- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
Sunita Textiles Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And
Bombay High Court
Mar 4, 2008
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
1. Considering the declaration sought as to the Constitutional validity of sections 245d(2d) and 245ha of it act, 1961 and considering the similar orders passed in earlier petitions, rule.
2. Notice has already been given to learned advocate general.
3. As the counsel for the Revenue seeks time to file affidavit in reply, by way of interim relief, we direct that during the pendency of this petition, Settlement Commission not to consider the Settlement Application filed by the petitioner No. 1 having abated under Section 245HA of the Act for want of compliance with Section 245D(2D) of the Act as amended by the Finance Act, 2007.
4. Respondent waives service.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.