- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv (S) v. Xavier Kelavani Mandal Pvt. Ltd. Opponent(S)
Factual and Procedural Background
The present appeal arises under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, preferred by the Revenue against the order dated 17.06.2011 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench ‘C’ concerning the assessment year 2006-07. The assessee filed its return of income for the year 2006-07 but did not furnish the mandatory audit report in Form No. 10B, required for exemption under section 11A of the Act as per section 12A(b) read with Rule 17B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. The Assessing Officer issued a show cause notice and subsequently denied the exemption, taxing the gross receipts without allowing expenditure deductions. On appeal, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) permitted the assessee to file the audit report at the appellate stage and granted the exemption under section 11. The Department’s appeal against this order was dismissed by the Tribunal, leading to the current appeal before the Court.
Legal Issues Presented
- Whether the Appellate Tribunal was correct in law and on facts in directing the Assessing Officer to accept the audit report from the assessee that was not filed during the assessment proceedings.
- Whether the exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, should be granted despite the audit report being furnished only at the appellate stage.
Arguments of the Parties
The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.
Table of Precedents Cited
| Precedent | Rule or Principle Cited For | Application by the Court |
|---|---|---|
| CIT v. Gujarat Oil and Allied Industries Ltd. [(1993) 201 ITR 325] | Audit report filing requirement is procedural and directory; substantial compliance suffices. | The court relied on this precedent to hold that furnishing the audit report at a later stage before completion of assessment is permissible. |
| CIT v. Shahzadanand Charity Trust [228 ITR 292] | Delay in furnishing audit report should not deny exemption; audit report can be produced later with sufficient cause. | The Tribunal and the court applied this principle to justify acceptance of the audit report at the appellate stage and grant of exemption. |
Court's Reasoning and Analysis
The Court analyzed whether the audit report could be accepted at the appellate stage despite not being filed during the assessment proceedings. It observed that the audit report was obtained by the assessee before filing the return and that the assessee had consistently filed audit reports in earlier and subsequent years, which supported the genuineness of the claim. The Court noted the procedural nature of the audit report requirement, referencing established precedents that treat such requirements as directory rather than mandatory. The Court found the assessee’s delay in filing the audit report excusable, supported by an affidavit, and agreed with the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal’s decision to accept the audit report and grant exemption under section 11. Thus, the Tribunal’s order was held to be justified both in law and on facts.
Holding and Implications
The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
The direct effect of this decision is that the assessee is entitled to have the audit report accepted at the appellate stage and to claim exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, despite the delay in furnishing the audit report during the assessment proceedings. No new precedent was established; rather, the Court reaffirmed existing principles regarding procedural compliance and the permissibility of filing documents at later stages with sufficient cause.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V ANJARIA)
The present appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 preferred by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 17.06.2011 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench ‘C’ in ITA No. 2050.Ahd/2009 for the assessment year 2006-07.
1.1 The following question is proposed by the appellant as a substantial question of law.
“Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in directing the Assessing Officer to accept the audit report from the assessee which was not filed during the course of assessment proceeding and to grant exemption u/s.11 of the Act?”
2. The issue in narrow compass and is about the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) directing acceptance of audit report from the assessee and granting exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for sake of brevity).
2.1 The assessee filed its return of income for the Assessment Year 2006-07. On verification, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee had not furnished audit report in Form No. 10B, which was compulsory requirement for eligibility of exemption under section 11A of the Act as stated in section 12A(b) read with Rule 17B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. Assessee was issued show cause notice as to why exemption claimed by it under section 11 should be disallowed. The Assessing Officer passed order denying the exemption. He taxed gross receipts without granting deduction of expenditure.
2.2 In the appeal preferred by the assessee, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) permitted the assessee to file the audit report and directed to accept the same by his order dated 16.04.2009 and the exemption under section 11 of the Act allowed. The Department filed appeal which came to be dismissed by the impugned order bringing the Department before this Court by way of present appeal.
3. The question whether it is permissible to the assessee to produce the audit report at the appellate stage, has already been answered by this court in CIT v. Gujarat Oil and Allied Industries Ltd. [(1993) 201 ITR 325], wherein it is held that the provision regarding furnishing of audit report along with the return has to be treated as a procedural provision. It is directory in nature and its substantial compliance would suffice. In that case, the assessee had not produced the audit report along with the return of income, but produced before completion of the assessment. The Punjab and Haryana High Court in CIT v. Shahzadanand Charity Trust [228 ITR 292] has reiterated the same principle holding that the benefit of exemption should not be denied merely on account of delay in furnishing the same, and it is permissible for the assessee to produce the audit report at a later stage either before the Income Tax Officer or before the appellate authority by showing a sufficient cause. This decision of Punjab & Haryana High Court has been relied on by the Tribunal.
4. In the above view, the Tribunal is eminently justified both in law and on facts in observing and holding as under:-
“In this case, it is not in dispute that the audit report in prescribed form was obtained prior to filing of the return on 20/12/2006; therefore, there was no reason for the assessee to keep the audit report with it in order to loose the exemption. The assessee in the earlier as well as in the subsequent assessment years filed the audit report and got the exemption. The conduct of the assessee in earlier year and subsequent years would prove that due to the facts stated above there was delay in filing the audit report and the contention of the assessee was supported by the affidavit of Mohmad Iqbal Vohra (PB-4). The learned CIT(A) on proper appreciation of the facts and material on record in the light of the decisions of the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court and the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court rightly directed the AO to accept the audit report of the assessee and grant exemption u/s.11 of the IT Act.”
5. For the above reasons, the appeal of the Revenue is devoid of merit, raising no question of law much less any substantial question of law.
6. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed.
Alert