Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Power Grid Corporation Of India Ltd. v. Madhya Pradesh Power Trading Company Ltd.

Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
Nov 9, 2011
Smart Summary (Beta)

Structured Summary of the Opinion (Petition No. 335/2010)

Factual and Procedural Background

A petition was filed seeking approval of transmission tariff for: (i) 400/220 kV ICT-I at Wardha Sub-station with associated bays (date of commercial operation: 1.4.2009) ("Asset-1"); and (ii) combined assets comprising 400/220 kV ICT-I (Asset-1) and 400/220 kV ICT-II at Wardha Sub-station with associated bays (anticipated/notional date of commercial operation for ICT-II/combined assets: 1.12.2010 / 1.2.2011) ("Combined Asset-1&2"), under the Sipat-II Supplementary Transmission System in the Western Region for the tariff block 2009-14.

The petitioner sought several specific reliefs including treatment of depreciation when assets are combined, grossing up base ROE with tax, reimbursement of petition filing costs and publication costs, separate billing of service tax if levied in future, adjustment for changes in floating interest rates, and separate recovery of licensee fee.

Investment approval and cost estimates for the Sipat II supplementary transmission system were referenced (Government of India letter dated 24.6.2005 and a revised cost estimate dated 3.9.2010). The petition set out dates of commercial operation (DOCO) for various assets; Asset-1 DOCO = 1.4.2009, Asset-2 (ICT-II) DOCO = 1.2.2011. The Commission had earlier determined tariff for certain assets by order dated 15.3.2011 in Petition No. 182/2010; the present petition seeks tariff for Asset-1 and Combined Asset-1&2, with Combined Asset-1&2 tariff computed for the period 1.2.2011 to 31.3.2014.

Notices under section 64 of the Electricity Act, 2003 were published and no public comments were received. None of the respondents filed any reply to the petition. The order concludes by disposing Petition No. 335/2010 and fixing the transmission charges and ancillary determinations described in the order.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether the petitioner is entitled, if assets are combined for tariff calculation, to recover full depreciation (up to 90% of gross block) during useful life reckoned from the actual date(s) of commercial operation and to treat recovery of depreciation accordingly.
  2. Whether the base rate of return on equity (ROE) should be grossed up with the applicable tax rate as per the relevant Finance Act for the relevant year and whether tax liability should be settled year-to-year between the licensee and beneficiaries.
  3. Whether the petitioner may be reimbursed by beneficiaries for petition filing fees and publication of notices (pursuant to Regulation 42 of the 2009 regulations) and other expenses related to petition filing.
  4. Whether the petitioner may bill and recover service tax on transmission charges separately from respondents if transmission of power becomes a taxable service in future.
  5. Whether the petitioner may bill and adjust impacts on interest on loan arising from changes in floating interest rates during the 2009-14 period.
  6. Whether the petitioner may bill and recover licensee fee separately from the respondents.

Arguments of the Parties

Petitioner's Arguments

  • The petitioner requested approval of transmission tariff for Asset-1 (DOCO 1.4.2009) and for Combined Asset-1&2 (notional DOCO 1.2.2011) for the 2009-14 tariff block, and specified the detailed elements of the tariff claim (depreciation, interest on loan, return on equity, interest on working capital, O&M expenses) for the respective years.
  • The petitioner sought (a) when assets are combined, to recover full depreciation (90% of gross block) over useful life reckoned from actual DOCO; (b) grossing up ROE with applicable tax rate; (c) reimbursement of petition filing fee and notice publication costs; (d) separate billing of service tax if levied in future; (e) ability to bill impact on interest on loan due to floating interest rate changes; and (f) separate recovery of licensee fee.
  • On time over-run: the petitioner stated that ICT-II commissioning was delayed due to high Tan-Delta values of the tertiary winding discovered during pre-commissioning (March 2009), necessitating return of the ICT to the supplier (BHEL) for repairs; BHEL's repair work caused delay until delivery on 14.9.2010 and commissioning on 1.2.2011. Petitioner submitted that these were supplier defects and that liquidated damages under the contract with BHEL were being pursued and would be adjusted in project cost when determined.
  • The petitioner asserted that downstream connectivity by MSETCL (220 kV lines) was not provided in a timely manner: although ICT-I was operational from 1.4.2009, the first set of two 220 kV lines were connected by MSETCL only on 20.1.2010 and the remaining lines were yet to be provided; consequently ICT loading has been low (50-80 MW) and the petitioner argued delay in evacuation and some delay attribution to MSETCL.
  • Petitioner provided detailed financial schedules, CA certificates (some to be filed at truing up), and calculated O&M on normalized historic costs including an assumed 50% wage hike effect for pay revision; petitioner reserved right to seek revision of O&M norms if wage impact exceeds 50% and requested license fee recovery on grounds that O&M norms did not capture license fee cost.

Respondents' Arguments

None of the respondents filed any reply to the petition; therefore no respondent arguments are recorded in the opinion.

Table of Precedents Cited

Precedent Rule or Principle Cited For Application by the Court
Commission order dated 15.3.2011 in Petition No. 182/2010 Transmission tariff determination for certain assets (assets at Srl. No. 1, 2 and 3 in the project list). The transmission tariff determined in Petition No. 182/2010 for assets listed was noted; the tariff for Asset-1 as computed in Petition No. 182/2010 applies from April 2009 to January 2011 but is superseded by the tariff allowed in the instant petition for Asset-1 and Combined Asset-1&2.
Commission letter Ref. No C-7/189/2040/2009-CERC dated 23.10.2009 Procedure for combining of assets for the purpose of tariff determination for 2009-14. The Court applied this procedure to combine Asset-1 and Asset-2 for the purposes of tariff calculation (Combined Asset-1&2).
Commission order dated 11.1.2010 in Petition No. 109/2009 Principle permitting recovery of petition filing fee by petitioner from beneficiaries. The Court followed that decision and held that the petitioner shall be entitled to recover the filing fee from the beneficiaries; ordered recovery of petition filing fees and publication costs from beneficiaries on a pro-rata basis.
Commission order dated 25.10.2011 in Petition Nos. 21/2011 and 22/2011 Treatment of licence fee (as addressed in those orders). The Court directed that reimbursement of licence fee will be dealt with in accordance with that order; did not resolve licence fee issue in the instant order but referred it to those prior determinations.
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2009 (selected provisions: Reg. 7(1), 9(1), 12(1), 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 23, 33) Statutory methodology for capital cost admission, additional capitalisation, debt-equity treatment, return on equity (ROE) computation and grossing up, interest on loan, depreciation, working capital components and interest, O&M norms, billing and recovery and sharing of charges. The Court applied these regulations throughout: set capital cost admission rules; disallowed certain IDC/IEDC for the period attributable to defective equipment; admitted additional capitalisation within cut-off date; applied debt-equity norms and normative loan treatment; computed ROE by grossing up base rate per Regulation 15 and applied pre-tax ROE of 17.481%; computed interest on loan per Regulation 16 methodology; computed depreciation per Regulation 17; computed working capital and interest per Regulation 18; applied O&M norms per Regulation 19; and directed billing and sharing in accordance with Regulations 23 and 33 up to 30.6.2011.
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Sharing of Inter-State Transmission Charges and Losses) Regulations, 2010 Framework for billing, collection and disbursement of transmission charges from 1.7.2011. The Court directed that with effect from 1.7.2011 billing, collection and disbursement of transmission charges shall be governed by these 2010 Regulations and Removal of Difficulties orders issued thereunder.
Income Tax Act, 1961 (as referenced in Regulation 15) Minimum Alternate Tax/Corporate Income Tax rates applicable for grossing up ROE and truing-up mechanisms. The Court applied Regulation 15 which requires grossing up of base ROE with the normal tax rate and truing up of ROE in accordance with tax rates under the Income Tax Act; the court computed ROE on the basis of the specified tax rate for 2008-2009 as used in the calculation (11.33%).

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The Court conducted a regulatory, item-by-item application of the 2009 tariff regulations to the petitioner's claims and documentary submissions. The central strands of reasoning are summarized as follows:

  1. Capital cost and submission requirements: The petitioner was required to submit auditor's certificates and revised forms as on the actual DOCO. Because the petitioner did not submit details of expenditure for December 2010 to January 2011, the Court clubbed and considered capital cost of both assets as on 1.12.2010 for tariff calculation.
  2. Time over-run and disallowance of IDC/IEDC: The Court accepted the petitioner's factual account that ICT-II failed pre-commissioning tests (high Tan-Delta), was sent back to BHEL for repairs, delivered on 14.9.2010 and commissioned 1.2.2011. The Court treated the ICT failure and repair delay as a bilateral contractual/supplier issue (between petitioner and BHEL) and held that consumers (beneficiaries) should not bear Interest During Construction (IDC) and IEDC that accrued due to non-commissioning caused by defective ICT. Consequently IDC and IEDC attributable to the 23-month repair-related delay were disallowed (specific amounts disallowed are tabulated in the order).
  3. Initial spares and opening capital cost: Initial spares had already been allowed in Petition No. 182/2010. The Court calculated adjusted opening capital costs for Asset-1 and Asset-2 excluding excess initial spares and disallowed IDC/IEDC.
  4. Additional capitalisation and cut-off date: Applying Regulation 9(1) and the definition of cut-off date (31.3.2014 for these projects), the Court found the petitioner's claimed additional capital expenditure for 2010-11 to fall within the cut-off date and admitted it for tariff calculation subject to prudence checks.
  5. Debt-equity treatment: Regulation 12(1) was applied: equity in excess of 30% would be treated as normative loan; where actual equity is less than 30%, actual equity is considered. The Court computed debt-equity composition for opening capital cost, additional capitalisation and as on 31.3.2014 for combined assets and used normative percentages (70:30) for projected additions.
  6. Return on Equity (ROE): The Court applied Regulation 15. The base ROE 15.5% was grossed up by the tax rate specified (tax rate for 2008-2009 = 11.33%) to arrive at a pre-tax ROE of 17.481% (rounded as per the regulation). The Court computed ROE amounts for Asset-1 and Combined Asset-1&2 accordingly and noted that grossing up and truing up shall be in accordance with Regulation 15 and subsequent amendments.
  7. Interest on loan: The Court applied Regulation 16. It treated loans as gross normative loans, computed normative outstanding loans by deducting cumulative repayment, equated repayment for the tariff period to the allowed depreciation, considered moratorium considerations as mandated, and applied weighted average rate of interest on actual loan portfolio for computation. For floating rate loans the Court adopted the methodology from Petition 132/2010: interest on loan was calculated on the basis of rates prevailing as on DOCO (1.4.2009); subsequent changes in interest rates will be considered at truing up.
  8. Depreciation: Regulation 17 was applied. Depreciation was calculated on the admitted capital cost using straight-line method and schedules from Appendix-III. Salvage value of 10% and maximum allowed depreciation (90% of capital cost) were applied; depreciation was charged from first year of commercial operation on pro rata basis for part-years. Cumulative depreciation of Asset-1 up to the notional DOCO of combined assets was carried forward for combined asset calculations.
  9. Operation & Maintenance (O&M) expenses: The Court applied the O&M norms in Regulation 19 (clause (g)) for 400 kV and 220 kV bays and calculated allowable O&M expenses for Combined Asset-1&2 for each year 2010-2014. The Court noted the petitioner's submissions about pay revision impact and reserved the possibility that decisions in other petitions on wage revision would apply here.
  10. Interest on working capital: The Court applied Regulation 18 to compute working capital components (receivables = two months fixed cost; maintenance spares = 15% of O&M; O&M = one month) and applied the specified rates of interest for working capital (SBI PLR 12.25% as on 1.4.2009 for Asset-1 and SBI base rate + 350 bps = 11.00% as on 1.7.2010 for Combined Asset-1&2).
  11. Computation and allowance of transmission charges: Using the above components (depreciation, interest on loan, ROE, interest on working capital, O&M), the Court computed and allowed transmission charges for Asset-1 (for April 2009–Jan 2011 and pro-rata months) and for Combined Asset-1&2 from 1.2.2011 to 31.3.2014. The Court set out the annual and pro-rata amounts in tabular numeric form in the order.
  12. Other reliefs: The Court allowed recovery of petition filing fees and publication costs from beneficiaries (applying the Commission's earlier decision in Petition No. 109/2009). The petitioner's prayer to separately bill service tax if levied in future was held premature; the petitioner may approach the Commission later as appropriate. The licence fee query was referred to the Court's order in Petition Nos. 21/2011 and 22/2011.
  13. Billing and sharing methodology: The Court ordered that transmission charges allowed will be recovered monthly in accordance with Regulation 23 and shared by beneficiaries as per Regulation 33 up to 30.6.2011, and from 1.7.2011 billing and disbursement shall follow the 2010 sharing regulations and Removal of Difficulties orders.

Holding and Implications

Holding: The Court issued an order allowing transmission tariff as computed in the petition subject to the adjustments and regulatory application set out in the order. In particular:

  • Transmission tariff for Asset-1 was allowed from its date of commercial operation (1.4.2009) up to 31.1.2011 (and on a pro-rata basis where indicated), but the tariff previously computed in Petition No. 182/2010 for Asset-1 is superseded by the tariff allowed in this instant petition.
  • Transmission tariff for Combined Asset-1&2 was computed and allowed for the period 1.2.2011 to 31.3.2014.
  • Disallowance of IDC and IEDC attributable to the 23-month delay caused by defective ICT (period March 2009 to January 2011) was ordered; the consumers/beneficiaries were held not liable to pay IDC/IEDC arising from supplier-caused non-commissioning.
  • Return on equity was computed in accordance with Regulation 15 and set at a pre-tax ROE of 17.481% for calculation purposes (grossed up from base rate using the tax rate specified for 2008-09).
  • Reimbursement of petition filing fee and publication costs was allowed and directed to be recovered from beneficiaries on pro-rata basis.
  • Petitioner's request to separately bill service tax if levied in future was held premature; the petitioner may approach the Commission later if necessary.
  • Licence fee recovery was not decided in this order and is to be dealt with as per earlier Commission orders (Petition Nos. 21/2011 and 22/2011 dated 25.10.2011).
  • This order disposes Petition No. 335/2010.

