Conn. Gen. Stat. § 29-35
(1949 Rev., S. 4166; 1957, P.A. 163, S. 35; 1959, P.A. 179; 1963, P.A. 437; P.A. 81-45; 81-222, S. 2; P.A. 88-128, S. 1; P.A. 99-212, S. 2; P.A. 00-99, S. 77, 154; P.A. 01-130, S. 9; P.A. 03-19, S. 68; P.A. 11-213, S. 47; P.A. 15-216, S. 2; P.A. 16-193, S. 9.)
Seizure of loaded revolver from defendant's person and arrest under section by police lieutenant on information by reliable person that defendant was armed is justifiable action. 157 Conn. 114. Cited. 162 C. 3; 168 C. 395. State must introduce evidence that pistol which defendant was carrying was less than 12 inches in length in order to prove that defendant has violated section. 173 Conn. 254. Cited. 179 C. 576. Burden not on state to disprove every listed exception in statute. 181 C. 388. Cited. 182 C. 262; 186 C. 261; Id., 654; 189 C. 303; 190 C. 1; 192 C. 85; 193 Conn. 7; 195 C. 651; 196 C. 122; Id., 157; 207 C. 191; 208 C. 689; 209 Conn. 322; 211 Conn. 258; 214 C. 540; 215 C. 739; 217 C. 73; 220 C. 385; 221 C. 315; Id., 915; 222 C. 718; 225 C. 270; 227 C. 518; 228 C. 234; 229 C. 125; 231 C. 43; 233 C. 1; Id., 215; Id., 813; 234 C. 324; 235 C. 274; Id., 397; Id., 595; 240 C. 395; 242 Conn. 318. Cited. 3 CA 225; Id., 289; 6 CA 189; Id., 402; 7 Conn.App. 367; 8 CA 667; 9 Conn.App. 169; judgment reversed, see 205 Conn. 370; Id., 330; 10 CA 532; Id., 683; Id., 697; 12 CA 662; 13 CA 139; 14 CA 140; 15 CA 330; Id., 749; 17 CA 243; 19 CA 576; 22 CA 507; 24 CA 408; Id., 685; Id., 692; Id., 737; 25 Conn.App. 433; Id., 578; Id., 734; 26 CA 65; Id., 367; 27 CA 263; Id., 403; 28 CA 833; judgment reversed, see 227 Conn. 518; 30 CA 26; Id., 68; 31 CA 385; Id., 614; 32 CA 724; 34 CA 103; Id., 223; 35 CA 541; 36 CA 345; Id., 483; Id., 576; Id., 805; Id., 831; 37 CA 276; 38 CA 247; 39 CA 82; Id., 224; Id., 242; Id., 563; 40 CA 60; Id., 151; Id., 189; 41 CA 515; Id., 565; Id., 831; 42 CA 41; 43 Conn.App. 252; 44 CA 790; 45 CA 261; Id., 282; 46 CA 640. Evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support conviction of carrying pistol without a license because state did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that gun barrel was less than 12 inches in length. 48 CA 193. State's search of state and city database for evidence of permit to carry pistol was insufficient to meet state's burden of establishing that defendant lacked a valid permit to lawfully carry a pistol on date of incident because state failed to establish that defendant was a resident of the city or had a place of business within the city during the 60-day period immediately preceding the alleged conduct. 156 CA 175; judgment reversed in part, see 324 C. 782. Section is designed to prohibit the carrying of a pistol without a permit and not the mere possession of one; constructive possession of a pistol will not suffice to support a conviction under section; to establish that a defendant carried a pistol or revolver, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he bore a pistol or revolver upon his person while exercising dominion or control of it; because there is no temporal requirement in section, and no requirement that the pistol or revolver be moved from one place to another to prove that it was carried, a defendant can be shown to have carried a pistol or revolver upon his person, within the meaning of section, by evidence proving, inter alia, that he grasped or held it in his hands, arms or clothing or otherwise bore it upon his body for any period of time while maintaining dominion or control over it. 184 CA 332. Cited. 27 CS 275; 35 CS 516. Subsec. (a): Cited. 224 C. 546; 237 C. 518. "Place of business" means premises containing a business in which a person has a proprietary, controlling or possessory interest, not a location at which a person is merely employed. 260 C. 219. "Place of business" exception to handgun permit requirement inapplicable to taxicab. 270 C. 198. Cited. 20 CA 137; 22 CA 321; 26 CA 242; 33 CA 521; 35 CA 138; 38 CA 750; 42 CA 768; 45 CA 591; 46 CA 216. Cumulative evidence established beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant's firearm had a barrel less than 12 inches long. 69 CA 1. Jury instructions that improperly included an explanation of the principles of constructive possession did not violate defendant's due process rights where such instructions had no probable effect on the jury. 71 CA 656. Court upheld prior rulings that convictions under both this Subsec. and Sec. 53a-217(a)(1) do not constitute double jeopardy. 83 CA 377. To obtain a conviction, the state was required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant carried a pistol, for which he lacked a permit, while outside his dwelling house or place of business. 126 CA 192.