Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Commissioner Of Inco... v. Jafari Momin Vikas C...

Gujarat High Court
Jan 15, 2014
Smart Summary (Beta)

Factual and Procedural Background

The Revenue challenged the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) concerning whether a cooperative credit society (respondent assessee) was entitled to claim deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, despite the provisions of section 80P(4). The Assessing Officer denied the deduction based on section 80P(4), but the CIT(Appeals) and the Tribunal allowed the deduction, holding that the respondent was not a cooperative bank and thus excluded from the disallowance under section 80P(4). The Revenue appealed against this decision.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in allowing deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) to the assessee's society, even though the same is covered under section 80P(4) read with section 2(24)(viia) as income from providing credit facilities carried on by a cooperative society with its members?

Arguments of the Parties

Revenue's Arguments

  • The newly inserted subsection (4) of section 80P by Finance Act, 2006, excludes the respondent from claiming deduction because it is income from providing credit facilities by a cooperative society.
  • The respondent should not be eligible for deduction under section 80P as per the amended provisions.

Respondent Assessee's Arguments

  • The respondent is a cooperative credit society, not a cooperative bank, and therefore not covered by the exclusion in section 80P(4).
  • Section 80P(4) excludes only cooperative banks other than primary agricultural credit societies and primary cooperative agricultural and rural development banks, and the respondent does not fall within these definitions.
  • The CBDT Circular No. 133 of 2007 clarifies that section 80P(4) does not apply to cooperative credit societies which are not cooperative banks.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The court analyzed the scope of section 80P(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which excludes certain cooperative banks from claiming deductions under section 80P. The court noted that the respondent is a cooperative credit society, not a cooperative bank as defined in Part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The court considered the CBDT Circular No. 133 of 2007, which clarified that the exclusion under section 80P(4) applies only to cooperative banks and not to cooperative credit societies. Hence, the respondent society, being a cooperative credit society and not a cooperative bank, remains eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The court rejected the Revenue's contention that the exclusion should extend to cooperative credit societies as well.

Holding and Implications

The Tax Appeals are dismissed.

The direct effect of this decision is that the respondent cooperative credit society is entitled to claim deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court's decision clarifies that the exclusion under section 80P(4) applies strictly to cooperative banks as defined under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, and does not extend to cooperative credit societies. No new precedent was established beyond this clarification.

Show all summary ...

ORAL ORDER

(HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)

1. All the assessees' Tax Appeals involve identical question.

2. Revenue has challenged the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short “the Tribunal”) raising following question for our consideration:-

“Whether the Hon'ble Tribunal is correct in allowing deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee's society even though same is covered under section 80P(4) rws 2(24)(viia) being income from providing credit facilities carried on by a co-operative society with its member?”

3. Issue pertains to interpretation of section 80P(2) and 80P(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1964 (“the Act” for short). Respondent assessee is a Cooperative Credit Society and claims benefit of deduction under section 80P(1) of the Act by virtue of the provisions contained in section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. As is well known under sub-section(1) of section 80P certain co-operative societies are granted deductions of the sum specified in sub-section(2) in computing the total income. As per section 80P(2)(a)(i), the sums referred in sub-section(1) would be in case of a co-operative society engaged in carrying on the business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members the whole of the amount of profits and gains of business attributable to any one or more of such activities. Revenue, however, contends that by virtue of newly amended sub-section(4) of section 80P inserted with effect from 1.4.2007 by Finance Act, 2006, section 80P would not apply to the respondent assessee. Section 80P(4) in the present form refers as under:-

“(4) The provisions of this section shall not apply in relation to any co-operative bank other than a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank. Explanation-For the purposes of this subsection,-

(a) “co-operative bank” and “primary agricultural credit society” shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in Part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949);

(b) “primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank” means a society having its area of operation confined to a taluk and the principal object of which is to provide for long-term credit for agricultural and rural development activities.”

4. As per section 80P(4), the provisions of section 80P would not apply in relation to any co-operative bank other than primary agricultural credit society or primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank. As per the explanation, the terms “co-operative bank” and “primary agricultural credit society” shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in Part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

5. Assessing Officer held that by virtue of section 80P(4), the respondent assessee would not be entitled to benefits of deduction under section 80P. CIT(Appeals) as well as the Tribunal reversed the decision of the Assessing Officer on the premise that the respondent assessee not being a bank, exclusion provided in sub-section(4) of section 80P would not apply. This, irrespective of the fact that the respondent would not fall within the expression “primary agricultural credit society”.

6. Had this been the plain statutory provisions under consideration in isolation, in our opinion, the question of law could be stated to have arisen. When, as contended by the assessee, by virtue of subsection(4) only co-operative banks other than those mentioned therein were meant to be excluded for the purpose of deduction under section 80P, a question would arise why then Legislature specified primary agricultural credit societies along with primary cooperative agricultural and rural development banks for exclusion from such exclusion and in other words, continued to hold such entity as eligible for deduction. However, the issue has been considerably simplified by virtue of CBDT circular No. 133 of 2007 dated 9.5.2007 Circular provides as under:-

“Subject: Clarification regarding admissibly of deduction under section 80P of the Income-Tax Act, 1961.

1. Please refer to your letter no. DCUS/30688/2007, dated 28.03.2007 addressed to Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes, on the above given subject.

2. In this regard, I have been directed to state that sub-section(4) of section 80P provides that deduction under the said section shall not be allowable to any co-operative bank other than a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank. For the purpose of the said sub-section, co-operative bank shall have the meaning assigned to it in part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

3. In part V of the Banking Regulation Act, “Co-operative Bank” means a State Co-operative bank, a Central Co-operative Bank and a primary Co-operative bank.

4. Thus, if the Delhi Co op Urban T & C Society Ltd. does not fall within the meaning of “Co-operative Bank” as defined in part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, subsection(4) of section 80P will not apply in this case.

5. The issues with the approval of Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes.”

7. From the above clarification, it can be gathered that sub-section(4) of section 80P will not apply to an assessee which is not a co-operative bank. In the case clarified by CBDT, Delhi Coop Urban Thrift & Credit Society Ltd. was under consideration. Circular clarified that the said entity not being a cooperative bank, section 80P(4) of the Act would not apply to it. In view of such clarification, we cannot entertain the Revenue's contention that section 80P(4) would exclude not only the co-operative banks other than those fulfilling the description contained therein but also credit societies, which are not cooperative banks. In the present case, respondent assessee is admittedly not a credit co-operative bank but a credit co-operative society. Exclusion clause of sub-section(4) of section 80P, therefore, would not apply. In the result, Tax Appeals are dismissed.