Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

eighth-circuit-rules-oklahoma&amp Case Commentaries

Clarifying IDEA Remand Scope and Procedural Violations: Second Circuit Summary Order on Bilingual Services, IEP Gaps, and Compensatory Education Timing

Clarifying IDEA Remand Scope and Procedural Violations: Second Circuit Summary Order on Bilingual Services, IEP Gaps, and Compensatory Education Timing

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Clarifying IDEA Remand Scope and Procedural Violations: Second Circuit Summary Order on Bilingual Services, IEP Gaps, and Compensatory Education Timing Introduction Case: Y.S. v. New York City...
Second Circuit (Non-Precedential) Guidance on Successive Summary Judgment Motions and Relation-Forward Appellate Jurisdiction in Pro Se Prisoner Litigation

Second Circuit (Non-Precedential) Guidance on Successive Summary Judgment Motions and Relation-Forward Appellate Jurisdiction in Pro Se Prisoner Litigation

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Second Circuit (Non-Precedential) Guidance on Successive Summary Judgment Motions and Relation-Forward Appellate Jurisdiction in Pro Se Prisoner Litigation Note on precedential weight: This is a...
Unnecessary Pain Suffices: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Causation and Deems Repeated “Submit Another Sick Call” Amid Known Futility Potentially Unreasonable in Eighth Amendment Medical-Indifference Claims

Unnecessary Pain Suffices: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Causation and Deems Repeated “Submit Another Sick Call” Amid Known Futility Potentially Unreasonable in Eighth Amendment Medical-Indifference Claims

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Unnecessary Pain Suffices: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Causation and Deems Repeated “Submit Another Sick Call” Amid Known Futility Potentially Unreasonable in Eighth Amendment Medical-Indifference...
Deterrence, Not Retribution: Generic “Punishment” Language at Revocation Does Not, Without More, Establish Plain-Error Reliance on § 3553(a)(2)(A) — United States v. Hunter (11th Cir. 2025)

Deterrence, Not Retribution: Generic “Punishment” Language at Revocation Does Not, Without More, Establish Plain-Error Reliance on § 3553(a)(2)(A) — United States v. Hunter (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Deterrence, Not Retribution: Generic “Punishment” Language at Revocation Does Not, Without More, Establish Plain-Error Reliance on § 3553(a)(2)(A) United States v. Keenan Devron Hunter (11th Cir....
Deterrence, Not Retribution, at Supervised-Release Revocation: Ambiguous “Punishment” Remarks Do Not Establish Plain Error Post-Esteras

Deterrence, Not Retribution, at Supervised-Release Revocation: Ambiguous “Punishment” Remarks Do Not Establish Plain Error Post-Esteras

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Deterrence, Not Retribution, at Supervised-Release Revocation: Ambiguous “Punishment” Remarks Do Not Establish Plain Error Post-Esteras Introduction In United States v. Keenan Devron Hunter, Nos....
Due Process Requires Oral Pronouncement (or Incorporation by Reference) of Discretionary Supervised‑Release Conditions; Appeal Waiver Does Not Compel Dismissal When the Written Judgment Conflicts with the Oral Sentence

Due Process Requires Oral Pronouncement (or Incorporation by Reference) of Discretionary Supervised‑Release Conditions; Appeal Waiver Does Not Compel Dismissal When the Written Judgment Conflicts with the Oral Sentence

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Due Process Requires Oral Pronouncement (or Incorporation by Reference) of Discretionary Supervised‑Release Conditions; Appeal Waiver Does Not Compel Dismissal When the Written Judgment Conflicts...
“Vulgarity Trumps Politics” in the Schoolhouse: Sixth Circuit Upholds Bans on Euphemistic Political Slogans under Fraser

“Vulgarity Trumps Politics” in the Schoolhouse: Sixth Circuit Upholds Bans on Euphemistic Political Slogans under Fraser

Date: Oct 16, 2025
“Vulgarity Trumps Politics” in the Schoolhouse: Sixth Circuit Upholds Bans on Euphemistic Political Slogans under Fraser Introduction In B. A. v. Tri-County Area Schools, No. 24-1769 (6th Cir. Oct....
No Chronological Preference for Conflicting ABG Studies: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Deference to ALJ Credibility Findings and Month‑of‑Filing Onset Under the BLBA

No Chronological Preference for Conflicting ABG Studies: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Deference to ALJ Credibility Findings and Month‑of‑Filing Onset Under the BLBA

Date: Oct 16, 2025
No Chronological Preference for Conflicting ABG Studies: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Deference to ALJ Credibility Findings and Month‑of‑Filing Onset Under the BLBA Introduction In Cumberland River Coal...
Sixth Circuit Adopts Sentencing‑Package Doctrine for First Step Act §404: Non‑Covered Counts May Be Reduced When Interdependent with Covered Offenses

Sixth Circuit Adopts Sentencing‑Package Doctrine for First Step Act §404: Non‑Covered Counts May Be Reduced When Interdependent with Covered Offenses

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Sixth Circuit Adopts Sentencing‑Package Doctrine for First Step Act §404: Non‑Covered Counts May Be Reduced When Interdependent with Covered Offenses Introduction In United States v. Edward Dale, a...
Sixth Circuit Endorses Sentencing-Package Resentencing Under the First Step Act: Non‑Covered Counts May Be Reduced Only If Interdependent (United States v. Polk)

Sixth Circuit Endorses Sentencing-Package Resentencing Under the First Step Act: Non‑Covered Counts May Be Reduced Only If Interdependent (United States v. Polk)

