Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

battery-claims-excluded-under-ftca& Case Commentaries

Refusal to Engage in Reunification Services and Violations of Court Orders Permit Termination Without Less-Restrictive Alternatives and Justify Denial of Post‑Termination Visitation — In re G.J. (W. Va. 2025)

Refusal to Engage in Reunification Services and Violations of Court Orders Permit Termination Without Less-Restrictive Alternatives and Justify Denial of Post‑Termination Visitation — In re G.J. (W. Va. 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Refusal to Engage in Reunification Services and Violations of Court Orders Permit Termination Without Less-Restrictive Alternatives and Justify Denial of Post‑Termination Visitation Introduction This...
After Rahimi, McCane Still Rules: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) Against Nonviolent-Felon As-Applied Challenges (United States v. Forbis & Smith)

After Rahimi, McCane Still Rules: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) Against Nonviolent-Felon As-Applied Challenges (United States v. Forbis & Smith)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
After Rahimi, McCane Still Rules: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) Against Nonviolent-Felon As-Applied Challenges (United States v. Forbis & Smith) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Reaffirming Montana’s Ariegwe Speedy‑Trial Framework: Defendant‑Caused Continuances Control the Balance; Evidence‑Anchored “Guilt” Statements in Closing Are Not Plain Error

Reaffirming Montana’s Ariegwe Speedy‑Trial Framework: Defendant‑Caused Continuances Control the Balance; Evidence‑Anchored “Guilt” Statements in Closing Are Not Plain Error

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reaffirming Montana’s Ariegwe Speedy‑Trial Framework: Defendant‑Caused Continuances Control the Balance; Evidence‑Anchored “Guilt” Statements in Closing Are Not Plain Error Introduction This...
Outrageous-Conduct Claims, Brady Duties on Confidential Informants, and No Confrontation Right to Compel Informant Testimony Absent Testimonial Statements — United States v. Marcus D. Flintroy (11th Cir. 2025)

Outrageous-Conduct Claims, Brady Duties on Confidential Informants, and No Confrontation Right to Compel Informant Testimony Absent Testimonial Statements — United States v. Marcus D. Flintroy (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Outrageous-Conduct Claims, Brady Duties on Confidential Informants, and No Confrontation Right to Compel Informant Testimony Absent Testimonial Statements — United States v. Marcus D. Flintroy (11th...
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: Successive Reconsideration Motions Do Not Toll Tax Court Appeal Deadlines; Actual Receipt of a Deficiency Notice Suffices Without Certified‑Mail Proof

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: Successive Reconsideration Motions Do Not Toll Tax Court Appeal Deadlines; Actual Receipt of a Deficiency Notice Suffices Without Certified‑Mail Proof

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: Successive Reconsideration Motions Do Not Toll Tax Court Appeal Deadlines; Actual Receipt of a Deficiency Notice Suffices Without Certified‑Mail Proof Case: Joseph Belcik...
Crawford v. State: Clarifying the Admissibility of Non‑Eyewitness Lay Opinions on a Defendant’s State of Mind and the Demanding Outcome‑Effect Requirement in Plain‑Error Review

Crawford v. State: Clarifying the Admissibility of Non‑Eyewitness Lay Opinions on a Defendant’s State of Mind and the Demanding Outcome‑Effect Requirement in Plain‑Error Review

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Crawford v. State: Clarifying the Admissibility of Non‑Eyewitness Lay Opinions on a Defendant’s State of Mind and the Demanding Outcome‑Effect Requirement in Plain‑Error Review Introduction In...
Reaffirming Pasternack’s Narrow Duty for Drug-Testing Labs: Procedural Irregularities Alone Do Not State Negligence Under New York Law

Reaffirming Pasternack’s Narrow Duty for Drug-Testing Labs: Procedural Irregularities Alone Do Not State Negligence Under New York Law

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reaffirming Pasternack’s Narrow Duty for Drug-Testing Labs: Procedural Irregularities Alone Do Not State Negligence Under New York Law Introduction In Spencer v. Omega Laboratories, Inc., No....
Visitation Alone Does Not Defeat “Failure to Plan” in Termination of Parental Rights: Delaware Supreme Court Affirms TPR Where Parent Declines Case-Plan Services and Lacks Capacity for Medically Complex Care

Visitation Alone Does Not Defeat “Failure to Plan” in Termination of Parental Rights: Delaware Supreme Court Affirms TPR Where Parent Declines Case-Plan Services and Lacks Capacity for Medically Complex Care

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Visitation Alone Does Not Defeat “Failure to Plan” in Termination of Parental Rights: Delaware Supreme Court Affirms TPR Where Parent Declines Case-Plan Services and Lacks Capacity for Medically...
Miller v. State: Misstated Felony Class at Plea Is Not Plain Error When the Substantive Charge Matches the Reindictment and the Defendant Receives a Substantial Benefit; Remand for Possible Sentence Reduction

Miller v. State: Misstated Felony Class at Plea Is Not Plain Error When the Substantive Charge Matches the Reindictment and the Defendant Receives a Substantial Benefit; Remand for Possible Sentence Reduction

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Miller v. State: Misstated Felony Class at Plea Is Not Plain Error When the Substantive Charge Matches the Reindictment and the Defendant Receives a Substantial Benefit; Remand for Possible Sentence...
Continued Relationship with a Co‑Abusive Partner Can Defeat an Improvement Period and Support Termination Despite Service Compliance

Continued Relationship with a Co‑Abusive Partner Can Defeat an Improvement Period and Support Termination Despite Service Compliance

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Continued Relationship with a Co‑Abusive Partner Can Defeat an Improvement Period and Support Termination Despite Service Compliance Introduction In In re I.R. and E.B., No. 24-496 (W. Va. Sept. 30,...
Reasonable Efforts in Repeat Abuse-Neglect Cases: Prior Services and Targeted Evaluations Can Satisfy DHS’s Obligation When Recurrence Shows Futility — In re D.G. and L.G. (W. Va. 2025)

Reasonable Efforts in Repeat Abuse-Neglect Cases: Prior Services and Targeted Evaluations Can Satisfy DHS’s Obligation When Recurrence Shows Futility — In re D.G. and L.G. (W. Va. 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reasonable Efforts in Repeat Abuse-Neglect Cases: Prior Services and Targeted Evaluations Can Satisfy DHS’s Obligation When Recurrence Shows Futility — In re D.G. and L.G. (W. Va. 2025) Introduction...
Strict Enforcement of the Fifteen-of-Twenty-Two-Month Foster Care Cap Absent Clear and Convincing Compelling Circumstances: In re B.S. (W. Va. 2025)

Strict Enforcement of the Fifteen-of-Twenty-Two-Month Foster Care Cap Absent Clear and Convincing Compelling Circumstances: In re B.S. (W. Va. 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Strict Enforcement of the Fifteen-of-Twenty-Two-Month Foster Care Cap Absent Clear and Convincing Compelling Circumstances: In re B.S. (W. Va. 2025) Introduction In In re B.S., No. 24-732 (W. Va....
Reaffirming the Rule 8 Presumption and Evidentiary Limits in Abuse–Neglect Adjudications: No Due Process Right to Confront Child Victims; Rape Shield and Discovery Constraints Clarified

Reaffirming the Rule 8 Presumption and Evidentiary Limits in Abuse–Neglect Adjudications: No Due Process Right to Confront Child Victims; Rape Shield and Discovery Constraints Clarified

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reaffirming the Rule 8 Presumption and Evidentiary Limits in Abuse–Neglect Adjudications: No Due Process Right to Confront Child Victims; Rape Shield and Discovery Constraints Clarified Introduction...
No Per Se “Interested-Adult Consultation” Rule for Juvenile Miranda Waivers in Connecticut: State v. Cooper (2025)

No Per Se “Interested-Adult Consultation” Rule for Juvenile Miranda Waivers in Connecticut: State v. Cooper (2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Per Se “Interested-Adult Consultation” Rule for Juvenile Miranda Waivers in Connecticut: State v. Cooper (2025) Introduction In State v. Cooper (Supreme Court of Connecticut, officially released...
Home Rule Applies to Zoning: Georgia Electors May Repeal County Zoning Ordinances by Referendum

Home Rule Applies to Zoning: Georgia Electors May Repeal County Zoning Ordinances by Referendum

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Home Rule Applies to Zoning: Georgia Electors May Repeal County Zoning Ordinances by Referendum Introduction In Bailey v. McIntosh County (consolidated with Webster v. McIntosh County and McIntosh...
Competency vs. Credibility: First Circuit okays judicial notice of a witness’s prior plea-competency finding and clarifies appeals from Rule 37 indicative rulings — United States v. Vázquez‑Rijos

Competency vs. Credibility: First Circuit okays judicial notice of a witness’s prior plea-competency finding and clarifies appeals from Rule 37 indicative rulings — United States v. Vázquez‑Rijos

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Competency vs. Credibility: First Circuit okays judicial notice of a witness’s prior plea-competency finding and clarifies appeals from Rule 37 indicative rulings — United States v. Vázquez‑Rijos...
Competency Is Not Credibility: First Circuit Upholds Judicial Notice of Prior Plea Competency and Clarifies Appellate Procedure for Rule 37 Motions

Competency Is Not Credibility: First Circuit Upholds Judicial Notice of Prior Plea Competency and Clarifies Appellate Procedure for Rule 37 Motions

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Competency Is Not Credibility: First Circuit Upholds Judicial Notice of Prior Plea Competency and Clarifies Appellate Procedure for Rule 37 Motions Introduction In United States v. Vázquez-Rijos, the...
Oral Requests Are Not Enough: West Virginia Reaffirms Written-Motion Requirement for Additional Improvement Periods and Permits Direct Termination When No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction (In re G.A.)

Oral Requests Are Not Enough: West Virginia Reaffirms Written-Motion Requirement for Additional Improvement Periods and Permits Direct Termination When No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction (In re G.A.)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Oral Requests Are Not Enough: West Virginia Reaffirms Written-Motion Requirement for Additional Improvement Periods and Permits Direct Termination When No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction (In re...
Competency Is Not Credibility: First Circuit Approves Limited Judicial Notice of Prior Plea Competency and Clarifies Appellate Practice for Rule 37 Motions in United States v. Vázquez-Rijos

Competency Is Not Credibility: First Circuit Approves Limited Judicial Notice of Prior Plea Competency and Clarifies Appellate Practice for Rule 37 Motions in United States v. Vázquez-Rijos

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Competency Is Not Credibility: First Circuit Approves Limited Judicial Notice of Prior Plea Competency and Clarifies Appellate Practice for Rule 37 Motions in United States v. Vázquez-Rijos...
No Plain Error for Unrequested Lesser-Offense Instructions; Single-Witness Identification Suffices: Commentary on Lewis v. State (Ga. 2025)

No Plain Error for Unrequested Lesser-Offense Instructions; Single-Witness Identification Suffices: Commentary on Lewis v. State (Ga. 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Plain Error for Unrequested Lesser-Offense Instructions; Single-Witness Identification Suffices Commentary on Lewis v. State, Supreme Court of Georgia (Sept. 30, 2025) Introduction In Lewis v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert