Queen-Empress v. Ram Sundar And Another

Edge, C.J and Blennerhassett, J.:— The offence of kidnapping for which Ram Sundar and Musammat Anupa have been committed for trial took place in Nepal. The charge was inquired into by a Magistrate in British India, and the commitment for an offence under s. 363 of the Indian Penal Code was made, but no certificate of the Political Agent in Nepal, which is required by the provisions of s. 188 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as a condition precedent to the hearing of the charge in British India, was produced or is shown to have been issued. The proviso to s. 188 is prohibitive, and under the circumstances, we hold that the Magistrate had no jurisdiction. We quash the commitment.