- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Haryana v. Karnal Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd. .
Factual and Procedural Background
The assessee deposited money to open a letter of credit for purchasing machinery required to set up its plant under an agreement with the supplier. Interest was earned on the money so deposited. The matter reached the Court in appeal; leave was granted and the appeal was heard and decided by this order.
Legal Issues Presented
- Whether interest earned on funds deposited to open a letter of credit for the purchase of plant and machinery (for setting up a plant) is to be treated as income from idle/surplus funds, or as incidental to the acquisition of assets for setting up the plant.
- Whether the principle in Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT applies, or whether the case is governed by CIT v. Bokaro Steel Plant, given the link between the deposit and acquisition of assets.
Arguments of the Parties
The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.
Table of Precedents Cited
| Precedent | Rule or Principle Cited For | Application by the Court |
|---|---|---|
| Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT (1997) 6 SCC 117, (1997) 227 ITR 172 | Principle concerning interest earned on surplus share capital money lying idle and deposited for earning interest. | Held inapplicable because the deposit here was not idle surplus; it was directly linked to purchasing machinery for setting up the plant. |
| CIT v. Bokaro Steel Plant (1999) 1 SCC 645, (1999) 236 ITR 315 | Principle treating receipts/income as incidental to acquisition/setting up of assets where directly linked to such activity. | Held to be the more appropriate authority on the facts, since the interest arose from a deposit directly linked to acquisition of plant and machinery. |
Court's Reasoning and Analysis
The Court distinguished between (i) interest earned on surplus funds lying idle and placed in a bank to earn interest, and (ii) interest earned on funds deposited for a specific, integral purpose connected with acquiring capital assets. It found that the assessee’s deposit was made to open a letter of credit required for purchasing machinery to set up the plant, and thus was directly linked to the acquisition of plant and machinery. Any interest earned on such a deposit was treated as incidental to acquiring assets for setting up the plant. On this factual characterization, the ratio of Tuticorin Alkali was held not to apply, and Bokaro Steel Plant was treated as governing.
Holding and Implications
APPEAL DISMISSED.
The Court upheld the view that the interest earned on the letter-of-credit deposit (being directly linked to purchase of machinery for setting up the plant) was incidental to acquisition of assets, and therefore the Tuticorin Alkali principle for idle surplus funds did not apply. There was no order as to costs. The order applies these existing precedents to the facts and does not indicate that any new legal principle was laid down.
Order
1. Leave granted.
2. In the present case the assessee had deposited money to open a letter of credit for the purchase of the machinery required for setting up its plant in terms of the assessee's agreement with the supplier. It was on the money so deposited that some interest has been earned. This is, therefore, not a case where any surplus share capital money which is lying idle has been deposited in the bank for the purpose of earning interest. The deposit of money in the present case is directly linked with the purchase of plant and machinery. Hence, any income earned on such deposit is incidental to the acquisition of assets for the setting up of the plant and machinery. In this view of the matter the ratio laid down by this Court in Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT (1997) 6 SCC 117, (1997) 227 ITR 172 will not be attracted. The more appropriate decision in the factual situation in the present case is one CIT v. Bokaro Steel Plant (1999) 1 SCC 645, (1999) 236 ITR 315. The appeal is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.
Alert