Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

limits-on-magistrate-judges&amp Case Commentaries

No Seasonal Exception to RSA 205-A:3 — Continuous Tenancy and 18-Month Change‑of‑Use Notice Required in Manufactured Housing Parks (Dobens v. Fagnant)

No Seasonal Exception to RSA 205-A:3 — Continuous Tenancy and 18-Month Change‑of‑Use Notice Required in Manufactured Housing Parks (Dobens v. Fagnant)

Date: Jul 18, 2025
No Seasonal Exception to RSA 205-A:3 — Continuous Tenancy and 18-Month Change‑of‑Use Notice Required in Manufactured Housing Parks Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (N.H. July 17, 2025) Introduction In...
Sixth Circuit Reaffirms: Unauthorized Overtime as Legitimate, Nondiscriminatory Basis for Termination; No ADEA Hostile Environment Without an Age Nexus

Sixth Circuit Reaffirms: Unauthorized Overtime as Legitimate, Nondiscriminatory Basis for Termination; No ADEA Hostile Environment Without an Age Nexus

Date: Jul 18, 2025
Sixth Circuit Reaffirms: Unauthorized Overtime as Legitimate, Nondiscriminatory Basis for Termination; No ADEA Hostile Environment Without an Age Nexus Case: Cynthia Barnes v. Secretary of Veterans...
No Duty to Infer “Implied” PSGs; Failures on Persecution and Nexus Obviate “Unable/Unwilling” Findings; Defective NTAs Do Not Strip Jurisdiction — Sixth Circuit Commentary on Torres de Lopez v. Bondi

No Duty to Infer “Implied” PSGs; Failures on Persecution and Nexus Obviate “Unable/Unwilling” Findings; Defective NTAs Do Not Strip Jurisdiction — Sixth Circuit Commentary on Torres de Lopez v. Bondi

Date: Jul 18, 2025
No Duty to Infer “Implied” PSGs; Failures on Persecution and Nexus Obviate “Unable/Unwilling” Findings; Defective NTAs Do Not Strip Jurisdiction — Sixth Circuit in Torres de Lopez v. Bondi Court:...
Reasonable Page Limits and Rule 41 Dismissal for Rule 8 Noncompliance: The Tenth Circuit’s Affirmance in Sullivan v. Graham

Reasonable Page Limits and Rule 41 Dismissal for Rule 8 Noncompliance: The Tenth Circuit’s Affirmance in Sullivan v. Graham

Date: Jul 18, 2025
Reasonable Page Limits and Rule 41 Dismissal for Rule 8 Noncompliance: The Tenth Circuit’s Affirmance in Sullivan v. Graham Introduction In Sullivan v. Graham, consolidated appeals Nos. 23-3153 and...
No State-Law End-Run Around ERISA for Top-Hat Plans; “Equitable Surcharge” Is Not Available Under § 1132(a)(3)

No State-Law End-Run Around ERISA for Top-Hat Plans; “Equitable Surcharge” Is Not Available Under § 1132(a)(3)

Date: Jul 18, 2025
No State-Law End-Run Around ERISA for Top-Hat Plans; “Equitable Surcharge” Is Not Available Under § 1132(a)(3) Introduction In Jerry Aldridge v. Regions Bank, No. 24-5603 (6th Cir. July 17, 2025),...
People v. Oyler: Clarifying Witherspoon–Witt Voir Dire After Leon and Applying Chapman Harmless Error to SB 1437 Instructional Omissions

People v. Oyler: Clarifying Witherspoon–Witt Voir Dire After Leon and Applying Chapman Harmless Error to SB 1437 Instructional Omissions

Date: Jul 18, 2025
People v. Oyler: Clarifying Witherspoon–Witt Voir Dire After Leon and Applying Chapman Harmless Error to SB 1437 Instructional Omissions Introduction People v. Oyler is a capital case arising from a...
Whitaker v. Dempsey: Seventh Circuit Clarifies the “Utter‑Implausibility” Exception at Summary Judgment, Affirms Limited Pepper‑Spray Use to Address Active Bloodborne-Risk, and Reaffirms the De Minimis Injury Bar in § 1983 Deliberate‑Indifference Claims