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Sixth Circuit Endorses Sentencing-Package Resentencing Under the First Step Act: Non‑Covered Counts May Be Reduced Only If Interdependent (United States v. Polk) Introduction In United States v. Gene...
Sixth Circuit Adopts Sentencing‑Package Doctrine for First Step Act Resentencings: Non‑Covered Offenses May Be Reduced Only If Interdependent with a Covered Offense

Sixth Circuit Adopts Sentencing‑Package Doctrine for First Step Act Resentencings: Non‑Covered Offenses May Be Reduced Only If Interdependent with a Covered Offense

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Sixth Circuit Adopts Sentencing‑Package Doctrine for First Step Act Resentencings: Non‑Covered Offenses May Be Reduced Only If Interdependent with a Covered Offense Introduction In United States v....
Sixth Circuit Adopts Sentencing‑Package Doctrine for First Step Act § 404: Non‑Covered Counts May Be Reduced Only If Interdependent With a Covered Offense

Sixth Circuit Adopts Sentencing‑Package Doctrine for First Step Act § 404: Non‑Covered Counts May Be Reduced Only If Interdependent With a Covered Offense

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Sixth Circuit Adopts Sentencing‑Package Doctrine for First Step Act § 404: Non‑Covered Counts May Be Reduced Only If Interdependent With a Covered Offense Introduction In United States v. John Gordon...
Dangerousness, Not Youth or Time Served: Sixth Circuit Applies Williams to Reject As-Applied § 922(g)(1) Challenge and Affirms Upward Variance in United States v. Tucker

Dangerousness, Not Youth or Time Served: Sixth Circuit Applies Williams to Reject As-Applied § 922(g)(1) Challenge and Affirms Upward Variance in United States v. Tucker

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Dangerousness, Not Youth or Time Served: Sixth Circuit Applies Williams to Reject As-Applied § 922(g)(1) Challenge and Affirms Upward Variance in United States v. Tucker Court: United States Court of...
Plain View Through a One‑Inch Curtain Gap: Tenth Circuit Rules Motel Exterior Walkways Are Not Curtilage and Unaided Peering Is Not a Search

Plain View Through a One‑Inch Curtain Gap: Tenth Circuit Rules Motel Exterior Walkways Are Not Curtilage and Unaided Peering Is Not a Search

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Plain View Through a One‑Inch Curtain Gap: Tenth Circuit Rules Motel Exterior Walkways Are Not Curtilage and Unaided Peering Is Not a Search Case: United States v. Watkins, No. 23-6210 (10th Cir....
Independent Decisionmaker Doctrine Refined: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies § 1983 Causation When Police Issue Trespass Warnings and Make Arrests

Independent Decisionmaker Doctrine Refined: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies § 1983 Causation When Police Issue Trespass Warnings and Make Arrests

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Independent Decisionmaker Doctrine Refined: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies § 1983 Causation When Police Issue Trespass Warnings and Make Arrests Introduction In Olivia Coley-Pearson v. Emily Misty...
Any Overlap Triggers the Single-Refiling Bar: Seventh Circuit Affirms Strict Application of Illinois’s Savings Statute in Singer v. City of Chicago

Any Overlap Triggers the Single-Refiling Bar: Seventh Circuit Affirms Strict Application of Illinois’s Savings Statute in Singer v. City of Chicago

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Any Overlap Triggers the Single-Refiling Bar: Seventh Circuit Affirms Strict Application of Illinois’s Savings Statute in Singer v. City of Chicago Introduction In Brian S. Singer v. City of Chicago,...
Humphreys v. Emmons: A Blueprint for an “Extreme Juror Misconduct” Exception to the No‑Impeachment Rule and a Clarification that AEDPA Deference Does Not Govern the Federal Cause‑and‑Prejudice Inquiry

Humphreys v. Emmons: A Blueprint for an “Extreme Juror Misconduct” Exception to the No‑Impeachment Rule and a Clarification that AEDPA Deference Does Not Govern the Federal Cause‑and‑Prejudice Inquiry

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Humphreys v. Emmons: A Blueprint for an “Extreme Juror Misconduct” Exception to the No‑Impeachment Rule and a Clarification that AEDPA Deference Does Not Govern the Federal Cause‑and‑Prejudice...
Mandating Separate Judgments and Strict Rule 41(b) Enforcement: DS Corporation v. Long Feng Corporation (2025 MP 8)

Mandating Separate Judgments and Strict Rule 41(b) Enforcement: DS Corporation v. Long Feng Corporation (2025 MP 8)

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Mandating Separate Judgments and Strict Rule 41(b) Enforcement: DS Corporation v. Long Feng Corporation (2025 MP 8) Introduction In DS Corporation v. Long Feng Corporation, 2025 MP 8 (NMI Oct. 14,...
No duty to convert or supply proprietary software for cellphone extractions under Ohio’s Public Records Act: State ex rel. Castellon v. Maloney

No duty to convert or supply proprietary software for cellphone extractions under Ohio’s Public Records Act: State ex rel. Castellon v. Maloney

Date: Oct 16, 2025
No duty to convert or supply proprietary software for cellphone extractions under Ohio’s Public Records Act Commentary on State ex rel. Castellon v. Maloney, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-4687 (Supreme...
Snodgrass v. Trumbull Corr. Inst.: Conclusory Affidavits Cannot Sustain Law‑Enforcement or Security Exemptions—Prison Device and Disciplinary Records Are Disclosable Absent Specific Proof

Snodgrass v. Trumbull Corr. Inst.: Conclusory Affidavits Cannot Sustain Law‑Enforcement or Security Exemptions—Prison Device and Disciplinary Records Are Disclosable Absent Specific Proof

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Snodgrass v. Trumbull Corr. Inst.: Conclusory Affidavits Cannot Sustain Law‑Enforcement or Security Exemptions—Prison Device and Disciplinary Records Are Disclosable Absent Specific Proof...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert