Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

establishing-&amp Case Commentaries

Erlinger Challenges Must Be Preserved, and Officer Responses to “What Are My Charges?” Are Not Interrogation: Commentary on People v. Emanuel (2025)

Erlinger Challenges Must Be Preserved, and Officer Responses to “What Are My Charges?” Are Not Interrogation: Commentary on People v. Emanuel (2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Erlinger Challenges Must Be Preserved, and Officer Responses to “What Are My Charges?” Are Not Interrogation: Commentary on People v. Emanuel (2025) Case: People v. Emanuel, 2025 NY Slip Op 04354...
State v. McNeal: Kansas Clarifies Paths to Prove Fair-Cross-Section Claims, Rejects Race‑Switching Implicit‑Bias Instructions, and Reaffirms the Low Threshold for Miranda Waivers

State v. McNeal: Kansas Clarifies Paths to Prove Fair-Cross-Section Claims, Rejects Race‑Switching Implicit‑Bias Instructions, and Reaffirms the Low Threshold for Miranda Waivers

Date: Jul 26, 2025
State v. McNeal: Kansas Clarifies Paths to Prove Fair-Cross-Section Claims, Rejects Race‑Switching Implicit‑Bias Instructions, and Reaffirms the Low Threshold for Miranda Waivers Introduction In...
Preserving CPL 30.30 Claims Despite Withdrawal of a Renewal Motion: The Fourth Department’s Clarification in People v. Banks

Preserving CPL 30.30 Claims Despite Withdrawal of a Renewal Motion: The Fourth Department’s Clarification in People v. Banks

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Preserving CPL 30.30 Claims Despite Withdrawal of a Renewal Motion: The Fourth Department’s Clarification in People v. Banks Introduction In People v. Banks, 2025 NY Slip Op 04346 (App Div 4th Dept...
Emergency Doctrine and Sudden Non‑Vehicular Highway Obstructions: Rear‑End Presumption Rebuttal, Police‑Report Hearsay, and Abandonment Clarified in Gallt v. Nelk (2025)

Emergency Doctrine and Sudden Non‑Vehicular Highway Obstructions: Rear‑End Presumption Rebuttal, Police‑Report Hearsay, and Abandonment Clarified in Gallt v. Nelk (2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Emergency Doctrine and Sudden Non‑Vehicular Highway Obstructions: Rear‑End Presumption Rebuttal, Police‑Report Hearsay, and Abandonment Clarified in Gallt v. Nelk (2025) Introduction In Gallt v....
Precision in Damages and a New Lens on Merchant Cash Advances: Bridge Funding Cap LLC v. SimonExpress Pizza, LLC (AD4th 2025)

Precision in Damages and a New Lens on Merchant Cash Advances: Bridge Funding Cap LLC v. SimonExpress Pizza, LLC (AD4th 2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Precision in Damages and a New Lens on Merchant Cash Advances: Bridge Funding Cap LLC v. SimonExpress Pizza, LLC (AD4th 2025) Introduction In Bridge Funding Cap LLC v. SimonExpress Pizza, LLC (2025...

      Rule of Completeness Can Permit Testimonial Hearsay to Correct Defense Misrepresentation; Security-Guard 911 Calls Are Non-Anonymous for Reasonable Suspicion: Commentary on People v. Peterson (2025)

Rule of Completeness Can Permit Testimonial Hearsay to Correct Defense Misrepresentation; Security-Guard 911 Calls Are Non-Anonymous for Reasonable Suspicion: Commentary on People v. Peterson (2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Rule of Completeness Can Permit Testimonial Hearsay to Correct Defense Misrepresentation; Security-Guard 911 Calls Are Non-Anonymous for Reasonable Suspicion Introduction In People v. Peterson (2025...
Fourth Department Recognizes Nonwaivable Appellate Authority to Reduce Sentences in the Interest of Justice, Even After a Valid Appeal Waiver — People v. Hannah T. (2025)

