- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
Marana Goundan v. Emperor
The appellant has been convicted under S. 304 (2) of the I.P.C for causing the death of one Karuppa Chuckli by kicking him on the abdomen and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for 7 years.
The deceased owed one anna to the appellant and the latter demanded repayment. The deceased promised to pay later and the appellant is stated to have kicked him twice on the abdomen remarking “How long am I to wait”. The deceased collapsed and died soon after.
The cause of death was shock due to the kicking and P.W 7 a disinterested witness, not to mention P.W 4 the widow, speak to the alleged kicking. P.W 5 was informed about it soon after and the story of the appellant that he merely pushed the deceased and went away is incredible. But there was no mark of injury, external or internal, and it is difficult to hold that the appellant intended or knew that by kicking on the abdomen as he did, he was likely to endanger life. The conviction under S. 304 (2) I.P.C is therefore unsustainable and as rightly conceded the conviction can only be under S. 323, I.P.C The conviction of the appellant is therefore altered to one under S. 313 I.P.C and he is sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year.
N.T.R
Alert