- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
P.S Rajan v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Factual and Procedural Background
The appellant, an assessee under the Income-tax Act, 1961, held 255 equity shares of SISCO Ltd. Essar Shipping Ltd. (ESSAR), part of the Essar group, made an open offer to acquire shares of SISCO Ltd., offering Rs. 65 in cash plus 50 equity shares of ESSAR (face value Rs. 10 each) per share of SISCO. The appellant sold his 255 shares pursuant to this offer and received 12,750 ESSAR shares and Rs. 16,575 in cash.
For the assessment year 1992-93, the appellant declared capital gains based on the face value of ESSAR shares (Rs. 10 per share), totaling Rs. 1,27,500. The assessing authority rejected this, valuing ESSAR shares at Rs. 72 per share, computing higher capital gains. The first appellate authority accepted the appellant’s computation, but the Tribunal set the value of ESSAR shares at Rs. 38.50 and directed the assessing authority to compute capital gains accordingly. The appellant challenged this order before the Court.
Legal Issues Presented
- Whether the full value of consideration for the transfer of shares should be taken as the face value of ESSAR shares received or their market value.
- Whether the Tribunal erred in adopting Rs. 38.50 as the market value of ESSAR shares instead of the face value of Rs. 10 or the assessing authority’s valuation of Rs. 72.
Arguments of the Parties
Appellant's Arguments
- The value of consideration for the sale of SISCO shares is as specified in the offer: 50 ESSAR shares at face value Rs. 10 each plus Rs. 65 in cash per share.
- The market price mentioned in the offer is only to demonstrate ESSAR’s creditworthiness, not to determine the value for capital gains computation.
- Relied on Supreme Court decisions in CIT v. George Henderson and Co. Ltd. and CIT v. Gillanders Arbuthnot and Co. to support that the agreed price between parties governs the valuation.
Respondent's Arguments
- The Tribunal’s valuation at Rs. 38.50 per ESSAR share was appropriate and consistent with Supreme Court and Andhra Pradesh High Court precedents.
- Relied on the decision in Motors and General Stores (P.) Ltd. v. CIT and its affirmation by the Supreme Court in CIT v. Motors and General Stores (P.) Ltd. to support valuation based on market price where price is not specified in cash terms.
Table of Precedents Cited
| Precedent | Rule or Principle Cited For | Application by the Court |
|---|---|---|
| CIT v. George Henderson and Co. Ltd., [1967] 66 ITR 622 (SC) | Full value of consideration is the price agreed by the parties. | Referenced by appellant to support valuation based on agreed price rather than market value. |
| CIT v. Gillanders Arbuthnot and Co., [1973] 87 ITR 407 | Principle that agreed price governs valuation for capital gains. | Relied upon by appellant to argue against market value adoption. |
| Motors and General Stores (P.) Ltd. v. CIT, [1967] 66 ITR 701 (AP) | Where value of shares is not specified in cash, market value must be used. | Applied by Tribunal and respondent to justify Rs. 38.50 market value adoption. |
| CIT v. Motors and General Stores (P.) Ltd., [1967] 66 ITR 692 (SC) | Affirmation of market value principle where price not specified in cash. | Supported Tribunal’s approach to valuation of ESSAR shares. |
Court's Reasoning and Analysis
The Court examined the terms of the open offer made by ESSAR, noting the consideration included both cash and shares. The offer explicitly stated the market price of ESSAR shares as Rs. 38.50 at the Madras Stock Exchange, and that the offer price exceeded the highest market price of SISCO shares in the preceding six months. The Court rejected the appellant’s argument that the face value of Rs. 10 per ESSAR share should be used, clarifying that the face value merely identifies the shares and does not represent their true value.
The Court found no material evidence supporting the assessing authority’s valuation of Rs. 72 per ESSAR share. The first appellate authority’s rejection of market value was also not accepted as the Tribunal had properly considered the market price and fixed the value at Rs. 38.50 per share, consistent with the offer’s terms and market data. The Court agreed that the agreed price between the parties included the market value of Rs. 38.50 plus Rs. 65 in cash, satisfying the principle that the full value of consideration is the price agreed by the parties.
Accordingly, the Court endorsed the Tribunal’s valuation and upheld the computation of capital gains based on the Rs. 38.50 market value per ESSAR share.
Holding and Implications
The appeal is dismissed.
The Court held that the full value of consideration for capital gains tax purposes must include the market value of the ESSAR shares received (Rs. 38.50 per share) plus Rs. 65 in cash per SISCO share sold. This decision confirms that where consideration includes shares without a specified cash value, the market value of those shares at the time of transfer governs the valuation for capital gains. No new precedent was set; the ruling affirms established principles and resolves the dispute in favor of the respondent’s valuation approach.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by
G. Sivarajan, J.:— The matter arises under the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short, “the Act”). The appellant is an assessee to income-tax on the files of the respondent. The appellant was holding 255 equity shares of face value of Rs. 100 in a company by name SISCO Ltd. Another company, Essar Shipping Ltd. (ESSAR) of ESSAR group, made an open offer vide its letter dated June 24, 1991, for acquisition of the shares of SISCO Ltd. As per the offer, for the transfer of each share, ESSAR Shipping Ltd. would give a consideration in cash of Rs. 65 and 50 equity shares of ESSAR Shipping Ltd. of the face value of Rs. 10 each as fully paid. Pursuant to the said offer, the appellant sold his 255 shares to ESSAR. The assessee got 12,750 shares of ESSAR and Rs. 16,575 as consideration for the transfer of 255 shares of SISCO.
2. The appellant filed his return of income under the Act for the assessment year 1992-93, wherein he had returned capital gains on account of the sale of 255 equity shares of SISCO Ltd., at Rs. 66,810. The appellant for the purpose of computation of the capital gains had adopted the full value of the consideration of a share of ESSAR at the rate of Rs. 10 which is the face value totalling Rs. 1,27,500. The assessing authority did not accept the said computation of the full value as, according to him, the market value of a share of ESSAR came to Rs. 72. The assessing authority determined the capital gains at Rs. 3,38,524. In appeal before the first appellate authority, the computation made by the appellant was accepted. However, in appeal by the Department, the Tribunal determined the value of each share of ESSAR at Rs. 38.50 and directed the assessing authority to compute the capital gains on that basis. Shri P. Balachandran, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, submits that the assessing authority and the Tribunal had erred in departing from the value of the share of ESSAR agreed to by the parties and in adopting a different figure as the value of a share of ESSAR. Counsel also relied on the decisions of the Supreme Court in CIT v. George Henderson and Co. Ltd., [1967] 66 ITR 622 and the decision in CIT v. Gillanders Arbuthnot and Co., [1973] 87 ITR 407 in support of his contention. We also heard Shri P.K.R Menon, learned senior standing counsel appearing for the respondent. Senior counsel took us to the relevant portions of the Tribunal's order (paragraphs 8 and 10) and submitted that the Tribunal had in fact followed the decision of the Supreme Court mentioned above and also another decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Motors and General Stores (P.) Ltd. v. CIT, [1967] 66 ITR 701, as affirmed by the Supreme Court in CIT v. Motors and General Stores (P.) Ltd., [1967] 66 ITR 692.
3. In view of the nature of the controversy involved in this appeal, it is necessary to refer to the terms of the offer with reference to which the appellant had sold his shares. The terms of the offer made by ESSAR for acquiring the shares of SISCO are contained in the order of the Tribunal. The relevant portion of the same are extracted hereinbelow:
“1. Background of the offer :
4. Essar Shipping Ltd. (ESSAR) is one of the Essar group of companies. The other, major companies in the group are Essar Gujarat Ltd., and Essar Investment Ltd. The group is committed to high growth, high technology core sector and has diversified over the years into various activities including marine and specialised civil construction, off-shore engineering, oil and gas exploration, shipping and sponge iron and steel.
5. ESSAR owns and operates a modern fleet of specialised tankers, offshore suppl. vessels computerised diving support vessels, multi-purpose support vessels and bulk carriers. Most of the vessels are employed on longterm charter to the energy sector in India.
6. ESSAR has an excellent financial standing and a consistent dividend record, dividends for the last three years/period are as follows:
Year ended 31-12-1987 : 20 per cent. Period ended 30-6-1989 (18 months) : 30 per cent. Year ended 30-6-1990 : 22 per cent.
2. The offer:
7. ESSAR together with Essar Investments Ltd. (another company belonging to the Essar group, details of which are given in Schedule 1) has acquired 1,33,235 equity shares of South India Shipping Corporation Ltd. (SISCO) of value of Rs. 100 each, as detailed below, at a price of Rs. 1,500 per equity share (hereinafter referred to as the acquisition price).
Name of company No. of shares percent. Essar Shipping Ltd. 1,19,985 20.00 Essar Investments Ltd. 13,250 2.21 1,33,235 22.21
8. In addition to the above, Essar Investments Ltd. also owns 15 equity shares of SISCO of face value of Rs. 100 each which was acquired prior to the above acquisition. ESSAR together with Essar Investment Ltd. acquired more than 10 per cent, of the total voting capital of SISCO on February 28, 1991. Subsequent to this date, Essar Investments Ltd. further acquired 12,897 equity shares of SISCO making its total holding to date aggregate 26,162 equity shares of SISCO.
9. Further to the announcement made in the newspapers on and after Saturday, March 23, 1991. ESSAR is making an open offer to the equity shareholders of SISCO whose names appeared in SISCO's register of members as on April 25, 1991, for acquisition of an aggregate minimum of 1,20,000 equity shares of Rs. 100 each, representing 20 per cent, of the present voting capital of SISCO.
3. Consideration :
10. For every one equity share of SISCO (face value of Rs. 100 each) offered to be purchased in terms of this offer, ESSAR will give as consideration (in the manner mentioned in clause (6) below):
(i) 50 (fifty) equity shares of ESSAR (face value of Rs. 10 each) issued and credited as fully paid-up and (ii) Rs. 65 (rupees sixty five only) in cash.
This total consideration is hereinafter referred to as “the offer price”.
11. As on February 28, 1991, the closing market price of ESSAR's equity shares were Rs. 38.50 per share at the Madras Stock Exchange and Rs. 37.50 at the Bombay Stock Exchange. Based on these prices, the offer price is more than the highest market price of the equity shares of SISCO during the six months immediately preceding this date.
12. The closing market price of ESSAR shares was Rs. 38.50 per share at Madras Stock Exchange as on March 6, 1991, which was the date on which ESSAR's board of directors decided on the consideration to be offered to the shareholders of SISCO.”
13. The contention of counsel for the assessee is that the consideration for the sale of the shares of SISCO has been specifically stated in clause 3 of the offer under the caption “consideration” and that as per the said clause, consideration for every one equity share of SISCO is 50 equity shares of ESSAR (face value of Rs. 10 each) plus Rs. 65 in cash. The further contention is that the market price referred to thereunder is only to show the creditworthiness of ESSAR Company Ltd. It is in this context, counsel has relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in which it observed that the full value of the consideration mentioned in section 48 has to be understood as the price which was agreed to by the parties.
14. There is no dispute that the appellant had transferred his shares in SISCO to ESSAR on the basis of the offer made by ESSAR. In the absence of any suggestion of bad faith or fraud, the true principle is that the taxing statute has to be applied in accordance with the legal rights of the parties to the transaction. When the transaction is embodied in a document, the liability to tax depends upon the meaning and context of the language used in accordance with the ordinary rules of construction (CIT v. Motors and General Stores (P.) Ltd., [1967] 66 ITR 692 (SC)). In the case of a sale for a price, there is no question of any market value unlike in the case of an exchange. The consideration for transfer of the shares in the instant case is not only cash, but also shares. In a case where the value of a share is not specified in terms of cash, necessarily the same has to be fixed in terms of the market value (Motors and General Stores (P.) Ltd. v. CIT, [1967] 66 ITR 701 (AP)). We find that ESSAR in the offer has clearly stated that as on February 28, 1991, the closing market price of ESSAR equity shares was Rs. 38.50 at the Madras Stock Exchange and Rs. 37.50 at the Bombay Stock Exchange and ESSAR has clearly stated that:
“Based on these prices, the offer price is more than the highest market price of the equity shares of SISCO during the six months immediately preceding to this date.”
The offer further states that:
“The closing market price of ESSAR shares was Rs. 38.50 per share at the Madras Stock Exchange as on March 6, 1991, which was the date on w ESSAR's board of directors decided on the consideration to be offered to the shareholders of SISCO.”
15. According to us, these two provisions in clause 3 of the offer clinch the issue and make the position clear that the price offered by ESSAR for one equity share of SISCO is 50 ESSAR shares having a market price of Rs. 38.50 plus Rs. 65. Reading the offer as a whole we are unable to agree with counsel for the assessee that the agreed price of one equity share of SISCO is 50 equity ESSAR shares of the face value of Rs. 10 plus Rs. 65 only. The reference to the face value of Rs. 10 is only to qualify and identify the shares which are sought to be transferred. It is clear that the agreed price was Rs. 38.50 per share plus Rs. 65. In this case, the assessing authority has fixed the market value of one ESSAR share at Rs. 72. There is no material on record to show as to how the assessing authority had arrived at the market price at Rs. 72 per ESSAR share. The first appellate authority also did not go into the said question as, according to him, the concept of market value is alien to the transaction in question. However, we find that the Tribunal had considered the matter properly and had adopted Rs. 38.50 plus Rs. 65 as the value of one ESSAR share and had directed the assessing authority to adopt the said figure for the purpose of computation of the capital gains arising out of the sale of the shares of SISCO. The Tribunal had clearly entered a finding that this is the price of one ESSAR share agreed to between the parties. We have also independently considered the matter and have come to the same finding. Thus, even accepting the contention of the appellant that it is the price which is agreed to by the parties which should be taken as the full value of the consideration received, the said test is satisfied in the present case. In these circumstances, we think it unnecessary to deal with the decisions relied on by the parties any more. The Tribunal had directed the assessing authority only to adopt Rs. 38.50 per share which is the price per share agreed to by the parties. We are in full agreement with the order of the Tribunal. There is no merit in this appeal.
16. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Alert