Fourth Department Recognizes Nonwaivable Appellate Authority to Reduce Sentences in the Interest of Justice, Even After a Valid Appeal Waiver — People v. Hannah T. (2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Fourth Department Recognizes Nonwaivable Appellate Authority to Reduce Sentences in the Interest of Justice, Even After a Valid Appeal Waiver — People v. Hannah T. (2025) Introduction In People v....
“Same-Gun Nexus” as Significant Common Evidence: People v. Spinks Clarifies Joinder Under CPL 200.20(2)(b) and (c)

“Same-Gun Nexus” as Significant Common Evidence: People v. Spinks Clarifies Joinder Under CPL 200.20(2)(b) and (c)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
“Same-Gun Nexus” as Significant Common Evidence: People v. Spinks Clarifies Joinder Under CPL 200.20(2)(b) and (c) Introduction People v. Spinks (2025 NY Slip Op 04303) arises from two violent...
Mandatory Romeo-and-Juliet Screening and Narrow “Sexually Explicit Conduct” Definition for Under‑19 Sexting Cases: State v. Grant (Kan. 2025)

Mandatory Romeo-and-Juliet Screening and Narrow “Sexually Explicit Conduct” Definition for Under‑19 Sexting Cases: State v. Grant (Kan. 2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Mandatory Romeo-and-Juliet Screening and Narrow “Sexually Explicit Conduct” Definition for Under‑19 Sexting Cases: State v. Grant (Kan. 2025) Introduction In State v. Grant, the Supreme Court of...
Flight After a Level‑Two Inquiry in a “Shots‑Fired” Investigation Can Ripen Founded Suspicion into Reasonable Suspicion; Consent‑to‑Frisk Requests Permissible at Level Two — Commentary on People v. Smith (2025 NY Slip Op 04317)

Flight After a Level‑Two Inquiry in a “Shots‑Fired” Investigation Can Ripen Founded Suspicion into Reasonable Suspicion; Consent‑to‑Frisk Requests Permissible at Level Two — Commentary on People v. Smith (2025 NY Slip Op 04317)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Flight After a Level‑Two Inquiry in a “Shots‑Fired” Investigation Can Ripen Founded Suspicion into Reasonable Suspicion; Consent‑to‑Frisk Requests Permissible at Level Two — Commentary on People v....
No Attenuation Without Preservation: Fourth Department Suppresses Station-House Statements After Unlawful Handcuffing During Traffic Stop

No Attenuation Without Preservation: Fourth Department Suppresses Station-House Statements After Unlawful Handcuffing During Traffic Stop

Date: Jul 26, 2025
No Attenuation Without Preservation: Fourth Department Suppresses Station-House Statements After Unlawful Handcuffing During Traffic Stop Introduction In People v. Hernandez (2025 NY Slip Op 04315),...
Patterson v. Meta: No Products‑Liability Workaround to Section 230; Algorithmic Recommendation Is a Protected Editorial Function (and Alternatively First‑Amendment‑Protected)

Patterson v. Meta: No Products‑Liability Workaround to Section 230; Algorithmic Recommendation Is a Protected Editorial Function (and Alternatively First‑Amendment‑Protected)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Patterson v. Meta: No Products‑Liability Workaround to Section 230; Algorithmic Recommendation Is a Protected Editorial Function (and Alternatively First‑Amendment‑Protected) Introduction This...
Fourth Department Clarifies PLCAA Boundaries: Aftermarket Magazine Locks Are “Component Parts,” But New York’s Deceptive Marketing Statutes (GBL §§ 349–350) And Aiding-and-Abetting SAFE Act Violations Can Trigger the Predicate Exception

Fourth Department Clarifies PLCAA Boundaries: Aftermarket Magazine Locks Are “Component Parts,” But New York’s Deceptive Marketing Statutes (GBL §§ 349–350) And Aiding-and-Abetting SAFE Act Violations Can Trigger the Predicate Exception

