References in Text
The date of the enactment of the Surface Transportation Board Reauthorization Act of 2015, referred to in subsec. (a), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 114–110, which was approved Dec. 18, 2015.
(1)
(2)
(3) shall not prevent parties from independently seeking or utilizing private arbitration services to resolve any disputes the parties may have.
(1) In general.—
(2) Limitation.— Initiation of the voluntary and binding arbitration process shall preclude the Board from separately reviewing a complaint or dispute related to the same rail rate or practice in a covered dispute involving the same parties.
(3) Rates.— In resolving a covered dispute involving the reasonableness of a rail carrier’s rates, the arbitrator or panel of arbitrators, as applicable, shall consider the Board’s methodologies for setting maximum lawful rates, giving due consideration to the need for differential pricing to permit a rail carrier to collect adequate revenues (as determined under section 10704(a)(2)).
(1) shall be consistent with sound principles of rail regulation economics;
(2) shall be in writing;
(3) shall contain findings of fact and conclusions;
(4) shall be binding upon the parties; and
(5) shall not have any precedential effect in any other or subsequent arbitration dispute.
(1) Selection.— An arbitrator or panel of arbitrators shall be selected not later than 14 days after the date of the Board’s decision to initiate arbitration.
(2) Evidentiary process.—
(3) Decision.— The arbitrator or panel of arbitrators, as applicable, shall issue a decision not later than 30 days after the date on which the evidentiary record is closed.
(4) Extensions.— The Board may extend any of the timelines under this subsection upon the agreement of all parties in the dispute.
(1) In general.— Unless otherwise agreed by all of the parties, an arbitration under this section shall be conducted by an arbitrator or panel of arbitrators, which shall be selected from a roster, maintained by the Board, of persons with rail transportation, economic regulation, professional or business experience, including agriculture, in the private sector.
(2) Independence.— In an arbitration under this section, the arbitrators shall perform their duties with diligence, good faith, and in a manner consistent with the requirements of impartiality and independence.
(3) Selection.—
(A) In general.— If the parties cannot mutually agree on an arbitrator, or the lead arbitrator of a panel of arbitrators, the parties shall select the arbitrator or lead arbitrator from the roster by alternately striking names from the roster until only 1 name remains meeting the criteria set forth in paragraph (1).
(B) Panel of arbitrators.—
(4) Cost.— The parties shall share the costs incurred by the Board and arbitrators equally, with each party responsible for paying its own legal and other associated arbitration costs.
(1) In general.— Subject to the limitations set forth in paragraphs (2) and (3), an arbitral decision under this section may award the payment of damages or rate prescriptive relief.
(2) Practice disputes.— The damage award for practice disputes may not exceed $2,000,000.
(3) Rate disputes.—
(A) Monetary limit.— The damage award for rate disputes, including any rate prescription, may not exceed $25,000,000.
(B) Time limit.— Any rate prescription shall be limited to not longer than 5 years from the date of the arbitral decision.
(1) the decision is consistent with sound principles of rail regulation economics;
(2) a clear abuse of arbitral authority or discretion occurred;
(3) the decision directly contravenes statutory authority; or
(4) the award limitation under subsection (g) was violated.
References in Text
The date of the enactment of the Surface Transportation Board Reauthorization Act of 2015, referred to in subsec. (a), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 114–110, which was approved Dec. 18, 2015.