Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Hdfc Asset Management Co. Ltd., In Re (Non-Compliance With The Statutory Requirements)

SEBI
Jun 17, 2010
Smart Summary (Beta)

Comprehensive Summary of the Opinion (Ad Interim Ex-Parte Order)

Factual and Procedural Background

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) received two separate references from the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and the National Stock Exchange (NSE) concerning suspected front-running of orders placed by HDFC Mutual Fund (managed by HDFC Asset Management Company Limited — HDFC AMC). The stock exchanges observed coincidences between trading patterns of three individuals — Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi (trading mainly on NSE), Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta and Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta (both trading on BSE) — and the trading of HDFC AMC, though the exchanges noted no apparent connections initially.

SEBI initiated investigations. The matter referred by NSE against Mr. Rajiv R. Sanghvi was converted into a formal investigation with an Investigating Authority; during inquiry it was found that the BSE-referred matter (Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta and Mrs. Dipti P. Mehta) was linked to the NSE matter, and investigations were combined.

The investigation identified 38 instances across 24 scrip-days between April and July 2007 in which the three individuals placed buy/sell orders ahead of substantial orders of HDFC AMC, subsequently squaring off their positions intra-day and realizing substantial profits. SEBI's investigation further uncovered evidence indicating that Mr. Nilesh Kapadia, Assistant Vice President—Equities at HDFC AMC (dealer since June 2000), had tipped and advised Mr. Rajiv R. Sanghvi in advance of HDFC AMC orders, and that the implicated traders operated from the premises of a sub-broker Om Enterprises.

The investigation recorded telephone call records and transcripts of conversations that indicated tipping and trading coordination, and after confrontation with documents, the principal persons admitted wrongdoing in recorded statements before the Investigating Authority.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether the trading activity of Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi, Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta and Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta constituted front-running of HDFC AMC's orders.
  2. Whether Mr. Nilesh Kapadia (the equities dealer of HDFC AMC) tipped off and advised Mr. Rajiv R. Sanghvi and thereby facilitated front-running, amounting to misuse of his position.
  3. Whether the conduct prima facie violated Regulation 3(a)–(d) and Regulation 4(1) and 4(2)(e) of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices) Regulations, 2003.
  4. Whether HDFC AMC should be held responsible for acts of its employee under Regulation 25(3) and be required to take internal remedial measures under Regulation 25(16) and the Fifth Schedule Code of Conduct.
  5. Whether immediate interim directions (including trading prohibitions, deposits of identified gains/losses, and internal investigations) were necessary to protect investors and market integrity.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The court's (SEBI's) step-by-step reasoning as reflected in the order is as follows:

  1. Initial identification and linkage: SEBI began with separate references from NSE and BSE identifying suspicious coincidence in trading patterns between certain individuals and HDFC AMC; on investigation the two matters were linked and combined.
  2. Factual findings on trading pattern and profits: Investigation revealed 38 instances over 24 scrip-days (April–July 2007) where the named individuals placed buy/sell orders ahead of substantial HDFC AMC orders, then square-off intra-day, realizing substantial intra-day profits. The order reproduces tables of realized profits for each individual (totals: Mr. Rajiv R. Sanghvi — Rs. 106.51 lakh; Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta — Rs. 46.761 lakh; Mrs. Dipti P. Mehta — Rs. 45.38 lakh), supporting a finding of front-running in the investigated instances.
  3. Evidence of tipping and coordination: SEBI relied on telephone records, transcripts of conversations (including a transcript from 24 April 2007 showing contemporaneous references to purchases on NSE and BSE), admissions in recorded statements, and the testimony of the Om Enterprises proprietor. These demonstrated that Mr. Nilesh Kapadia tipped Mr. Rajiv R. Sanghvi before placing HDFC AMC orders; Sanghvi traded on those tips and reported execution details back to Kapadia; and in multiple instances trades based on tips were executed in the accounts of Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta / Mrs. Dipti P. Mehta.
  4. Causal link and misuse of discretion: SEBI observed that Mr. Kapadia, as the dealer for HDFC AMC, had the discretion to execute trades and that by tipping Sanghvi he postponed executions for HDFC AMC and thereby misused that discretion. SEBI's calculations (Annexure-A) led to the conclusion that if the front-runners' trades were aggregated with HDFC AMC's trades, HDFC AMC could have executed volumes earlier and at more favorable prices — a reasonable approximation supported by three factors cited in the order: (a) Kapadia's influence over both the frontrunners and HDFC AMC trades; (b) similar execution strategies aimed at minimizing impact costs; and (c) comparable competency of the dealer/broker executing HDFC AMC's orders and the frontrunner aided by Kapadia.
  5. Statutory/regulatory framework and responsibility: SEBI concluded the conduct was prima facie in violation of Regulation 3(a)–(d) and Regulation 4(1) and 4(2)(e) of the SEBI (PFUTP) Regulations, 2003. SEBI also invoked Regulation 25(3) of the Mutual Funds Regulations, 1996 to state that the asset management company (HDFC AMC) is responsible for acts of its employees; and Regulation 25(16) together with the Fifth Schedule Code of Conduct (Clause 8) requiring high standards of integrity and fairness.
  6. Need for interim intervention: Given the nature of findings (tipping by an AMC dealer, coordinated front-running, substantial gains to frontrunners, prejudice to unitholders and portfolio clients, and erosion of public confidence), SEBI determined that continued presence of Kapadia and the other named persons in the securities market posed a threat and rendered immediate interim measures necessary to mitigate further damage.
  7. Legal basis for directions: SEBI exercised powers under Section 19 of the SEBI Act, 1992, read with Sections 11, 11B and 11(4)(b) and Regulation 11 of the PFUTP Regulations, 2003 to issue the ad interim ex-parte directions.