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Fourth Department Clarifies PLCAA Boundaries: Aftermarket Magazine Locks Are “Component Parts,” But New York’s Deceptive Marketing Statutes (GBL §§ 349–350) And Aiding-and-Abetting SAFE Act...
GML §239-m Referral as a Non-Waivable Jurisdictional Prerequisite for Non-Exempt Area Variances: Filing Does Not Trigger Limitations; ZBA Approval Is Null and Void

GML §239-m Referral as a Non-Waivable Jurisdictional Prerequisite for Non-Exempt Area Variances: Filing Does Not Trigger Limitations; ZBA Approval Is Null and Void

Date: Jul 26, 2025
GML §239-m Referral as a Non-Waivable Jurisdictional Prerequisite for Non-Exempt Area Variances: Filing Does Not Trigger Limitations; ZBA Approval Is Null and Void Introduction Matter of Johnson v....
Heinrich v. Serens: Clarifying Missing‑Witness Burdens and the Scope of Pleaded Negligence in Multi‑Provider Medical Malpractice Trials

Heinrich v. Serens: Clarifying Missing‑Witness Burdens and the Scope of Pleaded Negligence in Multi‑Provider Medical Malpractice Trials

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Heinrich v. Serens: Clarifying Missing‑Witness Burdens and the Scope of Pleaded Negligence in Multi‑Provider Medical Malpractice Trials Introduction In Heinrich v. Serens (2025 NY Slip Op 04318), the...
Limiting Labor Law § 200 to “Construction-Site” Context and Enforcing Broad Tenant Indemnity: Curran v. JJML, Inc. (4th Dep’t 2025)

Limiting Labor Law § 200 to “Construction-Site” Context and Enforcing Broad Tenant Indemnity: Curran v. JJML, Inc. (4th Dep’t 2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Limiting Labor Law § 200 to “Construction-Site” Context and Enforcing Broad Tenant Indemnity: Curran v. JJML, Inc. (4th Dep’t 2025) Introduction In Curran v. JJML, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 04356), the...
McGuire: Surrogate’s Courts May Compel Sibling DNA Testing to Establish Nonmarital Parentage Even in Testate Estates

McGuire: Surrogate’s Courts May Compel Sibling DNA Testing to Establish Nonmarital Parentage Even in Testate Estates

Date: Jul 26, 2025
McGuire: Surrogate’s Courts May Compel Sibling DNA Testing to Establish Nonmarital Parentage Even in Testate Estates Introduction This commentary analyzes the Appellate Division, Fourth Department’s...
No New Precedent: Denial of Review in People v. Terry, with a Dissent Urging Evidence-Based Causation and Aiding‑and‑Abetting Proof at Bindover

No New Precedent: Denial of Review in People v. Terry, with a Dissent Urging Evidence-Based Causation and Aiding‑and‑Abetting Proof at Bindover

Date: Jul 26, 2025
No New Precedent: Denial of Review in People v. Terry, with a Dissent Urging Evidence-Based Causation and Aiding‑and‑Abetting Proof at Bindover Introduction In People of Michigan v. Damaree Darvell...
Refining Equivocal Self‑Representation Requests After People v Lewis: The Fourth Department’s Framework in People v Davis (2025)

Refining Equivocal Self‑Representation Requests After People v Lewis: The Fourth Department’s Framework in People v Davis (2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Refining Equivocal Self‑Representation Requests After People v Lewis: The Fourth Department’s Framework in People v Davis (2025) Introduction People v. Davis (2025 NY Slip Op 04300) is a Fourth...
A Roof Is Not the Home: Public Exposure Defines “Outside the Home” under Penal Law § 265.03(3) and Limits on Miranda in On‑Scene Questioning — Commentary on People v. Casiano (2025)

A Roof Is Not the Home: Public Exposure Defines “Outside the Home” under Penal Law § 265.03(3) and Limits on Miranda in On‑Scene Questioning — Commentary on People v. Casiano (2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
A Roof Is Not the Home: Public Exposure Defines “Outside the Home” under Penal Law § 265.03(3) and Limits on Miranda in On‑Scene Questioning Commentary on People v. Casiano, 2025 NY Slip Op 04316...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert