- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
Indrawal v. Radhey Raman And Another
Factual and Procedural Background
This First Appeal arises from a decree for divorce passed by the court of 1st Additional District Judge, Allahabad, under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The parties were directed to personally appear in Court to facilitate a possible settlement. Upon appearance, a compromise was reached and an application for compromise was filed and sent to the Registrar for verification. The respondent-husband initially expressed that the children would remain with him despite the terms of the compromise indicating otherwise. After clarification regarding maintenance liabilities, the husband consented to the children staying with the wife. The original petition for divorce was filed by the husband on grounds of adultery, cruelty, and desertion, with the wife making counter-allegations. The trial court ruled in favor of the husband on all grounds and granted the divorce. The wife appealed, aggrieved primarily by the findings against her, but expressed her desire for the divorce to be upheld. Both parties agreed that the marriage should be dissolved.
Legal Issues Presented
- Whether the compromise between the parties should be accepted by the Court and the matter decided in terms thereof.
- Whether the decree for divorce, granted on specific grounds by the trial court, should stand confirmed despite the compromise.
Arguments of the Parties
Respondent-Husband's Arguments
- Initially asserted that the children would remain with him, contrary to the compromise terms.
- Expressed apprehensions regarding liability for maintenance expenses of the children.
- After explanation of legal obligations, agreed to the children remaining in the wife’s custody.
- Prepared not to press allegations against the wife provided the divorce decree was maintained.
Appellant-Wife's Arguments
- Did not wish to continue living with the husband and sought divorce.
- Aggrieved by the trial court’s adverse findings against her.
- Agreed to withdraw her allegations against the husband as part of the compromise.
Table of Precedents Cited
No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.
Court's Reasoning and Analysis
The Court considered the compromise reached between the parties and verified the respondent-husband’s position on custody and maintenance of the children. It noted the wife’s unequivocal desire for divorce and the mutual agreement to dissolve the marriage. The Court observed that there was no collusion between the parties and referred to the changed legal policy following the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976, which allows dissolution of marriage by agreement even if no traditional grounds for divorce are established. Finding the compromise lawful and the parties’ dispute adjusted accordingly, the Court concluded that the compromise should be recorded and the appeal dismissed, thereby confirming the decree of divorce.
Holding and Implications
DISMISSED
The Court dismissed the appeal and confirmed the decree for divorce passed by the trial court. The compromise application was ordered to form part of the decree. There was no order as to costs. No broader precedent was established; the decision directly affects the parties by confirming their divorce and the terms of their compromise.
1. In this First Appeal which arises from a decree for divorce passed by the court of 1st Additional District Judge, Allahabad, under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the parties were asked to personally appear in Court in order to enable me to bring about a settlement between the two. They appeared in Court yesterday and a settlement was arrived at between them, pursuant to which an application for compromise was filed. The compromise application was sent down to the Registrar for verification. It appears from the endorsement on the back of the first page of the compromise application that the respondent-husband stated before the Registrar that “the children would remain with him, though the terms of the compromise say otherwise”. I questioned the husband today before me. He said that he had no objection to the children, who were a daughter aged 9 years and a son 7 years, continuing to remain with the wife even after the divorce, but he expressed his apprehensions about the liability to pay the expenses of the maintenance of the children. On this, it was explained to him that though under the terms of the compromise he could no longer be liable to pay anything for the maintenance of the wife, he could, if demanded by the children, be required to pay for their maintenance in accordance with law. Having understood this position, the husband ultimately stated that he had no objection to the children continuing to remain in the custody of the wife.
2. Now the question is whether the compromise should be accepted and the matter decided in terms thereof. The petition for divorce was filed by the husband on three grounds, namely, adultery, cruelty and desertion against the wife. The wife had, on the other hand, made counter-allegations against the husband. The trial court found in favour of the husband on all the three points and dissolved the marriage by a decree of divorce. The wife is the appellant. When asked by the Court as to what she wanted to be done in the matter, she stated plainly that she herself did not want to live with the man and wanted divorce. All that she was aggrieved from were the findings recorded against her by the trial court. On this the husband was prepared not to press the allegations provided the decree for divorce was not disturbed and the wife, on her part, withdrew the allegations made by her against him. The result is that both the parties are agreed that the marriage between them should be dissolved.
3. There does not appear to be any collusion between them. The policy of the law having undergone a change after the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976, it is possible now to dissolve a marriage by agreement between the parties although none of the grounds, on which a marriage may be dissolved by a court, be found to exist. It cannot, therefore, be said that the compromise is in any manner unlawful. Being thus satisfied that the parties have adjusted the dispute between them by a lawful compromise, I order that the compromise be recorded and the appeal be dismissed. The result is that the decree for divorce, dissolving the marriage between the parties, shall stand confirmed.
4. The appeal is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.
5. The compromise application shall form part of the decree of this Court.
6. Appeal dismissed.
Alert