Whitaker v. Dempsey: Seventh Circuit Clarifies the “Utter‑Implausibility” Exception at Summary Judgment, Affirms Limited Pepper‑Spray Use to Address Active Bloodborne-Risk, and Reaffirms the De Minimis Injury Bar in § 1983 Deliberate‑Indifference Claims

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Whitaker v. Dempsey: Seventh Circuit Clarifies the “Utter‑Implausibility” Exception at Summary Judgment, Affirms Limited Pepper‑Spray Use to Address Active Bloodborne-Risk, and Reaffirms the De...
Misreading Rule 15 Is Not a “Mistake”: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Relation-Back, Notice-of-Appeal Specificity, and Affirms Kentucky’s One-Year Limitations for § 1983 Claims

Misreading Rule 15 Is Not a “Mistake”: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Relation-Back, Notice-of-Appeal Specificity, and Affirms Kentucky’s One-Year Limitations for § 1983 Claims

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Misreading Rule 15 Is Not a “Mistake”: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Relation-Back, Notice-of-Appeal Specificity, and Affirms Kentucky’s One-Year Limitations for § 1983 Claims Introduction In Jennie V....
Resetting the 182‑Day Clock and Recognizing “Reader” Support: The Sixth Circuit’s Persuasive Guidance on Michigan’s PWDCRA in Poplar v. Genesee County Road Commission

Resetting the 182‑Day Clock and Recognizing “Reader” Support: The Sixth Circuit’s Persuasive Guidance on Michigan’s PWDCRA in Poplar v. Genesee County Road Commission

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Resetting the 182‑Day Clock and Recognizing “Reader” Support: The Sixth Circuit’s Persuasive Guidance on Michigan’s PWDCRA in Poplar v. Genesee County Road Commission Introduction In Donna Poplar v....
Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Priority of Performing Construction Surety’s Equitable Subrogation Over Earlier Perfected UCC Security Interests; No Mistake-of-Fact Requirement

Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Priority of Performing Construction Surety’s Equitable Subrogation Over Earlier Perfected UCC Security Interests; No Mistake-of-Fact Requirement

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Performing Construction Surety’s Equitable Subrogation Trumps Earlier Perfected UCC Security Interests — No Mistake-of-Fact Requirement Introduction In a significant decision for public construction...
Clarifying the Franks Threshold and “Mere Tipster” Privilege: Seventh Circuit Affirms Probable Cause Built on a Corroborated, In‑Person CI Appearance

Clarifying the Franks Threshold and “Mere Tipster” Privilege: Seventh Circuit Affirms Probable Cause Built on a Corroborated, In‑Person CI Appearance

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Clarifying the Franks Threshold and “Mere Tipster” Privilege: Seventh Circuit Affirms Probable Cause Built on a Corroborated, In‑Person CI Appearance Introduction In United States v. Deandre Maxwell...
Double-Waiver Forecloses Interlocutory Arbitration Appeal in Bankruptcy: Sixth Circuit Affirms Where Appellants Neither Preserved the Arbitration Agreement Nor Challenged Bankruptcy-Conflict Grounds

Double-Waiver Forecloses Interlocutory Arbitration Appeal in Bankruptcy: Sixth Circuit Affirms Where Appellants Neither Preserved the Arbitration Agreement Nor Challenged Bankruptcy-Conflict Grounds

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Double-Waiver Forecloses Interlocutory Arbitration Appeal in Bankruptcy: Sixth Circuit Affirms Where Appellants Neither Preserved the Arbitration Agreement Nor Challenged Bankruptcy-Conflict Grounds...
Actual Physical Residency at Time of Receipt Required to Invoke South Dakota’s Anti‑Spam Statute: Commentary on Lapin v. Zeetogroup (2025 S.D. 36)

Actual Physical Residency at Time of Receipt Required to Invoke South Dakota’s Anti‑Spam Statute: Commentary on Lapin v. Zeetogroup (2025 S.D. 36)

