Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

retrospective-application-of-prehire-labor-agreements:-laborers&amp Case Commentaries

Heightened Evidentiary Requirement for § 666 “Benefits”: A Commentary on United States v. Evans (1st Cir. 2025)

Heightened Evidentiary Requirement for § 666 “Benefits”: A Commentary on United States v. Evans (1st Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Heightened Evidentiary Requirement for 18 U.S.C. § 666 “Benefits”: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Evans, 92 F.4th ___ (1st Cir. 2025) I. Introduction The First Circuit’s decision in...
State v. Hamilton: Foundation Requirements for Uncooperative Witnesses and the Inclusion of Adopted Statements Under the Whelan Doctrine

State v. Hamilton: Foundation Requirements for Uncooperative Witnesses and the Inclusion of Adopted Statements Under the Whelan Doctrine

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Clarifying Whelan: Foundation for Inconsistency and the Admissibility of Witness-Adopted Statements – A Commentary on State v. Hamilton (Conn. 2025) Introduction On 1 July 2025 the Supreme Court of...
Steffen Precedent Commentary – Retroactive License Revocation for Prosecutorial Sexual Misconduct

Steffen Precedent Commentary – Retroactive License Revocation for Prosecutorial Sexual Misconduct

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Retroactive License Revocation for Prosecutorial Sexual Misconduct: A Commentary on Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel P. Steffen, 2025 WI 31 1. Introduction Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel...
“One Case, One Conviction … Eventually” – State v. McAdory and the Reinstatement Power under Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(c)

“One Case, One Conviction … Eventually” – State v. McAdory and the Reinstatement Power under Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(c)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“One Case, One Conviction … Eventually” – State v. McAdory and the Reinstatement Power under Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(c) Introduction State v. Carl Lee McAdory, 2025 WI 30, presented the Supreme Court...
Adams v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Re-Enforces the Edge Limits—Felon-in-Possession Felony-Murder Stands Outside the Modified Merger Rule and Sets Fresh Guidance on Plain-Error Review

Adams v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Re-Enforces the Edge Limits—Felon-in-Possession Felony-Murder Stands Outside the Modified Merger Rule and Sets Fresh Guidance on Plain-Error Review

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Adams v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Re-Enforces the Edge Limits—Felon-in-Possession Felony-Murder Stands Outside the Modified Merger Rule and Sets Fresh Guidance on Plain-Error Review 1....
Chapman v. State (2025): Clarifying Judicial Commentary under OCGA § 17-8-57 and Witness-Based Authentication of Firearm Evidence

Chapman v. State (2025): Clarifying Judicial Commentary under OCGA § 17-8-57 and Witness-Based Authentication of Firearm Evidence

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Chapman v. State (2025): Clarifying Judicial Commentary under OCGA § 17-8-57 and Witness-Based Authentication of Firearm Evidence 1. Introduction In Chapman v. The State and its companion case Watson...
Clarifying Waiver of the Defendant’s Right to be Present During Jury Viewings: A Commentary on Jacobs v. State (Ga. 2025)

Clarifying Waiver of the Defendant’s Right to be Present During Jury Viewings: A Commentary on Jacobs v. State (Ga. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Clarifying Waiver of the Defendant’s Right to be Present During Jury Viewings: A Commentary on Jacobs v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2025) Case: Jacobs v. State, S25A0570, Supreme Court of...
Kitchens v. State: Georgia High Court Demands Precise Fact-Finding and Distinct Barker–Doggett Analysis in Speedy-Trial Claims

Kitchens v. State: Georgia High Court Demands Precise Fact-Finding and Distinct Barker–Doggett Analysis in Speedy-Trial Claims

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Kitchens v. State: Georgia High Court Demands Precise Fact-Finding and Distinct Barker–Doggett Analysis in Speedy-Trial Claims Introduction On 1 July 2025, the Supreme Court of Georgia delivered a...
State v. Haynes: The Connecticut Supreme Court’s Robust Re-Endorsement of the Harris Impeachment Exception and Independent-Source Doctrine

State v. Haynes: The Connecticut Supreme Court’s Robust Re-Endorsement of the Harris Impeachment Exception and Independent-Source Doctrine

Date: Jul 3, 2025
State v. Haynes: The Connecticut Supreme Court’s Robust Re-Endorsement of the Harris Impeachment Exception and Independent-Source Doctrine Introduction State v. Haynes, 345 Conn. ___ (July 1, 2025),...
State v. Haynes: Connecticut Re-Affirms the Full Harris Impeachment Exception under its State Constitution

State v. Haynes: Connecticut Re-Affirms the Full Harris Impeachment Exception under its State Constitution

Date: Jul 3, 2025
State v. Haynes (2025): Connecticut Re-Affirms the Full Harris Impeachment Exception under its State Constitution Introduction State v. Haynes presented the Connecticut Supreme Court with a chance to...
State v. Ramsey (2025): Clarifying the Appellate Test for Sufficiency of the Evidence where Self-Defense is Asserted

State v. Ramsey (2025): Clarifying the Appellate Test for Sufficiency of the Evidence where Self-Defense is Asserted