Implications: The direct consequences are the allowance of transmission charges for the specified assets and periods, the rejection of certain IDC/IEDC amounts attributable to supplier-caused delays, the admission of additional capital expenditure within the cut-off date, normative application of debt-equity and ROE rules, and directions about recovery of petition filing costs. The opinion does not purport to set out any unfamiliar legal principle beyond strict application of the 2009 regulations and the cited Commission precedents; broader precedent-setting implications are not asserted in the text.

Show all summary ...

This petition has been filed seeking approval of transmission tariff for (i) 400/220 kV ICT-I at Wardha Sub-station with associated bays (date of commercial operation: 1.4.2009) and (ii) combined assets of 400/220 kV ICT-I at Wardha Sub-station with associated bays (date of commercial operation: 1.4.2009)&400/220 kV ICT-II at Wardha Sub-station with associated bays (hereinafter referred to as “transmission assets”) (anticipated date of commercial operation: 1.12.2010) (notional date of commercial operation: 1.12.2010) under SIPAT-II Supplementary Transmission System in Western Region for tariff block 2009-14 period. The petitioner has also sought the following reliefs:—

(a) In case of the assets being combined to calculate the transmission charges, allow the petitioner to recover full depreciation (90% of the Gross Block) of the assets during its useful life (25 years for Substation and 35 years for Transmission Lines) reckoning from its actual date of commercial operation. Permit the petitioner to treat the recovery of depreciation after achieving the useful life by an asset (to be reckoned from the actual date of commercial operation);

(b) Allow grossing up of base rate of return with the applicable tax rate as per the Finance Act for the relevant year and direct settlement of tax liability between the generating company/transmission licensee and the beneficiaries/long term transmission customers on year to year basis;

(c) Approve the reimbursement of expenditure by the beneficiaries towards petition filing fee and publishing of notices in newspapers in terms of Regulation 42 of 2009 regulations and other expenditure (if any) in relation to the filing of petition;

(d) Allow the petitioner to bill and recover service tax on transmission charges separately from the respondents, if at any time exemption from service tax is withdrawn and transmission of power is notified as a taxable service;

(e) Allow the petitioner to bill and adjust impact on interest on loan due to change in interest rate on account of floating rate of interest applicable during 2009-14 period, if any, from the respondents; and

(f) Allow the petitioner to bill and recover licensee fee separately from the respondents.

2. The investment approval for Sipat II supplementary Transmission system was accorded by the Government of India vide their letter no. 12/24/2009-PG dated 24.6.2005 at an estimated cost of Rs. 81367 lakh including Interest During Construction of Rs. 3504 lakh (based on 4th quarter 2004 prices level). Revised Cost Estimate was accorded by the Board of Directors of the petitioner vide their letter No C/CP/RCE/Sipat II dated 3.9.2010 at an estimated cost of Rs. 98224 lakh including Interest During Construction of Rs. 7357 lakh (based on 2nd quarter, 2010 price level).

3. The details of the elements of the Sipat II supplementary transmission system and their respective dates of commercial operation are as under:—

Srl. No. Asset DOCO 1 765 kV S/C Seoni-Wardha Transmission Line with associated bays 400 kV D/C Wardha Akola Transmission Line with associate bays 1.4.2009 2 ICT-I at 400/220 kV Sub-Station at Wardha with associated bays (hereinafter “Asset-1”) 1.4.2009 3 400 kV D/C Akola-Aurangabad Transmission Line at Akola and Aurangabad and 400 kV Bus reactor at Wardha Sub-Station 1.12.2009 4 ICT-II 400/220 kV at Wardha Sub-Station with associated bays (hereinafter “Asset-2”) 1.2.2011

4. The transmission tariff for the assets mentioned at Srl. No. 1,2 and 3, above was determined by order dated 15.3.2011 in Petition No. 182/2010. The transmission tariff for the assets at Srl. No. 2 (Asset 1) and 4 (Asset 2), above are allowed in this instant petition. The actual date of commercial operation of Asset-1 and Asset-2 was 1.4.2009 and 1.2.2011, respectively and their notional date of commercial operation of Combined Assets-1&2 is 1.2.2011 Asset 1 and Asset 2 are combined together for the purposes of tariff calculation as per the Commission's letter Ref. No C-7/189/2040/2009-CERC dated 23.10.2009, wherein the procedure for combining of assets for the purpose of tariff determination for 2009-14 is prescribed.

5. The transmission tariff of Asset 1 computed in Petition No. 182/2010 is applicable from April 2009 to January 2011 and it is superseded by the tariff allowed in the instant petition. The transmission tariff for Combined Assets 1&2 has been computed for the period 1.2.2011 to 31.3.2014

6. The details of apportioned approved cost, the admitted cost as on the date of commercial operation and additional capital expenditure projected to be incurred for the assets covered in the petition is summarized overleaf:—

(Rs. in lakh)

Name of the asset Apportioned approved cost as per RCE Expenditure upto date of commercial operation Expenditure for 2009-2010 Expenditure from 1.4.2010 to 30.11.2010 Proposed Expenditure from 1.12.2010 to 31.3.2011 Total estimated completion cost Asset-1 3375.23 2185.35 307.94 56.72 825.21 3375.22 Asset-2 2456.75 1991.86 NA NA 226.84 2218.70 TOTAL 5831.98 5593.92

7. Capital cost of Asset 1 on the date of commercial operation is inclusive of the initial spares amounting to Rs. 89.14 lakh and it has already been considered in Petition No. 182/2010.

8. Details of the transmission charges claimed by the petitioner are as under:—

(Rs. in lakh)

Asset-1 2009-2010 2010-2011 (pro-rata for 8 months) Depreciation 123.67 155.10 Interest on Loan 64.22 74.03 Return on equity 122.67 153.87 Interest on Working Capital 14.60 16.57 O&M Expenses 162.44 171.74 Total 487.60 571.31

(Rs. in lakh)

Combined Asset-1&2 2010-2011 (pro-rata for 4 months) 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Depreciation 89.30 295.67 295.67 295.367 Interest on Loan 33.31 104.98 95.09 84.99 Return on equity 88.59 293.36 293.36 293.36 Interest on Working Capital 9.71 31.27 32.07 32.92 O&M Expenses 114.49 363.14 383.88 405.84 Total 335.40 1088.42 1100.07 1112.78

9. The details submitted by the petitioner in support of its claim for interest on working capital are given overleaf:—

(Rs. in lakh)

Asset-1 2009-2010 2010-2011 (pro-rata) Maintenance Spares 24.37 25.76 O&M expenses 13.54 14.31 Receivables 81.27 95.22 Total 119.18 135.29 Interest 14.60 16.57 Rate of Interest 12.25% 12.25%

(Rs. in lakh)

Combined Asset-1&2 2010-2011 (pro-rata) 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Maintenance Spares 51.52 54.47 57.58 60.87 O&M expenses 28.62 30.26 31.99 33.82 Receivables 167.70 181.40 183.35 185.46 Total 247.84 266.13 272.92 280.15 Interest 4.85 31.27 32.07 32.92 Rate of Interest 11.75% 11.75% 11.75% 11.75%

10. No comments or suggestions have been received from the general public in response to the notices published by the petitioner under section 64 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

11. None of the respondents have filed any reply to the petition.

CAPITAL COST

12. As regards the capital cost, Regulation 7(1) of the 2009 regulations provides as under:—

“The expenditure incurred or projected to be incurred, including interest during construction and financing charges, any gain or loss on account of foreign exchange risk variation during construction on the loan - (i) being equal to 70% of the funds deployed, in the event of the actual equity in excess of 30% of the funds deployed, by treating the excess equity as normative loan, or (ii)being equal to the actual amount of loan in the event of the actual equity less than 30% of the fund deployed, - up to the date of commercial operation of the project, as admitted by the Commission, after prudence check.”

13. In the instant petition, petitioner has claimed revised tariff for Asset-1 from the date of commercial operation i.e 1.4.2009 to anticipated date of commercial operation of Asset II, i.e 1.12.2010 and tariff for Combined Asset-1&2 from the notional date of commercial operation to 31.3.2014 The petitioner was directed to submit CA Certificate for capital cost and the revised forms as on the actual date of commercial operation. The petitioner submitted, vide affidavit dated 22.3.2011 that the revised auditor's cost certificates and revised forms for the combined ICT-I and ICT-II at Wardha sub-station shall be filed at the time of truing up.

14. As the petitioner has not submitted the details of the expenditure incurred from December 2010 to January 2011, capital cost of both the assets as on 1.12.2010 has been clubbed and considered for the purpose of tariff calculation.

TIME OVER-RUN

15. As per the investment approval for the system by the Ministry of Power on 24.6.2005 the system was scheduled to be commissioned within 36 months i.e by June, 2008. The petitioner has submitted that ICT-II 400/220 kV at Wardha Sub-station along with associated bays was commissioned on 1.2.2011 after a delay of 31 months. That ICT-2 was ready for commissioning by March 2009 along with Wardha sub-station and Akola Line. Accordingly, all works had been completed by February 2009 and pre-commissioning test carried out before charging of elements of Grid.

16. The petitioner has submitted that during the pre-commissioning test in March 2009, it was found that “Tan-Delta Value” of tertiary winding was very high and violating its acceptable limit. That BHEL initially tried to repair the ICT at site but eventually it had to be taken back to factory for further repairs. The repair of ICT took more time at BHEL works, who scheduled the same considering the time lines for readiness of the downstream transmission system of Maharashtra and new on-going works for other transmission projects. The repaired ICT was delivered by BHEL on 14.9.2010 The ICT was commissioned on 1.2.2011 The petitioner has also submitted that the first ICT commissioned at Wardha is loaded below 50% with LILO of 220 kV Wardha-Badnera.

17. The petitioner has submitted, vide affidavit dated 18.5.2011, that two nos. of 220 kV Transmission Lines along with one 400/220 kV ICT for each transmission line were placed for the Wardha sub-station as per the standard norms. Even though ICT I was put under commercial operation on 1.4.2009, first set of two nos. of 220 kV lines were connected by MSETCL at Wardha substation only on 20.1.2010 ICT II was put under commercial operation on 1.2.2011 and the balance two nos. of 220 kV Lines are yet to provided by MSETCL. It has also submitted that in the absence of downstream system, the loading of ICT is 50-80 MW only. That even though there was delay in commissioning of ICT II due to problem during pre-commissioning stage, there was no constraint in power evacuation to the downstream system at Wardha sub-station. The delay is attributable to MSETCL as it is not able to draw power even after commissioning of ICT II at Wardha. The petitioner has further submitted that levy of liquidated damages as per the provisions of the contract with BHEL for delay in delivery of ICT is under process and same shall be adjusted in the project cost in due course.

18. The delay in commissioning of the ICT II due to failure during the pre-commissioning test was a bilateral issue between the petitioner and the supplier. The consumers cannot be made to pay for the IDC and IEDC which has accrued on account of the non-commissioning of the assets due to defective ICT. The IDC and IEDC, for the delayed period of 23 months on account of repair of ICT by BHEL, are disallowed.

19. Details of IDC and IEDC disallowed are as under:—

(Rs. in lakh)

Detail of IDC and IEDC as per CA Certificate dated 2.8.2010 IEDC IDC Up to 31.3.2010 60.10 159.59 From 1.4.2010 to DOCO 21.26 50.08 Total IDC and IEDC Claimed 81.36 209.67 Detail of IDC and IEDC disallowed for 23 months From March 2009 to March 2010 (for 13 months) 13.71 36.40 From April 2010 to Jan 2011 (for 10 months) 21.26 50.08 Total Disallowed IDC and IEDC (for 23 months) 34.97 86.48

20. Initial spares have already been allowed in Petition No. 182/2010 considering both the assets covered in the instant petition. Details of opening capital cost considered for the purpose of tariff calculation are as follows:—

(Rs. in lakh)

Name of the asset DOCO Exp. upto DOCO Excess Initial Spares Restricted in Petition No. 182/2010 Disallow ed IDC and IEDC Capital Cost excluding Excess Initial Spares and disallowed IDC and IEDC Exp. for 2009-2010 Exp. from 1.4.2010 to 31.1.2011 Asset-1 1.4.2009 2185.35 5.31 — 2180.04 307.94 56.72 Asset-2 1.2.2011 1991.86 — 121.44 1870.42 Combined Asset-1&2 — — — 4415.11

ADDITIONAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE

21. With regard to additional capital expenditure, Regulation 9(1) of 2009 regulations provides as under:—

“Additional Capitalisation: (1) The capital expenditure incurred or projected to be incurred, on the following counts within the original scope of work, after the date of commercial operation and up to the cut-off date may be admitted by the Commission, subject to prudence check:

(i) Undischarged liabilities;

(ii) XXX

(iii) XXX

(iv) XXX

(v) XXX”

22. As per 2009 regulations:—

“cut-off date means 31st march of the year closing after 2 years of the year of commercial operation of the project, and in-case of the project is declared under commercial operation in the last quarter of the year, the cut-off date shall be 31 March of the year closing after 3 years of the year of commercial operation”.

23. As per the above definition, the cut-off date for the above mentioned assets is 31.3.2014 The petitioner has claimed additional capital expenditure of Rs. 881.93 lakh for 2010-2011 for Asset-1 and Rs. 226.84 lakh for 2010-2011 for Asset-2. The additional capital expenditure claimed falls within the cut-off date. Accordingly, the same has been considered for the purpose of tariff calculation.

DEBT-EQUITY RATIO

24. Regulation 12(1) of the 2009 regulations provides that—

“(1) For a project declared under commercial operation on or after 1.4.2009, if the equity actually deployed is more than 30% of the capital cost, equity in excess of 30% shall be treated as normative loan:

Provided that where equity actually deployed is less than 30% of the capital cost, the actual equity shall be considered for determination of tariff:

Provided further that the equity invested in foreign currency shall be designated in Indian rupees on the date of each investment.

(2) XXX.”

25. The details of debt-equity in respect of the transmission assets as on the date of commercial operation are given overleaf:—

Capital cost as on the date of commercial operation Asset-1 Particulars Amount (in lakh) % Debt 1526.09 70.00 Equity 653.95 30.00 Total 2180.04 100.00 Combined Asset-1&2 Debt 3090.81 70.01 Equity 1324.30 29.99 Total 4415.11 100.00

26. The details of debt-equity in respect of the transmission assets as on 31.3.2014 are as under:—

Capital cost as on 31.3.2014 Combined Asset-1&2 Particulars (Rs. in lakh) % Debt 3827.25 70.00 Equity 1639.91 30.00 Total 5467.16 100.00

27. As regards the projected additional capital expenditure (referred to as “Ad-Cap” in the table below) the debt-equity details are as under:—

Normative Particulars (Rs. in lakh) % Asset-1 Add Cap for 2009-2010 Debt 215.56 70.00 Equity 92.38 30.00 Total 307.94 100.00 Add Cap for 2010-2011 Debt 617.35 70.00 Equity 264.58 30.00 Total 881.93 100.00 Combined Assets-1&2 Add Cap for 2010-2011 Debt 736.44 70.00 Equity 315.62 30.00 Total 1052.05 100.00

RETURN ON EQUITY

28. Regulation 15 of the 2009 regulations provides that:—

“15. (1) Return on equity shall be computed in rupee terms, on the equity base determined in accordance with regulation 12.

(2) Return on equity shall be computed on pre-tax basis at the base rate of 15.5% to be grossed up as per clause (3) of this regulation:

Provided that in case of projects commissioned on or after 1st April, 2009, an additional return of 0.5% shall be allowed if such projects are completed within the timeline specified in Appendix-II:

Provided further that the additional return of 0.5% shall not be admissible if the project is not completed within the timeline specified above for reasons whatsoever.

(3) The rate of return on equity shall be computed by grossing up the base rate with the normal tax rate for the year 2008-2009 applicable to the concerned generating company or the transmission licensee, as the case may be:

Provided that return on equity with respect to the actual tax rate applicable to the generating company or the transmission licensee, as the case may be, in line with the provisions of the relevant Finance Acts of the respective year during the tariff period shall be trued up separately for each year of the tariff period along with the tariff petition filed for the next tariff period.

(4) Rate of return on equity shall be rounded off to three decimal points and be computed as per the formula given below:

Rate of pre-tax return on equity = Base rate/(1-t)

Where t is the applicable tax rate in accordance with clause (3) of this regulation.

(5) The generating company or the transmission licensee as the case may be, shall recover the shortfall or refund the excess Annual Fixed charge on account of Return on Equity due to change in applicable Minimum Alternate/Corporate Income Tax Rate as per the Income Tax Act, 1961 (as amended from time to time) of the respective financial year directly without making any application before the Commission.

Provided further that Annual Fixed charge with respect to the tax rate applicable to the generating company or the transmission licensee, as the case may be, in line with the provisions of the relevant Finance Acts of the respective financial year during the tariff period shall be trued up in accordance with Regulation 6 of these regulations”

29. The amount of equity considered for calculation of return on equity is as under:—

(Rs. in lakh)

Description Equity on DOCO Notional equity due to ACE for the period 2009-2010 Total equity considered for tariff calculations for the period 2009-2010* Notional equity due to ACE for the period 2010-2011 Total equity considered for tariff calculatio ns for the period 2010-2011* Notional equity due to ACE for the period 2011-14 Total equity considered for tariff calculations for the period 2011-14* Asset 1 653.95 92.38 700.14 264.58 878.62 — — Com. Asset 1&2 1324.30 — — 315.62 1482.11 0.00 1639.91

30. In this order, Return on Equity has been calculated as per Regulation 15 of the 2009 regulations with pre-tax ROE of 17.481%.

31. Petitioner's prayer to allow grossing up the base rate of ROE based on the tax rates viz., MAT, surcharge, any other cess, charges, levies etc., as per the relevant Finance Act, shall be settled in accordance with the provisions of Regulation 15 of 2009 regulations as amended by Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2011.

32. Details of return on equity calculated are as under:—

(Rs. in lakh)

Asset-1 2009-2010 2010-2011 Opening Equity 653.95 746.33 Addition due to Additional Capitalisation 92.38 264.58 Closing Equity 746.33 1010.91 Average Equity 700.14 878.62 Return on Equity (Base Rate) 15.50% 15.50% Tax rate for the year 2008-2009 11.33% 11.33% Rate of Return on Equity (Pre Tax) 17.4815 17.4815 Return on Equity (Pre Tax) 122.39 153.59

(Rs. in lakh)

Combined Asset 1 & 2 2010-2011 (pro-rata) 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Opening Equity 1324.30 1639.91 1639.91 1639.91 Addition due to Additional Capitalisation 315.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 Closing Equity 1639.91 1639.91 1639.91 1639.91 Average Equity 1482.11 1639.91 1639.91 1639.91 Return on Equity (Base Rate) 15.50% 15.50% 15.50% 15.50% Tax rate for the year 2008-2009 11.330% 11.330% 11.330% 11.330% Rate of Return on Equity (Pre Tax) 17.481% 17.481% 17.481% 17.481% Return on Equity (Pre Tax) 43.18 286.67 286.67 286.67

INTEREST ON LOAN

33. Regulation 16 of the 2009 regulations provides that—

“16. (1) The loans arrived at in the manner indicated in regulation 12 shall be considered as gross normative loan for calculation of interest on loan.

(2) The normative loan outstanding as on 1.4.2009 shall be worked out by deducting the cumulative repayment as admitted by the Commission up to 31.3.2009 from the gross normative loan.

(3) The repayment for the year of the tariff period 2009-2014 shall be deemed to be equal to the depreciation allowed for that year:

(4) Notwithstanding any moratorium period availed by the generating company or the transmission licensee, as the case may be the repayment of loan shall be considered from the first year of commercial operation of the project and shall be equal to the annual depreciation allowed,.

(5) The rate of interest shall be the weighted average rate of interest calculated on the basis of the actual loan portfolio at the beginning of each year applicable to the project:

Provided that if there is no actual loan for a particular year but normative loan is still outstanding, the last available weighted average rate of interest shall be considered: Provided further that if the generating station or the transmission system, as the case may be, does not have actual loan, then the weighted average rate of interest of the generating company or the transmission licensee as a whole shall be considered.

(6) The interest on loan shall be calculated on the normative average loan of the year by applying the weighted average rate of interest.

(7) The generating company or the transmission licensee, as the case may be, shall make every effort to re-finance the loan as long as it results in net savings on interest and in that event the costs associated with such re-financing shall be borne by the beneficiaries and the net savings shall be shared between the beneficiaries and the generating company or the transmission licensee, as the case may be, in the ratio of 2:1.

(8) The changes to the terms and conditions of the loans shall be reflected from the date of such re-financing.

(9) In case of dispute, any of the parties may make an application in accordance with the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 1999, as amended from time to time, including statutory re-enactment thereof for settlement of the dispute:

Provided that the beneficiary or the transmission customers shall not withhold any payment on account of the interest claimed by the generating company or the transmission licensee during the pendency of any dispute arising out of re-financing of loan.”

34. In these calculations, the interest on loan has been worked out as detailed overleaf:—

(a) Gross amount of loan, repayment of instalments and rate of interest and weighted average rate of interest on actual average loan have been considered as per the petition;

(b) The repayment for the tariff period 2009-2014 shall be deemed to be equal to the depreciation allowed for that period.

(c) Moratorium period availed by the transmission licensee and the repayment of the loan shall be considered from the first year of commercial operation of the project and shall be equal to the annual depreciation allowed.

(d) Weighted average rate of interest on actual average loan worked out as per (a) above is applied on the notional average loan during the year to arrive at the interest on loan

35. The methodology followed for the calculation of weighted average rate of interest in case of floating interest loans in Petition 132/2010 has been adopted in the instant petition. Accordingly, the interest on loan has been calculated on the basis of rate prevailing as on the date of commercial operation, i.e 1.4.2009 Any change in rate of interest subsequent to the date of commercial will be considered at the time of truing up.

36. Transmission tariff has been allowed for Asset-1 from date of commercial operation, i.e 1.4.2009 to 31.1.2011 Repayment of normative loan i.e Rs. 252.41 lakh for Asset-1 upto 31.1.2011 has been considered as cumulative repayment of normative loan for Combined Asset-1&2 as on the notional date of commercial operation, i.e 1.2.2011

37. Details of the interest on loan worked on the above basis are as under:—

(Rs. in lakh)

Asset-1 2009-2010 2010-2011 Gross Normative Loan 1526.09 1741.65 Cumulative Repayment upto Previous Year 0.00 123.39 Net Loan-Opening 1526.09 1618.26 Addition due to Additional Capitalisation 215.56 617.35 Repayment during the year 123.39 154.82 Net Loan-Closing 1618.26 2080.79 Average Loan 1572.18 1849.53 Weighted Average Rate of Interest on Loan 4.0753% 3.9958% Interest 64.07 73.90

(Rs. in lakh)

Combined Asset 1 & 2 2010-2011 (pro-rata) 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Gross Normative Loan 3090.81 3827.25 3827.25 3827.25 Cumulative Repayment upto Previous Year 252.41 295.94 584.91 873.87 Net Loan-Opening 2838.41 3531.31 3242.34 2953.38 Addition due to Additional Capitalisation 736.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 Repayment during the year 43.53 288.97 288.97 288.97 Net Loan-Closing 3531.31 3242.34 2953.38 2664.41 Average Loan 3184.86 3386.83 3097.86 2808.89 Weighted Average Rate of Interest on Loan 3.0501% 3.0417% 3.0132% 2.9713% Interest 16.19 103.02 93.34 83.46

DEPRECIATION

38. Regulation 17 of the 2009 regulations provides for computation of depreciation in the following manner, namely:—

“17. (1) The value base for the purpose of depreciation shall be the capital cost of the asset admitted by the Commission.

(2) The salvage value of the asset shall be considered as 10% and depreciation shall be allowed up to maximum of 90% of the capital cost of the asset.

(3) Land other than the land held under lease and the land for reservoir in case of hydro generating station shall not be a depreciable asset and its cost shall be excluded from the capital cost while computing depreciable value of the asset.

(4) Depreciation shall be calculated annually based on Straight Line Method and at rates specified in Appendix-III to these regulations for the assets of the generating station and transmission system:

Provided that, the remaining depreciable value as on 31st March of the year closing after a period of 12 years from date of commercial operation shall be spread over the balance useful life of the assets.

(5) In case of the existing projects, the balance depreciable value as on 1.4.2009 shall be worked out by deducting the cumulative depreciation as admitted by the Commission up to 31.3.2009 from the gross depreciable value of the assets.

(6) Depreciation shall be chargeable from the first year of commercial operation. In case of commercial operation of the asset for part of the year, depreciation shall be charged on pro rata basis.”

39. Asset-1 and Combined Assets 1&2 were put under commercial operation on 1.4.2009 and their notional date of commercial operation is 1.2.2011 and accordingly will complete 12 years beyond 2013-2014 and thus depreciation has been calculated annually based on Straight Line Method and at rates specified in Appendix-III to the 2009 regulations. Cumulative depreciation of Rs. 252.41 of Asset-1 upto the notional date of commercial operation has been considered as cumulative depreciation for the Combine Asset 1&2.

40. Details of the depreciation worked out are as under:—

(Rs. in lakh)

Asset-1 2009-2010 2010-2011 Gross Block 2180.04 2487.98 Addition during 2009-2014 due to Projected Additional Capitalisation 307.94 881.93 Closing Gross Block 2487.98 3369.91 Average Gross Block 2334.01 2928.94 Rate of Depreciation 5.2864% 5.2860% Depreciable Value 2100.61 2636.05 Remaining Depreciable Value 2100.61 2512.66 Depreciation 123.39 154.82

(Rs. in lakh)

Combined Asset 1 & 2 2010-2011 (pro-rata) 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Gross Block 4415.11 5467.16 5467.16 5467.16 Addition during 2009-14 due to Projected Additional Capitalisation 1052.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 Closing Gross Block 5467.16 5467.16 5467.16 5467.16 Average Gross Block 4941.14 5467.16 5467.16 5467.16 Rate of Depreciation 5.2860% 5.2855% 5.2855% 5.2855% Depreciable Value 90% 4447.02 4920.45 4920.45 4920.45 Remaining Depreciable Value 4194.62 4624.51 4335.54 4046.57 Depreciation 43.53 288.97 288.97 288.97

OPERATION&MAINTENANCE EXPENSES

41. Clause (g) of regulation 19 of the 2009 regulations prescribes the norms for operation and maintenance expenses based on the type of sub-station and line. Norms prescribed in respect of the asset covered in the instant petition are as under:—

Element 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 400 kV bays (X Lakh per Bay) 52.40 55.40 58.57 61.92 65.46 220 kV bays (X Lakh per Bay) 36.68 38.78 41.00 43.34 45.82

42. Based on the above norms, the allowable O&M expenses for the assets covered in the instant petition are as under:—

(Rs. in lakh)

Combined Asset-&2 Element 2010-2011 (pro-rata) 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Two Nos. 400 kV bay 18.46 117.14 123.84 130.92 Six Nos. 220 kV bays 38.78 246.00 260.04 274.92 Total O&M expenses 57.24 363.14 383.88 405.84

43. The Petitioner has submitted that O&M expenditure for the year 2009-2014 had been arrived at on the basis of normalized actual O&M expenses during the period 2003-2004 to 2007-2008. The wage hike of 50% on account of pay revision of the employees of public sector undertaking has also been considered while calculating the O&M charges for tariff period 2009-2014. The petitioner has further submitted that it reserved the right to approach the Commission for suitable revision in the norms for O&M expenditure in case the impact of wage hike with effect from 1.1.2007 is more than 50%. The petitioner has further submitted that in O&M norms for the period 2009-2014, the cost associated with license fees had not been captured and therefore licence fee be allowed to be recovered separately from the respondents.

44. We observe that the issue regarding reimbursement of additional expenditure on account of wage revision has been raised by the petitioner in other petitions also. The decision as and when taken will be applicable to the present case also.

INTEREST ON WORKING CAPITAL

45. As per the 2009 regulations the components of the working capital and the interest thereon are discussed hereunder:—

(i) Receivables: As per Regulation 18(1)(c)(i) of the 2009 regulations, receivables will be equivalent to two months of fixed cost. The petitioner has claimed the receivables on the basis of 2 months transmission charges claimed in the petition. In the tariff being allowed, receivables have been worked out on the basis of 2 months transmission charges.

(ii) Maintenance spares: Regulation 18(1)(c)(ii) of the 2009 regulations provides for maintenance spares @ 15% per annum of the O&M expenses from 1.4.2009 The value of maintenance spares has accordingly been worked out.

(iii) O&M expenses: Regulation 18(1)(c)(iii) of the 2009 regulations provides for operation and maintenance expenses for one month as a component of working capital. The petitioner has claimed O&M expenses for 1 month of the respective year as claimed in the petition. This has been considered in the working capital.

(iv) Rate of interest on working capital: As per clause (3) of regulation 18 of the 2009 regulations (for the Assets commissioned before 30.6.2010) SBI PLR rate of 12.25% as on 1.4.2009 for Asset-1 and SBI Base Rate Plus 350 basis points as on 1.7.2010 (i.e 11.00%) for Combined Asset-1&2 has been considered as the rate of interest on working capital.

46. Necessary computation in support of interest on working capital is appended hereinbelow:—

(Rs. in lakh)

2009-2010 2010-2011 (12 months) Maintenance Spares 24.37 25.76 O&M expenses 13.54 14.31 Receivables 81.15 95.10 Total 119.05 135.18 Rate of Interest 12.25% 12.25% Interest 14.58 16.56

(Rs. in lakh)

Combined Asset-1&2 2010-2011 (pro-rata) 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Maintenance Spares 51.52 54.47 57.58 60.88 O&M expenses 28.62 30.26 31.99 33.82 Receivables 164.63 178.46 180.43 182.57 Total 244.77 263.19 270.00 277.27 Rate of Interest 11.00% 11.00% 11.00% 11.00% Interest 4.49 28.95 29.70 30.50

TRANSMISSION CHARGES

47. The transmission charges being allowed for the transmission lines are summarized below:—

(Rs. in lakh)

Asset-1 2009-2010 2010-2011 (12 months) 2010-2011 (pro-rata for 10 months) Depreciation 123.39 154.82 129.02 Interest on Loan 64.07 73.90 61.59 Return on equity 122.39 153.59 127.99 Interest on Working Capital 14.58 16.56 13.80 O&M Expenses 162.44 171.74 143.12 Total 486.87 570.62 475.51

(Rs. in lakh)

Combined Asset-1&2 2010-2011 (pro-rata) 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Depreciation 43.53 288.97 288.97 288.97 Interest on Loan 16.19 103.02 93.34 83.46 Return on equity 43.18 286.67 286.67 286.67 Interest on Working Capital 4.49 28.95 29.70 30.50 O&M Expenses 57.24 363.14 383.88 405.84 Total 164.63 1070.75 1082.57 1095.44

OTHER ISSUES

48. The petitioner has sought approval for the reimbursement of fee paid by it for filing the petition. In accordance with the Commission's decision in order dated 11.1.2010 in Petition No. 109/2009, the petitioner shall be entitled to recover the filing fee from the beneficiaries.

49. Accordingly, expenses incurred by the petitioner on petition filing fees and publication of notices in connection with the present petition shall be directly recovered from the beneficiaries on pro-rata basis.

50. The petitioner has made a specific prayer to be allowed to bill and recover the service tax on transmission charges separately from the respondents if it is subjected to such service tax in future. We consider the prayer pre-mature. The petitioner is at liberty to approach the Commission for any relief at the appropriate as per law.

51. As regards the prayer for reimbursement of licence fee, it is clarified that the same shall be dealt with in accordance with our order dated 25.10.2011 in Petition No. 21/2011 and 22/2011.

52. The transmission charges allowed shall be recovered on monthly basis in accordance with Regulation 23 and shared by the beneficiaries in accordance with Regulation 33 of the 2009 regulations upto 30.6.2011 With effect from 1.7.2011, the billing collection and disbursement of the transmission charges shall be governed by the provisions of Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Sharing of Inter-State Transmission Charges and Losses) Regulations, 2010 and the Removal of Difficulties orders issued thereunder.

53. This order disposes Petition No. 335/2010.

Annexure-1

(Rs. in lakh) Details of Loan 2009-2010 2010-2011 1 IBRD III Gross loan opening 1315.81 1315.81 Cumulative Repayment upto DOCO/previous year 0.00 0.00 Net Loan-Opening 1315.81 1315.81 Additions during the year 0.00 0.00 Repayment during the year 0.00 0.00 Net Loan-Closing 1315.81 1315.81 Average Loan 1315.81 1315.81 Rate of Interest 3.24% 3.24% Interest 42.63 42.63 Rep Schedule 30 half yearly installment from 15.09.2011 2 Bond XXVI Gross loan opening 14.00 14.00 Cumulative Repayment upto DOCO/previous year 0.00 0.00 Net Loan-Opening 14.00 14.00 Additions during the year 0.00 0.00 Repayment during the year 0.00 0.00 Net Loan-Closing 14.00 14.00 Average Loan 14.00 14.00 Rate of Interest 9.30% 9.30% Interest 1.30 1.30 Rep Schedule 12 annual installments from 07.03.2012 3 Bond XX Gross loan opening 13.00 13.00 Cumulative Repayment upto DOCO/previous year 0.00 0.00 Net Loan-Opening 13.00 13.00 Additions during the year 0.00 0.00 Repayment during the year 0.00 1.08 Net Loan-Closing 13.00 11.92 Average Loan 13.00 12.46 Rate of Interest 8.93% 8.93% Interest 1.16 1.11 Rep Schedule 12 annual installments from 07.09.2010 4 Bond XXI Gross loan opening 15.00 15.00 Cumulative Repayment upto DOCO/previous year 0.00 0.00 Net Loan-Opening 15.00 15.00 Additions during the year 0.00 0.00 Repayment during the year 0.00 1.25 Net Loan-Closing 15.00 13.75 Average Loan 15.00 14.38 Rate of Interest 8.73% 8.73% Interest 1.31 1.25 Rep Schedule 12 annual installments from 11.10.2010 5 Bond XXV Gross loan opening 103.00 103.00 Cumulative Repayment upto DOCO/previous year 0.00 0.00 Net Loan-Opening 103.00 103.00 Additions during the year 0.00 0.00 Repayment during the year 0.00 0.00 Net Loan-Closing 103.00 103.00 Average Loan 103.00 103.00 Rate of Interest 10.10% 10.10% Interest 10.40 10.40 Rep Schedule 12 annual installments from 12.06.2011 6 Bond XXVIII Gross loan opening 69.00 69.00 Cumulative Repayment upto DOCO/previous year 0.00 0.00 Net Loan-Opening 69.00 69.00 Additions during the year 0.00 0.00 Repayment during the year 0.00 0.00 Net Loan-Closing 69.00 69.00 Average Loan 69.00 69.00 Rate of Interest 9.33% 9.33% Interest 6.44 6.44 Rep Schedule 12 annual installments from 15.12.2012 7 IBRD III (Add Cap for 2009-2010 drwal on 15.05.2009) Gross loan opening 0.00 215.58 Cumulative Repayment upto DOCO/previous year 0.00 0.00 Net Loan-Opening 0.00 215.58 Additions during the year 215.58 0.00 Repayment during the year 0.00 0.00 Net Loan-Closing 215.58 215.58 Average Loan 107.79 215.58 Rate of Interest 3.24% 3.24% Interest 3.49 6.98 Rep Schedule 30 half yearly installment from 15.09.2011 8 IBRD III (Add Cap for 2010-2011 drwal on 01.04.2010) Gross loan opening 0.00 0.00 Cumulative Repayment upto DOCO/previous year 0.00 0.00 Net Loan-Opening 0.00 0.00 Additions during the year 0.00 39.73 Repayment during the year 0.00 0.00 Net Loan-Closing 0.00 39.73 Average Loan 0.00 19.87 Rate of Interest 1.82% 1.82% Interest 0.00 0.36 Rep Schedule 30 half yearly installment from 15.09.2011 Total Loan Gross loan opening 1529.81 1745.39 Cumulative Repayment upto DOCO/previous year 0.00 0.00 Net Loan-Opening 1529.81 1745.39 Additions during the year 215.58 39.73 Repayment during the year 0.00 2.33 Net Loan-Closing 1745.39 1782.79 Average Loan 1637.60 1764.09 Rate of Interest 4.0753% 3.9958% Interest 66.74 70.49

Annexure-2

(Rs. in lakh) Details of Loan 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 1 IBRD III Gross loan opening 1315.81 1315.81 1315.81 1315.81 Cumulative Repayment upto DOCO/previous year 0.00 0.00 64.03 130.86 Net Loan-Opening 1315.81 1315.81 1251.78 1184.95 Additions during the year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Repayment during the year 0.00 64.03 66.83 69.72 Net Loan-Closing 1315.81 1251.78 1184.95 1115.23 Average Loan 1315.81 1283.79 1218.37 1150.09 Rate of Interest 1.82% 1.82% 1.82% 1.82% Interest 23.95 23.37 22.17 20.93 Rep Schedule 30 half yearly installment from 15.09.2011 2 Bond XXVI Gross loan opening 62.00 62.00 62.00 62.00 Cumulative Repayment upto DOCO/previous year 0.00 0.00 5.17 10.33 Net Loan-Opening 62.00 62.00 56.83 51.67 Additions during the year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Repayment during the year 0.00 5.17 5.17 5.17 Net Loan-Closing 62.00 56.83 51.67 46.50 Average Loan 62.00 59.42 54.25 49.08 Rate of Interest 9.30% 9.30% 9.30% 9.30% Interest 5.77 5.53 5.05 4.56 Rep Schedule 12 annual installments from 07.03.2012 3 Bond XX Gross loan opening 49.00 49.00 49.00 49.00 Cumulative Repayment upto DOCO/previous year 4.08 4.08 8.17 12.25 Net Loan-Opening 44.92 44.92 40.83 36.75 Additions during the year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Repayment during the year 0.00 4.08 4.08 4.08 Net Loan-Closing 44.92 40.83 36.75 32.67 Average Loan 44.92 42.88 38.79 34.71 Rate of Interest 8.93% 8.93% 8.93% 8.93% Interest 4.01 3.83 3.46 3.10 Rep Schedule 12 annual installments from 07.09.2010 4 Bond XXI Gross loan opening 72.00 72.00 72.00 72.00 Cumulative Repayment upto DOCO/previous year 6.00 6.00 12.00 18.00 Net Loan-Opening 66.00 66.00 60.00 54.00 Additions during the year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Repayment during the year 0.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 Net Loan-Closing 66.00 60.00 54.00 48.00 Average Loan 66.00 63.00 57.00 51.00 Rate of Interest 8.73% 8.73% 8.73% 8.73% Interest 5.76 5.50 4.98 4.45 Rep Schedule 12 annual installments from 11.10.2010 5 Bond XXV Gross loan opening 206.00 206.00 206.00 206.00 Cumulative Repayment upto DOCO/previous year 0.00 0.00 17.17 34.33 Net Loan-Opening 206.00 206.00 188.83 171.67 Additions during the year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Repayment during the year 0.00 17.17 17.17 17.17 Net Loan-Closing 206.00 188.83 171.67 154.50 Average Loan 206.00 197.42 180.25 163.08 Rate of Interest 10.10% 10.10% 10.10% 10.10% Interest 20.81 19.94 18.21 16.47 Rep Schedule 12 annual installments from 12.06.2011 6 Bond XXVIII Gross loan opening 127.00 127.00 127.00 127.00 Cumulative Repayment upto DOCO/previous year 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.58 Net Loan-Opening 127.00 127.00 127.00 116.42 Additions during the year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Repayment during the year 0.00 0.00 10.58 10.58 Net Loan-Closing 127.00 127.00 116.42 105.83 Average Loan 127.00 127.00 121.71 111.13 Rate of Interest 9.33% 9.33% 9.33% 9.33% Interest 11.85 11.85 11.36 10.37 Rep Schedule 12 equal installments w.e.f 15.12.2012 7 IBRD III (Add Cap for 2009-2010 drwal on 15.05.2009) Gross loan opening 215.58 215.58 215.58 215.58 Cumulative Repayment upto DOCO/previous year 0.00 0.00 10.49 21.44 Net Loan-Opening 215.58 215.58 205.09 194.14 Additions during the year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Repayment during the year 0.00 10.49 10.95 11.42 Net Loan-Closing 215.58 205.09 194.14 182.72 Average Loan 215.58 210.33 199.61 188.43 Rate of Interest 1.82% 1.82% 1.82% 1.82% Interest 3.92 3.83 3.63 3.43 Rep Schedule 30 half yearly installment from 15.09.2011 8 IBRD III (Add Cap for 2010-2011 drwal on 01.04.2010) Gross loan opening 39.73 39.73 39.73 39.73 Cumulative Repayment upto DOCO/previous year 0.00 0.00 1.93 3.95 Net Loan-Opening 39.73 39.73 37.80 35.78 Additions during the year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Repayment during the year 0.00 1.93 2.02 2.11 Net Loan-Closing 39.73 37.80 35.78 33.67 Average Loan 39.73 38.76 36.79 34.73 Rate of Interest 1.82% 1.82% 1.82% 1.82% Interest 0.72 0.71 0.67 0.63 Rep Schedule 30 half yearly installment from 15.09.2011 9 IBRD III (Exchange Rate @ 46.26) Gross loan opening 1092.34 1092.34 1092.34 1092.34 Cumulative Repayment upto DOCO/previous year 0.00 0.00 53.16 108.63 Net Loan-Opening 1092.34 1092.34 1039.18 983.71 Additions during the year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Repayment during the year 0.00 53.16 55.48 57.88 Net Loan-Closing 1092.34 1039.18 983.71 925.83 Average Loan 1092.34 1065.76 1011.45 954.77 Rate of Interest 1.82% 1.82% 1.82% 1.82% Interest 19.88 19.40 18.41 17.38 Rep Schedule 30 half yearly installment from 15.09.2011 Total Loan Gross loan opening 3179.46 3179.46 3179.46 3179.46 Cumulative Repayment upto DOCO/previous year 10.08 10.08 172.11 350.38 Net Loan-Opening 3169.38 3169.38 3007.35 2829.08 Additions during the year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Repayment during the year 0.00 162.03 178.27 184.13 Net Loan-Closing 3169.38 3007.35 2829.08 2644.95 Average Loan 3169.38 3088.36 2918.21 2737.01 Rate of Interest 3.0501% 3.0417% 3.0132% 2.9713% Interest 96.67 93.94 87.93 81.33