Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Raja Ram Kulwant Rai v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

Punjab & Haryana High Court
May 28, 1997
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Smart Summary (Beta)

Structured Summary of the Opinion

Factual and Procedural Background

The petitioner is a commission agent operating at Mansa. The original assessment for assessment year 1988–89 was completed on a taxable income of Rs. 1,78,040 on 28 February 1989. Subsequently, a notice under Section 148 dated 21 February 1992 was issued; in response the petitioner filed a return declaring net taxable income of Rs. 97,060, but the Assessing Officer assessed taxable income at Rs. 10,00,070. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Batinda, by order dated 23 February 1995 set aside that assessment and remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer with directions. The Assessing Officer did not pass a fresh order for 1988–89; the assessment for that year on income of Rs. 1,11,350 became final as no appeal was taken against it.

Search and seizure operations in the petitioner’s case were conducted on 5 December 1995. Because the search was after 30 June 1995, Chapter XIV-B applied and a notice under Section 158BC was issued on 12 February 1996. The petitioner filed the prescribed return (Form No. 2-B) for the block period 1 April 1985 to 5 December 1995 declaring undisclosed income as nil. The Assessing Officer computed aggregate income for the block period and arrived at undisclosed income of Rs. 1,15,702.

Despite the block assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer issued notices under Section 143(2) dated 20 January 1997 relating to assessment years 1988–89 and 1989–90 (annexures P-4 and P-5) requiring attendance on 30 January 1997. The petitioner objected, contending that once a block assessment had been framed under Section 158BC, the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to issue notices under Section 143(2) for years covered by that block period; the Assessing Officer continued proceedings and required appearance on 4 March 1997 (annexure P-8). The petitioner challenged those notices and the communication directing attendance before the assessing authority.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether the Income-tax Officer can issue a notice under Section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for an assessment year which is covered by the "block period" under Section 158B and in respect of which assessment has already been framed under Section 158BC.

Arguments of the Parties

Petitioner's Arguments

  • After completion of assessment for the ten-year block period under Section 158BC (Chapter XIV-B), the Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction to issue notices under Section 143(2) in relation to returns filed earlier for years included in that block.
  • Once the collective block assessment was framed, the year-wise incomes (including both income already assessed and concealed income) had been determined and pending assessments for those years stood merged in the block assessment under Section 158BC(c).
  • The Assessing Officer should therefore drop proceedings initiated by the Section 143(2) notices for the relevant years.

Respondent's Arguments

  • The basic facts of search and block assessment were admitted, but the respondent contended that assessment for assessment year 1989–90 had not become final because a notice under Section 148 had been issued on 19 May 1994 and a return filed on 17 June 1994, with assessment proceedings still pending.
  • The respondent asserted that notices under Section 143(2) for 1988–89 and 1989–90 were valid because concealment of income had been detected by the Department before the date of the search; therefore the Department could not be precluded by the block assessment regime where concealment detection predated the search.
  • It was pointed out that an assessment order for 1988–89 had been passed on 15 March 1994 (before the search of 5 December 1995), implying detection of concealment earlier than the search date.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The court examined the statutory scheme introduced by the Finance Bill, 1995: Chapter XIV-B (Sections 158BA, 158BB, 158BC and related provisions) which creates a special procedure for assessment of undisclosed income detected as a result of searches under Section 132 or requisitions under Section 132A after 30 June 1995. The Notes on Clauses for the Finance Bill explain that undisclosed income found on such searches is to be assessed separately as income of a ten-year block period, and the court reproduced that note.

The court set out the salient features of Chapter XIV-B as reflected in the statute:

  • Undisclosed income detected from a search after 30 June 1995 is to be aggregated and assessed as income of a block period covering the ten previous years preceding the year of search and the part of the year up to the date of search.
  • The total undisclosed income of the block period is to be taxed at a flat rate (cited in the opinion as 60%).
  • Section 158BB prescribes how undisclosed income for the block period is to be computed: by aggregating total incomes of the years within the block as computed under Chapter IV on the basis of evidence found as a result of the search/requisition and then reducing the aggregate by the aggregate of total income already returned/assessed for those years; it also provides that, where assessments under Section 143/144/147 have been concluded, those assessments form the basis for computation.
  • Section 158BC prescribes procedural steps: service of a notice requiring a return for the block period (no Section 148 notice required), application of provisions of Section 142 and certain provisions of Sections 143 and 144 mutatis mutandis, and passing of a block assessment order determining tax payable on the undisclosed income.

