Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Madras High Court5405
+ Bombay High Court5088
+ Allahabad High Court2600
+ Calcutta High Court2292
+ Delhi High Court1608
+ Patna High Court1508
+ Karnataka High Court1480
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court1286
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal1269
+ Rajasthan High Court1269
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court1256
+ Supreme Court Of India1248
+ Kerala High Court1119
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court942
+ Gujarat High Court787
+ Orissa High Court462
+ Gauhati High Court458
+ Privy Council415
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission403
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court400
+ Telangana High Court302
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court284
+ Chhattisgarh High Court250
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission219
+ Central Administrative Tribunal204
+ Jharkhand High Court200
+ Board of Revenue148
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission132
+ Uttarakhand High Court114
+ Central Information Commission104
+ National Green Tribunal88
+ CESTAT73
+ SEBI69
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal63
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal62
+ Tripura High Court49
+ Meghalaya High Court45
+ National Company Law Tribunal43
+ Manipur High Court42
+ Armed Forces Tribunal38
+ Sikkim High Court26
+ Company Law Board25
+ RERA10
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity9
+ Authority For Advance Rulings9
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board8
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal6
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal6
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal6
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India4
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission3
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST2
+ Commissioner (Appeals)2
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority2
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST1
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property1
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal1
+ Competition Commission Of India1
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission1
+ Trade Marks Registry1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards8529
From 2011 To 20207358
From 2001 To 20102197
From 1991 To 20001315
From 1981 To 19901168
From 1971 To 19801242
From 1961 To 19701674
From 1951 To 19602122
Before 19506314

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...statement from Venkatasubbarayudu on 1-9-1925 (Ex. B-35) that he was willing to have a jeroyti patta, though he stated that his action was without prejudice to any case that he might file in court..., and they are (a) whether the suit should be dismissed on the ground of want of proper pleas by the appellant in answer to the written statement, and (b) whether the decision that this was not a...appellant relies are divided into two parts, those after the patta, Ex. A-5 dated 1-9-1925 or in connection with the grant thereof, and those before the grant of the said patta. Exhibit B-1 is of the...

...State of Jammu and Kashmir”. The effect of Section 3 read with the Schedule was to extend the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 to all Part B States including the State of Travancore...-Cochin with effect from April 1, 1951 which was the appointed date under the Part B States (Laws) Act, 1951. The question is as to what was the impact of the extension of the Indian Succession Act, 1925...of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 to Part B State of Travancore-Cochin, the rules relating to intestate succession enacted in Chapter II of Part V would be applicable equally to Indian Christians in...

...Magistrate in his judgment to be dated July 30, 1926. This, however, is a mistake. The order itself is dated December 22, 1925, as is mentioned in Exhibit B, which is merely a statement by the Criminal...Bombay after he was asked to go or restrict himself to Sholapur Settlement.It is argued on behalf of the accused that the order, Exhibit B of December 22, 1925, is not a legal order, on...Sholapur Settlement, the Settlement Officer had power to determine from time to time the place where the accused should reside, and if the Settlement Officer by his order, Exhibit B, dated December 22, 1925...

...Ex.DW-5/1 pertains to Khasra Nos. 2647/1925 and 2649/1925. The suit land is bears Khasra No. 2646/1925. In view of this, both the courts below have rightly ignored report Ex.DW-5/1, ExPW-5/B statement.... 14. DW-5 Hari Chand has deposed that he demarcated the land and submitted his report Ex.DW-5/1. He has placed on record statement of defendant Ex.DW-5/B. He supported the report of.... According to the plaintiff, the land comprised of Khata No. 182 min, Khatauni No. 436 min, Khasra No. 2646/1925 measuring 118-10 square meters, according to the Jamabandi for the year 1991-92 (hereafter...