Holding and Implications

Core Ruling: Ad interim ex-parte directions issued by SEBI pursuant to its powers under the SEBI Act and relevant regulations.

Directives (Immediate and Specific Effects)

  • HDFC Asset Management Company Limited is directed not to utilize the services of Mr. Nilesh Kapadia for trading activities done on behalf of HDFC AMC and to institute an internal inquiry to be conducted by the Trustees of HDFC Mutual Fund.
  • Mr. Nilesh Kapadia and HDFC AMC are to jointly deposit the estimated losses identified so far (as per Annexure-A) to the Trustees of HDFC Mutual Fund; the trustees will hold the amount in a segregated account until further SEBI orders.
  • The Trustees of HDFC Mutual Fund must set up an investigation committee to examine all transactions/dealings by Mr. Nilesh Kapadia in his capacity as dealer to identify any other instances; the committee must submit a final report to SEBI within six months.
  • The Trustees of HDFC Mutual Fund must, within one month, submit a plan to overhaul HDFC AMC's internal control systems and preventive measures to avoid recurrence.
  • Mr. Nilesh Kapadia (PAN AABPK0356Q) is prohibited from buying, selling or dealing in securities, directly or indirectly, or being associated with any SEBI-registered intermediary/entity, until further orders.
  • Mr. Rajiv R. Sanghvi (PAN AAVPS8908E), Rajiv R. Sanghvi HUF (PAN AAAHR3188Q), Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta (PAN AABPM4190Q) and Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta (PAN AHKPM9167B) are prohibited from buying, selling or dealing in securities, directly or indirectly, until further orders.
  • Within fifteen days, Mr. Rajiv R. Sanghvi, Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta and Mrs. Dipti P. Mehta shall deposit the illegitimate gains identified in the investigations (as shown in paragraph 4 tables) with the National Stock Exchange of India Limited, which shall hold the amount in an escrow account until further SEBI orders.
  • The order takes immediate effect and copies will be sent to HDFC AMC, Trustees of HDFC Mutual Fund, NSE, BSE, NSDL and CDSL for compliance.
  • The directed entities/persons may file objections within fifteen days and may request a personal hearing before SEBI.

Broader Implications and Note on Precedential Effect

The order's rationale emphasizes protection of unitholders and clients, maintenance of market integrity and public confidence, and the responsibility of an asset management company for acts of its employees under the Mutual Funds Regulations. The opinion itself does not purport to create a novel legal precedent; it records prima facie findings and imposes interim regulatory measures to prevent further potential harm while further investigations and proceedings continue. The order therefore has immediate practical consequences for the named individuals and HDFC AMC, and initiates further investigatory and remedial processes, but the opinion does not state that it establishes binding judicial precedent beyond the parties and circumstances addressed.

Show all summary ...

1. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as SEBI) had received two separate references from the Bombay Stock Exchange Limited (hereinafter referred to as BSE) and the National Stock Exchange of India Limited (hereinafter referred to as NSE) on suspected instances of front-running of the orders of HDFC Mutual Fund. The said stock exchanges had found certain coincidence between the trading pattern of individuals namely, Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi (trading mostly on NSE), Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta and Ms. Dipti Paras Mehta (both trading on BSE) with that of HDFC Asset Management Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as HDFC AMC). However, no apparent connections were noted by the stock exchanges. The preliminary findings of SEBI in respect of the said references are given in the following paragraphs.

2. HDFC AMC manages the assets of the HDFC Mutual Fund and also provides portfolio management services to other clients. The fund managers and portfolio managers of HDFC AMC get their deals executed through a common dealing desk within the AMC which mostly receives these orders through computerized systems and then allocates them to various stock brokers. The dealer has the discretion to execute the orders at any time during the day, depending on the traded volumes/prices. Mr. Nilesh Kapadia, Assistant Vice President-Equities of HDFC AMC has been its equities dealer since June 2000. SEBI found that Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi had dealt through the sub broker, Om Enterprises (affiliated with ISE Securities Limited for trading on NSE and affiliated with Jitendra Harjivandas Securities, for trading on BSE). It was also found that Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta had opened his trading account with Om Enterprises, for trading on BSE along with his daughter-in-law, Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta, on April 20, 2007. It was also found that prior to this, Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta had been an investor in securities, buying and holding shares for a long period. Though, Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta had opened a trading account, the same was being operated by Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta. It was found that Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi and Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta (for himself and Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta) were trading from the premises of Om Enterprises. While Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi mostly traded on NSE, the trades of Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta and Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta were on BSE.

3. SEBI took up the aforesaid references for investigation and after substantial groundwork; the case related to suspicious trading by Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi (referred by NSE) was converted into a formal investigation with the appointment of the Investigating Authority. While carrying out the investigations, it was found that the other case related to the suspected frontrunning by Mr. Chadrakant P. Mehta and Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta (referred by BSE) was linked to the case involving Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi. Thereafter, the investigations into the two cases were combined.

4. The investigation conducted so far in the matter had revealed 38 instances over 24 scrip days spread across BSE and NSE during April to July 2007. In these instances, Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi/Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta/Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta were placing buy/sell orders ahead of substantial buy/sell orders of HDFC AMC. The buy/sell by the abovementioned persons were successively followed by the buy/sell by HDFC AMC till finally, the aforesaid persons could square off their trades within the same trading session, substantially against the orders of HDFC AMC that were still coming in. In the investigated instances, the volumes accumulated by the said individuals were also found to be significantly large. Thus, the instances apparently represented front running. In the 38 instances mentioned in the following tables, Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi, Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta and Mrs. Dipti P. Mehta have made substantial intra day profits by front running the orders of HDFC AMC.

Profits made by Mr. Rajiv Ramnikal Sanghvi (Amounts in Rs. lakh) Sl. No. Trade Date Scrip Buy Qty. in Lac shares Sell Qty. in Lac shares Net Qty. in Lac shares Buy value Sell value Realized profit in Rs. Lac 1 13-Apr-07 ICRA 0.46 0.46 0 282.04 291.98 9.94 2 19-Apr-07 ZEEL 2.18 2.172 0.008 573.57 586.97 15.5 3 24-Apr-07 CENTURYTEX 1.25 1.25 0 746.2 758.35 12.15 4 3-May-07 DISHTV 2.05 2.05 0 226.12 235.21 9.09 5 8-May-07 BHARTIARTL 0.92 0.92 0 755.56 759.63 4.07 6 9-May-07 HTMEDIA 3.12 3.12 0 624.19 634.31 10.12 7 10-May-07 TATAELXSI 0.38 0.38 0 120.08 123.46 3.38 8 10-May-07 UNIPHOS 0.96 0.96 0 283.65 285.84 2.19 9 15-Jun-07 UNIPHOS 0.65 0.65 0 192.41 195.25 2.84 10 26-Jun-07 RPL 3.28 3.28 0 343.46 351.1 7.64 11 16-Jul-07 SBIN 0.25 0.25 0 388.56 389.58 1.03 12 17-Jul-07 ZEENEWS 2.56 2.56 0 126.83 133.3 6.47 13 17-Jul-07 DISHTV 0.68 0.68 0 65.14 66.58 1.44 14 18-Jul-07 ZEENEWS 7.16 7.16 0 502.45 421.02 18.57 15 24-Jul-07 SPARC 0.61 0.61 0 58.87 60.95 2.08 Total 106.51
Profits made by Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta (Amounts in Rs. lakh) Sl. No. Trade Date Scrip Buy Qty. in Lac shares Sell Qty. in Lac shares Net Qty. in Lac shares Buy value Sell value Realized profit in Rs. Lac 1 13-Apr-07 ICRA 0.36 0.36 0 229.32 235.6 6.28 2 11-May-07 RIL 0.19 0.19 0 301.22 303.14 1.92 3 12-Jun-07 Dishman 0.372 0.372 0 112.15 114.19 2.04 4 12-Jun-07 United Phos 0.267 0.267 0 72.058 72.65 0.592 5 12-Jun-07 Amtek Auto 0.29 0.29 0 122.66 124.45 1.79 7 16-Jul-07 Dish TV 1.03 1.03 0 101.09 103.32 2.23 8 17-Jul-07 RIL 0.17 0.17 0 309.28 311.35 2.07 9 17-Jul-07 Birla 3M 0.024 0.024 0 47.02 49.66 2.64 10 17-Jul-07 ZEENEWS 1.45 1.45 0 71.89 75.4 3.51 11 18-Jul-07 ZEENEWS 5.29 5.29 0 296.26 310.68 14.42 12 19-Jul-07 Zee NEWS 0.524 0.524 0 34.495 37.124 2.629 13 23-Jul-07 ZEENEWS 0.19 0.19 0 12.75 13.08 0.33 14 31-Jul-07 TV Today 0.78 0.78 0 113.28 119.59 6.31 Total 46.761
Profits made by Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta (Amounts in Rs. lakh) Sl. No. Trade Date Scrip Buy Qty. in Lac shares Sell Qty. in Lac shares Net Qty. in Lac shares Buy value Sell value Realized profit in Rs. Lac 1 13-Apr-07 ICRA 0.51 0.51 0 319.08 327.78 8.7 2 19-Apr-07 ZEEL 0.85 0.85 0 223.6 229.64 6.04 3 24-Apr-07 CENTURYTEX 0.9 0.9 0 536.35 546.04 9.69 4 3-May-07 DISHTV 1.15 1.15 0 126.39 131.79 5.4 5 3-May-07 ICICIBANK 0.7 0.7 0 608.98 613.43 4.45 6 8-May-07 BHARTIARTL 0.35 0.35 0 287.37 288.74 1.37 7 9-May-07 HTMEDIA 1.28 1.28 0 258.2 261.54 3.34 8 10-May-07 TATAELXSI 0.23 0.23 0 72.68 74.506 1.826 9 26-Jun-07 RPL 2 1.71 0.29 209.43 183.62 4.56 Total 45.38

5. The preliminary findings of investigation also revealed that Mr. Nilesh Kapadia, Assistant Vice President-Equities of HDFC AMC was tipping off and advising Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi to trade ahead of the orders of HDFC AMC and had helped him to make substantial gains in the process. Though, Mr. Nilesh Kapadia and Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi had initially claimed in their statement to SEBI during the investigation that they did not know each other, the investigations unearthed evidence of their regular conversations over telephone during the relevant period (April to July, 2007) when the instances of front-running identified by BSE and NSE, had taken place. It was also found that Mr. Nilesh Kapadia and Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi were college mates and had known each other since long. Evidence collected in the form of telephonic call records and the transcript of conversations between them reflect that, Mr. Nilesh Kapadia was tipping off Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi before placing the orders for HDFC AMC and Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi was trading on the basis of the same. Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi was also reporting back to Mr. Nilesh Kapadia on the quantity executed by him, price details etc. Mr. Nilesh Kapadia and Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi after being confronted with the documents collected during the investigation, have admitted to their wrongdoing in their recorded statements under oath before the Investigating Authority.

6. It was found that the tips and instructions from Mr. Nilesh Kapadia to Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi were towards trading both on BSE and NSE, at times in multiple stocks within the same day. Their conversation on certain occasions also indicated that the subject matter had been discussed by them previously and the said conversation was in continuation of the same. Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi was also reporting back to Mr. Nilesh Kapadia on the trades executed on BSE and NSE. While the trades reported for NSE matched with the trades by Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi, the trades reported for BSE matched with the trades by Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta/Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta. On some days, there were no trades by Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi in the scrip referred to in his conversation with Mr. Nilesh Kapadia but the tips passed on to him have been actually executed in the account of Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta/Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta. Mr. Uday Kulkarni, the proprietor of Om Enterprises, who also used to operate one of the trading terminals of Om Enterprises, has also admitted before the Investigating Authority in a recorded statement that, sometimes Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi used to place orders in the account of Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta/Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta. Incidentally, both Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi and Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta were trading from the premises of Om Enterprises. Besides, Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta further stated to SEBI that he did not have any prior experience in intra-day trading or executing large number of trades and that his prior experience was limited to buying and holding stocks for long periods. Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi when confronted by the Investigating Authority of SEBI with the evidence of his reporting back to Mr. Nilesh Kapadia on the trades executed by Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta/Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta, has stated in his recorded statement that, he did not have any logical answer.

7. From a transcript of the conversation between Mr. Nilesh Kapadia and Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi on April 24, 2007, it was found that Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi was frontrunning the orders of HDFC AMC in the shares of Century Textiles Limited on NSE. It was also found that on the same date, Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta (in the account of Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta) was also frontrunning the orders of HDFC AMC in the same scrip on BSE. The relevant portion of the transcript of the conversation between Mr. Nilesh Kapadia and Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi at around 12:20 pm on the said date is given below:

Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi: Hello.

Nilesh Kapadia: Aa gaya? (Did it come?)

Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi: Haan 95 kar raha hoon. Ho gaya 95,59425. (Yes doing 95, it became 95,59,425.)

Nilesh Kapadia: 9425.

Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi: Haan. (Yes.)

Nilesh Kapadia: Okay, BSE pe 70 hai na. (In BSE there is 70 right?)

Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi: Haan. (Yes.)

Nilesh Kapadia: Okay, bolta hoon. (Ok I will tell you.)

It is observed that at that point, Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi had completed the purchase of 95,000 shares of Century Textiles Limited on NSE and another 70,000 shares of Century Textiles Limited was already bought in the account of Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta, on BSE. There was no other account which had bought 70,000 shares of Century Textiles Limited on BSE till that moment, on that day. This apparently indicates that the trades in the account of Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta were based on the tips passed on to Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi by Mr. Nilesh Kapadia. Since Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta has admitted that he himself was operating the account of Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta, it also appears that he too was involved in the frontrunning, through his account as well as that of Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta.

8. In view of the foregoing, I arrive at the following prima facie findings:

a. Mr. Nilesh Kapadia had tipped off Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi before placing the orders for HDFC AMC and that Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi traded based on such tips and instructions.

b. The trading accounts of Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta/Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta were also operated based on the tips received by Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi from Mr. Nilesh Kapadia.

9. In view of the preliminary findings arrived at above, the conduct of Mr. Nilesh Kapadia, Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi, Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta and Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta is prima facie in violation of Regulation 3(a) to (d) and Regulation 4(1) and 4(2)(e) of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003. Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi is the karta of Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi HUF. The role of Om Enterprises as well as that of HDFC AMC and the officers in charge and responsible for the conduct of its business would be further investigated and if the findings so warrant, appropriate actions shall be initiated against them.

10. Though, the instances found by the investigation had taken place in 2007, it has taken a lot of perseverance to collect the evidence and establish the connections discussed above. However, having found those details, it is imperative to identify if there were other instances by Mr. Nilesh Kapadia, as he is the equities dealer of HDFC AMC since June 2000 till date. In view of the aforesaid findings, his continuation as a dealer for HDFC AMC poses a threat to the large number of unitholders of HDFC Mutual Fund and the portfolio management clients of HDFC AMC and appears to be undesirable as such transgressions in the institutions managing public funds cannot be looked at indulgently as it would dent public confidence reposed in such institutions and cause damage to the securities market as a whole. Further, the continuance of Mr. Nilesh Kapadia and his accomplices viz., Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi, Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta and Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta in the securities market also appears undesirable in view of their acts of commissions and omissions, as discussed above. Therefore, such situations genuinely warrant intervention by SEBI, towards mitigating the extent of such transgressions and ensuring that the persons responsible do no further damage.

11. It is further noted that the interests of numerous unitholders of HDFC Mutual Fund and portfolio management clients of HDFC AMC have been compromised due to such frontrunning orchestrated by none other than the dealer of HDFC AMC. Under most circumstances, such frontrunning increases the cost of acquisition of shares or reduces the realizations from the sale of shares, for the concerned mutual fund schemes and portfolio management clients. In the instances under investigation, initially when the frontrunner/s were building up their positions, they are also trying to attain their own volume targets, in the process taking away the liquidity that would have gone to the Mutual Fund, as Mr. Nilesh Kapadia had tipped Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi instead of placing orders for HDFC AMC with the stock broker. Thus, on each of the occasions when Mr. Nilesh Kapadia had tipped Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi, he had misused his discretion as the dealer of HDFC AMC by postponing the execution of the trades for HDFC AMC. From the calculations shown in Annexure-A, it can be observed that, in most of the instances, if the trades of Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi, Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta and Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta are cumulated with that of HDFC AMC, the volumes finally executed by HDFC AMC for a scrip in that day could have been executed earlier and at a lower cost (for buys) or at better realizations (for sells). This, in my opinion is a reasonable approximation considering three factors viz.(a) The mind of Mr. Nilesh Kapadia was behind the frontrunners as well the trades for HDFC AMC (b) The execution strategies were similar i.e, to incur minimum impact costs and (c) the level of competency of the dealer for the broking firm executing HDFC AMC's orders was close to that of Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi aided by Mr. Nilesh Kapadia himself. In terms of Regulation 25(3) of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996 “The asset management company shall be responsible for the acts of commission or omission by its employees ….”. Therefore, HDFC AMC is also responsible for the acts of its employee Mr. Nilesh Kapadia. Further, Regulation 25(16) thereof, prescribes that, the asset management company shall abide by the Code of Conduct as specified in the Fifth Schedule. In terms of Clause 8 of the Code of Conduct specified in the Fifth Schedule to the aforesaid Regulations, an asset management company shall maintain high standards of integrity and fairness in all their dealings and in the conduct of their business.

12. Under these circumstances, I, in exercise of the powers conferred upon me under Section 19 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992, read with Sections 11, 11-B and 11(4)(b) thereof and Regulation 11 of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003, by way of this ad interim ex-parte order, hereby direct as follows:

i. HDFC Asset Management Company Limited shall not utilize the services of Mr. Nilesh Kapadia for the trading activities done on behalf of HDFC Asset Management Company Limited and shall institute an internal inquiry to be conducted by the trustees of HDFC Mutual Fund in the matter.

ii. Mr. Nilesh Kapadia and HDFC Asset Management Company Limited shall jointly deposit the estimated losses identified so far as per Annexure-A of this order, to the Trustees of HDFC Mutual Fund. This amount shall be held by the Trustees in an account segregated for this purpose, till further orders by Securities and Exchange Board of India in this matter.

iii. The Trustees of HDFC Mutual Fund shall also set up an investigation committee to examine all transactions/dealings by Mr. Nilesh Kapadia, in his position as the dealer of HDFC Asset Management Company Limited, to identify whether he had indulged in similar frontrunning activities on other occasions. The committee shall submit the final report to the Securities and Exchange Board of India within six months of this order explaining any such instances.

iv. The Trustees of HDFC Mutual Fund shall, within a period of one month from the date of this order, submit a plan to overhaul the internal control systems and the internal preventive measures of HDFC Asset Management Company Limited, to avoid such instances in future.

v. Mr. Nilesh Kapadia (Permanent Account Number AABPK0356Q) is prohibited from buying, selling or dealing in securities, directly or indirectly, or being associated with any intermediary or any entity registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India, till further orders.

vi. Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi (Permanent Account Number AAVPS8908E), Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi HUF (Permanent Account Number AAAHR3188Q), Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta (Permanent Account Number AABPM4190Q) and Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta (Permanent Account Number AHKPM9167B) are prohibited from buying, selling or dealing in securities, directly or indirectly, till further orders.

vii. Further, Mr. Rajiv Ramniklal Sanghvi, Mr. Chandrakant P. Mehta and Mrs. Dipti Paras Mehta shall, within fifteen days of this order, deposit the illegitimate gain identified so far in the investigations, as shown in the tables in paragraph 4 above, with the National Stock Exchange of India Limited which shall hold the amount in an escrow account till further orders by the Securities and Exchange Board of India in this matter.

13. This order shall come into force with immediate effect.

14. Copies of this Order shall be forwarded to HDFC Asset Management Company Limited, Trustees of HDFC Mutual Fund, National Stock Exchange of India Limited, Bombay Stock Exchange Limited, National Securities Depository Limited and Central Depository Services (India) Limited for necessary compliance with the directions issued in this order.

15. The entities/persons against whom the aforesaid directions are issued may file their objections, if any, to this Order, within fifteen days and, if they so desire, avail an opportunity of personal hearing before the Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C4-A, ‘G’ Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai 400051, on a date and time to be fixed on a specific request.