- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
P.J Narayan v. Union Of India And Others
Factual and Procedural Background
This opinion disposes of a writ petition seeking a direction to an insurance company to delete a clause in an insurance policy. The clause stated that, in cases involving compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, the insurance company would not be liable to pay interest. The court considered the petition and dismissed it, with no order as to costs.
Legal Issues Presented
- Whether a court can direct an insurance company to delete a contractual policy clause excluding the insurer’s liability to pay interest on compensation awarded under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, in the absence of a statute imposing such liability on the insurer.
Arguments of the Parties
The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.
Table of Precedents Cited
No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.
Court's Reasoning and Analysis
The court found no merit in the writ petition on the basis that the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 places statutory liability on the employer, not on the insurance company. It emphasized that insurance is a matter of contract between the insurer and the insured, and that the insurer is free to refuse to insure.
On this contractual footing, the court held that the insurer is also entitled to stipulate—by contract—that it will not assume liability for interest. In the absence of any statutory provision requiring insurers to bear interest liability, the court concluded that insurers cannot be compelled by courts to undertake liabilities they do not wish to assume.
Holding and Implications
DISMISSED: The writ petition seeking deletion of the policy clause excluding the insurer’s liability to pay interest was dismissed.
The direct effect is that the contractual clause remains in force, and the insurance company cannot be compelled (through this writ petition) to cover interest liability for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 absent statutory mandate. The opinion does not indicate any broader implications or creation of new precedent beyond resolving the parties’ dispute.
No order as to costs.
Order
This writ petition is for the purposes of directing the insurance company to delete the clause in the insurance policy which provides that in cases of compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, the insurance company will not be liable to pay interest. We see no substance in the writ petition. There is no statutory liability on the insurance company. The statutory liability under the Workmen's Compensation Act is on the employer. An insurance is a matter of contract between the insurance company and the insured. It is always open to the insurance company to refuse to insure. Similarly, they are entitled to provide by contract that they will not take on liability for interest. In the absence of any statute to that effect, insurance companies cannot be forced by courts to take on liabilities which they do not want to take on. The writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Alert