2. In a prosecution under subsection
1, paragraph B, the requirements of specificity in the charge and proof at the trial otherwise required by law do not include a requirement to allege or prove the ownership of the property. In a prosecution under subsection
1, paragraph A, it is a defense that the actor reasonably believed he had the permission of the property owner to engage in the conduct alleged. In a prosecution under subsection
1, paragraph A, "property of another" has the same meaning as in section
352, subsection
4.
[ 1975, c. 740, §86 (AMD).]