The court emphasized Section 158BA's non obstante clause that mandates block assessment procedure for searches after 30 June 1995 "notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this Act." From this framework the court inferred that once a block assessment has been framed under Section 158BC in respect of the block period, the income of any year covered by that block period cannot thereafter be determined afresh under other provisions; pending assessments of those years stand merged in the collective block assessment under Section 158BC(c).

The court analyzed the function of Section 143(2): it permits the Assessing Officer to call upon an assessee to attend or produce evidence to ensure that returns do not understate income. However, allowing the Assessing Officer to proceed under Section 143(2) in respect of years that are already subject to a block assessment under Chapter XIV-B would defeat the special procedure and purpose of Chapter XIV-B. The court reasoned that the scheme of Chapter XIV-B was to subsume determination of undisclosed income for the block period into a single procedure and outcome; permitting separate assessments (or further inquiries under Section 143) in respect of the same years would amount to framing two assessments for the same assessment year, which cannot be permitted.

Applying those statutory principles to the facts, the court concluded that notices under Section 143(2) and related communications issued in respect of assessment years that fell within the block period (and after the block assessment procedure had been invoked and framed) were without jurisdiction. The court further held that notices under Section 148 which were issued prior to framing of the block assessment were rendered infructuous once the block assessment under Chapter XIV-B was framed.

Holding and Implications

Core Ruling: The petition was accepted and the impugned notices — annexures P-4, P-5 and P-8 — were quashed as being without jurisdiction and unsustainable in law.

Implications (direct effect as expressed in the opinion):

  • The Assessing Officer cannot, by issuing notices under Section 143(2), proceed to assess the income of an assessment year that has already been covered and determined under a block assessment framed under Chapter XIV-B (Section 158BC).
  • Pending or earlier notices issued under Section 148 prior to framing of the block assessment are rendered infructuous once the block assessment is framed under Chapter XIV-B.
  • The immediate consequence for the parties is that the specific notices and communication challenged in the petition were quashed. The court ordered no costs.

The opinion frames and applies the statutory rule that block assessments under Chapter XIV-B are intended to be exclusive and preclusive of separate assessments for the same years; the decision quashes the particular notices challenged on that statutory basis.

Show all summary ...

1. An important question which falls for consideration in this petition is -

"Whether the Income-tax Officer can issue notice under Section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for an assessment year which is covered by the "block period" under Section 158B regarding which assessment has already been framed under Section 158BC ?"

2. The facts giving rise to this question are :

The assessee-petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner) is a commission agent at Mansa. The original assessment for the year 1988-89 was completed on a taxable income of Rs. 1,78,040 on February 28, 1989. In response to the notice dated February 21, 1992, issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), for the income escaping assessment on February 21, 1992, the petitioner filed its return of income declaring the net taxable income of Rs. 97,060. The assessing authority assessed the taxable income at Rs. 10,00,070. The petitioner challenged the said assessment order in appeal before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Batinda, who vide its order dated February 23, 1995, set aside the assessment order and remitted the case to the Assessing Officer with certain directions and to pass a fresh order in accordance with the directions issued.

3. The assessing authority did not pass any fresh order for the assessment year 1988-89. For the assessment year 1988-89, the assessing authority had completed the assessment on an income of Rs. 1,11,350 which became final as no appeal was carried against that assessment order to the appellate authority.

4. On December 5, 1995, search and seizure operations in the case of the petitioner firm were conducted. As the provisions of Chapter XIV-B of the Act were applicable to the search having been initiated after June 30, 1995, notice under Section 158BC of the Act was issued on February 12, 1996. The return in Form No. 2-B for the block period April 1, 1985, to December 5, 1995, was filed declaring undisclosed income at nil. The assessing authority computed the total income including the undisclosed income for the block period from April 1, 1985, to December 5, 1995, as under;

Previous year Income already declared Aggregation of total income including undisclosed income for the block period 1985-86 17,120 17,120 1986-87 72,410 72,410 1987-88 1,14,772 1,14,772 1988-89 1,13,720 1,13,720 1989-90 1,11,350 1,11,350 1990-91 88,040 88,040 1991-92 1,38,030 1,38,030 1992-93 39,680 39,680 1993-94 45,568 45,368 1994-95 34,620 34,620 1995-96

Addition as discussed 1,15,702 1,15,702 Aggregate of total income including undisclosed income for the block period 8,90,804 Less : Income returned for the previous year 7,75,102 Undisclosed income for the block period 1,15,702."

5. The assessing authority thereafter issued notice under Section 143(2) of the Act dated January 20, 1997, relating to the assessment years 1988-89 and 1989-90 calling upon the petitioner to attend the office of the assessing authority on January 30,1997, as the assessing authority required certain information in connection with the return of income for the said years. Copies of the said notices have been attached as annexures P-4 and P-5. The petitioner filed detailed reply objecting to the issuance of notice under Section 143(2), inter alia, on the ground that assessment having already been completed under Section 158BC(c) of the Act for the block period of ten years which covers the years in question, the assessing authority had no jurisdiction to issue notice under Section 143(2) of the Act. After framing of the assessment, the income of any of the years covered by the block period could not be determined afresh as all pending assessments of those years stood merged in the collective assessment under Section 158BC{c) of the Act. It was prayed that proceedings started with the issuance of notice under Section 143(2) be dropped. The objections filed by the petitioner were not accepted. The assessing authority continued the proceedings and asked the petitioner to appear before it on March 4, 1997. A copy of the communication dated February 12, 1997, is attached as annexure P-8.

6. The petitioner has challenged the impugned notices under Section 143(2), annexures P-4 and P-5, and the communication, annexure P-8, requiring the petitioner to appear before the assessing authority on March 4, 1997, in response to the notices, annexures P-4 and P-5.

7. The case of the petitioner in a nutshell is that after completion of the assessment for a block period of ten years under Section 158BC of the newly introduced Chapter XIV-B of the Act, which included the assessment years 1988-89 and 1989-90, the assessing authority had no jurisdiction to issue notice under Section 143(2) of the Act in relation to the return filed earlier.

8. The written statement has been filed. The facts as regards the search and seizure and framing of assessment for the block years including the. years in question are admitted. The facts given in respect of the assessment year 1988-89 are accepted to be correct. So far as the assessment year 1989-90 is concerned, the stand taken by the respondent is that assessment for the assessment year 1989-90 had not become final because as per assessment records notice under Section 148 was issued and served upon the petitioner on May 19, 1994, for filing of the return. In compliance with the said notice, the return was duly filed by the assessee on June 17, 1994, and the assessment proceedings in pursuance of notice under Section 148 were still pending. It has been denied that notices issued under Section 143(2) for the assessment years 1988-89 and 1989-90, are without jurisdiction. It has been asserted that the same are validly issued because concealment of income was detected by the Department before the date of search. The assessment order for the assessment year 1988-89 was passed on March 15, 1994, while the search took place on December 5, 1995. Once the Department has detected the concealment in the assessee's case, it cannot be covered under the block assessment as the provisions applicable in the two cases are entirely different.

9. Counsel for the parties have been heard.

10. The Finance Bill of 1995 inserted a new Chapter XIV-B in the Act. It provides a new concept for assessment in relation to searches conducted under Section 132 of the Act or requisition made under Section 132A after June 30, 1995. The purpose of enactment of this Chapter was to make the procedure of assessment of search cases more effective. The purpose as given in Clause 32 of the Notes on Clauses of the Finance Bill, 1995 (see [1995] 212 ITR (St.) 306 reads as under :

" In order to make the procedure of assessment of search or requisition cases effective, it is proposed to introduce new provisions for assessment of undisclosed income detected as a result of search or requisition. Under the new provisions, the undisclosed income detected as a result of search initiated or requisition made after June 30, 1995, shall be assessed separately as income of a block of ten previous years. Where the previous year has not ended or the due date for filing a return of income for any previous year has not expired, the income recorded on or before the date of search or requisition in the books of account or other documents maintained in the normal course relating to such previous years will not be included in that block."

11. The salient features of Chapter XIV-B are that the total undisclosed income of a person shall be assessed as the income of a block period consisting of previous years relevant to ten assessment years preceding the previous year in which the search was conducted or requisition was made and also the period of the current previous year up to the date of the search or the requisition. The undisclosed income of the block period is to be taxed at a flat rate of 60 per cent, as given in Section 113. The order of assessment for the block period is to be passed within one year from the end of the month in which the last authorisation for the search or the requisition was executed. Prior to insertion of Chapter XIV-B estimation of the undisclosed income was made in a summary manner under Sections 132{5) and 132(7). Chapter XIV-B was in substitution of Section 132(5) with an extension of scope.

12. "Block period" as defined in Section 158B means the previous years relevant to ten assessment years preceding the previous year in which the search was conducted under Section 132 or any requisition was made under Section 132A, and includes, in the previous year in which such search was conducted or requisition made, the period up to the date of the commencement of such search or, as the case may be, the date of such requisition. The definition of "undisclosed income" includes any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing or any income based on any entry in the books of account or other documents or transactions, where such money, bullion, jewellery, valuable article, thing, entry in the books of account or other document or transaction represents wholly or partly income or property which has not been or would not have been disclosed for the purposes of this Act. Section 158BA provides that notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this Act, where after the June 30, 1995, a search is initiated under Section 132 or books of account, other documents or any assets are requisitioned under Section 132A in the case of any person, then, the Assessing Officer shall proceed to assess the undisclosed income in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XIV-B. The total undisclosed income relating to the block period was to be assessed at a flat rate of 60 per cent.

13. Section 158BB of the Act reads as under :

" 158BB. Computation of undisclosed income of the block period. -

(1) The undisclosed income of the block period shall be the aggregate of the total income of the previous years falling within the block period computed, in accordance with the provisions of Chapter IV, on the basis of evidence found as a result of search or requisition of books of account or documents and such other materials or information as are available with the Assessing Officer, as reduced by the aggregate of the total income, or, as the case may be, as increased by the aggregate of the losses of such previous years, determined, --

(a) where assessments under Section 143 or Section 144 or Section 147 have been concluded, on the basis of such assessments ;

(b) where returns of income have been filed under Section 139 or Section 147 but assessments have not been made till the date of search or requisition, on the basis of the income disclosed in such returns ;

(c) where the due date for filing a return of income has expired but no return of income has been filed, as nil ;

(d) where the previous year has not ended or the date of filing the return of income under Sub-section (1) of Section 139 has not expired, on the basis of entries relating to such income or transactions as recorded in the books of account and other documents maintained in the normal course on or before the date of the search or requisition relating to such previous years ;

(e) where any order of settlement has been made under Subsection (4) of Section 245D, on the basis of such order ;

(f) where an assessment of undisclosed income had been made earlier under Clause (c) of Section 158BC, on the basis of such assessment ;

Explanation. -- For the purposes of determination of undisclosed income -

(a) the total income or loss of each previous year shall, for the purpose of aggregation, be taken as the total income or loss computed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter IV without giving effect to set off of brought forward losses under Chapter VI or unabsorbed depreciation under Sub-section (2) of Section 32 ;

(b) of a firm, returned income and total income assessed for each of the previous years falling within the block period shall be the income determined before allowing deduction of salary, interest, commission, bonus or remuneration by whatever name called :

Provided that undisclosed income of the firm so determined shall not be chargeable to tax in the hands of the partners, whether on allocation or on account of enhancement ;

(c) assessment under Section 143 includes determination of income under Sub-section (1) or Sub-section (1B) of Section 143.

(2) In computing the undisclosed income of the block period, the provisions of sections 68, 69, 69a, 69b and 69C shall, so far as may be, apply and references to 'financial year' in those Sections shall be construed as references to the relevant previous year falling in the block period including the previous year ending with the date of search or of the requisition.

(3) The burden of proving to the satisfaction of the Assessing Officer that any undisclosed income had already been disclosed in any return of income filed by the assessee before the commencement of search or of the requisition, as the case may be, shall be on the assessee.

(4) For the purpose of assessment under this Chapter, losses brought forward from the previous year under Chapter VI or unabsorbed depreciation under Sub-section (2) of Section 32 shall not be set off against the undisclosed income determined in the block assessment under this Chapter, but may be carried forward for being set off in the regular assessments."

14. Procedure for block assessment is given under Section 158BC of the Act, which is reproduced below :

" 158BC. Procedure for block assessment. --Where any search has been conducted under Section 132 or books of account, other documents or assets are requisitioned under Section 132A, in the case of any person, then, --

(a) the Assessing Officer shall serve a notice to such person requiring him to furnish, within such time, not being less than fifteen days, as may be specified in the notice, a return in the prescribed form and verified in the same manner as a return under Clause (i) of Sub-section (1) of Section 142, setting forth his total income including the undisclosed income for the block period :

Provided that no notice under Section 148 is required to be issued for the purposes of proceeding under this Chapter ;

(b) the Assessing Officer shall proceed to determine the undisclosed income of the block period in the manner laid down in Section 158BB and the provisions of Section 142, Sub-sections (2) and (3) of Section 143 and Section 144 shall, so far as may be, apply ;

(c) the Assessing Officer, on determination of the undisclosed income of the block period in accordance with this Chapter, shall pass an order of assessment and determine the tax payable by him on the basis of such assessment ;

(d) the assets seized under Section 132 or requisitioned under Section 132A shall be retained to the extent necessary and the provisions; of Section 132B shall apply subject to such modification as may be necessary and the references to 'regular assessment' or 'reassessment' in Section 132B shall be construed as references to 'block assessment'."

15. A perusal of this Section would show that the Assessing Officer has to serve a notice to the concerned person requiring him to furnish within a specified time (not less than fifteen days) in the notice, a return in the prescribed form setting forth his total income including the undisclosed income for the block period. No notice under Section 148 is required to be issued for the purposes of proceeding under Chapter XIV-B. The Assessing Officer thereafter shall proceed to determine the undisclosed income of the block period in the manner laid down in Section 158BB. The Assessing Officer on determination of the undisclosed income of the block period in accordance with Chapter XIV-B then passes an order of assessment and determines the tax payable by the assessee on the basis of such assessment of the undisclosed income of the block period.

16. The purpose of introduction of Chapter XIV-B is that the undisclosed income detected as a result of any search initiated or any requisition made after June 30, 1995, shall be assessed separately as the income of the block years. Special procedure was introduced for framing of assessment of search cases. Section 158BA starts with a non obstante Clause that notwithstanding anything contained in any other provisions of the Act after June 30, 1995, cases arising out of search and seizure under Section 132 shall be assessed in accordance with the newly introduced Chapter XIV-B. Once an assessment is framed qua a particular year falling within the block period of ten years then, no other assessment under any other provisions of the Act can be framed.

17. The income of each of the ten years prior to the year of search, that is, including the assessment years 1988-89 and 1989-90 had already been determined separately under two heads : (1) income already assessed, and (ii) concealed income. The income of the assessment years 1988-89 and 1989-90 did not remain to be determined after determination of year wise income and pending assessments of those years stood merged in the collective assessment under Section 158BC(c) of the Act. Once the income of the assessment years 1988-89, 1989-90 has been determined taking into account the income already assessed and concealed income which includes the years in question, no assessment remained to be framed. Once the assessment has been framed it can only be reopened by issuing notice under Section 147/148 where income has escaped assessment or as a result of search and seizure under Section 132. Notices issued under Section 148 prior to the search were rendered infructuous after the framing of the assessment for the block period of ten years under Chapter XIV-B. The Department could not proceed on the basis of notices issued under Section 148 prior to the framing of assessment under Chapter XIV-B.

18. Under Section 143(2), the Assessing Officer can issue notice in case he deems it necessary or expedient where a return has been filed under Section 139 or in response to a notice under Section 142(1) to ensure that the assesssee has not understated the income or has not computed excessive loss or has not underpaid the tax in any manner, serve on the assessee a notice requiring him, on a date to be specified therein, either to attend his office or to produce, or cause to be produced there, any evidence on which the assessee may rely in support of the return. The purpose of introducing of Chapter XIV-B which provides for special procedure for framing of assessment orders for a block period of ten years would be lost if the Assessing Officer is allowed to proceed under Section 143 on a return filed under Section 139 or in response to a notice under Section 142(1). Certainly two assessments cannot be framed for the same assessment year on an assessee. Once an assessment has been framed for a block period under Section 158BC which includes the years in question, the Income-tax Officer stands debarred from framing an assessment under Section 143 on the basis of returns already filed under Section 139.

19. After framing of assessment under Section 158BC for a block period of ten years, income of any year covered by any block period could not be determined afresh as all pending assessments of those years stood merged in the collective assessment under Section 158BC(c) of the Act.

20. The action taken by the respondent-authorities is indefensible and cannot be sustained. The assessee could not be assessed twice over for the same assessment year by framing two assessments, one under Chapter XIV-B in the case of search and the other under Chapter XIV in the course of assessment framed in the ordinary course.

21. For the reasons stated above, we accept this petition and quash the impugned notices annexures P-4, P-5 and P-8 being without jurisdiction and unsustainable in law. No costs.