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Actual Physical Residency at Time of Receipt Required to Invoke South Dakota’s Anti‑Spam Statute: Lapin v. Zeetogroup (2025 S.D. 36) Court: Supreme Court of South Dakota | Date: July 16, 2025 |...
Causation Required for Juvenile Restitution: South Dakota Aligns Delinquency Restitution with Adult Standard in In re Interest of J.W. (2025 S.D. 38)

Causation Required for Juvenile Restitution: South Dakota Aligns Delinquency Restitution with Adult Standard in In re Interest of J.W. (2025 S.D. 38)

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Causation Required for Juvenile Restitution: South Dakota Aligns Delinquency Restitution with Adult Standard in In re Interest of J.W. (2025 S.D. 38) Introduction In In the Interest of J.W., 2025...
Matter of Santos: Second Department Reaffirms Consent Discipline Parameters and a One‑Year Suspension Baseline for Attorney Neglect Coupled with Client Deception

Matter of Santos: Second Department Reaffirms Consent Discipline Parameters and a One‑Year Suspension Baseline for Attorney Neglect Coupled with Client Deception

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Matter of Santos: Second Department Reaffirms Consent Discipline Parameters and a One‑Year Suspension Baseline for Attorney Neglect Coupled with Client Deception Introduction In Matter of Santos...
Interplay of SSL §409‑h and FCA §1055‑c Clarified: Courts Must Prove Actual Unavailability of Less Restrictive Placements Before Approving QRTPs

Interplay of SSL §409‑h and FCA §1055‑c Clarified: Courts Must Prove Actual Unavailability of Less Restrictive Placements Before Approving QRTPs

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Interplay of SSL §409‑h and FCA §1055‑c Clarified: Courts Must Prove Actual Unavailability of Less Restrictive Placements Before Approving QRTPs Introduction This commentary analyzes the Appellate...
Courts Are Not Agencies: Loper Bright Does Not Trigger Minnesota’s Postconviction “New Interpretation of Law” Exception and the Two-Year Time Bar Remains Strict

Courts Are Not Agencies: Loper Bright Does Not Trigger Minnesota’s Postconviction “New Interpretation of Law” Exception and the Two-Year Time Bar Remains Strict

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Courts Are Not Agencies: Loper Bright Does Not Trigger Minnesota’s Postconviction “New Interpretation of Law” Exception and the Two-Year Time Bar Remains Strict Introduction In Nantambu Noah Kambon...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Narrow Judicial Review of I‑751 Good‑Faith Marriage Waivers: Credibility and Weight-of-Evidence Challenges Are Unreviewable

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Narrow Judicial Review of I‑751 Good‑Faith Marriage Waivers: Credibility and Weight-of-Evidence Challenges Are Unreviewable

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Narrow Judicial Review of I‑751 Good‑Faith Marriage Waivers: Credibility and Weight-of-Evidence Challenges Are Unreviewable Introduction In Nathaniel Kumedzro v. Pamela Bondi,...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies No Shortcuts Under Daubert or the TPLA: Expertise Must Match the Theory; Malfunction Theory and Consumer-Expectation Shortcuts Fail for Complex Medical Implants

Sixth Circuit Clarifies No Shortcuts Under Daubert or the TPLA: Expertise Must Match the Theory; Malfunction Theory and Consumer-Expectation Shortcuts Fail for Complex Medical Implants

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Sixth Circuit Clarifies No Shortcuts Under Daubert or the TPLA: Expertise Must Match the Theory; Malfunction Theory and Consumer-Expectation Shortcuts Fail for Complex Medical Implants Case: Joseph...
Two-Year Medical Malpractice Repose Means Two Calendar Years Ending the Day Before the Anniversary: Paulsen v. Avera McKennan

Two-Year Medical Malpractice Repose Means Two Calendar Years Ending the Day Before the Anniversary: Paulsen v. Avera McKennan

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Two-Year Medical Malpractice Repose Means Two Calendar Years Ending the Day Before the Anniversary: Paulsen v. Avera McKennan Introduction In Paulsen v. Avera McKennan, 2025 S.D. 37, the South Dakota...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert