...statement from Venkatasubbarayudu on 1-9-1925 (Ex. B-35) that he was willing to have a jeroyti patta, though he stated that his action was without prejudice to any case that he might file in court..., and they are (a) whether the suit should be dismissed on the ground of want of proper pleas by the appellant in answer to the written statement, and (b) whether the decision that this was not a...appellant relies are divided into two parts, those after the patta, Ex. A-5 dated 1-9-1925 or in connection with the grant thereof, and those before the grant of the said patta. Exhibit B-1 is of the...

...Magistrate in his judgment to be dated July 30, 1926. This, however, is a mistake. The order itself is dated December 22, 1925, as is mentioned in Exhibit B, which is merely a statement by the Criminal...Bombay after he was asked to go or restrict himself to Sholapur Settlement.It is argued on behalf of the accused that the order, Exhibit B of December 22, 1925, is not a legal order, on...Sholapur Settlement, the Settlement Officer had power to determine from time to time the place where the accused should reside, and if the Settlement Officer by his order, Exhibit B, dated December 22, 1925...

.... The suit was to recover Rs. 5,010 levied by way of non-agricultural assessment for the years 1925–1926, 1926–1927 and 1927–1928. The appended statement B gives the details of the plots in question. The first three of them..., the first three plots in statement B. As regards the prayers for injunction, plaintiff in each case is entitled to the injunction prayed for in respect of the plots for which the assessment is ordered...-Subordinate Judge, Ahmedabad, dismissing a suit for refund of Rs. 15,581-5-7 alleged to have been illegally recovered as non agricultural assessment on lands belonging to the company for the years 1925...

...Ex.DW-5/1 pertains to Khasra Nos. 2647/1925 and 2649/1925. The suit land is bears Khasra No. 2646/1925. In view of this, both the courts below have rightly ignored report Ex.DW-5/1, ExPW-5/B statement.... 14. DW-5 Hari Chand has deposed that he demarcated the land and submitted his report Ex.DW-5/1. He has placed on record statement of defendant Ex.DW-5/B. He supported the report of.... According to the plaintiff, the land comprised of Khata No. 182 min, Khatauni No. 436 min, Khasra No. 2646/1925 measuring 118-10 square meters, according to the Jamabandi for the year 1991-92 (hereafter...

...statement was no confession of guilt. Similarly in Emperor v. Gulam Raza AIR 1925 Lah 153 (B), where the accused admitted that he obstructed the road under mistake...petitioner on the basis of his statement and on the alleged plea of 'guilty'. I have been taken through the statement of the petitioner which was recorded by the learned Magistrate and it runs as follows...complainant. I have been taken through the evidence of these witnesses and I find that the only complainant H. Hangi Singh has made some statement about the dishonest intention of the present accused in...

.... Sometime in January, 1925, Ramji Das himself appears to have made a statement to the Tahsildar, Barnala, in which he said:“This inn land was given to me...for the respondents has drawn our attention to the statement of Ramji Das made in 1925 and the order of the Revenue Minister dated December 13, 1954, and has contended that Ramji Das himself admitted...complaint against Ramji Das (Ex. B) in which allegations were made to the effect that Ramji Das was utilising the dharmasala for his private purpose etc. Nothing appears to have come out of this complaint...

...’, AIR 1925 Mad 675 (B), the document relied on as containing an...Kochukunju Pillai of Korungattu house under Ext. A dated 4-5-1057. This Kochukunju Pillai sub-mortgaged the properties under Ext. B dated 13-7-1063 in favour of one Krishnan Nair who was the ancestor of the...Mavelikara Munsiff's Court for redemption of the properties covered by Ext. B and for recovery of possession of the properties from the sub-mortgagees.2. That suit was transferred to the...

...not made a party to this suit. On November 12, 1925, the defendants in that suit filed their written statement (Ex. B). On November 14, 1935, the suit was decreed by consent and the properties were....In this suit of 1925, the defendants appeared, filed a written statement on November 12, 1925, and prayed, that the suit may be decreed but with costs to the defendants.On...No. 172 of 1925, (b) the deeds of mortgage and the sub-mortgage and (c) the mortgage decrees. The reliefs claimed in that suit were:—(i) declaration, on a proper construction of the...

.... Similarly in Emperor v. Gulam Raza, AIR 1925 Lah 153 (B), where the accused admitted that he obstructed the road under mistake without admitting that...his statement and on the alleged plea of ‘guilty’. I have been taken through the statement of the petitioner which was recorded by the learned Magistrate and it runs as follows:—“Q...been taken through the evidence of these witnesses and I find that the only complainant H. Hangi Singh has made some statement about the dishonest intention of the present accused in the following...

...State of Jammu and Kashmir”. The effect of Section 3 read with the Schedule was to extend the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 to all Part B States including the State of Travancore...-Cochin with effect from April 1, 1951 which was the appointed date under the Part B States (Laws) Act, 1951. The question is as to what was the impact of the extension of the Indian Succession Act, 1925...of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 to Part B State of Travancore-Cochin, the rules relating to intestate succession enacted in Chapter II of Part V would be applicable equally to Indian Christians in...

...view of provisions of Section 57(a) & (b) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (‘the Act, 1925’). The additional submissions made in the written statement were not tenable and the suit was...material alteration without consent. 3. The appellant-defendant filed written statement disputing the fact of Will dated 21/10/1974 executed by Aidan Thanvi; ownership of...raised before the trial court in the written statement, an issue in this regard should have been framed and failure whereof has vitiated the impugned judgments passed by the two courts below...

...the shareholders, I do not entertain the slightest doubt. 5. But this statement is inconsistent with the remarks of Lords Justices in the Court of Appeal and with later special...shareholders." But even this statement is too wide. Cotton, L.J., said: "They have misapplied funds as to. which they stood in the position of trustees." In In re Faure Electric Accumulator Company...control, etc. 7. Lindley,.., L. J., says: "Although directors are not properly speaking trustees, etc." in In re City Equitable Fire Insurance Company (1925) 1 Ch. 407, Romer, J...

...Bombay Cooperative Societies Act, 1925, as applicable to the erstwhile State of Saurashtra. According to the appellant's writ petition, it is doing banking business. It has 127 branches spread all over the...with full back wages.7. The Bank filed a written statement, raising a preliminary objection that the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946, under which the application was made...in Section 5, clauses (b) and (c) of the Banking Companies Act, 1949; and that this being the true position, the Notification BIR-1362 v. H dated March 2, 1963, published in the Gujarat Government...

...daughters to maintenance until marriage or death, and to their marriage expenses. On 17th March 1925, the widow of Abdul Rahim (Hawabai), having been duly empowered by the High Court, filed a petition...Rs.1,99,025 after deducting funeral expenses and debts. On 6th May 1925 it was ordered that on the sureties being justified for the whole of the estate of Abdul Rahim and on filing the necessary...administration bond, and on payment of fees and stamp duty, letters of administration should issue as prayed to Hawabai. On 14th May 1925, Hawabai and the present appellants as sureties executed a bond...

...prevailing. For this purpose the respondents relied upon a statement, that the father-in-law had survived the husband, made by the donor in a mortgage suit in 1925, to establish her case. When this...statement made in the mortgage suit in 1925 carries greater weight as it was made at a time when there was no dispute in the family. [160 E-F] JUDGMENT... 156 order in which Basudeo Narain and Ramruch died. But in the opinion of the High Court there was a statement made by Mst. Phuljhari as far back as 1925 in a...

...the time of his death and also that the suit was barred by time as she had become owner and possessor of the land in suit in 1925 on the death of her husband when the entries in her favour were made...made a statement contrary to those admissions. The purpose of contradicting the witness under s. 145 of the Evidence Act is very much different from the purpose of proving the admission. Admission is...substantive evidence of the fact admitted while a previous statement used to contradict a witness does not become substantive evidence and merely serves the purpose of throwing doubt on the veracity...

...Article 47 of the, Indian Limitation Act, 1908.8. The earliest documents on the record are the rent receipts, Exs. 5, 5(c), A-3(l), A-3(11), B-3(11) dating from 1293 fasli.... 193 and 198 of 1916. The court found that the 244 bighas appertained to Dubha Taufir. On 30-04-1925, in execution of the decree in Suit No. 193 of 1916, the Dumraon Raj obtained possession of the...Taufir was given to the Dumraon Raj. The Bhagar was now gradually drying up and 77 bighas of land on the northwest of Dubha Taufir became fit for cultivation. On 27-05-1925, an order under Section 145...

...The Judgment of the Court was as follows:—The facts giving rise to this Rule-shortly stated are as follows:—The Petitioner before us is a postal peon. On the 30th June 1925...Police who reported to the Magistrate on the 13th July 1925 that the charges against Bhujendra Nath Bhattacharjee were false. The Petitioner was informed on the 15th July 1925 by the Sub-Inspector of...Police that the Petitioner's charges against Bhujendra Nath Bhattacharjee were false. This information it would appear was given to the Petitioner under the provisions of sec. 173 (b), Cr. P.C On the...

...himself is the decree-holder in that suit. He purchased the property on the 31st January 1922. Afterwards, on the 29th January, 1925, he filed E. A. No. 240 of 1925, for obtaining delivery of...possession of the property. The application was dismissed for non-payment of batta A fresh application E. A. No. 886 of 1925 was filed on the 29th September, 1925, i.e, within eight months after the...dismissal of E. A. No. 240 of 1925. It was held by both the lower Courts that this petition E. A. No. 886 of 1925 cannot be treated as a continuation of E. A. No. 240 of 1925, and is therefore barred by...

...-History of rates in England and India-Government of India Act, 1935 (26 Geo. 5 ch. 2), Seventh Schedule, List I,item 55, List II, item 42-Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 (Bom. 18 of 1925), ss. 73...lands situate within the municipal limits. The rate was levied under section 73 of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925, read with Explanation to s. 75 of the Act. The Municipality framed rule 350-A...350-A read with rule 243 is ultra vires. 73 of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925, read with Explanation to s. 75. The assessment list for the year 1947-48 published by the municipality for...