Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

interpreting-& Case Commentaries

United States v. Ferguson: Admissibility of “Rapport-Building” Segments in Child Forensic Interview Videos

United States v. Ferguson: Admissibility of “Rapport-Building” Segments in Child Forensic Interview Videos

Date: Jun 20, 2025
United States v. Ferguson: Fourth Circuit Clarifies the Admissibility of Rapport-Building Segments in Child Forensic Interviews 1. Introduction United States v. Donald Gene Ferguson, II (4th Cir.,...
Extended Retention of Seized Digital Devices Pending Technological Advancements: A Commentary on United States v. Mark Bolling (4th Cir. 2025)

Extended Retention of Seized Digital Devices Pending Technological Advancements: A Commentary on United States v. Mark Bolling (4th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Extended Retention of Seized Digital Devices Pending Technological Advancements: A Commentary on United States v. Mark Bolling (4th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction The unpublished Fourth Circuit decision...
Prospective Due-Process Notice for Junior Judgment Lienholders in Hawaiʻi Execution Sales

Prospective Due-Process Notice for Junior Judgment Lienholders in Hawaiʻi Execution Sales

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Prospective Due-Process Notice for Junior Judgment Lienholders in Hawaiʻi Execution Sales 1. Introduction In Winn v. Brady, SCWC-17-0000806 (Haw. June 13 2025), the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court delivered a...
“Substantial Compliance” and “Unified Representation” Confirmed for Election-Commissioner Qualifications: A Commentary on Brown v. Madison County Board of Supervisors (Miss. 2025)

“Substantial Compliance” and “Unified Representation” Confirmed for Election-Commissioner Qualifications: A Commentary on Brown v. Madison County Board of Supervisors (Miss. 2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Substantial Compliance” and “Unified Representation” Confirmed for Election-Commissioner Qualifications: A Commentary on Brown v. Madison County Board of Supervisors (Miss. 2025) Introduction The...
Clark v. State: Mississippi Supreme Court Abolishes Procedural Waiver for First-Time Atkins Claims

Clark v. State: Mississippi Supreme Court Abolishes Procedural Waiver for First-Time Atkins Claims

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Clark v. State: Mississippi Supreme Court Abolishes Procedural Waiver for First-Time Atkins Claims Introduction In Tony Terrell Clark v. State of Mississippi, decided on 19 June 2025, the Mississippi...
Karpen v. Andrade: Defining When HSTPA’s Personal-Use Limitations Govern Pending Holdover Proceedings

Karpen v. Andrade: Defining When HSTPA’s Personal-Use Limitations Govern Pending Holdover Proceedings

Date: Jun 19, 2025
Karpen v. Andrade: Defining When HSTPA’s Personal-Use Limitations Govern Pending Holdover Proceedings Introduction The Appellate Division, Second Department, in Matter of Karpen v. Andrade, 2025 NY...
“The Three-Step Lens” – PF Dev. Group, LLC v. Town of Brunswick and the Refined Test for CPLR 3211(a)(7) Motions in Declaratory-Judgment Zoning Challenges

“The Three-Step Lens” – PF Dev. Group, LLC v. Town of Brunswick and the Refined Test for CPLR 3211(a)(7) Motions in Declaratory-Judgment Zoning Challenges

Date: Jun 19, 2025
“The Three-Step Lens” – PF Dev. Group, LLC v. Town of Brunswick and the Refined Test for CPLR 3211(a)(7) Motions in Declaratory-Judgment Zoning Challenges 1. Introduction PF Development Group, LLC v....
Common Carrier Duty Now Embraces “Reasonably Accessible Crosswalks” – A Commentary on Lans v. Farnam (2025)

Common Carrier Duty Now Embraces “Reasonably Accessible Crosswalks” – A Commentary on Lans v. Farnam (2025)

Date: Jun 19, 2025
Common Carrier Duty Now Embraces “Reasonably Accessible Crosswalks” – A Commentary on Lans v. Farnam (2025) 1. Introduction In Lans v. Farnam, the Appellate Division, Third Department, confronted a...
Coleman and Noor Apply Retroactively; Knaffla Does Not Bar First Petitions Raising New Interpretations of Law

Coleman and Noor Apply Retroactively; Knaffla Does Not Bar First Petitions Raising New Interpretations of Law

Date: Jun 19, 2025
Coleman and Noor Apply Retroactively; Knaffla Does Not Bar First Petitions Raising New Interpretations of Law Introduction In Carlos Heard v. State of Minnesota, 22 N.W.3d 154 (Minn. 2025), the...
“The Tittle Range” – A New Benchmark for Escrow-Related Attorney Discipline in New York

“The Tittle Range” – A New Benchmark for Escrow-Related Attorney Discipline in New York

Date: Jun 19, 2025
“The Tittle Range” – A New Benchmark for Escrow-Related Attorney Discipline in New York Introduction Matter of Tittle (2025 NY Slip Op 03729) is an Appellate Division, Second Department decision that...
Retroactive Reach of New York’s FAPA: When Abandonment Cuts Off the CPLR 205-a “Second-Chance” in Mortgage Foreclosures

Retroactive Reach of New York’s FAPA: When Abandonment Cuts Off the CPLR 205-a “Second-Chance” in Mortgage Foreclosures

