- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
Pondicherry Institute Of Medical Sciences And Another v. Union Of India And Another
Factual and Procedural Background
The order concerns a writ petition involving permission for admission of the second batch of MBBS students against an increased intake (from 100 to 150) for the academic year 2015–2016 in respect of Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Pondicherry, under Pondicherry University, under Section 10-A of the IMC Act, 1956. During the proceedings, an interlocutory application seeking permission to file additional documents was moved and allowed. The Court was handed a communication dated 17-8-2015 evidencing a decision of the Executive Committee of the Medical Council of India (MCI) to renew the relevant permission.
Legal Issues Presented
The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues.
Arguments of the Parties
The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.
Table of Precedents Cited
No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.
Court's Reasoning and Analysis
The Court noted that the Additional Solicitor General handed over a copy of communication No. MCI-37(1)(RI-89)(UG)/2014-Med./127/90 dated 17-8-2015, which recorded that the MCI Executive Committee had decided to renew permission for admission of the second batch of MBBS students against the increased intake from 100 to 150 under Section 10-A of the IMC Act, 1956 for the academic year 2015–2016. A copy of the same communication was also provided to counsel for the Union of India.
On the basis that a resolution had been passed by MCI, the Court expressed an expectation that the Central Government would take an immediate decision on it, preferably within one week. The Court further recorded that MCI had taken its decision in the peculiar facts of the case, and concluded that the petitioner's grievance had been redressed.
Holding and Implications
DISPOSED OF: The writ petition was disposed of on the ground that, in light of MCI's decision to renew permission for the increased intake for 2015–2016, the petitioner's grievance stood redressed.
The direct effect of the order is that the proceedings ended without further adjudication on merits, while the Court recorded its expectation that the Central Government would decide on the MCI resolution preferably within one week. The order states that MCI acted in the peculiar facts of the case and does not indicate that any new precedent or broader legal principle was laid down.
Order
1. The interlocutory application for permission to file additional documents is allowed.
2. Mr Tushar Mehta, learned Additional Solicitor General, has handed over to us a copy of communication No. MCI-37(1)(RI-89)(UG)/2014-Med./127/90 dated 17-8-2015, which is addressed to the Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. In this communication, it is mentioned that the Executive Committee of the Medical Council of India (hereinafter referred to as “MCI”) in its meeting held on 17-8-2015, has decided to renew the permission for admission of second batch of MBBS students against the increased intake i.e. from 100 to 150 under Section 10-A of the IMC Act, 1956, in respect of Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Pondicherry, under the Pondicherry University for the academic year 2015-2016.
3. Ms Pinky Anand, learned Additional Solicitor General who is appearing for the Union of India, has also been handed over a copy of the said communication.
4. Once, this resolution is passed by MCI, we expect the Central Government to take immediate decision thereon preferably within one week.
5. We place on record that MCI has taken the aforesaid decision in the peculiar facts of this case. Since the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Court Masters
Alert