Date: Jul 3, 2025
State v. Ramsey (Conn. 2025): Clarifying the Appellate Test for Sufficiency of the Evidence where Self-Defense is Asserted Introduction In State v. Ramsey, 208 A.3d ___ (Conn. 2025), the Supreme...
Third Circuit Abolishes “Subordination” and “Animus” Tests for Asylum Nexus and Re-focuses CAT Acquiescence on State Capability – Commentary on Hector Tipan Lopez v. Attorney General (3d Cir. 2025)

Third Circuit Abolishes “Subordination” and “Animus” Tests for Asylum Nexus and Re-focuses CAT Acquiescence on State Capability – Commentary on Hector Tipan Lopez v. Attorney General (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Third Circuit Abolishes “Subordination” and “Animus” Tests for Asylum Nexus and Re-focuses CAT Acquiescence on State Capability Commentary on Hector Tipan Lopez v. Attorney General of the United...
The “Rosa Rule” – 404(b) Floodgates and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel under Strickland

The “Rosa Rule” – 404(b) Floodgates and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel under Strickland

Date: Jul 3, 2025
The “Rosa Rule” – 404(b) Floodgates and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel under Strickland Introduction In Kelvin Rosa v. Administrator East Jersey State Prison, the United States Court of Appeals...
United States v. Kimble: Categorical Disarmament of Drug-Trafficking Felons Survives Second-Amendment Scrutiny

United States v. Kimble: Categorical Disarmament of Drug-Trafficking Felons Survives Second-Amendment Scrutiny

Date: Jul 3, 2025
United States v. Kimble: Categorical Disarmament of Drug-Trafficking Felons Survives Second-Amendment Scrutiny 1. Introduction In United States v. Kimble, No. 23-50874 (5th Cir. June 30 2025), the...

Fourth-Circuit Clarifies “Joint-Venture Constructive Possession” and Plain-Error Limits on Competency Challenges – A Commentary on United States v. Cristian Cabrera-Rivas (2025)

Fourth-Circuit Clarifies “Joint-Venture Constructive Possession” and Plain-Error Limits on Competency Challenges – A Commentary on United States v. Cristian Cabrera-Rivas (2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Fourth-Circuit Clarifies “Joint-Venture Constructive Possession” and Plain-Error Limits on Competency Challenges A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Cristian Cabrera-Rivas, 93 F.4th ___...
“Total Relevant Conduct” Means Total: United States v. Dehaven Craig and the Limits on Government-Sought Guideline Enhancements

“Total Relevant Conduct” Means Total: United States v. Dehaven Craig and the Limits on Government-Sought Guideline Enhancements

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Total Relevant Conduct” Means Total: United States v. Dehaven Craig and the Limits on Government-Sought Guideline Enhancements Introduction On 30 June 2025 the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Ferguson v. City of New York: Reinforcing the Evidentiary Threshold to Rebut Grand-Jury Probable Cause and Advance § 1983 Malicious-Prosecution and Fair-Trial Claims on Summary Judgment

Ferguson v. City of New York: Reinforcing the Evidentiary Threshold to Rebut Grand-Jury Probable Cause and Advance § 1983 Malicious-Prosecution and Fair-Trial Claims on Summary Judgment

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Ferguson v. City of New York: Reinforcing the Evidentiary Threshold to Rebut Grand-Jury Probable Cause and Advance § 1983 Malicious-Prosecution and Fair-Trial Claims on Summary Judgment Introduction...

    “Cash Is Not a Record”: The Second Circuit’s Re-affirmation that
    Mental Reconstructions and Lost Papers Do Not Excuse a §727(a)(3) Violation

“Cash Is Not a Record”: The Second Circuit’s Re-affirmation that Mental Reconstructions and Lost Papers Do Not Excuse a §727(a)(3) Violation

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Cash Is Not a Record”: The Second Circuit’s Re-affirmation that Mental Reconstructions and Lost Papers Do Not Excuse a §727(a)(3) Violation 1. Introduction The Second Circuit’s summary order in In...
Reaffirming the Necessity of Bad-Faith Allegations to Pierce § 102(b)(7) Shields in Disclosure-Based SPAC Merger Challenges: A Commentary on Mullen v. Bell (2d Cir. 2025)

Reaffirming the Necessity of Bad-Faith Allegations to Pierce § 102(b)(7) Shields in Disclosure-Based SPAC Merger Challenges: A Commentary on Mullen v. Bell (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Reaffirming the Necessity of Bad-Faith Allegations to Pierce § 102(b)(7) Shields in Disclosure-Based SPAC Merger Challenges: Mullen v. Bell, 24-2291 (2d Cir. 2025) Introduction Mullen v. Bell...
“Same Website, Same Clock” – Second Circuit Clarifies the Limits of the Single-Publication Rule and Equitable Tolling in Online Defamation and Fraud Actions

“Same Website, Same Clock” – Second Circuit Clarifies the Limits of the Single-Publication Rule and Equitable Tolling in Online Defamation and Fraud Actions

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Same Website, Same Clock” – Second Circuit Clarifies the Limits of the Single-Publication Rule and Equitable Tolling in Online Defamation and Fraud Actions Introduction Case: Sarkar v. City of New...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert