitution of India, the State Governments were not authorised to levy tax on sale or purchase of goods in the course of import into, or export of the goods out of, the territory of India. Further, Section 5(1) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 defined that a sale or purchase of goods shall be deemed to take place in the course of export of the goods out of territory of India, if the sale or purchase takes place after the goods have crossed the Customs Frontier of India. Since, the sale of goods from duty free shops at International Airports to passengers was taking place beyond customs frontier of India, no State Government was competent to levy VAT on such goods.
30. A similar issue was also decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hotel Ashoka (Indian Tourism Development Corporation Limited). The Hon'ble Supreme Court had examined the issue of levy of VAT on the goods sold from duty free shops. It was observed that under the provisions of Article 286 of the Constitution of India and Section 5 of the CST Act, goods which were sold beyond Customs frontiers of India, the transactions had taken place in the course of import and the State Government was not permitted to levy VAT on such sale or purchase of goods. It was also observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that as per Section 2(11) of the Customs Act, the said sale transactions had taken place outside India.
31. The abovementioned decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court does not appear to be applicable in the present case as in the said case, the Hon'ble Supreme Court had interpreted the scope of Se ction 2(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 under which “Customs area” were defined. No doubt the free shops may be established beyond the Customs Frontiers of India. However, the issue in the present case is whether the said duty free shops are outside India i.e. whether they are “beyond airspace on territorial waters of India”.
32. In the present case, as per Section 2(5) of the IGST Act 2017, export of goods takes place only when goods are taken out to a place outside India. Further, India is defined under Section 2(27) of the Customs Act, 1962 as “India includes the territorial waters of India”. Similarly, under CGST Act 2017, under Section 2(56), India means the territory of India including its territorial waters and the air space above its territory and territorial waters. Hence, the goods can be said to be exported only when they cross the territorial waters of India and the goods cannot be called to be exported, merely on crossing the Customs Frontiers of India.
33. However, under GST regime effective from 01.07.2017, the applicant has claimed that no GST is payable on such supply taking place beyond the customs frontiers of India as the same should be considered as exports of goods under Section 2(5) of the IGST Act 2017 and should be zero rated supply under Section 2(23) r/w Section 16(1) of the IGST Act 2017.
34. It is observed that “export of goods” has been defined under Section 2(5) of the IGST Act, 2017 as taking goods out of India to a place outside India. The India is defined under Section 2(56) of the CGST Act as “India” means the territory of India as referred to in article 1 of the Constitution, its territorial waters, seabed and sub-soil underlying such waters, continental shelf, exclusive economic zone or any other maritime zone as referred to in the Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone and other Maritime Zones Act, 1976, and the air space above its territory and territorial waters”. Hence, when goods are exported by Air, the export will be completed only when goods crosses airspace limits of its territory or territorial waters of India.
35. It is also observed that Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, in the case of Collector Of Customs, Calcutta v. Sun Industries . decided on 11.04.1988 held that under Section 2(18) of the Customs Act, 1962, the export of goods out of India was completed when the ship had passed beyond the territorial waters of India. Since, definition of “export” under Section 2(18) of the Customs Act, 1962 and the definition under Section 2(5) of the IGST Act, 2017 are exactly the same, the ratio of judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the abovementioned case is squarely aplicable in the present case also.
RULING
36. It is held that the supply of goods to the International passengers going abroad by the applicant from their retail outlet situated in the Security Hold Area of the Terminal-3 of IGI Airport, New Delhi may be taking place beyond Customs Frontiers of India as defined under Section 2(4) of the IGST Act, 2017. However, the said outlet is not outside India, as claimed by the applicant but the same is within the territory of India as defined under Section 2(56) of the CGST Act, 2017 and Section 2(27) of the Customs Act, 1962 and hence the applicant is not taking goods out of India and hence their supply cannot be callect “export” under Section 2(5) of the IGST Act, 2017 or “zero rated supply” under Section 2(23) and Section 16(1) of the IGST Act, 2017. Accordingly, the applicant is required to pay GST atj the applicable rates.
Alert