Date: Jun 19, 2025
Retroactive Reach of New York’s Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act (FAPA): When Abandonment Cuts Off the CPLR 205-a “Second-Chance” in Mortgage Foreclosures 1. Introduction Case: Deutsche Bank National...
“The Harrigan Safeguard” – Mandatory Opportunity to Withdraw a Plea When the Promised Sentence Proves Illegal

“The Harrigan Safeguard” – Mandatory Opportunity to Withdraw a Plea When the Promised Sentence Proves Illegal

Date: Jun 19, 2025
“The Harrigan Safeguard” – Mandatory Opportunity to Withdraw a Plea When the Promised Sentence Proves Illegal Introduction Citation: People v. Harrigan, 2025 NY Slip Op 03669 (App. Div., 3d Dep’t,...
The “Bacon Preservation Rule” — Clarifying How and When a Confrontation-Clause Objection Must Be Raised in New York

The “Bacon Preservation Rule” — Clarifying How and When a Confrontation-Clause Objection Must Be Raised in New York

Date: Jun 19, 2025
The “Bacon Preservation Rule” — Clarifying How and When a Confrontation-Clause Objection Must Be Raised in New York Introduction People v. Bacon (2025 NY Slip Op 03692) presented the New York Court...
Intrinsic Evidence Has Limits: State v. Rouse Restricts “Res Gestae” to Truly Contextual Facts, Reinforces 404(b) Foundations, and Reaffirms Written-Order Tolling Under the 180‑Day Rule

Intrinsic Evidence Has Limits: State v. Rouse Restricts “Res Gestae” to Truly Contextual Facts, Reinforces 404(b) Foundations, and Reaffirms Written-Order Tolling Under the 180‑Day Rule

Date: Jun 19, 2025
Intrinsic Evidence Has Limits: State v. Rouse Restricts “Res Gestae” to Truly Contextual Facts, Reinforces 404(b) Foundations, and Reaffirms Written-Order Tolling Under the 180‑Day Rule Introduction...
Bentkowski v. City of New York (2025): Raising the Bar for “Clear and Unambiguous” Promises in Public-Sector Promissory Estoppel Claims

Bentkowski v. City of New York (2025): Raising the Bar for “Clear and Unambiguous” Promises in Public-Sector Promissory Estoppel Claims

Date: Jun 19, 2025
Bentkowski v. City of New York (2025): Raising the Bar for “Clear and Unambiguous” Promises in Public-Sector Promissory Estoppel Claims Introduction For more than half a century New York City...
“The Actual-Mailing Rule” & Pre-Mailing RPAPL 1306 Filings: A Commentary on Tri-State III, LLC v. Litkowski (2025)

“The Actual-Mailing Rule” & Pre-Mailing RPAPL 1306 Filings: A Commentary on Tri-State III, LLC v. Litkowski (2025)

Date: Jun 19, 2025
“The Actual-Mailing Rule” & Validity of Pre-Mailing RPAPL 1306 Filings: An In-Depth Commentary on Tri-State III, LLC v. Litkowski (2025) Introduction Tri-State III, LLC v. Litkowski, 2025 NY Slip Op...
Matter of Martinez v. Toole: Isolated Incidents Insufficient for Harassment Findings & Refined Standards for Relocation-Based Custody Modifications

Matter of Martinez v. Toole: Isolated Incidents Insufficient for Harassment Findings & Refined Standards for Relocation-Based Custody Modifications

Date: Jun 19, 2025
Matter of Martinez v. Toole: Isolated Incidents Insufficient for Harassment Findings & Refined Standards for Relocation-Based Custody Modifications 1. Introduction Matter of Martinez v. Toole (2025...
Misperceived Criminal Records and Employer Liability: Commentary on Matter of Janitronics, Inc. v. NYS Division of Human Rights

Misperceived Criminal Records and Employer Liability: Commentary on Matter of Janitronics, Inc. v. NYS Division of Human Rights

Date: Jun 19, 2025
Misperceived Criminal Records and Employer Liability: A Detailed Commentary on Matter of Janitronics, Inc. v. New York State Division of Human Rights (2025) 1. Introduction Matter of Janitronics,...
The “Reasonably Reliable and Relevant” Standard for Vacancy Surveys & Expanded Rent-Reduction Powers under the ETPA

The “Reasonably Reliable and Relevant” Standard for Vacancy Surveys & Expanded Rent-Reduction Powers under the ETPA

Date: Jun 19, 2025
The “Reasonably Reliable and Relevant” Standard for Vacancy Surveys & Expanded Rent-Reduction Powers under the ETPA Introduction Matter of Hudson Valley Property Owners Association Inc. v. City of...

Commentary on US Bank N.A. v. 927 E. 86th Residence Corp. (2025): 
Re-affirming the Six-Year Statute of Limitations on Mortgage Installments 
and the Court’s Discretion to Cure Procedural Irregularities

Commentary on US Bank N.A. v. 927 E. 86th Residence Corp. (2025): Re-affirming the Six-Year Statute of Limitations on Mortgage Installments and the Court’s Discretion to Cure Procedural Irregularities

Date: Jun 19, 2025
US Bank N.A. v. 927 E. 86th Residence Corp. (2025) – The Appellate Division Clarifies the Temporal Scope of Recoverable Mortgage Installments and Endorses Judicial Flexibility under CPLR 2001 1....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.