.... Sometime in January, 1925, Ramji Das himself appears to have made a statement to the Tahsildar, Barnala, in which he said:“This inn land was given to me...for the respondents has drawn our attention to the statement of Ramji Das made in 1925 and the order of the Revenue Minister dated December 13, 1954, and has contended that Ramji Das himself admitted...complaint against Ramji Das (Ex. B) in which allegations were made to the effect that Ramji Das was utilising the dharmasala for his private purpose etc. Nothing appears to have come out of this complaint...

...not made a party to this suit. On November 12, 1925, the defendants in that suit filed their written statement (Ex. B). On November 14, 1935, the suit was decreed by consent and the properties were....In this suit of 1925, the defendants appeared, filed a written statement on November 12, 1925, and prayed, that the suit may be decreed but with costs to the defendants.On...No. 172 of 1925, (b) the deeds of mortgage and the sub-mortgage and (c) the mortgage decrees. The reliefs claimed in that suit were:—(i) declaration, on a proper construction of the...

...Bombay Cooperative Societies Act, 1925, as applicable to the erstwhile State of Saurashtra. According to the appellant's writ petition, it is doing banking business. It has 127 branches spread all over the...with full back wages.7. The Bank filed a written statement, raising a preliminary objection that the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946, under which the application was made...in Section 5, clauses (b) and (c) of the Banking Companies Act, 1949; and that this being the true position, the Notification BIR-1362 v. H dated March 2, 1963, published in the Gujarat Government...

...prevailing. For this purpose the respondents relied upon a statement, that the father-in-law had survived the husband, made by the donor in a mortgage suit in 1925, to establish her case. When this...statement made in the mortgage suit in 1925 carries greater weight as it was made at a time when there was no dispute in the family. [160 E-F] JUDGMENT... 156 order in which Basudeo Narain and Ramruch died. But in the opinion of the High Court there was a statement made by Mst. Phuljhari as far back as 1925 in a...

...the time of his death and also that the suit was barred by time as she had become owner and possessor of the land in suit in 1925 on the death of her husband when the entries in her favour were made...made a statement contrary to those admissions. The purpose of contradicting the witness under s. 145 of the Evidence Act is very much different from the purpose of proving the admission. Admission is...substantive evidence of the fact admitted while a previous statement used to contradict a witness does not become substantive evidence and merely serves the purpose of throwing doubt on the veracity...

...Article 47 of the, Indian Limitation Act, 1908.8. The earliest documents on the record are the rent receipts, Exs. 5, 5(c), A-3(l), A-3(11), B-3(11) dating from 1293 fasli.... 193 and 198 of 1916. The court found that the 244 bighas appertained to Dubha Taufir. On 30-04-1925, in execution of the decree in Suit No. 193 of 1916, the Dumraon Raj obtained possession of the...Taufir was given to the Dumraon Raj. The Bhagar was now gradually drying up and 77 bighas of land on the northwest of Dubha Taufir became fit for cultivation. On 27-05-1925, an order under Section 145...

...of the detenu given before the IO on 18-9-2009.(b) Statement of SI T. Khogen Singh of CDO/IW recorded under Section 161 CrPC in connection with FIR...satisfaction that the detenu was acting in a manner prejudicial to the maintenance of the public order. The High Court has also pointed out that the statement incriminating himself under Section 161 was...detention order. The documents relied upon by the District Magistrate, West Imphal, as mentioned in the grounds of detention dated 28-9-2009 are:(a) The statement...

.... The suit was to recover Rs. 5,010 levied by way of non-agricultural assessment for the years 1925–1926, 1926–1927 and 1927–1928. The appended statement B gives the details of the plots in question. The first three of them..., the first three plots in statement B. As regards the prayers for injunction, plaintiff in each case is entitled to the injunction prayed for in respect of the plots for which the assessment is ordered...-Subordinate Judge, Ahmedabad, dismissing a suit for refund of Rs. 15,581-5-7 alleged to have been illegally recovered as non agricultural assessment on lands belonging to the company for the years 1925...

..., whereas Section 71 of the 1881 Act corresponds to sub-section (4) of Section 284 of the 1925 Act.40. The statement required to be made as envisaged in Schedule V of the 1925 Act...S.B Sinha, J.— Leave granted.Introduction2. What is a caveatable interest within the meaning of the Succession Act, 1925...(the 1925 Act) vis-à-vis the Rules framed by the Calcutta High Court in the year 1940 is the question involved herein.Background facts3. Smt...

...of Rs. 46 on the 8th March, 1925, and the next year's rent on the 16th March, 1926. No further rent was paid by the defendant to the Receiver or to the proprietor after that date. The proprietor...acceptance of annual rent in 1925 and 1926 did not create a monthly tenancy but two tenancies for one year each for two successive years, that the relation of landlord and tenant came to an end on the...month in the absence of a contract to the contrary; (iii) a contract that the tenancy was for one year certain could not be inferred in the present case from the fact that an annual rent was paid in 1925...

...the shareholders, I do not entertain the slightest doubt. 5. But this statement is inconsistent with the remarks of Lords Justices in the Court of Appeal and with later special...shareholders." But even this statement is too wide. Cotton, L.J., said: "They have misapplied funds as to. which they stood in the position of trustees." In In re Faure Electric Accumulator Company...control, etc. 7. Lindley,.., L. J., says: "Although directors are not properly speaking trustees, etc." in In re City Equitable Fire Insurance Company (1925) 1 Ch. 407, Romer, J...

..., the Board of Review created by s. 41 of the (Federal) Income Tax Assessment Act, 1922-1925, to review the decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation, and whose members are...(Federal) Income Tax Assessment Act, 1922-1925, and from a judgment of the High Court, dated October 31, 1927, affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court of Victoria, dated September 16, 1927, the...assessment made upon the company in March, 1924, under s. 28 of the (Federal) Income Tax Assessment Act, 1922-1924, in respect of the financial year 1924-1925. The section provides...

...defendant, of Shri N. Sreeramamurthi, advocate for fifth defendant, and of Sri B. Subba Rao, pleader for Defendants 6 and 7, and Defendants 3 and 4, appearing in person and Defendants 1 and 8, being...along with the written statement of Defendants 6 to 8 (Surasani Yanam lands) be divided into equal shares by metes and plaintiff and Defendants 2 to 5 be put in possession of one such share and the...other share be taken by Defendants 6 and 7.(ii) That half of the purchase price of Items 2 and 3 of Schedule A filed along with the written statement of...

...' case is that the same has been revoked. However, there is no attesting witness to prove Ext. B-19 dated 2-5-1980 and Ext. B-20 dated 25-4-1980, which are the two subsequent wills...was not alive. It was also admitted by the appellant that the testator was not well for about four months prior to his death. Admittedly Ext. B-19 and Ext. B-20 were allegedly executed when the...testator was unwell. On those facts the learned first appellate court held that the subsequent two wills being Ext. B-19 and Ext. B-20 were not proved.10. The High Court held that...

...statement was no confession of guilt. Similarly in Emperor v. Gulam Raza AIR 1925 Lah 153 (B), where the accused admitted that he obstructed the road under mistake...petitioner on the basis of his statement and on the alleged plea of 'guilty'. I have been taken through the statement of the petitioner which was recorded by the learned Magistrate and it runs as follows...complainant. I have been taken through the evidence of these witnesses and I find that the only complainant H. Hangi Singh has made some statement about the dishonest intention of the present accused in...

...aforestated defendants denied that Siva died intestate. That, Siva died on 6-11-1978 leaving behind the will dated 19-10-1978 (Ext. B-8). In the written statement, it was submitted that at the time of...disinherited the plaintiffs vide the aforestated will (Ext. B-8), which was duly executed and attested in accordance with the provisions of Section 63 of the Succession Act, 1925.9...the plaintiffs, neither Sadasivam nor Gnanambal, much less than their children, were entitled to succeed to the properties of late Siva.8. In the written statement, the...